Hypothesis
  Four pre-registered questions on the untouched validation split:
  (Q-a) CKX 1day — the lone kappa=0.25 cost survivor — does NOT replicate
        (skeptical prior: sparse-name estimation artifact).
  (Q-b) The NEGATIVE finding replicates: zero intraday rules from the
        expG pool have positive net mean at kappa=0.25 on validation.
  (Q-c) ES->SPY basis effect (fresh corr(SPY_{t-1}, ES_t) = -0.032 in
        train) replicates in sign with a small day-block bootstrap p,
        and remains splice-invariant.
  (Q-d) The daily 2008-2015 mega-cap reversal family was crisis-regime:
        its VR30 excess and excess AC1 SHRINK toward zero on validation.

Falsification criterion
  (Q-a) falsified (CKX real) if net@0.25 > 0 with bootstrap CI excluding
  0 on validation AND in both validation sub-periods. (Q-b) falsified if
  ANY intraday rule has net@0.25 CI above 0. (Q-c) falsified if the sign
  flips or splices disagree. (Q-d) falsified if the family's median VR30
  excess is as negative or more negative than 2008-2015 (regime story
  wrong -> persistent structure, escalate to holdout).

Artifact null(s)
  Inherited from the scans: EDGE-based costs (expG model), MA(1)-consistent
  VR null (expC), both-fresh synchronization (expD). No new nulls.

Method (pre-declared)
  Window: VALIDATION 2016-2021; sub-periods 2016-2018 / 2019-2021.
  (a,b) The expG pool (31 rules, rebuilt mechanically) re-evaluated with
  identical machinery: gross, kappa*, net@{0.25, 1.0} with 21-day-block
  bootstrap CIs (n=300, seed 42).
  (c) expD machinery on 2016-2021: ES(3 splices)->SPY and SPX->SPY fresh
  xcorr +/-3, day-block bootstrap p (n=200, seed 42).
  (d) Liquid-12 daily cells on validation: AC1, VR30, MA(1) excess, EDGE
  excess AC1 — side by side with their 2008-2015 train values.
  Everything through the cached client; results sanitized JSON.

Result
  Run 20260812T072518Z (418 requests, 18.8M rows — the validation window's
  first and only download). (Q-b) REPLICATES: zero rules net-positive with
  CI>0 at kappa=1.0; at kappa=0.25 only CKX. (Q-a) CKX fails its
  pre-registered robustness clause: validation overall net@0.25 = +16.3
  bp/day CI [1.4, 26.5], BUT 2019-2021 sub-period CI covers zero
  ([-19.5, +22.0]) and kappa* decays 0.445 -> 0.263 within validation —
  NOT confirmed, NOT escalated to the holdout. (Q-c) ES->SPY FAILS to
  replicate: fresh corr = +0.003 (p=0.68), sign flipped, all three splices
  agree. (Q-d) regime story CONFIRMED: the daily family's median VR30
  excess goes -0.143 (train 2008-15) -> +0.023 (validation); the crisis
  reversal vanished OOS (a few single names retain small negative excess
  AC1: MSFT, NVDA, QQQ — noted for the record, not promoted).

Interpretation
  The full ladder closes with the charter's anticipated honest outcome:
  NOTHING in the searched universe survives artifact nulls + search
  correction + costs + out-of-sample validation. The negative finding
  ("short-horizon anomalies in open bar data do not survive costs, and the
  gross survivors do not replicate") is itself corrected, OOS-confirmed
  and robust -> Level 2; it becomes the atlas's first entry, together with
  the SPX->SPY artifact demonstration (present in train +0.132 AND
  validation +0.080 — the artifact replicates even though the "anomalies"
  do not, which is exactly the point). The sealed holdout (2022->) is NOT
  spent on a dead pool; it remains sealed for any future Level-2 claim.

Next experiment
  Atlas entries (via tools/new_finding.py) for whatever this settles;
  anything that PASSES here goes to the sealed holdout exactly once.