SPB Git
8.6 KB

# AI model comparison — Note SPBoucher AI

Generated 2026-11-01T07:18:30.320Z. 836 real runs across 38 models; total estimated spend for Phase Zero ≈ $17.24.

# Ranking (deterministic mean score, then latency)

# Model Provider Pass Score Judged TTFT Latency tok/s $/run
1 chat-latest openai 100% 1.00 5.00 741 ms 1.4 s 157 $0.019
2 gpt-5.3-codex openai 100% 1.00 4.67 602 ms 1.4 s 94 $0.012
3 gpt-4.1 openai 100% 1.00 4.17 450 ms 1.7 s 163 $0.012
4 gpt-6-sol openai 100% 1.00 5.00 1106 ms 1.7 s 149 $0.0075
5 gpt-5.4 openai 100% 1.00 5.00 716 ms 1.8 s 86 $0.016
6 claude-fable-5-1 anthropic 100% 1.00 5.00 389 ms 2.1 s 118 $0.090
7 gpt-5.2 openai 100% 1.00 4.33 676 ms 2.1 s 85 $0.0074
8 claude-sonnet-5 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.33 950 ms 2.2 s 145 $0.019
9 gpt-5.1 openai 100% 1.00 4.50 650 ms 2.2 s 139 $0.0057
10 gpt-6.1-sol openai 100% 1.00 4.67 1444 ms 2.2 s 89 $0.0070
11 claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.33 775 ms 2.3 s 90 $0.022
12 claude-haiku-5-5 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.83 1301 ms 2.4 s 487 $0.0011
13 gpt-5.6-sol openai 100% 1.00 5.00 1108 ms 2.5 s 133 $0.015
14 gpt-5.5 openai 100% 1.00 4.83 1755 ms 2.5 s 147 $0.021
15 claude-opus-4-5-20251101 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.67 862 ms 2.5 s 98 $0.036
16 claude-opus-5-5 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.83 1703 ms 2.8 s 161 $0.043
17 claude-sonnet-5-5 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.67 1020 ms 2.9 s 202 $0.020
18 claude-opus-4-8 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.67 488 ms 2.9 s 104 $0.045
19 o3 openai 100% 1.00 4.33 1763 ms 2.9 s 533 $0.015
20 gpt-6-astra openai 100% 1.00 5.00 2376 ms 3.1 s 78 $0.037
21 gpt-6.1-terra openai 100% 1.00 4.67 1515 ms 3.2 s 93 $0.0037
22 claude-opus-4-7 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.33 687 ms 3.3 s 91 $0.045
23 claude-opus-5 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.67 2530 ms 4.0 s 161 $0.051
24 claude-opus-4-6 anthropic 100% 1.00 4.83 1622 ms 4.2 s 75 $0.035
25 claude-sonnet-4-6 anthropic 100% 1.00 5.00 735 ms 4.7 s 90 $0.021
26 gpt-5 openai 100% 1.00 4.33 4121 ms 5.0 s 962 $0.012
27 gpt-5-mini openai 100% 1.00 4.83 4395 ms 5.7 s 375 $0.0026
28 gpt-4o openai 95% 1.00 3.83 656 ms 2.4 s 106 $0.015
29 gpt-5.6-luna openai 95% 0.98 4.67 1398 ms 3.0 s 136 $0.0008
30 gpt-4.1-mini openai 91% 0.97 3.83 449 ms 1.7 s 153 $0.0024
31 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 anthropic 91% 0.97 3.33 502 ms 2.0 s 135 $0.0072
32 gpt-5-nano openai 95% 0.97 3.67 6133 ms 6.8 s 1362 $0.0006
33 gpt-5.4-mini openai 95% 0.95 4.67 624 ms 1.2 s 167 $0.0029
34 gpt-5.6-terra openai 95% 0.95 5.00 869 ms 1.8 s 126 $0.0077
35 gpt-6-luna openai 95% 0.95 4.67 2045 ms 3.0 s 194 $0.0007
36 gpt-4o-mini openai 82% 0.94 4.00 561 ms 2.0 s 116 $0.0009
37 gpt-5.4-nano openai 86% 0.92 4.00 549 ms 1.7 s 135 $0.0003
38 claude-fable-5 anthropic 91% 0.91 5.00 1764 ms 2.8 s 112 $0.092

# Best model per task (deterministic score, ties → cheaper)

Task Best Score Latency $/run Cheapest model with a perfect score
Document analysis gpt-6-luna 1.00 2.4 s $0.0001 gpt-6-luna ($0.0001)
JSON generation gpt-4o-mini 1.00 1.3 s $0.0001 gpt-4o-mini ($0.0001)
Complex reasoning gpt-6-luna 1.00 5.1 s $0.0002 gpt-6-luna ($0.0002)
Long-context retrieval gpt-5.4-nano 1.00 0.8 s $0.0011 gpt-5.4-nano ($0.0011)
English writing claude-haiku-5-5 1.00 2.7 s $0.0002 claude-haiku-5-5 ($0.0002)
French writing gpt-4o-mini 1.00 2.5 s $0.0002 gpt-4o-mini ($0.0002)
Programming gpt-4o-mini 1.00 1.6 s $0.0001 gpt-4o-mini ($0.0001)
Simple reasoning gpt-6-luna 1.00 1.4 s $0.0000 gpt-6-luna ($0.0000)
Knowledge synthesis gpt-4o-mini 1.00 2.8 s $0.0002 gpt-4o-mini ($0.0002)
Tool calling gpt-6-luna 1.00 1.1 s $0.0000 gpt-6-luna ($0.0000)
Mathematics gpt-6-luna 1.00 20.4 s $0.0002 gpt-6-luna ($0.0002)

# Writing quality (two-judge LLM rubric, 1–5; experimental, not used for pass rates)

Model French writing English writing Knowledge synthesis
chat-latest 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-5.3-codex 5.00 5.00 4.00
gpt-4.1 5.00 5.00 2.50
gpt-6-sol 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-5.4 5.00 5.00 5.00
claude-fable-5-1 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-5.2 5.00 5.00 3.00
claude-sonnet-5 5.00 5.00 3.00
gpt-5.1 5.00 5.00 3.50
gpt-6.1-sol 5.00 5.00 4.00
claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 5.00 5.00 3.00
claude-haiku-5-5 4.50 5.00 5.00
gpt-5.6-sol 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-5.5 5.00 5.00 4.50
claude-opus-4-5-20251101 5.00 5.00 4.00
claude-opus-5-5 5.00 5.00 4.50
claude-sonnet-5-5 5.00 5.00 4.00
claude-opus-4-8 5.00 5.00 4.00
o3 4.50 5.00 3.50
gpt-6-astra 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-6.1-terra 5.00 5.00 4.00
claude-opus-4-7 5.00 5.00 3.00
claude-opus-5 5.00 5.00 4.00
claude-opus-4-6 5.00 5.00 4.50
claude-sonnet-4-6 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-5 5.00 5.00 3.00
gpt-5-mini 5.00 5.00 4.50
gpt-4o 4.00 5.00 2.50
gpt-5.6-luna 5.00 5.00 4.00
gpt-4.1-mini 4.00 5.00 2.50
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 3.50 4.00 2.50
gpt-5-nano 3.00 5.00 3.00
gpt-5.4-mini 5.00 5.00 4.00
gpt-5.6-terra 5.00 5.00 5.00
gpt-6-luna 5.00 5.00 4.00
gpt-4o-mini 5.00 4.00 3.00
gpt-5.4-nano 4.50 5.00 2.50
claude-fable-5 5.00 5.00 5.00

# Speed

Model TTFT median Latency median Output tok/s median
gpt-5.4-mini 624 ms 1.2 s 167
chat-latest 741 ms 1.4 s 157
gpt-5.3-codex 602 ms 1.4 s 94
gpt-4.1-mini 449 ms 1.7 s 153
gpt-4.1 450 ms 1.7 s 163
gpt-5.4-nano 549 ms 1.7 s 135
gpt-6-sol 1106 ms 1.7 s 149
gpt-5.6-terra 869 ms 1.8 s 126
gpt-5.4 716 ms 1.8 s 86
gpt-4o-mini 561 ms 2.0 s 116
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 502 ms 2.0 s 135
claude-fable-5-1 389 ms 2.1 s 118
gpt-5.2 676 ms 2.1 s 85
claude-sonnet-5 950 ms 2.2 s 145
gpt-5.1 650 ms 2.2 s 139
gpt-6.1-sol 1444 ms 2.2 s 89
claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 775 ms 2.3 s 90
gpt-4o 656 ms 2.4 s 106
claude-haiku-5-5 1301 ms 2.4 s 487
gpt-5.6-sol 1108 ms 2.5 s 133
gpt-5.5 1755 ms 2.5 s 147
claude-opus-4-5-20251101 862 ms 2.5 s 98
claude-opus-5-5 1703 ms 2.8 s 161
claude-fable-5 1764 ms 2.8 s 112
claude-sonnet-5-5 1020 ms 2.9 s 202
claude-opus-4-8 488 ms 2.9 s 104
o3 1763 ms 2.9 s 533
gpt-6-luna 2045 ms 3.0 s 194
gpt-5.6-luna 1398 ms 3.0 s 136
gpt-6-astra 2376 ms 3.1 s 78
gpt-6.1-terra 1515 ms 3.2 s 93
claude-opus-4-7 687 ms 3.3 s 91
claude-opus-5 2530 ms 4.0 s 161
claude-opus-4-6 1622 ms 4.2 s 75
claude-sonnet-4-6 735 ms 4.7 s 90
gpt-5 4121 ms 5.0 s 962
gpt-5-mini 4395 ms 5.7 s 375
gpt-5-nano 6133 ms 6.8 s 1362

# Caveats

  • Two trials per cell: differences of a few points are noise. Latency depends on provider load at run time (2026-11-01).
  • Costs are estimates (provider-reported tokens × list price); provider invoices are authoritative.
  • Writing scores come from LLM judges and are shown separately from deterministic results.
  • Pro-tier models (gpt-5.5-pro, gpt-5.4-pro, gpt-5.2-pro, gpt-5-pro, o3-pro) passed discovery probes but were excluded from the benchmark for cost ($20–$30 per M input tokens); they are selectable manually in the app.
Files · 2c37cb5a3e2af18e5ba361996d453cab97da82c2
Menu

Theme