{
  "task_id": "F4-conf-02",
  "verdicts": {
    "A1": "supported",
    "A2": "not_supported",
    "A3": "not_supported",
    "A4": "not_supported",
    "A5": "not_assessable",
    "A6": "supported"
  },
  "locators": {
    "A1": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \"ATT\" | column \"5 km\"",
    "A2": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \"HIV\" | column \"1 km\"",
    "A3": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \"% change\" | column \"3 km\"",
    "A4": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \"Hepatitis\" | column \"5 km\"",
    "A5": "not reported in arxiv-2609.27732v1",
    "A6": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row \"Weeks on UI\" | column \"Average treatment effect estimate\""
  },
  "reasons": {
    "A1": "Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) at 5 km (** = p<0.05) and a % change of -35.0%, matching 100*(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.0%.",
    "A2": "Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +0.063 (SE (0.801)), positive and insignificant, so the sign claimed (-0.063, a fall) is contradicted.",
    "A3": "An ATT of -0.283 log points implies 100*(exp(-0.283)-1) = -24.6% (Table 6 prints -24.7%), not 28.3%; the assertion equates log points with percent.",
    "A4": "With ATT -0.406 and SE 0.250 (no star), the 95% CI is [-0.896, 0.084] (±1.96 SE), which includes zero; the claimed [-0.66, -0.16] is only ±1 SE ((-0.656, -0.156)).",
    "A5": "The extract reports ATTs only by buffer, outcome category and estimator; no estimate by sex (men vs women) appears anywhere, so the comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.",
    "A6": "Table 2 prints the ATE -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with control mean 17.3 weeks, and 1.99/17.3 = 11.5%, as also stated in the Section 3 text."
  },
  "n_supported": 2,
  "n_not_supported": 3,
  "n_not_assessable": 1,
  "feasibility": "complete",
  "feasibility_reason": null,
  "data_issues": [
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 prints the CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431** with SE (0.218), whereas Table 6 prints the same estimate with SE (0.210).",
      "handling": "A1 assessed against Table 6 (the cited main table); with SE 0.218 the estimate remains significant at 5% (|t|=1.98), so the verdict is unchanged."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 note states 640 never-treated comparison regions while its 'Control regions' row and Tables 6-7 state 608.",
      "handling": "Recorded; does not bear on any assertion."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35%, but Table 7 (5 km, -0.354) implies -29.8% and Section 6.1 says 'approximately 30%'.",
      "handling": "Recorded as an internal inconsistency; no assertion concerns this number."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: results text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero', although 3 km and 5 km point estimates are -0.239 and -0.340 (insignificant).",
      "handling": "Recorded; A2 judged on the printed 1 km coefficient (+0.063)."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: extract ends mid-sentence in the Table A19 note (truncated).",
      "handling": "No assertion depends on the missing text."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: Section 3 text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75, 2.24], [1.55, 1.99]) while Table 2 prints signed values; text contains rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' (for p < 0.001).",
      "handling": "Treated as sign convention for a 'reduction' and a character-encoding defect; A6 judged on Table 2 values."
    }
  ],
  "n_input_rows": {
    "assertions.json": 6,
    "README.md": 14,
    "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134,
    "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58
  },
  "n_analysed": 6,
  "random_seed": null
}