{
  "task_id": "F5-conf-01",
  "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,
  "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,
  "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,
  "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,
  "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,
  "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,
  "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,
  "walras_law_residual": 0.0,
  "walras_law_residual_offeq_max_abs": 7.105427357601002e-15,
  "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good1_recorded": 14.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good2_recorded": 10.0,
  "price_ratio_numerical": 0.8749999999999998,
  "price_abs_diff_closed_vs_numerical": 1.1102230246251565e-16,
  "alpha_A": 0.4,
  "alpha_B": 0.6,
  "feasibility": "complete",
  "feasibility_reason": null,
  "data_issues": [
    {
      "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1 = 14.0 does not equal the sum of individual endowments in endowments.csv (12.0); discrepancy +2.",
      "handling": "Used the sum of the primary per-agent endowments (12.0) in the market-clearing condition; the summary-sheet value 14.0 was not used. Clearing against 14.0 would be inconsistent with the agents' budget constraints (Walras' law would fail by p*(-2))."
    }
  ],
  "n_input_rows": {
    "endowments.csv": 2,
    "parameters.csv": 4
  },
  "n_analysed": 2,
  "random_seed": null
}