{
  "task_id": "F5-conf-01",
  "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,
  "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,
  "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,
  "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,
  "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,
  "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,
  "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,
  "walras_law_residual": 0.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good1_summary_sheet": 14.0,
  "aggregate_endowment_good2_summary_sheet": 10.0,
  "price_ratio_numerical": 0.8750000000000001,
  "price_abs_diff_closed_vs_numerical": 2.220446049250313e-16,
  "feasibility": "complete",
  "feasibility_reason": null,
  "data_issues": [
    {
      "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1=14.0 differs from the sum of individual endowments in endowments.csv (12.0).",
      "handling": "Used the sum of individual endowments (12.0) since aggregate endowment in a pure exchange economy is by definition the sum of individual endowments and endowments.csv is the primary data. Diagnostic: clearing good 1 against 14.0 would give p=0.666667 with good-2 excess demand -1.333333 != 0, i.e. no consistent equilibrium; the summary value is treated as a recording error."
    }
  ],
  "n_input_rows": {
    "endowments.csv": 2,
    "parameters.csv": 4
  },
  "n_analysed": 2,
  "random_seed": null
}