# Data audit (P1)
| file | SHA-256 | wc -l / items | matches README/bundle hash |
|---|---|---|---|
| data/assertions.json | 2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 | 6 top-level items (fields id, cites, text) | yes (bundle) |
| data/README.md | 5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 | 14 lines | yes (bundle) |
| data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b | 134 lines | yes (README) |
| data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 | 58 lines | yes (README) |

No duplicate assertion ids (A1–A6); A1–A5 cite arxiv-2609.27732v1, A6 cites arxiv-2606.14621v1. No missing fields. Units: DCR outcomes in log hospitalisation rates per 100,000 (ATTs in log points); RESEA weeks on UI in weeks.

## Anomalies / internal inconsistencies found in the sources
1. DCR Table A19 prints the CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431** with SE (0.218), while Table 6 prints the same estimate with SE (0.210).
2. DCR Table A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions; Table A19 body, Table 6 and Figure 6 note say 608.
3. DCR abstract says fatal hospitalisations "fall by 35%"; Table 7 5 km fatal ATT is -0.354 log points = -29.8%, and Section 6.1 says "approximately 30%".
4. DCR Section 6 text says HIV estimates are "close to zero", while Table 7 HIV at 3 km/5 km are -0.239/-0.340 (insignificant but not small).
5. RESEA results text prints the weeks-on-UI CI as magnitudes "[1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]" while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75] — consistent up to sign convention.
6. RESEA line 39 rendering defect "p ¡ 0.001" (evidently p < 0.001).
None of these violate the information-availability rules; all inputs are admissible. Handling: tables are treated as the primary locator; issues recorded in results.json data_issues.