{
  "task_id": "F4-conf-03",
  "harmonised": {
    "E1": {
      "value": -35.0141,
      "unit": "percent of the counterfactual hospitalisation rate",
      "transformation": "100*(exp(b)-1) with b=-0.431** -> 100*(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.0141% (cross-check: printed '% change' row = -35.0%)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row 'ATT' (line 36) | column '5 km'; cross-check row '% change' (line 40) | column '5 km'"
    },
    "E2": {
      "value": 1.96,
      "unit": "percent of the control-group mean reemployment rate",
      "transformation": "100*Delta/p with Delta=1.47 pp, p=75.0% -> 100*1.47/75.0 = 1.9600%",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row 'Reemployment' (line 29) | column 'Average treatment effect estimate' (1.47 pp) and column 'Control' (75.0%)"
    },
    "E3": {
      "value": -1.8236,
      "unit": "percent change in employment",
      "transformation": "100*eta*g with eta=-0.388, g=0.047 (proportional MW change) -> 100*(-0.388)*(0.047) = -1.8236%",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Table 2 | row 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' (line 50) | column 'Estimate (SE)'; row '% MW changes' (line 60) | column 'Estimate (SE)'"
    },
    "E4": {
      "value": null,
      "unit": "hospitalisations per 100,000 inhabitants per year",
      "transformation": "would be R0*(exp(b)-1) with b=-0.354**; the relative part 100*(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8125% is computable, but the level R0 is not printed",
      "harmonisable": false,
      "missing_quantity": "baseline/counterfactual level (mean) of the fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 inhabitants per year for the treated regions within 5 km (e.g. pre-opening or untreated-potential-outcome mean); not printed in the extract",
      "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row 'Drug-related (fatal)' (line 86) | column '5 km'"
    },
    "E5": {
      "value": -9.62,
      "unit": "percentage points",
      "transformation": "100*beta with beta=-0.0962 -> -9.6200 pp (exact unit rescaling)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3 | row 'Treatment' (line 49) | column '(4)'"
    }
  },
  "n_harmonised": 4,
  "n_not_harmonisable": 1,
  "feasibility": "complete",
  "feasibility_reason": null,
  "data_issues": [
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract states fatal drug-related hospitalisations 'fall by 35%', but Table 7 (5 km) prints -0.354 log points, i.e. 100*(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%, and Section 6.1 says 'approximately 30%'.",
      "handling": "Table 7 value used for E4; abstract figure not used."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 prints SE (0.218) for the CS-DR ATT -0.431 while Table 6 prints (0.210); A19 note mentions 640 never-treated regions while the tables print 608 control regions.",
      "handling": "Point estimate identical in both tables; Table 6 used for E1. SEs not propagated."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 '% change' entries for Synthetic DiD (-30.3%) and Stacked DiD (-13.9%) differ by about 0.1 from 100*(exp(b)-1) (-30.37%, -13.84%).",
      "handling": "Not used; noted only. The Table 6 '% change' for 5 km (-35.0%) agrees with the transform of -0.431 (-35.01%)."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: Table 2 prints '% MW changes | 0.047' while the table note says 'about 4% minimum wage increase'; the row label '%' with value 0.047 is ambiguous between a proportion (4.7%) and a percent (0.047%).",
      "handling": "Table value used as instructed, read as a proportion g = 0.047 (4.7%), consistent in magnitude with the note's 'about 4%'. With g = 0.04 the result would be -1.55%."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: Table 3 col (4) prints '% Change -0.3685' while -0.0962/0.261 = -0.3686 (printed mean rounded); text refers to a Table 2 (-0.0855/0.455) that is not in the extract; footnote markers are rendered as '^9^9 9' etc.",
      "handling": "Not needed for the pp conversion of E5; noted only. Rendering artefacts ignored."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: the control mean 75.0% is the unadjusted aggregate control-group mean (rounded to 0.1), whereas the 1.47 pp ATE is adjusted for randomisation week; the printed control mean is therefore only an approximation of the counterfactual level for the ATE.",
      "handling": "Used as the denominator because the target definition specifies the control-group mean."
    }
  ],
  "n_input_rows": {
    "effects.json": 5,
    "README.md": 16,
    "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,
    "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 91,
    "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,
    "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134
  },
  "n_analysed": 5,
  "random_seed": null,
  "baseline_printed": {
    "E1": {
      "printed_value": -0.431,
      "printed_unit": "log points"
    },
    "E2": {
      "printed_value": 1.47,
      "printed_unit": "percentage points"
    },
    "E3": {
      "printed_value": -0.388,
      "printed_unit": "elasticity (dimensionless)"
    },
    "E4": {
      "printed_value": -0.354,
      "printed_unit": "log points",
      "relative_percent_change_reachable": -29.8125
    },
    "E5": {
      "printed_value": -0.0962,
      "printed_unit": "change in probability (0-1 scale)"
    }
  }
}