{
  "task_id": "F4-conf-03",
  "harmonised": {
    "E1": {
      "value": -35.01,
      "unit": "percent change relative to the counterfactual hospitalisation rate",
      "transformation": "100*(exp(b)-1) with b = -0.431 log points -> 100*(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.0141%, reported to 2 dp (consistent with printed '% change' -35.0%)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row 'ATT' (line 36) | column '5 km'; cross-check row '% change' (line 40) | column '5 km'"
    },
    "E2": {
      "value": 1.96,
      "unit": "percent change relative to the control-group mean reemployment rate",
      "transformation": "100*Delta/p with Delta = 1.47 pp (ATE) and p = 75.0% (control mean) -> 100*1.47/75.0 = 1.9600%, reported to 2 dp",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row 'Reemployment' (line 29) | columns 'Average treatment effect estimate' (Delta) and 'Control' (p)"
    },
    "E3": {
      "value": -1.8236,
      "unit": "percent change in employment",
      "transformation": "100*eta*g with eta = -0.388 and g = 0.047 (proportional MW change) -> 100*(-0.388)*0.047 = -1.8236% (first-order/linear approximation)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Table 2 | row 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' (line 50) | column 'Estimate (SE)'; row '% MW changes' (line 60) | column 'Estimate (SE)'"
    },
    "E4": {
      "value": null,
      "unit": "hospitalisations per 100,000 inhabitants per year",
      "transformation": "absolute change = R0*(exp(b)-1) with b = -0.354; exp(-0.354)-1 = -0.2981 (relative), but R0 (counterfactual level of the fatal rate) is not printed, so the absolute change cannot be computed",
      "harmonisable": false,
      "missing_quantity": "counterfactual (or pre-treatment / control-group mean) level of the fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 inhabitants per year for the treated 5 km regions",
      "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row 'Drug-related (fatal)' (line 86) | column '5 km'"
    },
    "E5": {
      "value": -9.62,
      "unit": "percentage points",
      "transformation": "100*beta with beta = -0.0962 (probability, 0-1 scale) -> 100*(-0.0962) = -9.62 pp (exact rescaling)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3 | row 'Treatment' (line 49) | column '(4)'"
    }
  },
  "n_harmonised": 4,
  "n_not_harmonisable": 1,
  "feasibility": "complete",
  "feasibility_reason": null,
  "data_issues": [
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431 printed with SE 0.210 in Table 6 but 0.218 in Table A19; Table A19 note says 640 never-treated regions while tables say 608.",
      "handling": "Internal inconsistency of the source; irrelevant to point estimates (no SE propagated); recorded only."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract says fatal hospitalisations 'fall by 35%', Section 6.1 says 'approximately 30%'; Table 7 5 km coefficient -0.354 implies 100*(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%.",
      "handling": "Abstract is inconsistent with Table 7; Table 7 coefficient used as the printed input for E4 (E4 not harmonisable anyway)."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: no level (mean, baseline or control) of the fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 is printed in the extract.",
      "handling": "E4 declared not harmonisable; value null; missing quantity named. No external value substituted."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: Table 2 note describes 'about 4% minimum wage increase' while row '% MW changes' prints 0.047.",
      "handling": "Used the table row value g = 0.047 as instructed by the target definition; the note's '4%' is a rounded/loose description; with g = 0.04 the result would be -1.55%."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: control mean 75.0% in Table 2 is the raw aggregate control-group mean (not adjusted for randomisation week), while the 1.47 pp ATE is block-adjusted; the paper states raw aggregate comparisons are biased.",
      "handling": "Used 75.0% as p because the target definition specifies 'percent of the control-group mean'; flagged as an approximation of the counterfactual level."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: text cites a 'table 2' estimate -0.0855 with mean 0.455 (table not in extract); printed % Change -0.3685 vs -0.0962/0.261 = -0.3686 (rounding of inputs).",
      "handling": "Not relevant to E5 (pure x100 rescaling of Table 3 col (4)); recorded only."
    }
  ],
  "n_input_rows": {
    "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,
    "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 91,
    "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,
    "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134,
    "README.md": 16,
    "effects.json": 5
  },
  "n_analysed": 5,
  "random_seed": null
}