[
 {"id":"C1","text":"The 5 km overall DCR ATT of -0.431 log points corresponds to a -35.01% relative change in drug-related hospitalisations, consistent with the printed -35.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact under the 100*(exp(b)-1) convention; no SE propagated."},
 {"id":"C2","text":"The RESEA reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp is a +1.96% relative change versus the 75.0% control-group mean.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Control mean is the raw aggregate mean while the ATE is block-adjusted."},
 {"id":"C3","text":"The employment elasticity of -0.388 applied to the printed 0.047 minimum-wage change implies a -1.82% change in employment.","results_keys":["harmonised","data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Linear approximation; the table note says 'about 4%', which would give -1.55%."},
 {"id":"C4","text":"The fatal drug-related hospitalisation effect (E4) cannot be expressed as an absolute change per 100,000 per year because the baseline rate is not printed in the extract.","results_keys":["harmonised","n_not_harmonisable"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Would require the baseline/counterfactual fatal hospitalisation rate for treated 5 km regions."},
 {"id":"C5","text":"The Benin LPM coefficient -0.0962 equals -9.62 percentage points.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact rescaling."},
 {"id":"C6","text":"Four of five items were harmonised, one is not harmonisable, and the task is complete.","results_keys":["n_harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","feasibility","n_analysed"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Complete means each item has a value or a justified impossibility statement."},
 {"id":"C7","text":"The DCR source is internally inconsistent about the size of the fatal-hospitalisation reduction (abstract 35% vs Section 6.1 ~30% vs Table 7 implied -29.8%).","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Recorded only; does not affect any harmonised value."}
]