{
  "harmonised": {
    "E1": {
      "value": -35.01,
      "unit": "percent (relative change vs counterfactual rate)",
      "transformation": "100*(exp(-0.431) - 1) = -35.0141% (exact conversion of a log-point coefficient; matches the printed '% change' -35.0%)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row 'ATT' | column '5 km' (extract line 36); cross-check: row '% change', column '5 km' (line 40)"
    },
    "E2": {
      "value": 1.96,
      "unit": "percent (relative to the control-group mean reemployment rate)",
      "transformation": "100*1.47 pp / 75.0% = 1.9600% (exact given the definition; denominator = raw control-group mean)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row 'Reemployment' | column 'Average treatment effect estimate' (1.47 pp) and column 'Control' (75.0%) (extract line 29)"
    },
    "E3": {
      "value": -1.82,
      "unit": "percent (relative change in employment)",
      "transformation": "100*(-0.388)*(0.047) = -1.8236% (first-order/linear approximation; g = printed '% MW changes' = 0.047, i.e. 4.7%)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Table 2 | row 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' | column 'Estimate (SE)' (line 50); row '% MW changes' | column 'Estimate (SE)' (line 60)"
    },
    "E4": {
      "value": null,
      "unit": "hospitalisations per 100,000 inhabitants per year",
      "transformation": "absolute change = R0*(exp(-0.354) - 1), where R0 is the counterfactual (pre-treatment/baseline) fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 in the treated (5 km) regions; the relative part is exp(-0.354)-1 = -0.2981 (-29.81%), but R0 is not printed in the extract, so the target cannot be reached",
      "harmonisable": false,
      "missing_quantity": "baseline (counterfactual / pre-treatment) level of the fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 inhabitants per year in the treated 5 km regions (not printed in the extract)",
      "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row 'Drug-related (fatal)' | column '5 km' (extract line 86)"
    },
    "E5": {
      "value": -9.62,
      "unit": "percentage points",
      "transformation": "100*(-0.0962) = -9.62 pp (exact rescaling from 0-1 probability scale)",
      "harmonisable": true,
      "missing_quantity": null,
      "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3 | row 'Treatment' | column '(4)' (extract line 49)"
    }
  },
  "n_harmonised": 4,
  "n_not_harmonisable": 1,
  "task_id": "F4-conf-03",
  "feasibility": "complete",
  "feasibility_reason": null,
  "data_issues": [
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the abstract states fatal drug-related hospitalisations 'fall by 35%', but the Table 7 5 km coefficient -0.354 log points implies 100*(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%; Section 6.1 says 'approximately 30%'. The abstract figure appears to conflate the overall effect (-35.0%) or log points with percent.",
      "handling": "Used the Table 7 coefficient as instructed; E4 is not harmonisable anyway (missing level). Flagged."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the 5 km CS-DR ATT -0.431 has SE (0.210) in Table 6 but (0.218) in Table A19; Table 6/7 report 608 control regions while the A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions.",
      "handling": "Point estimates agree (-0.431); SEs not used (no uncertainty propagation). Flagged only."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Section 6 text describes 'five diagnostic sub-categories' while the Figure 7 note mentions four; the Table 7 note lists four ICD sub-outcome groups and gives no definition for the 'Drug-related (fatal)' row.",
      "handling": "Did not affect the E1/E4 harmonisation; flagged."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: the Table 2 note describes the 2023 changes as 'about 4% minimum wage increase', while the table row '% MW changes' prints 0.047 (4.7%).",
      "handling": "Used the printed table value 0.047 as the target definition requires ('size of that increase as printed in the same table'); with 0.04 the result would be -1.55%."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: Section 4.1 refers to 'table 2' and a coefficient -0.0855 with dependent mean 0.455 (headline 18.79%), which is not in the extract; the Table 3 column (4) '% Change' prints -0.3685 whereas -0.0962/0.261 = -0.3686 (rounding difference in the last digit).",
      "handling": "Used Table 3 column (4) as specified in effects.json; flagged."
    },
    {
      "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: the abstract rounds the reemployment ATE to 1.5 pp versus 1.47 pp in Table 2; the control mean 75.0% is the raw (not block-adjusted) group mean.",
      "handling": "Used the Table 2 printed values 1.47 pp and 75.0% as the target definition specifies the control-group mean."
    }
  ],
  "n_input_rows": {
    "effects.json": 5,
    "README.md": 16,
    "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,
    "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 91,
    "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,
    "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134
  },
  "n_analysed": 5,
  "random_seed": null
}