\section{Formal Results and Negative Findings} \label{sec:formal} \input{sections/11a_formal} \subsection{Negative findings} The mandate counts a rigorously documented failure as a result (Outcome~D). Table~\ref{tab:negative} collects the negative findings of this study with the form of evidence behind each. \begin{table}[htbp] \centering\footnotesize \begin{threeparttable} \caption{Negative findings: candidate shortcuts and why they fail.} \label{tab:negative} \begin{tabular}{@{}p{4.6cm}p{5.4cm}p{4.4cm}@{}} \toprule Candidate & Why it fails & Evidence \\ \midrule A further efficiently computable endomorphism of \secp{} & $\End(E)=\Z[\omega]$ is the maximal order; every endomorphism is $u+v\phi$ & Proposition~\ref{prop:end}; exact check $t^2-4p=-3f^2$ \\ A group structure on the automorphism orbits (DLP of size $n/6$) & the projection would be injective; orbits are not a congruence & Proposition~\ref{prop:noquotient}; $1500/1500$ counterexamples \\ Index calculus with a factor base $x(P)