\section{Robustness Checks} \label{sec:robustness} \subsection{Sensitivity to VAR Lag Selection} We verify robustness to alternative VAR lag specifications. \Cref{tab:robustness_lags} reports the total spillover index and top-3 net transmitters for $p \in \{2, 4, 6\}$. \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Robustness to VAR Lag Selection.} \label{tab:robustness_lags} \begin{threeparttable} \begin{tabular}{@{}lrrr@{}} \toprule & $p=2$ & $p=4$ (baseline) & $p=6$ \\ \midrule Total Spillover Index (\%) & 53.8 & 55.4 & 56.9 \\ ES net spillover (\%) & $+$25.1 & $+$26.8 & $+$27.4 \\ NQ net spillover (\%) & $+$18.3 & $+$19.7 & $+$20.5 \\ VIX net spillover (\%) & $-$21.8 & $-$23.4 & $-$24.1 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \begin{tablenotes}[flushleft] \footnotesize \item \textit{Notes:} Total spillover index and selected net directional spillovers under alternative VAR lag orders. Directional rankings remain qualitatively unchanged across all specifications. \end{tablenotes} \end{threeparttable} \end{table} \subsection{Sensitivity to Forecast Horizon} \Cref{tab:robustness_horizon} reports sensitivity to the forecast horizon $H$. \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Robustness to Forecast Horizon.} \label{tab:robustness_horizon} \begin{threeparttable} \begin{tabular}{@{}lrrr@{}} \toprule & $H=5$ & $H=10$ (baseline) & $H=20$ \\ \midrule Total Spillover Index (\%) & 49.2 & 55.4 & 58.1 \\ ES net spillover (\%) & $+$24.0 & $+$26.8 & $+$28.3 \\ BTC own-shock (\%) & 82.6 & 79.3 & 77.1 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \begin{tablenotes}[flushleft] \footnotesize \item \textit{Notes:} Cross-asset spillovers increase with the horizon, as expected, but qualitative conclusions regarding the volatility hierarchy are robust. \end{tablenotes} \end{threeparttable} \end{table} \newpage \section{Summary of Key Numerical Results} \label{sec:appendix_summary} \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Summary of Key Findings.} \label{tab:summary_findings} \begin{tabular}{@{}p{7.5cm}r@{}} \toprule Metric & Value \\ \midrule Total Spillover Index (full sample) & 55.44\% \\ Mean rolling TSI (200-day) & 67.13\% \\ Maximum rolling TSI & 81.55\% \\ Minimum rolling TSI & 57.22\% \\ \midrule Largest net transmitter (full sample) & ES: $+$26.80\% \\ Second largest net transmitter & NQ: $+$19.72\% \\ Largest net receiver (full sample) & VIX: $-$23.37\% \\ \midrule BTC own-shock contribution (full sample) & 79.33\% \\ ETH own-shock contribution (full sample) & 77.88\% \\ BTC--ETH pairwise spillover & 19.3\% / 20.6\% \\ \midrule TSI pre-COVID regime & 64.72\% \\ TSI COVID crash regime & 66.66\% \\ TSI rate-hiking regime & 65.62\% \\ \midrule BTC net spillover (pre-COVID) & $-$0.02\% \\ BTC net spillover (COVID crash) & $-$21.34\% \\ BTC net spillover (rate hikes) & $+$7.90\% \\ \midrule ES $\to$ VIX Granger $F$-statistic & 19.864 \\ NQ $\to$ VIX Granger $F$-statistic & 16.708 \\ \midrule Mean annualized RV: ES & 13.85\% \\ Mean annualized RV: BTC & 98.69\% \\ Mean annualized RV: CL & 29.67\% \\ Total 5-minute observations & $>$235 million \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{table}