% ============================================================================= % Author: Simon-Pierre Boucher % Contact: contact@spboucher.ai % ============================================================================= % Appendix % ============================================================================= \section{Implied Correlation Around Crises}\label{app:crises} Table~\ref{tab:app_crises} details the behavior of the implied-correlation index around the nine major market events of the sample period. Implied correlation rises after every event, with the largest jumps around Volmageddon ($+0.328$) and the August 2015 China devaluation ($+0.258$). \begin{table}[H] \centering \caption{Implied correlation around major market events.} \label{tab:app_crises} \begin{threeparttable} \small \begin{tabular}{@{}ld{1.3}d{1.3}d{1.3}@{}} \toprule Crisis & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Pre IC} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Post IC} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta$IC} \\ \midrule Flash Crash (May 2010) & 0.223 & 0.404 & +0.181 \\ Euro Crisis (Aug 2011) & 0.313 & 0.469 & +0.156 \\ China Deval.\ (Aug 2015) & 0.231 & 0.489 & +0.258 \\ Volmageddon (Feb 2018) & 0.108 & 0.436 & +0.328 \\ COVID-19 (Mar 2020) & 0.473 & 0.648 & +0.175 \\ Meme Stocks (Jan 2021) & 0.228 & 0.326 & +0.098 \\ Rate Shock (Jun 2022) & 0.417 & 0.447 & +0.030 \\ SVB Crisis (Mar 2023) & 0.328 & 0.373 & +0.045 \\ VIX Spike (Aug 2024) & 0.138 & 0.316 & +0.178 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \begin{tablenotes}[flushleft]\footnotesize \item \textit{Notes.} IC = Implied Correlation. Pre = 30-day window before the event; Post = 10-day window after. \end{tablenotes} \end{threeparttable} \end{table} \section{SPX Options Surface Features (RQ5)}\label{app:features} The 21 SPX surface features used in Section~\ref{sec:results} are: $IV_{ATM}$ at six tenors (1w, 2w, 1m, 2m, 3m, 6m); 25$\delta$ skew (1m, 3m); 10$\delta$ deep OTM skew (1m); butterfly ratio (1m); term-structure slopes (3m$-$1m, 6m$-$1m); total gamma\,$\times$\,OI; net gamma; total vega\,$\times$\,OI; average $\Theta$; put-call volume ratio; put-call OI ratio; total option volume; total OI; and the average bid-ask spread percentage. \section{Random Forest Feature Importance (RQ5)}\label{app:importance} Table~\ref{tab:app_importance} reports the full Random Forest importance ranking underlying the RQ5 discussion; the two shortest ATM tenors jointly account for two thirds of total importance. \begin{table}[H] \centering \caption{Random Forest feature importance (1-day RV target, 2010--2019 training).} \label{tab:app_importance} \begin{threeparttable} \begin{tabular}{@{}lr@{}} \toprule Feature & Importance \\ \midrule $IV_{ATM,2w}$ & 0.508 \\ $IV_{ATM,1w}$ & 0.151 \\ Total option volume & 0.083 \\ PC vol.\ ratio & 0.067 \\ Net gamma exposure & 0.037 \\ $IV_{ATM,1m}$ & 0.023 \\ $RV_{weekly}$ & 0.022 \\ Skew (25$\delta$, 3m)& 0.013 \\ Avg.\ $\Theta$ & 0.012 \\ $IV_{ATM,2m}$ & 0.011 \\ \midrule \textit{All others (14 features)} & \textit{0.073} \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{threeparttable} \end{table} \section{Forecast Error Variance Decomposition}\label{app:fevd} Table~\ref{tab:app_fevd} reports the full horizon profile of the forecast error variance decomposition summarized in Section~\ref{sec:results}: the share of realized-variance forecast error variance attributable to implied-volatility shocks rises monotonically from zero on impact to 73.8\% at 20 days. \begin{table}[H] \centering \caption{FEVD: share of RV forecast error variance explained by IV shocks (\%).} \label{tab:app_fevd} \begin{threeparttable} \begin{tabular}{@{}rcc@{}} \toprule Horizon (days) & IV shocks (\%) & RV shocks (\%) \\ \midrule 1 & 0.0 & 100.0 \\ 2 & 28.0 & 72.0 \\ 5 & 56.1 & 43.9 \\ 10 & 66.4 & 33.6 \\ 15 & 71.1 & 28.9 \\ 20 & 73.8 & 26.2 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \begin{tablenotes}[flushleft]\footnotesize \item \textit{Notes.} From the bivariate VAR(5) in standardized ATM IV and RV, averaged across 20 tickers. \end{tablenotes} \end{threeparttable} \end{table}