# UPGRADE_REPORT — Scholarly upgrade of WP9 (v1.1 → v1.2, 2026-08-05) Scope: literature and framing only. **No result, number, figure or table changed.** Paper: 26 → **34 pages** (+31%); references: 32 → **64** (63 cited); new **Discussion** section (§7). Critical pre-assessment in `PAPER_REVIEW.md`. Builds cleanly (pdflatex + bibtex, zero errors/undefined citations). ## 1. New references (32), each verified before entry Verification method: direct Crossref DOI lookup for 30 entries (metadata in the .bib copied from the Crossref record); Mills (1967) and the two books confirmed via JSTOR issue listing / publisher records ([Mills 1967 AER 57(2):197–210](https://www.jstor.org/stable/i331577), [Alonso 1964](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought/article/abs/william-alonso-richard-muth-resources-for-the-future-and-the-founding-of-urban-economics/A1F19C2F841A0D0AA33D15F46918CFEA), [Muth 1969](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/recherches-economiques-de-louvain-louvain-economic-review/article/abs/rf-muth-cities-and-housing-the-spatial-pattern-of-urban-residential-land-use-chicago-and-london-the-university-of-chicago-press-1969-xxii-p-355-p-90/0AA8AA64AD2123A62CED306A63423327), [Case–Shiller 1989 AER 79(1):125–137](https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:79:y:1989:i:1:p:125-37)). The OpenAlex MCP connector was budget-limited, so Crossref's REST API was used instead. **Urban spatial structure (motivates the gradient section, previously uncited):** - `alonso1964location` — founding monocentric land-rent model. - `muth1969cities` — housing version of the monocentric model. - `mills1967aggregative` — the third leg of the Alonso–Muth–Mills tradition. - `ahlfeldt2015density` — modern quantitative estimation of density/amenity gradients (Berlin Wall). **Land value & the location share (external benchmark for the 30-pp headline):** - `davis2007price` — U.S. residential land share ≈ 46%; direct macro counterpart. - `knoll2017no` — land explains ~80% of global house-price growth since 1950. - `albouy2016cities` — cross-city dispersion of land rents & amenity values. - `cheshire1995price` — early land-price/amenity decomposition. **Supply constraints / superstar cities (explains WHY premia disperse ×9):** - `saiz2010geographic` — geographic supply constraints; Vancouver-type geography. - `gyourko2013superstar` — superstar-city price dynamics; frames Vancouver/Toronto. **House-price indices (paper claimed index relevance with zero index citations):** - `bailey1963regression` — repeat-sales method origin. - `case1989efficiency` — the index tradition + efficiency questions (also cited in Limitations). - `hill2013hedonic` — authoritative survey of hedonic price indexes. **Submarkets (the FSA design is a submarket argument):** - `goodman1998housing` — market segmentation tests. - `bourassa2003submarkets` — submarkets improve prediction; simple geography suffices. **Spatial dependence, empirics (Moran's I had one 1950 citation):** - `dubin1988estimation` — spatially autocorrelated errors distort hedonic inference. - `basu1998analysis` — canonical measurement of residual spatial autocorrelation. - `dube2013spatiotemporal` — Canadian spatio-temporal weights (Dubé & Legros). **Capitalization theory (why a neighbourhood intercept is 'value' at all):** - `tiebout1956pure` — sorting on local public goods. - `oates1969effects` — first capitalization measurement. - `roback1982wages` — spatial-equilibrium amenity capitalization. **Hedonic identification:** - `epple1987hedonic` — second-stage simultaneity; grounds our first-stage-only stance. **List prices & microstructure (the paper's central data caveat, previously uncited):** - `genesove2001loss` — sellers set list prices strategically (loss aversion). - `han2015microstructure` — search/bargaining microstructure (Handbook chapter). - `kiel2008location` — the '3L' structure/location decomposition framework. **AVM / mass appraisal (grounds 'competitive with commercial AVMs'):** - `clapp2003semiparametric` — location-value surface for automated valuation. - `mccluskey2013prediction` — accuracy comparison across mass-appraisal model classes. **Canadian evidence (was: one CMHC report):** - `desrosiers1996shopping`, `desrosiers2002landscaping` — the Quebec City hedonic program. - `haider2000effects` — spatial hedonics for Toronto. **High-dimensional FE methodology:** - `abowd1999high` — the AKM origin of the estimator lineage. - `guimaraes2010simple` — the standard computational reference. ## 2. Sections expanded and how | Section | Before | After | |---|---|---| | Introduction | 5 ¶, assertion-style gap | 6 ¶: stakes ¶ (housing wealth, assessment, land share), positioning vs. named literatures, **numbered 3-part contribution**, roadmap incl. §7 | | Related Literature | 5 loose subsections, 32 refs | **7 thematic subsections**, each ending with an explicit *Gap:* statement; ~55 refs engaged | | Data | unchanged | one grounding citation for the 1% trim | | Methodology | unchanged equations | AKM lineage + computational refs added to the absorbing-LS paragraph | | Results | **numbers/figures untouched** | 3 citation anchors only (bedrooms "textbook finding"; monocentric theory for the gradient; no text changes otherwise) | | Robustness | **numbers untouched** | 2 citation anchors (spatial-dependence empirics; AVM accuracy claim now sourced) | | **Discussion (NEW §7)** | — | 6 subsections: magnitudes vs. literature (land share, elasticities, Moran, quantiles, AVM accuracy); **points of tension**; implications (assessment, indices, AVM, policy); Limitations (5, consolidated); Future work | | Conclusion | 3 ¶ incl. limitations | limitations moved to §7; added an explicit "what the reading is" paragraph; no overselling (contribution restated with the same numbers) | ## 3. Claims flagged for your verification 1. **"First listing-level structure-vs-location decomposition spanning the entire Canadian market" (intro, contribution 1).** I softened it with "(to our knowledge)", and the Canadian-literature subsection now documents what exists (metropolitan-scale work). Please confirm you are comfortable with the novelty claim. 2. **Bathroom premium "at the upper end of published estimates" (Discussion §7.1).** Directionally supported by Sirmans et al.'s tabulations, but I did not run a formal meta-comparison. Soften to "within the range" if you prefer. 3. **AVM accuracy comparison.** The paper now cites McCluskey et al. (2013) and Clapp (2003) instead of claiming an unsourced comparison with "commercial" AVMs. If you have an IAAO-ratio-standard source you prefer, it slots in naturally there. 4. **Half-bath negative coefficient interpretation** remains conjectural in Results (unchanged text). Consider adding "we conjecture" if a referee pushes. ## 4. Literature that potentially contradicts the paper - **`bourassa2003submarkets` / `goodman1998housing`** — argue implicit prices (slopes), not just intercepts, vary across submarkets. The paper's own provincial heterogeneity (elasticity 0.49–0.66) partially *confirms* this, so the grand model's pooled slopes are an approximation. Now acknowledged explicitly in §7.2 ("Points of tension"). - **`kuminoff2010which`** — hedonic estimates can be specification-fragile; addressed via the robustness battery but flagged in §7.2 as binding for any welfare use of the premia. - **`genesove2001loss` / `han2015microstructure`** — list prices embed strategic behaviour; directly qualifies the paper's dependent variable. Now the first limitation in §7.4 with citations. - **LOPO's negative Alberta R²** (paper's own result) — cuts against fully universal structural prices; now stated plainly in §7.2 rather than left implicit. - I found **no verified source contradicting the headline location-share result**; the closest quantitative benchmarks (Davis–Heathcote 46% land share; Knoll et al.) point the same way. ## 5. Not changed All tables, all figures, all reported numbers, the abstract's quantitative claims, the data and methodology substance, and `results/reference/`. The uncited legacy bib entry `gabaix2016power` (orphaned in the original) was left in place.