SPB Git forge

spb/wp20_uqo

Public
1commits 1branches 0releases
2.8 MBsize
maindefault branch
yesterdaylast push
TeX 59% Python 40.8%
2.4 KB · 35 lines xml
Raw Blame History
1<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>2<feed xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:arxiv="http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">3  <id>https://arxiv.org/api/FdcbesGohViVRcFPqVFkwaj2OSE</id>4  <title>arXiv Query: search_query=&amp;id_list=1706.04599&amp;start=0&amp;max_results=10</title>5  <updated>2026-10-20T11:16:24Z</updated>6  <link href="https://arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=&amp;start=0&amp;max_results=10&amp;id_list=1706.04599" type="application/atom+xml"/>7  <opensearch:itemsPerPage>10</opensearch:itemsPerPage>8  <opensearch:totalResults>1</opensearch:totalResults>9  <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>10  <entry>11    <id>http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04599v2</id>12    <title>On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks</title>13    <updated>2017-08-03T13:29:46Z</updated>14    <link href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04599v2" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>15    <link href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.04599v2" rel="related" type="application/pdf" title="pdf"/>16    <summary>Confidence calibration -- the problem of predicting probability estimates representative of the true correctness likelihood -- is important for classification models in many applications. We discover that modern neural networks, unlike those from a decade ago, are poorly calibrated. Through extensive experiments, we observe that depth, width, weight decay, and Batch Normalization are important factors influencing calibration. We evaluate the performance of various post-processing calibration methods on state-of-the-art architectures with image and document classification datasets. Our analysis and experiments not only offer insights into neural network learning, but also provide a simple and straightforward recipe for practical settings: on most datasets, temperature scaling -- a single-parameter variant of Platt Scaling -- is surprisingly effective at calibrating predictions.</summary>17    <category term="cs.LG" scheme="http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom"/>18    <published>2017-06-14T17:33:50Z</published>19    <arxiv:comment>ICML 2017</arxiv:comment>20    <arxiv:primary_category term="cs.LG"/>21    <author>22      <name>Chuan Guo</name>23    </author>24    <author>25      <name>Geoff Pleiss</name>26    </author>27    <author>28      <name>Yu Sun</name>29    </author>30    <author>31      <name>Kilian Q. Weinberger</name>32    </author>33  </entry>34</feed>35