1{2 "record_id": "4e94c698b9b6217c36e2e8842148142f5bccfb36",3 "eligible": true,4 "exclusion_reason": null,5 "study": {6 "title": "A re-assessment of house price indices: evidence from the Spanish market",7 "year": 2019,8 "doi": "10.3846/ijspm.2019.6366",9 "country": "Spain",10 "region_city": "Alicante province (Valencian Community)",11 "sample_start": 2010,12 "sample_end": 2010,13 "property_type": "unknown",14 "price_type": "listing",15 "data_source": "Tabimed valuation-company database of comparables (asking prices), Spain 1995Q1-2012Q3; Table 2 uses Alicante province 2010",16 "document_type": "journal",17 "estimators": [18 "OLS"19 ],20 "spatial_method": "none (urban-dependence level only; no geo-references)",21 "time_fe": false,22 "location_fe": false,23 "se_type": "unknown",24 "n_obs_total": 596170,25 "ai_methods": [],26 "notes": "Paper is about house price index construction; only Table 2 prints attribute coefficients. CAUTION: Table 2 reports the AVERAGE of four urban-level hedonic imputation (HI) model betas estimated for Alicante province in 2010 (4 quarters), with standardized betas and an (averaged) 'Stand. error' column; it is not a single regression column. Printed N = 596,170 although the note says 478,418 usable Alicante observations overall and ~11,390 per quarter of 2010. Dependent variable = log of asking prices (semi-log; m2 and population enter in logs). Variable definitions are in supplementary Table S1 (not in the PDF); most neighbourhood/city variables are valuer-perception categorical ratings, so units are unknown. Stars: *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05. All coefficients recorded with confidence 'medium' because of the averaging; standardized betas are not extracted."27 },28 "models": [29 {30 "model_id": "T2-c1",31 "table": "2",32 "column": "1 (b, unstandardized)",33 "page": 9,34 "dep_var": "log of asking price",35 "dep_transform": "log",36 "estimator": "OLS",37 "n_obs": 596170,38 "r2": 0.768,39 "se_or_t_in_parentheses": "se",40 "sample_subset": "Average of four urban-level HI model betas, Alicante province, 2010 (4 quarters); Adj R2 0.768; SE column is an average of model SEs"41 }42 ],43 "coefficients": [44 {45 "model_id": "T2-c1",46 "var_name_printed": "PD",47 "taxonomy_id": "density",48 "x_transform": "other",49 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",50 "beta": 0.044,51 "se": 0.001,52 "t": null,53 "p": null,54 "p_stars": "***",55 "ci_lo": null,56 "ci_hi": null,57 "page": 9,58 "confidence": "medium",59 "notes": "City-level population density rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"60 },61 {62 "model_id": "T2-c1",63 "var_name_printed": "Pdev",64 "taxonomy_id": "other",65 "x_transform": "other",66 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",67 "beta": -0.004,68 "se": 0.001,69 "t": null,70 "p": null,71 "p_stars": "***",72 "ci_lo": null,73 "ci_hi": null,74 "page": 9,75 "confidence": "medium",76 "notes": "City population development rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"77 },78 {79 "model_id": "T2-c1",80 "var_name_printed": "PGR",81 "taxonomy_id": "other",82 "x_transform": "other",83 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",84 "beta": 0.039,85 "se": 0.001,86 "t": null,87 "p": null,88 "p_stars": "***",89 "ci_lo": null,90 "ci_hi": null,91 "page": 9,92 "confidence": "medium",93 "notes": "City population growth rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"94 },95 {96 "model_id": "T2-c1",97 "var_name_printed": "P (logs)",98 "taxonomy_id": "other",99 "x_transform": "log",100 "x_unit": "count (population)",101 "beta": 0.035,102 "se": 0.0,103 "t": null,104 "p": null,105 "p_stars": "***",106 "ci_lo": null,107 "ci_hi": null,108 "page": 9,109 "confidence": "medium",110 "notes": "Log of total city population (numeric); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"111 },112 {113 "model_id": "T2-c1",114 "var_name_printed": "Eco",115 "taxonomy_id": "other",116 "x_transform": "other",117 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",118 "beta": 0.035,119 "se": 0.0,120 "t": null,121 "p": null,122 "p_stars": "***",123 "ci_lo": null,124 "ci_hi": null,125 "page": 9,126 "confidence": "medium",127 "notes": "Economic activity in the area. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"128 },129 {130 "model_id": "T2-c1",131 "var_name_printed": "UENV",132 "taxonomy_id": "other",133 "x_transform": "other",134 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",135 "beta": 0.158,136 "se": 0.004,137 "t": null,138 "p": null,139 "p_stars": "***",140 "ci_lo": null,141 "ci_hi": null,142 "page": 9,143 "confidence": "medium",144 "notes": "Urban environment quality. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"145 },146 {147 "model_id": "T2-c1",148 "var_name_printed": "Inc",149 "taxonomy_id": "income",150 "x_transform": "other",151 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",152 "beta": 0.054,153 "se": 0.001,154 "t": null,155 "p": null,156 "p_stars": "***",157 "ci_lo": null,158 "ci_hi": null,159 "page": 9,160 "confidence": "medium",161 "notes": "Income level of the city (valuer perception, not monetary). Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"162 },163 {164 "model_id": "T2-c1",165 "var_name_printed": "Resarea",166 "taxonomy_id": "other",167 "x_transform": "other",168 "x_unit": "ordinal",169 "beta": 0.092,170 "se": 0.001,171 "t": null,172 "p": null,173 "p_stars": "***",174 "ci_lo": null,175 "ci_hi": null,176 "page": 9,177 "confidence": "medium",178 "notes": "Residence typology of area (first vs secondary homes). Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"179 },180 {181 "model_id": "T2-c1",182 "var_name_printed": "Con",183 "taxonomy_id": "other",184 "x_transform": "other",185 "x_unit": "unknown",186 "beta": 0.001,187 "se": 0.0,188 "t": null,189 "p": null,190 "p_stars": "***",191 "ci_lo": null,192 "ci_hi": null,193 "page": 9,194 "confidence": "medium",195 "notes": "Undefined abbreviation in PDF. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"196 },197 {198 "model_id": "T2-c1",199 "var_name_printed": "URR",200 "taxonomy_id": "other",201 "x_transform": "other",202 "x_unit": "unknown",203 "beta": -0.001,204 "se": 0.0,205 "t": null,206 "p": null,207 "p_stars": "***",208 "ci_lo": null,209 "ci_hi": null,210 "page": 9,211 "confidence": "medium",212 "notes": "Undefined abbreviation in PDF. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"213 },214 {215 "model_id": "T2-c1",216 "var_name_printed": "Qroad",217 "taxonomy_id": "public_services",218 "x_transform": "other",219 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",220 "beta": 0.02,221 "se": 0.003,222 "t": null,223 "p": null,224 "p_stars": "***",225 "ci_lo": null,226 "ci_hi": null,227 "page": 9,228 "confidence": "medium",229 "notes": "Quality of roads. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"230 },231 {232 "model_id": "T2-c1",233 "var_name_printed": "Qw-pipe",234 "taxonomy_id": "public_services",235 "x_transform": "other",236 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",237 "beta": -0.634,238 "se": 0.001,239 "t": null,240 "p": null,241 "p_stars": "***",242 "ci_lo": null,243 "ci_hi": null,244 "page": 9,245 "confidence": "medium",246 "notes": "Quality of water pipes/supply. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"247 },248 {249 "model_id": "T2-c1",250 "var_name_printed": "Qlig",251 "taxonomy_id": "public_services",252 "x_transform": "other",253 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",254 "beta": -0.009,255 "se": 0.002,256 "t": null,257 "p": null,258 "p_stars": "***",259 "ci_lo": null,260 "ci_hi": null,261 "page": 9,262 "confidence": "medium",263 "notes": "Quality of street lighting. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"264 },265 {266 "model_id": "T2-c1",267 "var_name_printed": "Qsh",268 "taxonomy_id": "commercial_distance",269 "x_transform": "other",270 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",271 "beta": 0.006,272 "se": 0.001,273 "t": null,274 "p": null,275 "p_stars": "***",276 "ci_lo": null,277 "ci_hi": null,278 "page": 9,279 "confidence": "medium",280 "notes": "Quality of shops (city level). Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"281 },282 {283 "model_id": "T2-c1",284 "var_name_printed": "Qschool",285 "taxonomy_id": "school_quality",286 "x_transform": "other",287 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",288 "beta": 0.012,289 "se": 0.002,290 "t": null,291 "p": null,292 "p_stars": "***",293 "ci_lo": null,294 "ci_hi": null,295 "page": 9,296 "confidence": "medium",297 "notes": "Quality of schools. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"298 },299 {300 "model_id": "T2-c1",301 "var_name_printed": "Qchurch",302 "taxonomy_id": "neighbourhood_amenities",303 "x_transform": "other",304 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",305 "beta": 0.049,306 "se": 0.002,307 "t": null,308 "p": null,309 "p_stars": "***",310 "ci_lo": null,311 "ci_hi": null,312 "page": 9,313 "confidence": "medium",314 "notes": "Quality/presence of churches. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"315 },316 {317 "model_id": "T2-c1",318 "var_name_printed": "Qleis",319 "taxonomy_id": "neighbourhood_amenities",320 "x_transform": "other",321 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",322 "beta": 0.08,323 "se": 0.001,324 "t": null,325 "p": null,326 "p_stars": "***",327 "ci_lo": null,328 "ci_hi": null,329 "page": 9,330 "confidence": "medium",331 "notes": "Quality of leisure amenities. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"332 },333 {334 "model_id": "T2-c1",335 "var_name_printed": "Qhealth",336 "taxonomy_id": "hospital_distance",337 "x_transform": "other",338 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",339 "beta": -0.113,340 "se": 0.001,341 "t": null,342 "p": null,343 "p_stars": "***",344 "ci_lo": null,345 "ci_hi": null,346 "page": 9,347 "confidence": "medium",348 "notes": "Quality of health facilities (rating, not distance). Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"349 },350 {351 "model_id": "T2-c1",352 "var_name_printed": "Bus",353 "taxonomy_id": "transit_distance",354 "x_transform": "other",355 "x_unit": "ordinal (accessibility rating)",356 "beta": 0.007,357 "se": 0.0,358 "t": null,359 "p": null,360 "p_stars": "***",361 "ci_lo": null,362 "ci_hi": null,363 "page": 9,364 "confidence": "medium",365 "notes": "Bus accessibility rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"366 },367 {368 "model_id": "T2-c1",369 "var_name_printed": "Train",370 "taxonomy_id": "transit_distance",371 "x_transform": "other",372 "x_unit": "ordinal (accessibility rating)",373 "beta": -0.002,374 "se": 0.001,375 "t": null,376 "p": null,377 "p_stars": "***",378 "ci_lo": null,379 "ci_hi": null,380 "page": 9,381 "confidence": "medium",382 "notes": "Train accessibility rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"383 },384 {385 "model_id": "T2-c1",386 "var_name_printed": "Und-Tram",387 "taxonomy_id": "transit_distance",388 "x_transform": "other",389 "x_unit": "ordinal (accessibility rating)",390 "beta": 0.029,391 "se": 0.0,392 "t": null,393 "p": null,394 "p_stars": "***",395 "ci_lo": null,396 "ci_hi": null,397 "page": 9,398 "confidence": "medium",399 "notes": "Underground/tram accessibility rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"400 },401 {402 "model_id": "T2-c1",403 "var_name_printed": "TB",404 "taxonomy_id": "dwelling_type",405 "x_transform": "other",406 "x_unit": "categorical",407 "beta": 0.101,408 "se": 0.001,409 "t": null,410 "p": null,411 "p_stars": "***",412 "ci_lo": null,413 "ci_hi": null,414 "page": 9,415 "confidence": "medium",416 "notes": "Type of building (categorical). Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"417 },418 {419 "model_id": "T2-c1",420 "var_name_printed": "dwel",421 "taxonomy_id": "other",422 "x_transform": "level",423 "x_unit": "count",424 "beta": -0.001,425 "se": 0.0,426 "t": null,427 "p": null,428 "p_stars": "***",429 "ci_lo": null,430 "ci_hi": null,431 "page": 9,432 "confidence": "medium",433 "notes": "Number of dwellings (in building), definition in Table S1; averaged beta"434 },435 {436 "model_id": "T2-c1",437 "var_name_printed": "lift",438 "taxonomy_id": "accessibility",439 "x_transform": "level",440 "x_unit": "count",441 "beta": 0.058,442 "se": 0.001,443 "t": null,444 "p": null,445 "p_stars": "***",446 "ci_lo": null,447 "ci_hi": null,448 "page": 9,449 "confidence": "medium",450 "notes": "Number of lifts (text: 'number of lifts'); averaged beta"451 },452 {453 "model_id": "T2-c1",454 "var_name_printed": "age",455 "taxonomy_id": "age",456 "x_transform": "level",457 "x_unit": "years",458 "beta": -0.008,459 "se": 0.0,460 "t": null,461 "p": null,462 "p_stars": "***",463 "ci_lo": null,464 "ci_hi": null,465 "page": 9,466 "confidence": "medium",467 "notes": "Age of the dwelling (years, assumed level); averaged beta"468 },469 {470 "model_id": "T2-c1",471 "var_name_printed": "Qshop_n",472 "taxonomy_id": "commercial_distance",473 "x_transform": "other",474 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",475 "beta": 0.118,476 "se": 0.0,477 "t": null,478 "p": null,479 "p_stars": "***",480 "ci_lo": null,481 "ci_hi": null,482 "page": 9,483 "confidence": "medium",484 "notes": "Quality of shops in the neighbourhood. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"485 },486 {487 "model_id": "T2-c1",488 "var_name_printed": "Inc_t",489 "taxonomy_id": "income",490 "x_transform": "other",491 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",492 "beta": 0.096,493 "se": 0.001,494 "t": null,495 "p": null,496 "p_stars": "***",497 "ci_lo": null,498 "ci_hi": null,499 "page": 9,500 "confidence": "medium",501 "notes": "Neighbourhood income level (valuer perception, not monetary). Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"502 },503 {504 "model_id": "T2-c1",505 "var_name_printed": "PD_t",506 "taxonomy_id": "density",507 "x_transform": "other",508 "x_unit": "ordinal (valuer perception)",509 "beta": -0.02,510 "se": 0.001,511 "t": null,512 "p": null,513 "p_stars": "***",514 "ci_lo": null,515 "ci_hi": null,516 "page": 9,517 "confidence": "medium",518 "notes": "Neighbourhood population density rating. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"519 },520 {521 "model_id": "T2-c1",522 "var_name_printed": "Ori",523 "taxonomy_id": "sunlight",524 "x_transform": "other",525 "x_unit": "categorical",526 "beta": 0.003,527 "se": 0.0,528 "t": null,529 "p": null,530 "p_stars": "***",531 "ci_lo": null,532 "ci_hi": null,533 "page": 9,534 "confidence": "medium",535 "notes": "Orientation of the dwelling. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"536 },537 {538 "model_id": "T2-c1",539 "var_name_printed": "Vi",540 "taxonomy_id": "view",541 "x_transform": "other",542 "x_unit": "categorical",543 "beta": 0.019,544 "se": 0.001,545 "t": null,546 "p": null,547 "p_stars": "***",548 "ci_lo": null,549 "ci_hi": null,550 "page": 9,551 "confidence": "medium",552 "notes": "View. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"553 },554 {555 "model_id": "T2-c1",556 "var_name_printed": "ConQ",557 "taxonomy_id": "condition",558 "x_transform": "other",559 "x_unit": "ordinal",560 "beta": 0.033,561 "se": 0.001,562 "t": null,563 "p": null,564 "p_stars": "***",565 "ci_lo": null,566 "ci_hi": null,567 "page": 9,568 "confidence": "medium",569 "notes": "Quality of construction. Categorical valuer-perception variable (definition in supplementary Table S1, unit unknown); averaged beta across 4 urban-level models"570 },571 {572 "model_id": "T2-c1",573 "var_name_printed": "m2 (log)",574 "taxonomy_id": "living_area",575 "x_transform": "log",576 "x_unit": "m2",577 "beta": 0.811,578 "se": 0.001,579 "t": null,580 "p": null,581 "p_stars": "***",582 "ci_lo": null,583 "ci_hi": null,584 "page": 9,585 "confidence": "medium",586 "notes": "Log of dwelling surface in m2; averaged beta"587 },588 {589 "model_id": "T2-c1",590 "var_name_printed": "m2_O (log)",591 "taxonomy_id": "other",592 "x_transform": "log",593 "x_unit": "m2",594 "beta": 0.034,595 "se": 0.0,596 "t": null,597 "p": null,598 "p_stars": "***",599 "ci_lo": null,600 "ci_hi": null,601 "page": 9,602 "confidence": "medium",603 "notes": "Log of additional/other surface area (m2); averaged beta"604 }605 ]606}