1{2 "record_id": "4ecf623f40ce01fde8d4ac0ee88291986f7a72fa",3 "eligible": false,4 "exclusion_reason": "No hedonic regression: the study compares mean municipal valuations and estimated market values per m2 (South African Rand/m2) across three distance zones around five urban green spaces in Potchefstroom (n=188) using dependent t-tests, ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (Tables 3-5). No regression coefficients on property characteristics or on distance to green space are estimated.",5 "study": {6 "title": "Economic Assessment of South African Urban Green Spaces Using the Proximity Principle: Municipal Valuation vs. Market Value",7 "year": 2021,8 "doi": "10.17645/up.v6i4.4407",9 "country": "South Africa",10 "region_city": "Potchefstroom, North West Province",11 "sample_start": 2019,12 "sample_end": 2020,13 "property_type": "single_family",14 "price_type": "appraisal",15 "data_source": "Municipal valuations (2019) and estimated market values (2020) for 188 properties in zones around five urban green spaces",16 "document_type": "journal",17 "estimators": [18 "other"19 ],20 "spatial_method": "zone comparison (distance zones 1-3)",21 "time_fe": false,22 "location_fe": false,23 "se_type": "unknown",24 "n_obs_total": 188,25 "ai_methods": [],26 "notes": "Urban Planning 6(4) 54-66. Qualitative evidence on the proximity principle for urban green space (confirmed in 2 of 5 sites with market values); keep for narrative synthesis only."27 },28 "models": [],29 "coefficients": []30}