1{2 "record_id": "7e996f814b72e80b4de3f1e836fe30324b1e2912",3 "eligible": false,4 "exclusion_reason": "Repeat-sales model (GLS on log price change between successive sales of the same home, Larimer and Boulder counties CO, 1998-2011): structural characteristics are differenced out; the only reported coefficients are year-specific host-tree-proximity (within 0.1 km) effects, a differenced wildfire-within-5km/5yr indicator, year dummies and an age-depreciation term (Tables 6, 7, 8, 12, 13). No cross-sectional hedonic regression with property-characteristic coefficients. Flag for human review if repeat-sales environmental effects are to be included.",5 "study": {6 "title": "Hedonic Valuation with Translating Amenities: Mountain Pine Beetles and Host Trees in the Colorado Front Range",7 "year": 2014,8 "doi": "10.1007/s10640-014-9856-y",9 "country": "United States",10 "region_city": "Larimer and Boulder counties, Colorado Front Range (control: Spokane WA)",11 "sample_start": 1998,12 "sample_end": 2011,13 "property_type": "single_family",14 "price_type": "transaction",15 "data_source": "County assessor repeat sales, host tree GIS layers",16 "document_type": "journal",17 "estimators": [18 "other"19 ],20 "spatial_method": "none (area-specific intercepts and trends)",21 "time_fe": true,22 "location_fe": true,23 "se_type": "unknown",24 "n_obs_total": 0,25 "ai_methods": [],26 "notes": "Repeat-sales model with translating amenity (host trees as proxy for mountain pine beetle damage). Published Environ Resource Econ 2016, 63:613-642. Table 6 p.17: Larimer baseline HT effect 0.062 (SE 0.019), Boulder 2002 baseline -0.127 (0.029); fire 5yr/5km Larimer 0.017 (0.013), Boulder -0.042 (0.011). Not extracted as coefficients because the design is repeat-sales."27 },28 "models": [],29 "coefficients": []30}