1{2 "record_id": "ba26780937630bfce76ea1bcc89a7777faa87ed0",3 "eligible": false,4 "exclusion_reason": "Unit of analysis is aggregate: the hedonic model (eq. 4-6, p. 7) is estimated on district x property-type x quarter MEANS of log price (balanced panel obtained by averaging over individual transactions), not on individual properties. In addition, Tables 3-4 print point estimates only with no standard errors, t-statistics or p-values (only symbols for |t|<=1.96 and 1.96<|t|<=4), so no usable precision information. Kept qualitatively (earthquake-risk capitalization, Japan).",5 "study": {6 "title": "Earthquake Risk Embedded in Property Prices: Evidence From Five Japanese Cities",7 "year": 2021,8 "doi": "10.1080/01621459.2021.1928512",9 "country": "Japan",10 "region_city": "Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya, Fukuoka, Sapporo",11 "sample_start": 2006,12 "sample_end": 2015,13 "property_type": "mixed",14 "price_type": "transaction",15 "data_source": "MLIT real estate transaction-price information (quarterly survey of transactions), 331,343 observations; JSHIS seismic hazard data",16 "document_type": "journal",17 "estimators": ["other"],18 "spatial_method": "none (city dummies + district random error component)",19 "time_fe": false,20 "location_fe": true,21 "se_type": "unknown",22 "n_obs_total": 331343,23 "ai_methods": [],24 "notes": "Published in JASA 2021 (metadata year 2018 is wrong). Maximum-likelihood multivariate error-components (two-error components) model on district-type-quarter averaged log prices; three property types (land & building, land only, condo). Table 3 (p. 8) reports coefficients for area (m2), floor area (m2), distance to nearest station (walking minutes), age, built-period dummies, structure dummies, BCR, FAR, ward attractiveness and earthquake-risk probabilities, but without SEs."25 },26 "models": [],27 "coefficients": []28}29