1{2 "record_id": "fb704039a7cb48f523fc8649b0477ed96bedc7f7",3 "eligible": true,4 "exclusion_reason": null,5 "study": {6 "title": "Improved Methods for Predicting Property Prices in Hazard Prone Dynamic Markets",7 "year": 2016,8 "doi": "10.1007/s10640-016-0076-5",9 "country": "United States",10 "region_city": "Pitt County, North Carolina",11 "sample_start": 1992,12 "sample_end": 2002,13 "property_type": "single_family",14 "price_type": "transaction",15 "data_source": "4,779 single-family sales in Pitt County NC, January 1992-June 2002 (Bin and Landry 2013 data), around hurricanes Fran (1996) and Floyd (1999)",16 "document_type": "journal",17 "estimators": [18 "OLS",19 "other"20 ],21 "spatial_method": "kriging of residuals (M4); log distances to amenities (M1-M2)",22 "time_fe": true,23 "location_fe": false,24 "se_type": "unknown",25 "n_obs_total": 4779,26 "ai_methods": [],27 "notes": "Environmental and Resource Economics 69. Primarily a prediction-accuracy study (Monte Carlo sub-sampling, out-of-sample errors). The only printed characteristic coefficient is the floodplain dummy (Table 3, 'Total population' row, no SE); sub-sample rows are averages over 50,000 Monte Carlo runs and were not extracted. Sample period January 1992-June 2002 (stated in Sect. 2.1). time_fe refers to sale-period dummies in M1-M2 only."28 },29 "models": [30 {31 "model_id": "T3-c1",32 "table": "3",33 "column": "M1 (Total population row)",34 "page": 13,35 "dep_var": "ln sales price (USD)",36 "dep_transform": "log",37 "estimator": "OLS",38 "n_obs": 4779,39 "r2": null,40 "se_or_t_in_parentheses": "none",41 "sample_subset": "full sample (N = 4779), Pitt County NC single-family sales 1992-2002; full traditional hedonic: age, bedrooms, lot size, structure sqft each as X + X^2, amenity dummies, log distances (creek, airport, major road, business centre, railroad, Tar River, park), sale-period dummies, floodplain and floodplain x period interactions; Monte Carlo sub-sample rows of Table 3 not extracted (resampling averages)"42 },43 {44 "model_id": "T3-c2",45 "table": "3",46 "column": "M2 (Total population row)",47 "page": 13,48 "dep_var": "ln sales price (USD)",49 "dep_transform": "log",50 "estimator": "OLS",51 "n_obs": 4779,52 "r2": null,53 "se_or_t_in_parentheses": "none",54 "sample_subset": "full sample (N = 4779), Pitt County NC single-family sales 1992-2002; as M1 but X + sqrt(X) (age, bedrooms, lot size) and X + ln(X) (structure sqft); Monte Carlo sub-sample rows of Table 3 not extracted (resampling averages)"55 },56 {57 "model_id": "T3-c3",58 "table": "3",59 "column": "M3 & M4 (Total population row)",60 "page": 13,61 "dep_var": "ln sales price (USD)",62 "dep_transform": "log",63 "estimator": "other",64 "n_obs": 4779,65 "r2": null,66 "se_or_t_in_parentheses": "none",67 "sample_subset": "full sample (N = 4779), Pitt County NC single-family sales 1992-2002; reduced model: age, bedrooms, sqrt(lot size), ln(structure sqft), floodplain dummy; M4 additionally kriges residuals for spatial variation (floodplain coefficient identical for M3 and M4); Monte Carlo sub-sample rows of Table 3 not extracted (resampling averages)"68 }69 ],70 "coefficients": [71 {72 "model_id": "T3-c1",73 "var_name_printed": "Floodplain (= 1)",74 "taxonomy_id": "flood_risk",75 "x_transform": "dummy",76 "x_unit": "binary",77 "beta": -0.056,78 "se": null,79 "t": null,80 "p": null,81 "p_stars": "",82 "ci_lo": null,83 "ci_hi": null,84 "page": 13,85 "confidence": "medium",86 "notes": "coefficient on 100-year floodplain dummy from the full-sample regression ('Total population' row of Table 3); no SE or significance printed; for M1 and M2 the text states the floodplain coefficient 'was controlled for the interaction terms' with the post-Fran and post-Floyd period dummies (exact adjustment not specified); other hedonic coefficients of the models are not printed"87 },88 {89 "model_id": "T3-c2",90 "var_name_printed": "Floodplain (= 1)",91 "taxonomy_id": "flood_risk",92 "x_transform": "dummy",93 "x_unit": "binary",94 "beta": -0.056,95 "se": null,96 "t": null,97 "p": null,98 "p_stars": "",99 "ci_lo": null,100 "ci_hi": null,101 "page": 13,102 "confidence": "medium",103 "notes": "coefficient on 100-year floodplain dummy from the full-sample regression ('Total population' row of Table 3); no SE or significance printed; for M1 and M2 the text states the floodplain coefficient 'was controlled for the interaction terms' with the post-Fran and post-Floyd period dummies (exact adjustment not specified); other hedonic coefficients of the models are not printed"104 },105 {106 "model_id": "T3-c3",107 "var_name_printed": "Floodplain (= 1)",108 "taxonomy_id": "flood_risk",109 "x_transform": "dummy",110 "x_unit": "binary",111 "beta": -0.054,112 "se": null,113 "t": null,114 "p": null,115 "p_stars": "",116 "ci_lo": null,117 "ci_hi": null,118 "page": 13,119 "confidence": "medium",120 "notes": "coefficient on 100-year floodplain dummy from the full-sample regression ('Total population' row of Table 3); no SE or significance printed; for M1 and M2 the text states the floodplain coefficient 'was controlled for the interaction terms' with the post-Fran and post-Floyd period dummies (exact adjustment not specified); other hedonic coefficients of the models are not printed"121 }122 ]123}