1"key","authors","year","title","outlet","doi","scope","n_studies","n_estimates","countries","period","effect_metric","method","headline","source_of_counts","confidence"2"sirmans2005composition","Sirmans, G. S.; Macpherson, D. A.; Zietz, E. N.","2005","The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models","Journal of Real Estate Literature 13(1):1-44","10.1080/10835547.2005.12090154","general; composition of hedonic models, sign/significance of characteristics","","","","","sign and significance of coefficients (no pooling)","descriptive tabulation of recent hedonic studies","Review of recent hedonic house-price studies; slanted/flat roof, sprinkler, garden bath, shower stall, double oven, gated community raise price; no attic, earthquake zone, hog farm, landfill, high-voltage lines, corporate ownership, share Black/Hispanic, flood-insurance requirement lower price (abstract).","abstract only (OpenAlex/IDEAS); full text closed; the '125 studies' figure often quoted could NOT be verified from any accessible text","high (DOI) / counts unverified"3"sirmans2006meta","Sirmans, G. S.; MacDonald, L.; Macpherson, D. A.; Zietz, E. N.","2006","The Value of Housing Characteristics: A Meta Analysis","Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 33(3):215-240","10.1007/s11146-006-9983-5","general; 9 structural characteristics of single-family housing (square footage, lot size, age, bedrooms, bathrooms, garage, pool, fireplace, air conditioning)","","","","","estimated regression coefficients of each characteristic (moderator analysis)","meta-regression (Stanley-Jarrell type) on location, time, data type, model specification, income","Coefficients vary by geographical location for square footage, lot size, age, bathrooms, pool, AC; no change over time; data type matters for bathrooms; income no effect; lot-size coefficient falls when square footage is controlled; model size affects square-footage coefficient (abstract).","abstract, keywords and reference list from Springer landing page; full text closed (SSRN copy blocked, HTTP 403)","high (DOI) / counts not accessible"4"sirmans2010tom","Sirmans, G. S.; MacDonald, L.; Macpherson, D. A.","2010","A Meta-Analysis of Selling Price and Time-on-the-Market","Journal of Housing Research 19(2):139-152","10.1080/10835547.2010.12092027","time-on-the-market coefficient in hedonic models","","","","","TOM coefficient","meta-regression","TOM coefficient sensitive to year of sale, income, model size and specification; not sensitive to location (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"5"khoshnoud2023evolution","Khoshnoud, M.; Sirmans, G. S.; Zietz, E. N.","2023","The Evolution of Hedonic Pricing Models","Journal of Real Estate Literature 31(1):1-47","10.1080/09277544.2023.2201020","general; extension of Sirmans et al. 2005 to real-estate journals 2005-2021","252","","global authorship and data, mostly US","2005-2021 (publication years)","descriptive (no pooling)","descriptive review","252 studies (150 in JREFE/JRER/REE, 42 in J. Housing Research); research global but mostly US data/authors; modelling now includes spatial autoregressive, difference-in-differences, quantile regression (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"6"malpezzi2003hedonic","Malpezzi, S.","2003","Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review","Ch. 5 in O'Sullivan & Gibb (eds), Housing Economics and Public Policy, Blackwell, pp. 67-89","10.1002/9780470690680.ch5","general; theory, specification, functional form, submarkets, applications","","","global (mostly US/UK examples)","","none (narrative)","selective narrative review","Theory gives little guidance on specification; semi-log preferred; coefficients not robust to omitted variables (Butler 1982; Ozanne & Malpezzi 1985); submarket F-tests usually reject pooling; spatial econometrics most promising (full text of 2002 draft read).","full text (2002 draft, Wayback copy)","high"7"herath2010review","Herath, S.; Maier, G.","2010","The Hedonic Price Method in Real Estate and Housing Market Research: A Review of the Literature","WU Vienna SRE-Discussion 2010/03","10.57938/e55da0fe-d130-415d-9a5d-7bbc07c329a1","general; history, estimation, classification of the most-cited HPM papers","471","","global (ISI Web of Knowledge)","to 2010","none (classification counts)","bibliometric classification of 471 most-cited papers","321 empirical (102 general, 219 specific-variable), 134 theoretical/methodological; 178 on neighbourhood characteristics (134 specific), only 16 on structural characteristics; environmental factors (56) and air pollution (41) over-researched, social factors (crime 3, racial 11) under-researched (full text).","full text (WU repository)","high (DataCite DOI)"8"boyle2001externalities","Boyle, M. A.; Kiel, K. A.","2001","A Survey of House Price Hedonic Studies of the Impact of Environmental Externalities","Journal of Real Estate Literature 9(2):117-144","10.1080/10835547.2001.12090098","environmental externalities (air, water, toxic sites)","","","","","none (narrative)","narrative survey","Reviews consistency of hedonic prices for air quality, water quality and distance to toxic sites, changes over time and the role of information (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"9"bowen2001space","Bowen, W. M.; Mikelbank, B. A.; Prestegaard, D. M.","2001","Theoretical and Empirical Considerations Regarding Space in Hedonic Housing Price Model Applications","Growth and Change 32(4):466-490","10.1111/0017-4815.00171","methodological; spatial dependence in hedonic models","","","US (Cuyahoga County application)","","none","review plus application","Explicit modelling of space not always warranted but spatial diagnostics should be standard; large differences when misspecification is present (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"10"hill2012indexes","Hill, R. J.","2013","Hedonic Price Indexes for Residential Housing: A Survey, Evaluation and Taxonomy","Journal of Economic Surveys 27(5):879-914","10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00731.x","methodological; hedonic house price indexes","","","","last three decades","none","survey and taxonomy","Taxonomy of hedonic index methods; calls for spatial econometric and nonparametric methods; advantages of hedonic approach outweigh disadvantages (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"11"kuminoff2010trust","Kuminoff, N. V.; Parmeter, C. F.; Pope, J. C.","2010","Which Hedonic Models Can We Trust to Recover the Marginal Willingness to Pay for Environmental Amenities?","Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60(3):145-160","10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.001","methodological (Monte Carlo); not a literature review","","","","","","simulation","Not a review: Monte Carlo comparison of hedonic specifications (flexible forms, spatial FE, panel) for recovering MWTP; included as a methodological benchmark only.","title/metadata only","high (DOI); not a review"12"bishop2020bestpractices","Bishop, K. C.; Kuminoff, N. V.; Banzhaf, H. S.; Boyle, K. J.; von Gravenitz, K.; Pope, J. C.; Smith, V. K.; Timmins, C. D.","2020","Best Practices for Using Hedonic Property Value Models to Measure Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality","Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 14(2):260-281","10.1093/reep/reaa001","methodological guidance; environmental amenities","","","","","","best-practice review","Research design should identify exogenous variation in an observable amenity; guidance on variables, sale prices, specification (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"13"jayantha2019bibliometric","Jayantha, W. M.; Oladinrin, O. T.","2020","Bibliometric Analysis of Hedonic Price Model Using CiteSpace","International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 13(2):357-371","10.1108/ijhma-04-2019-0044","general; bibliometric","269","","global (Scopus)","1970-2019","none","bibliometric (CiteSpace)","269 Scopus publications 1970-2019; rising annual output; core authors, countries, hotspots identified (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"14"nicholls2019disturbances","Nicholls, S.","2019","Impacts of Environmental Disturbances on Housing Prices: A Review of the Hedonic Pricing Literature","Journal of Environmental Management 246:1-10","10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.144","environmental disturbances (pests, invasive species, wildfire)","","","","","none (narrative)","narrative review","Most disturbances have negative or insignificant price effects; some cases of positive responses discussed (abstract).","abstract (PubMed)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"15"debrezion2007railway","Debrezion, G.; Pels, E.; Rietveld, P.","2007","The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-analysis","Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 35(2):161-180","10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z","railway station proximity (residential and commercial)","","102 estimation results collected, 73 used (TI 2004 working-paper version)","North America and Europe","","% change in property value within 1/4 mile and per 250 m closer","WLS meta-regression with dummies for property type, station type, model form, access variables, location, period","Commercial within 1/4 mile +12.2% vs residential; residential +2.3% per 250 m closer; commuter rail stations larger effect; other accessibility variables reduce reported station effect (abstract, 2007).","full text of 2004 Tinbergen working-paper version (counts); abstract of 2007 article","high (DOI); counts from WP version"16"mohammad2013rail","Mohammad, S. I.; Graham, D. J.; Melo, P. C.; Anderson, R. J.","2013","A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Rail Projects on Land and Property Values","Transportation Research Part A 50:158-170","10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.013","rail projects; land and property values","23","102","","","% change in land/property value","meta-regression; publication bias tests","Significant variation by land use, rail type, system maturity, distance, location, road access, method, land vs property; purchase price and rent effects similar; no change over time; publication bias toward significant estimates (abstract).","abstract (IDEAS)","high"17"zhang2020brt","Zhang, M.; Yen, B. T. H.","2020","The Impact of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Land and Property Values: A Meta-Analysis","Land Use Policy 96:104684","10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104684","bus rapid transit; land value uplift","23","","","","% land value uplift","random-effects meta-regression","Maturity, property vs land, type of value (asking/assessed/sales), distance, method and location significantly affect estimated uplift; comparison with rail meta-analysis (abstract).","abstract (Semantic Scholar)","high"18"higgins2016transit","Higgins, C. D.; Kanaroglou, P. S.","2016","Forty Years of Modelling Rapid Transit's Land Value Uplift in North America: Moving Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg","Transport Reviews 36(5):610-634","10.1080/01441647.2016.1174748","rapid transit land value uplift","60","130+ analyses","North America","c. 1976-2016","","critical narrative review","Significant heterogeneity across >130 analyses in 60 studies; proximity as proxy leads to omitted variables; recommends relative accessibility and TOD measures (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"19"nelson2004airport","Nelson, J. P.","2004","Meta-Analysis of Airport Noise and Hedonic Property Values: Problems and Prospects","Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 38(1):1-27","10.3828/jtep.2004.38.1.1","airport noise","20","33 (23 airports)","Canada and United States","","noise depreciation index: % price per dB","meta-regression","Country and model specification affect the noise discount; year, sample size, mean value, aggregation, accessibility little effect (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"20"nelson2008noise","Nelson, J. P.","2008","Hedonic Property Value Studies of Transportation Noise: Aircraft and Road Traffic","Ch. 4 in Baranzini et al. (eds), Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets, Springer, pp. 57-82","10.1007/978-0-387-76815-1_4","aircraft and road traffic noise","","","","","noise depreciation index","review of hedonic noise studies","Chapter reviewing hedonic valuation of aircraft and road traffic noise (chapter preview; no abstract available).","chapter preview (Springer); counts not accessible","high (DOI) / counts blank"21"wadud2013airports","Wadud, Z.","2013","Using Meta-Regression to Determine Noise Depreciation Indices for Asian Airports","Asian Geographer 30(2):127-141","10.1080/10225706.2013.778580","airport noise; benefit transfer to Asia","","","","","noise depreciation index","meta-regression","Higher wealth (property prices, income) raises the NDI; income dependence used to transfer NDI to Asian airports (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"22"gluszak2017airport","Gluszak, M.; Konowalczuk, J.; Forys, I.","2017","Airport Noise, Land Use Controls and Real Estate Values: Critical Review and Meta-Analysis","24th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference (ERES 2017)","10.15396/eres2017_244","airport noise incl. non-North-American airports and land-use controls","","","Europe and North America","","","meta-analysis (conference paper)","Extends Nelson (2004) beyond US/Canada; argues land-use controls around airports should be modelled (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex); conference paper","medium (conference; counts not in abstract)"23"mcconnell2005openspace","McConnell, V.; Walls, M. A.","2005","The Value of Open Space: Evidence from Studies of Nonmarket Benefits","Resources for the Future report (no DOI)","","open space (hedonic and stated preference)","60+","","mostly US","","","narrative review","More than 60 articles reviewed; most open-space types valued positively but estimates highly site-specific (RFF page).","RFF publication page (no DOI; not in Crossref)","medium (no DOI)"24"brander2011openspace","Brander, L. M.; Koetse, M. J.","2011","The Value of Urban Open Space: Meta-Analyses of Contingent Valuation and Hedonic Pricing Results","Journal of Environmental Management 92(10):2763-2773","10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019","urban open space (CV and HP)","","","","","% change in house price for a 10 m decrease in distance to open space (HP)","multilevel meta-regression","Value rises with population density, not with income; parks valued more than other open space; method matters; regional differences limit transfer (abstract).","abstract (PubMed)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"25"waltert2010landscape","Waltert, F.; Schlaepfer, F.","2010","Landscape Amenities and Local Development: A Review of Migration, Regional Economic and Hedonic Pricing Studies","Ecological Economics 70(2):141-152","10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.031","landscape amenities (migration, regional, hedonic)","71","","","","sign/significance","systematic vote-count review","71 peer-reviewed studies; nature reserves and land-cover diversity mostly positive on house prices, open space/forest often, agricultural land rarely; larger-scale and urban studies more often significant (abstract).","abstract (EconPapers)","high"26"perino2013greenspace","Perino, G.; Andrews, B.; Kontoleon, A.; Bateman, I.","2014","The Value of Urban Green Space in Britain: A Methodological Framework for Spatially Referenced Benefit Transfer","Environmental and Resource Economics 57(2):251-272","10.1007/s10640-013-9665-8","urban greenspace, UK","","","United Kingdom","","marginal value functions","meta-analysis + GIS benefit transfer","Meta-analysis of UK urban greenspace valuations yields spatially sensitive marginal value functions applied to five British cities and NEA scenarios 2010-2060 (abstract).","abstract (Springer page)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"27"siriwardena2016trees","Siriwardena, S. D.; Boyle, K. J.; Holmes, T. P.; Wiseman, P. E.","2016","The Implicit Value of Tree Cover in the U.S.: A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Studies","Ecological Economics 128:68-76","10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.016","tree canopy cover","","","United States","","implicit price of tree cover","meta-analysis merged with spatial data","Implicit price maximised at about 30% property-level and 38% county-level tree cover; current average 14% implies under-investment (abstract).","abstract (Semantic Scholar)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"28"siriwardena2025trees","Siriwardena, S. D.; Boyle, K. J.; Holmes, T. P.","2025","Capitalization of Urban Tree Cover: An Internal Meta-Analysis","Ecological Economics 238:108709","10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108709","urban tree cover (internal meta-analysis)","","","United States","","","internal meta-analysis","Abstract not retrievable through accessible channels at verification time; title and metadata only.","metadata only","medium (DOI verified; no abstract)"29"crompton2019greenways","Crompton, J. L.; Nicholls, S.","2019","The Impact of Greenways and Trails on Proximate Property Values: An Updated Review","Journal of Park and Recreation Administration","10.18666/jpra-2019-9906","greenways and trails","20 hedonic analyses (+16 opinion surveys)","","United States","1978-2006 surveys; post-2000 hedonic","% premium","narrative review","Twenty hedonic analyses show homes near trails typically 3-5% higher; mega-trails much higher premiums (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"30"nicholls2018waterquality","Nicholls, S.; Crompton, J.","2018","A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence of the Impact of Surface Water Quality on Property Values","Sustainability 10(2):500","10.3390/su10020500","surface water quality","43 (48 publications)","","","","sign/significance","narrative review","Expected significant positive water-quality effect found in all but two of 43 studies (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"31"guignet2021water","Guignet, D.; Heberling, M. T.; Papenfus, M.; Griot, O.","2022","Property Values, Water Quality, and Benefit Transfer: A Nationwide Meta-analysis","Land Economics 98(2):191-218","10.3368/le.98.2.050120-0062r1","water quality (clarity) and housing values","36","656","United States","","elasticity of price w.r.t. water clarity (by distance band)","meta-regression with within-market dependence, precision weights, publication bias, methodological controls; public meta-dataset","Systematic heterogeneity found but out-of-sample transfer errors large (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"32"heberling2024water","Heberling, M. T.; Guignet, D.; Papenfus, M.","2024","Hedonic Property Values and Water Quality: A Meta-Analysis of Commodity, Market, and Methodological Choices","Journal of Environmental Management 352:119829","10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119829","surface water quality","29","290","","1985-2017","sign and significance of elasticities","probit meta-regression","Methodological choices (spatial dependence, non in-situ water quality measures) critically affect probability of significant expected-sign result (abstract).","abstract (PubMed)","high"33"jayalath2025water","Jayalath, T. A.; Lloyd-Smith, P.","2025","Water Quality and Property Values: A Meta-Analysis and Canadian National Benefit Assessment","Canadian Water Resources Journal 51(1):1-22","10.1080/07011784.2025.2543860","water quality (Secchi depth); Canada benefit assessment","29","600+","","","price elasticity w.r.t. water quality","meta-regression + spatial benefit transfer","10% water-quality improvement -> +1.60% price within 500 m, +0.08% at 500-1000 m; CAD 8.2 billion national benefits (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"34"daniel2009flood","Daniel, V. E.; Florax, R. J. G. M.; Rietveld, P.","2009","Flooding Risk and Housing Values: An Economic Assessment of Environmental Hazard","Ecological Economics 69(2):355-365","10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.018","flood risk","","","predominantly United States","","% price difference per 0.01 annual flood probability","meta-analysis using implicit prices and standard errors; meta-regression","A 0.01 increase in annual flood probability associated with -0.6% price; ex ante vs ex post effects small; MWTP rising over time; amenity/risk confounding biases estimates (abstract).","abstract (IDEAS)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"35"beltran2018flood","Beltran, A.; Maddison, D.; Elliott, R. J. R.","2018","Is Flood Risk Capitalised Into Property Values?","Ecological Economics 146:668-685","10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.015","flood risk (inland and coastal)","37","364","","","% price discount for 100-year floodplain","meta-analysis and meta-regression; publication bias tests","Estimates range -75.5% to +61.0%; inland 100-year floodplain discount -4.6%; coastal premium attributed to omitted amenities; publication bias in coastal literature; time since last flood important (abstract).","abstract (EconPapers)","high"36"smith1995airquality","Smith, V. K.; Huang, J.-C.","1995","Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta-Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Models","Journal of Political Economy 103(1):209-227","10.1086/261981","air quality (particulates)","","","United States","models developed 1967-1988","MWTP in 1982-84 dollars per unit TSP","OLS and minimum absolute deviation meta-regression","IQR of MWTP 0 to 98.52 USD; mean 109.90 vs median 22.40 (outliers); market conditions and implementation procedures matter (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex); counts of studies/estimates not in abstract","high (DOI) / counts blank"37"simons2006contamination","Simons, R. A.; Saginor, J. D.","2006","A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Environmental Contamination and Positive Amenities on Residential Real Estate Values","Journal of Real Estate Research 28(1):71-104","10.1080/10835547.2006.12091168","environmental contamination and positive amenities","75","about 290","United States","","% loss in property value","OLS meta-regression","Contamination type, amenities, region, distance, information and research method significant (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"38"braden2011waste","Braden, J. B.; Feng, X.; Won, D.","2011","Waste Sites and Property Values: A Meta-Analysis","Environmental and Resource Economics 50(2):175-201","10.1007/s10640-011-9467-9","waste sites (hazardous, non-hazardous, nuclear)","46","129","North America","1971-2008","property value impact","meta-regression, robust across estimators","All waste-site classes reduce prices; hazardous (esp. aquatic) largest; NPL sites smaller than non-NPL; regional differences; larger impact areas and aggregated data give smaller estimates (abstract).","abstract (Springer page)","high"39"jackson2010powerlines","Jackson, T. O.; Pitts, J.","2010","The Effects of Electric Transmission Lines on Property Values: A Literature Review","Journal of Real Estate Literature 18(2):239-259","10.1080/10835547.2010.12090275","electric transmission lines","","","","","","narrative review","Most regression-based sales analyses find little or no price effect; effects dissipate with time and distance (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"40"parsons2022wind","Parsons, G.; Heintzelman, M. D.","2022","The Effect of Wind Power Projects on Property Values: A Decade (2011-2021) of Hedonic Price Analysis","International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 16(1):93-170","10.1561/101.00000132","wind power projects","18 core studies","","Europe (10), North America (8)","2011-2021","% impact by distance band","structured review with averaged effects","13 of 18 find net-negative effects; average -5.0%, -4.0%, -2.6%, -1.2% for <1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 km; all European studies negative, 3 of 8 North American (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"41"cespedeslopez2019epc","Cespedes-Lopez, M.-F.; Mora-Garcia, R.-T.; Perez-Sanchez, V. R.; Perez-Sanchez, J.-C.","2019","Meta-Analysis of Price Premiums in Housing with Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) in the European Union","Sustainability 11(22):6303","10.3390/su11226303","energy performance certificates","66 documents","173 sales registers","global; North America, Asia, Europe","","% price premium","systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression","Overall EPC premium 4.20%; North America 5.36%, Asia 4.81%, Europe 2.32%; letter-level results in Europe inconclusive (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"42"nguyenhoang2011school","Nguyen-Hoang, P.; Yinger, J.","2011","The Capitalization of School Quality into House Values: A Review","Journal of Housing Economics 20(1):30-48","10.1016/j.jhe.2011.02.001","school quality capitalization","","","","studies since 1999","% house value per 1 SD test scores","narrative review","Most studies find significant capitalization; fixed-effects studies find <4% per one-SD increase in test scores (abstract).","abstract (Semantic Scholar)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"43"turnbull2019school","Turnbull, G. K.; Zheng, M.","2021","A Meta-Analysis of School Quality Capitalization in U.S. House Prices","Real Estate Economics 49(4):1120-1171","10.1111/1540-6229.12300","school quality capitalization","","","United States","","capitalization estimates","meta-analysis / meta-regression","Measurement of school quality matters; boundary and neighbourhood FE matter; more quality variables reduce each one's significance; South weaker; econometric method not driving results (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"44"macchiaroli2025crime","Macchiaroli, M.; Dolores, L.","2025","The Influence of Urban Lack of Safety and Preventive Measures on Property Values: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","Valori e Valutazioni 38:139-176","10.48264/vvsiev-20253810","crime, crime prevention, CPTED","50","","","","% devaluation","systematic literature review and meta-analysis","Urban crime without prevention lowers property values by up to 12-19% depending on context; prevention and CPTED evidence limited (abstract).","abstract (OpenAlex)","high"45"wang2019massappraisal","Wang, D.; Li, V. J.","2019","Mass Appraisal Models of Real Estate in the 21st Century: A Systematic Literature Review","Sustainability 11(24):7006","10.3390/su11247006","mass appraisal models (AI, GIS, mixed)","104","","","2000-2018","none (classification)","systematic literature review","3I trend: AI-based, GIS-based and mixed models; 'mass appraisal 2.0' (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"46"valier2020avm","Valier, A.","2020","Who Performs Better? AVMs vs Hedonic Models","Journal of Property Investment & Finance 38(3):213-225","10.1108/jpif-12-2019-0157","AVM machine learning vs regression accuracy","","","","","predictive accuracy scores","systematic review of head-to-head tests on same data","ML models more accurate than regression; black-box and weak inference noted (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"47"jaafar2021slr","Ja'afar, N. S.; Mohamad, J.; Ismail, S.","2021","Machine Learning for Property Price Prediction and Price Valuation: A Systematic Literature Review","Planning Malaysia 19","10.21837/pm.v19i17.1018","ML for property price prediction and valuation","","","","","predictive performance","systematic literature review","Increasing use of ML; random forest most successful (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"48"geerts2023survey","Geerts, M.; vanden Broucke, S.; De Weerdt, J.","2023","A Survey of Methods and Input Data Types for House Price Prediction","ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 12(5):200","10.3390/ijgi12050200","house price prediction methods and data types","93","","","1992-2021","none (novelty scoring)","systematic literature review with cluster analysis","Conventional methods and data still predominant; slow adoption of advanced techniques and unstructured/spatial data (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high"49"tekouabou2023survey","Tekouabou, S. C. K.; Gherghina, S. C.; Kameni, E. D.; Filali, Y.; Idrissi Gartoumi, K.","2024","AI-Based on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Real Estate Prediction: A Systematic Survey","Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 31(2):1079-1095","10.1007/s11831-023-10010-5","ML for urban real estate prediction","70","","USA, China, India, Japan, Hong Kong dominant","","predictive performance","systematic survey (Scopus)","70 papers; small datasets and simple ML dominate; explainability challenge (abstract).","abstract (Springer page)","high"50"naz2024slr","Naz, S.; Jamil, M.; Ijaz, S.","2024","Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Hybrid Approaches in Real Estate Price Prediction: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review","Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences A 61(2):129-144","10.53560/PPASA(61-2)863","ML, DL and hybrid price prediction","","","","","predictive accuracy","systematic literature review","Classical ML accurate on small data; DL for large complex data; hybrids promising (abstract).","abstract (Crossref)","high (DOI) / counts not in abstract"51"morenoforonda2025review","Moreno-Foronda, I.; Sanchez-Martinez, M.-T.; Pareja-Eastaway, M.","2025","Comparative Analysis of Advanced Models for Predicting Housing Prices: A Review","Urban Science 9(2):32","10.3390/urbansci9020032","ML vs hedonic regression comparisons","23","","Asia 43% (10 studies); others","","predictive accuracy and explanatory power","systematic review (PRISMA)","ML more precise; hedonic regression more robust and interpretable for attribute effects (location, internal features, distance to centre) (full text).","full text (Granada repository copy)","high"52