1\begin{table}[t]2\centering\small3\begin{threeparttable}4\caption{Empirical log-log slopes of the RMS scaled gap to $\widehat\theta_N$ against $m$ at fixed $N$ (largest $N$ of each design), with the slopes predicted by the leading bias term.}\label{tab:mc_rates}5\begin{tabular}{@{}llrrrrrrrrr@{}}6\toprule7Design & $p$ & $N$ & r1\_q0 & r1\_q1 & r1\_q2 & r2\_q0 & r2\_q1 & r3\_q0 & r3\_q1 & cs\_q1 \\8predicted & & & -1 & -2 & -4 & -2 & -4 & -3 & -6 & -4 \\9\midrule10exp & 1 & 262,144 & -1.02 & -2.04 & -4.10 & -1.18 & -2.24 & -0.98 & -1.87 & -1.04 \\11pois & 8 & 262,144 & -1.01 & -2.01 & -3.95 & -0.77 & -1.46 & -0.56 & -1.12 & -1.03 \\12\bottomrule13\end{tabular}14\begin{tablenotes}\footnotesize15\item Slopes are least-squares fits over the available $m$ grid; they approach the predicted exponent only where the bias term dominates the random remainder and the sample is in the asymptotic regime. The predicted slope for the Cox--Snell + 1 Newton estimator assumes an exact first-order bias formula ($-4$). Source: \texttt{results/processed/summary.csv}.16\end{tablenotes}17\end{threeparttable}18\end{table}19