1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"Exactly one reference, R3, is unverifiable; R1, R2, R4 and R5 pass all three checks.","results_keys":["unverifiable_references","n_verified","reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"R1 passes, but the source prints a different SE for the same estimate in Appendix Table A19 (0.218 vs 0.210)."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"R3's entry has a title and year (2024) that do not match the document (a different title; submitted 2026).","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"The arXiv number matches."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"R3's cited finding misstates the timing: the source reports about 0.5% in the event year, rising gradually to 3.4-3.7% by years four and five, not a jump in the entry year.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"The 3.4-3.7% magnitude does appear in the source, but at later horizons."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"R1's ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210) is significant at 5%, and the 35% figure follows from exp(-0.431)-1.","results_keys":["reference_checks","data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table A19 shows SE 0.218 for the same estimate; significance holds under either SE."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"R4's elasticities (-0.388, SE 0.132; -0.732, SE 0.091) and R5's estimate (-0.0962, SE 0.0129; 36.85%) are printed verbatim in the sources.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"For R4, the year 2025 matches v1, while the extract reproduces v3 (2026)."}7]8