1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"The DCR overall 5 km ATT of -0.431 log points corresponds to a -35.01% change in the drug-related hospitalisation rate.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact under the log-point convention; matches printed -35.0%."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"The RESEA reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp is a 1.96% increase relative to the 75.0% control-group mean.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Control mean is the raw aggregate, not block-adjusted."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"The minimum-wage employment elasticity of -0.388 applied to the printed 0.047 MW change implies a -1.8236% employment change.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Linear approximation; table note describes the increase as about 4%."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"The absolute change in fatal drug-related hospitalisations per 100,000 (E4) cannot be computed from the extract because no baseline level of that rate is printed.","results_keys":["harmonised","n_not_harmonisable"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Value left null; no external value substituted."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"The Benin LPM coefficient -0.0962 equals -9.62 percentage points.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact rescaling."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"Four of five items were harmonised and one was declared not harmonisable, so the task is complete.","results_keys":["n_harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","n_analysed","feasibility"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Completeness per TASK.md definition."},8 {"id":"C7","text":"The sources contain internal inconsistencies (DCR abstract vs Table 7 fatal effect; SE and control-count discrepancies; MW note 4% vs 0.047) that do not change the harmonised values.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Recorded, not resolved; the 4% alternative for E3 would give -1.55%."}9]10