1run_id,kind,id,passed_or_type,description2RD0001,criterion,beta_point,1,OLS slope equals reference to 1e-43RD0001,criterion,se_cluster,1,Cluster-robust SE within 8% of CR1 reference (covers CR1/CR0/CR3 conventions and t vs normal)4RD0001,criterion,ci,1,95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1) or normal critical values both accepted)5RD0001,criterion,counts,1,n_analysed and n_clusters exact6RD0001,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE (the design has strong within-cluster correlation)7RD0003,criterion,beta_point,1,OLS slope equals reference to 1e-48RD0003,criterion,se_cluster,1,Cluster-robust SE within 8% of CR1 reference (covers CR1/CR0/CR3 conventions and t vs normal)9RD0003,criterion,ci,1,95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1) or normal critical values both accepted)10RD0003,criterion,counts,1,n_analysed and n_clusters exact11RD0003,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE (the design has strong within-cluster correlation)12RD0004,criterion,beta_point,1,OLS slope equals reference to 1e-413RD0004,criterion,se_cluster,1,Cluster-robust SE within 8% of CR1 reference (covers CR1/CR0/CR3 conventions and t vs normal)14RD0004,criterion,ci,1,95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1) or normal critical values both accepted)15RD0004,criterion,counts,1,n_analysed and n_clusters exact16RD0004,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE (the design has strong within-cluster correlation)17RD0002,criterion,beta_point,1,OLS slope equals reference to 1e-418RD0002,criterion,se_cluster,1,Cluster-robust SE within 8% of CR1 reference (covers CR1/CR0/CR3 conventions and t vs normal)19RD0002,criterion,ci,1,95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1) or normal critical values both accepted)20RD0002,criterion,counts,1,n_analysed and n_clusters exact21RD0002,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE (the design has strong within-cluster correlation)22RP0001,criterion,unemployment_rate,1,Unemployment rate September 2026 = 6.5 (as printed in 'Highlights' and 'Unemployment rate increases to 6.5%')23RP0001,criterion,employment_change,1,Monthly employment change = -68000 persons (as printed)24RP0001,criterion,locators_name_sections,1,Locators name a section of the release in which the figure appears25RP0001,criterion,assertion_verdict,1,Assertion is not supported: the release states the core-aged men's unemployment rate FELL 0.2 points to 5.8% (women part is correct)26RP0001,criterion,assertion_locator,1,Assertion locator names the section 'Unemployment rate up for core-aged women'27RP0002,criterion,unemployment_rate,1,Unemployment rate September 2026 = 6.5 (as printed in 'Highlights' and 'Unemployment rate increases to 6.5%')28RP0002,criterion,employment_change,1,Monthly employment change = -68000 persons (as printed)29RP0002,criterion,locators_name_sections,1,Locators name a section of the release in which the figure appears30RP0002,criterion,assertion_verdict,1,Assertion is not supported: the release states the core-aged men's unemployment rate FELL 0.2 points to 5.8% (women part is correct)31RP0002,criterion,assertion_locator,1,Assertion locator names the section 'Unemployment rate up for core-aged women'32RP0003,criterion,unemployment_rate,1,Unemployment rate September 2026 = 6.5 (as printed in 'Highlights' and 'Unemployment rate increases to 6.5%')33RP0003,criterion,employment_change,1,Monthly employment change = -68000 persons (as printed)34RP0003,criterion,locators_name_sections,1,Locators name a section of the release in which the figure appears35RP0003,criterion,assertion_verdict,1,Assertion is not supported: the release states the core-aged men's unemployment rate FELL 0.2 points to 5.8% (women part is correct)36RP0003,criterion,assertion_locator,1,Assertion locator names the section 'Unemployment rate up for core-aged women'37RP0004,criterion,unemployment_rate,1,Unemployment rate September 2026 = 6.5 (as printed in 'Highlights' and 'Unemployment rate increases to 6.5%')38RP0004,criterion,employment_change,1,Monthly employment change = -68000 persons (as printed)39RP0004,criterion,locators_name_sections,1,Locators name a section of the release in which the figure appears40RP0004,criterion,assertion_verdict,1,Assertion is not supported: the release states the core-aged men's unemployment rate FELL 0.2 points to 5.8% (women part is correct)41RP0004,criterion,assertion_locator,1,Assertion locator names the section 'Unemployment rate up for core-aged women'42RP0005,criterion,counts,1,"n_unique_firms, n_missing_revenue and n_analysed exact"43RP0005,criterion,mean_revenue,1,"mean revenue (millions USD) after de-duplication and unit harmonisation, within 0.05"44RP0005,criterion,median_revenue,1,"median revenue (millions USD) after cleaning, within 0.05"45RP0005,criterion,mean_employees,1,"mean employees over unique firms, within 0.5"46RP0005,criterion,analytic_rows,1,"out/analytic.csv has exactly n_analysed rows, one per firm, with a revenue column"47RP0005,criterion,ledger,1,"out/exclusions.csv exists, has the required columns, is internally consistent and its total removals equal n_input_rows - n_analysed"48RP0005,criterion,issues_detected,1,data_issues lists both the duplicated rows and the unit mix49RP0006,criterion,counts,1,"n_unique_firms, n_missing_revenue and n_analysed exact"50RP0006,criterion,mean_revenue,1,"mean revenue (millions USD) after de-duplication and unit harmonisation, within 0.05"51RP0006,criterion,median_revenue,1,"median revenue (millions USD) after cleaning, within 0.05"52RP0006,criterion,mean_employees,1,"mean employees over unique firms, within 0.5"53RP0006,criterion,analytic_rows,1,"out/analytic.csv has exactly n_analysed rows, one per firm, with a revenue column"54RP0006,criterion,ledger,1,"out/exclusions.csv exists, has the required columns, is internally consistent and its total removals equal n_input_rows - n_analysed"55RP0006,criterion,issues_detected,1,data_issues lists both the duplicated rows and the unit mix56RP0007,criterion,counts,1,"n_unique_firms, n_missing_revenue and n_analysed exact"57RP0007,criterion,mean_revenue,1,"mean revenue (millions USD) after de-duplication and unit harmonisation, within 0.05"58RP0007,criterion,median_revenue,1,"median revenue (millions USD) after cleaning, within 0.05"59RP0007,criterion,mean_employees,1,"mean employees over unique firms, within 0.5"60RP0007,criterion,analytic_rows,1,"out/analytic.csv has exactly n_analysed rows, one per firm, with a revenue column"61RP0007,criterion,ledger,1,"out/exclusions.csv exists, has the required columns, is internally consistent and its total removals equal n_input_rows - n_analysed"62RP0007,criterion,issues_detected,1,data_issues lists both the duplicated rows and the unit mix63RP0008,criterion,counts,1,"n_unique_firms, n_missing_revenue and n_analysed exact"64RP0008,criterion,mean_revenue,1,"mean revenue (millions USD) after de-duplication and unit harmonisation, within 0.05"65RP0008,criterion,median_revenue,1,"median revenue (millions USD) after cleaning, within 0.05"66RP0008,criterion,mean_employees,1,"mean employees over unique firms, within 0.5"67RP0008,criterion,analytic_rows,1,"out/analytic.csv has exactly n_analysed rows, one per firm, with a revenue column"68RP0008,criterion,ledger,1,"out/exclusions.csv exists, has the required columns, is internally consistent and its total removals equal n_input_rows - n_analysed"69RP0008,criterion,issues_detected,1,data_issues lists both the duplicated rows and the unit mix70RP0009,criterion,beta_fe,1,Two-way within (firm + year FE) slope equals reference to 1e-471RP0009,criterion,se_cluster,1,Firm-clustered SE within 10% of CR1/LSDV-K reference (covers CR0/CR1/CR3 and K-counting conventions)72RP0009,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1), t(N-K) or normal critical values all accepted)"73RP0009,criterion,counts,1,"n_firms, n_years, n_analysed exact"74RP0009,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE by at least 20% (within-firm serial correlation in x and u)75RP0009,criterion,pooled_differs,1,Reported pooled slope must differ from reported FE slope by more than 0.05 (the executor must actually have removed the effects)76RP0010,criterion,beta_fe,1,Two-way within (firm + year FE) slope equals reference to 1e-477RP0010,criterion,se_cluster,1,Firm-clustered SE within 10% of CR1/LSDV-K reference (covers CR0/CR1/CR3 and K-counting conventions)78RP0010,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1), t(N-K) or normal critical values all accepted)"79RP0010,criterion,counts,1,"n_firms, n_years, n_analysed exact"80RP0010,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE by at least 20% (within-firm serial correlation in x and u)81RP0010,criterion,pooled_differs,1,Reported pooled slope must differ from reported FE slope by more than 0.05 (the executor must actually have removed the effects)82RP0011,criterion,beta_fe,1,Two-way within (firm + year FE) slope equals reference to 1e-483RP0011,criterion,se_cluster,1,Firm-clustered SE within 10% of CR1/LSDV-K reference (covers CR0/CR1/CR3 and K-counting conventions)84RP0011,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1), t(N-K) or normal critical values all accepted)"85RP0011,criterion,counts,1,"n_firms, n_years, n_analysed exact"86RP0011,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE by at least 20% (within-firm serial correlation in x and u)87RP0011,criterion,pooled_differs,1,Reported pooled slope must differ from reported FE slope by more than 0.05 (the executor must actually have removed the effects)88RP0012,criterion,beta_fe,1,Two-way within (firm + year FE) slope equals reference to 1e-489RP0012,criterion,se_cluster,1,Firm-clustered SE within 10% of CR1/LSDV-K reference (covers CR0/CR1/CR3 and K-counting conventions)90RP0012,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t(G-1), t(N-K) or normal critical values all accepted)"91RP0012,criterion,counts,1,"n_firms, n_years, n_analysed exact"92RP0012,criterion,se_ordering,1,Reported cluster SE must exceed reported conventional SE by at least 20% (within-firm serial correlation in x and u)93RP0012,criterion,pooled_differs,1,Reported pooled slope must differ from reported FE slope by more than 0.05 (the executor must actually have removed the effects)94RP0013,criterion,year_and_counts,1,"analysis_year, n_analysed and n_excluded_missing exact (countries/economies only, aggregates excluded)"95RP0013,criterion,slope,1,OLS slope of life expectancy on log GDP per capita within 0.02 of reference96RP0013,criterion,robust_se,1,"heteroskedasticity-robust SE within 5% of HC1 reference (HC0–HC3 accepted, conventional OLS SE rejected)"97RP0013,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t or normal critical values, any HC variant)"98RP0013,criterion,correlation_baseline,1,Pearson correlation and R² within 0.00599RP0013,criterion,fit_metrics,1,baseline RMSE (mean-only) and model RMSE within 1–1.5%100RP0013,criterion,conclusion,1,conclusion code = positive_effect101RP0013,criterion,figure,1,out/figure1.png exists and is a valid PNG102RP0013,criterion,table,1,out/table1.csv parses with >= 2 data rows103RP0014,criterion,year_and_counts,1,"analysis_year, n_analysed and n_excluded_missing exact (countries/economies only, aggregates excluded)"104RP0014,criterion,slope,1,OLS slope of life expectancy on log GDP per capita within 0.02 of reference105RP0014,criterion,robust_se,1,"heteroskedasticity-robust SE within 5% of HC1 reference (HC0–HC3 accepted, conventional OLS SE rejected)"106RP0014,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t or normal critical values, any HC variant)"107RP0014,criterion,correlation_baseline,1,Pearson correlation and R² within 0.005108RP0014,criterion,fit_metrics,1,baseline RMSE (mean-only) and model RMSE within 1–1.5%109RP0014,criterion,conclusion,1,conclusion code = positive_effect110RP0014,criterion,figure,1,out/figure1.png exists and is a valid PNG111RP0014,criterion,table,1,out/table1.csv parses with >= 2 data rows112RP0015,criterion,year_and_counts,1,"analysis_year, n_analysed and n_excluded_missing exact (countries/economies only, aggregates excluded)"113RP0015,criterion,slope,1,OLS slope of life expectancy on log GDP per capita within 0.02 of reference114RP0015,criterion,robust_se,1,"heteroskedasticity-robust SE within 5% of HC1 reference (HC0–HC3 accepted, conventional OLS SE rejected)"115RP0015,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t or normal critical values, any HC variant)"116RP0015,criterion,correlation_baseline,1,Pearson correlation and R² within 0.005117RP0015,criterion,fit_metrics,1,baseline RMSE (mean-only) and model RMSE within 1–1.5%118RP0015,criterion,conclusion,1,conclusion code = positive_effect119RP0015,criterion,figure,1,out/figure1.png exists and is a valid PNG120RP0015,criterion,table,1,out/table1.csv parses with >= 2 data rows121RP0016,criterion,year_and_counts,1,"analysis_year, n_analysed and n_excluded_missing exact (countries/economies only, aggregates excluded)"122RP0016,criterion,slope,1,OLS slope of life expectancy on log GDP per capita within 0.02 of reference123RP0016,criterion,robust_se,1,"heteroskedasticity-robust SE within 5% of HC1 reference (HC0–HC3 accepted, conventional OLS SE rejected)"124RP0016,criterion,ci,1,"95% CI bounds within 0.03 of reference (t or normal critical values, any HC variant)"125RP0016,criterion,correlation_baseline,1,Pearson correlation and R² within 0.005126RP0016,criterion,fit_metrics,1,baseline RMSE (mean-only) and model RMSE within 1–1.5%127RP0016,criterion,conclusion,1,conclusion code = positive_effect128RP0016,criterion,figure,1,out/figure1.png exists and is a valid PNG129RP0016,criterion,table,1,out/table1.csv parses with >= 2 data rows130RP0017,criterion,demands,1,Marshallian demands within 1e-3 of the closed form (accepts a numerical optimiser)131RP0017,criterion,indirect_utility,1,Indirect utility within 1e-4 of the closed form132RP0017,criterion,budget_identity,1,Reported budget identity residual p1*x1 + p2*x2 - m within 1e-6 of zero133RP0017,criterion,mrs_equals_price_ratio,1,MRS at the optimum within 1e-3 of p1/p2 and price_ratio exact134RP0017,criterion,numerical_validation,1,Numerically maximised utility on the budget line within 1e-4 of the analytical indirect utility135RP0017,criterion,assumptions_stated,1,report.md states the assumptions/scope of the closed form (regex: 'assum' and one of interior|positive|concav|monoton|Cobb|log)136RP0018,criterion,demands,1,Marshallian demands within 1e-3 of the closed form (accepts a numerical optimiser)137RP0018,criterion,indirect_utility,1,Indirect utility within 1e-4 of the closed form138RP0018,criterion,budget_identity,1,Reported budget identity residual p1*x1 + p2*x2 - m within 1e-6 of zero139RP0018,criterion,mrs_equals_price_ratio,1,MRS at the optimum within 1e-3 of p1/p2 and price_ratio exact140RP0018,criterion,numerical_validation,1,Numerically maximised utility on the budget line within 1e-4 of the analytical indirect utility141RP0018,criterion,assumptions_stated,1,report.md states the assumptions/scope of the closed form (regex: 'assum' and one of interior|positive|concav|monoton|Cobb|log)142RP0019,criterion,demands,1,Marshallian demands within 1e-3 of the closed form (accepts a numerical optimiser)143RP0019,criterion,indirect_utility,1,Indirect utility within 1e-4 of the closed form144RP0019,criterion,budget_identity,1,Reported budget identity residual p1*x1 + p2*x2 - m within 1e-6 of zero145RP0019,criterion,mrs_equals_price_ratio,1,MRS at the optimum within 1e-3 of p1/p2 and price_ratio exact146RP0019,criterion,numerical_validation,1,Numerically maximised utility on the budget line within 1e-4 of the analytical indirect utility147RP0019,criterion,assumptions_stated,1,report.md states the assumptions/scope of the closed form (regex: 'assum' and one of interior|positive|concav|monoton|Cobb|log)148RP0020,criterion,demands,1,Marshallian demands within 1e-3 of the closed form (accepts a numerical optimiser)149RP0020,criterion,indirect_utility,1,Indirect utility within 1e-4 of the closed form150RP0020,criterion,budget_identity,1,Reported budget identity residual p1*x1 + p2*x2 - m within 1e-6 of zero151RP0020,criterion,mrs_equals_price_ratio,1,MRS at the optimum within 1e-3 of p1/p2 and price_ratio exact152RP0020,criterion,numerical_validation,1,Numerically maximised utility on the budget line within 1e-4 of the analytical indirect utility153RP0020,criterion,assumptions_stated,1,report.md states the assumptions/scope of the closed form (regex: 'assum' and one of interior|positive|concav|monoton|Cobb|log)154