1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"Exactly one reference, R3, is unverifiable; R1, R2, R4 and R5 pass all three checks.","results_keys":["unverifiable_references","n_verified"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Based only on the provided extracts."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"R3's entry title and year (2024) do not match the document, whose v1 and v2 were both submitted in 2026 under a different title.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"The arXiv number in the entry does match the extract."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"R3's attributed finding (a 3.4-3.7% jump in the entry year with no later appreciation) contradicts the source, which reports about 0.5% in the event year rising to 3.4-3.7% by years four and five.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Coefficients are log points, which the source interprets as percentages."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"R1's cited ATT -0.431, SE 0.210 and 35% reduction match Table 6 (5 km), and the estimate is significant at 5%.","results_keys":["reference_checks","data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; significance holds under both SEs."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"R2, R4 and R5's cited numbers match the printed table cells exactly (RESEA Table 2 ATE column; Kanayama Table 2; Tossou Table 3 column (4)).","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"In Kanayama Table 2, the own-wage elasticity's SE duplicates the affected-employment SE (0.091), which may be a source error."}7]8