1{2 "task_id": "F5-conf-01",3 "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,4 "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,5 "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,6 "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,7 "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,8 "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,9 "walras_law_residual": 0.0,10 "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,11 "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,12 "price_ratio_numerical": 0.8749999999999998,13 "feasibility": "complete",14 "feasibility_reason": null,15 "data_issues": [16 {17 "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1 = 14 but individual endowments in endowments.csv sum to 12 (A 8 + B 4).",18 "handling": "Used the sum of individual endowments (12) as the aggregate, because in an exchange economy aggregate supply is by definition the sum of agents' endowments and endowments.csv is designated primary data; the summary-sheet value 14 is treated as a transcription error. Using 14 would put 2 units of good 1 that no agent owns into the market-clearing condition (inconsistent with Walras' law); a sensitivity check is reported in report.md."19 }20 ],21 "n_input_rows": {22 "endowments.csv": 2,23 "parameters.csv": 424 },25 "n_analysed": 2,26 "random_seed": null27}