1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"Exactly one reference, R3, is unverifiable; the other four pass all three checks.","results_keys":["unverifiable_references","n_verified","reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Element decomposition of each cited finding is a reading judgement."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"R3 fails title, year and finding checks: the entry's title and year (2024) differ from the extract (2026 v1/v2), and the extract shows a gradual rise from ~0.5% at entry to 3.4-3.7% by years 4-5, not an immediate jump.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Based on Section 3.2 text and Table 3 whose header was garbled and read via the editor's note."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"R1's cited ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210), -35% and 5% significance match Table 6, 5 km column.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate (source inconsistency); significance holds under both."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"R2, R4 and R5 cited magnitudes and uncertainty statements match the printed tables exactly.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"R4's own-wage elasticity SE may be a source-side copy error."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"A bibliographic-only baseline (title+year) flags the same single reference, R3.","results_keys":["baseline_unverifiable_bibliographic_only","baseline_n_verified_bibliographic_only"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},7 {"id":"C6","text":"Six input data issues were found and none changes a verdict.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}8]9