1{2 "task_id": "F5-conf-01",3 "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,4 "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,5 "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,6 "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,7 "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,8 "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,9 "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,10 "walras_law_residual": 0.0,11 "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,12 "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,13 "price_ratio_numerical": 0.8749999999999998,14 "abs_diff_closed_form_vs_numerical": 1.1102230246251565e-16,15 "baseline_price_ratio_numerical": 0.8749999999999998,16 "sensitivity_summary_sheet_E1": 14.0,17 "sensitivity_price_clearing_good1_with_sheet_E1": 0.6666666666666669,18 "sensitivity_excess_demand_good2_with_sheet_E1": -1.3333333333333321,19 "sensitivity_walras_residual_with_sheet_E1": -1.3333333333333346,20 "feasibility": "complete",21 "feasibility_reason": null,22 "data_issues": [23 {24 "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1 = 14.0 but sum of individual endowments in endowments.csv = 12.0.",25 "handling": "Used the sum of individual endowments (12.0) as the aggregate, since budgets are defined by individual endowments and endowments.csv is the primary data; using 14.0 would violate Walras' law. Summary-sheet value reported only as a sensitivity in report.md."26 }27 ],28 "n_input_rows": {29 "endowments.csv": 2,30 "parameters.csv": 431 },32 "n_analysed": 2,33 "random_seed": null34}