1{2 "task_id": "F5-conf-01",3 "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,4 "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,5 "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,6 "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,7 "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,8 "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,9 "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,10 "walras_law_residual": 0.0,11 "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,12 "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,13 "price_ratio_numerical": 0.875,14 "abs_diff_closed_form_vs_numerical": 1.1102230246251565e-16,15 "feasibility": "complete",16 "feasibility_reason": null,17 "data_issues": [18 {19 "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1 = 14 is inconsistent with the sum of individual endowments in endowments.csv (12).",20 "handling": "Used the sum of individual endowments (12) as the aggregate endowment, because endowments.csv is the primary data and in an exchange economy the aggregate endowment is by definition the sum of individual endowments (otherwise Walras' law plus budget balance would make market clearing impossible). The summary-sheet value was not used."21 }22 ],23 "n_input_rows": {24 "endowments.csv": 2,25 "parameters.csv": 426 },27 "n_analysed": 2,28 "random_seed": null,29 "sensitivity_sheet_aggregate": {30 "p_if_sheet_E1_imposed": 0.666666666666666,31 "z2_at_that_p_using_true_E2": -1.3333333333333375,32 "note": "Good-2 market does not clear: the sheet value is inconsistent with budget-balanced demands."33 }34}