1{2 "task_id": "F4-conf-04",3 "reference_checks": {4 "R1": {5 "title_matches": true,6 "year_matches": true,7 "finding_supported": true,8 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6, row ATT, column 5 km (with % change row; Section 6 text; abstract)",9 "note": "ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and -35.0% at 5 km are printed in Table 6, 5% significance is stated in the text, and the staggered DiD on Swiss hospital records is described in the abstract."10 },11 "R2": {12 "title_matches": true,13 "year_matches": true,14 "finding_supported": true,15 "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2, column 'Average treatment effect estimate', rows Wage, Reemployment, Weeks on UI (N from abstract)",16 "note": "Table 2's ATE column prints $1,153 (95% CI [166, 2,141]), 1.47 pp and -1.99 weeks, and the abstract gives the preregistered RCT with N = 23,549."17 },18 "R3": {19 "title_matches": false,20 "year_matches": false,21 "finding_supported": false,22 "locator": "arxiv-2603.03260v2 | Section 3.2 'Headline dynamic pattern' (stacked coefficients tau=0..5) and Table 3, row Clean-onset threshold-2, columns tau=4/tau=5",23 "note": "The extract reports a gradual rise from 0.005 (about 0.5%) at the event year to 0.037/0.034 (3.4-3.7%) only by years four and five and states prices do not jump immediately, contradicting a 3.4-3.7% jump in the entry year with no later appreciation; title and year (2024) also disagree with the record."24 },25 "R4": {26 "title_matches": true,27 "year_matches": true,28 "finding_supported": true,29 "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Appendix A.1, Table 2, rows 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' and 'Emp. elasticity w.r.t affected wage' (Japan spot market from abstract)",30 "note": "Table 2 prints -0.388 (0.132) and -0.732 (0.091), the text calls the latter the own-wage employment elasticity, and the abstract places the study in Japan's spot labor market."31 },32 "R5": {33 "title_matches": true,34 "year_matches": true,35 "finding_supported": true,36 "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3, row Treatment, column (4) (with % Change and Mean Dep. Var. rows; Section 4.1 text)",37 "note": "Table 3 column (4), identified as the preferred specification in Section 4.1, prints -0.0962 (0.0129) and a -0.3685 change relative to the mean 0.261, matching the 36.85% stated in the text."38 }39 },40 "unverifiable_references": [41 "R3"42 ],43 "n_verified": 4,44 "feasibility": "complete",45 "feasibility_reason": null,46 "data_issues": [47 {48 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the 5 km CS-DR ATT -0.431 has SE 0.210 in Table 6 but SE 0.218 in Table A19; Table 6 reports 608 never-treated control regions while the Table A19 note says 640.",49 "handling": "R1 cites Table 6 (SE 0.210), which is printed verbatim; finding judged supported, and with either SE |t| > 1.96 so the 5% significance claim is unaffected. Inconsistency reported, not resolved."50 },51 {52 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract says fatal outcomes fall by 35%, Section 6.1 says approximately 30%; exp(-0.354)-1 = -29.8% from Table 7.",53 "handling": "Not part of any cited finding; recorded only."54 },55 {56 "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: the SE of the own-wage elasticity (0.091) equals the SE of 'Affected employment' (0.091); the point estimate -0.732 = -0.268/0.366 is reproduced but the SE cannot be checked from the extract.",57 "handling": "R4 quotes the printed value (0.091); judged supported as stated in the source, possible source typo flagged. The table note's 'about 4%' MW increase vs the '% MW changes' row 0.047 is also noted."58 },59 {60 "issue": "arxiv-2603.03260v2: Table 3 header row is garbled in the HTML rendering (column order reconstructed by the extract editor).",61 "handling": "Used the editor's column order; the tau=4/tau=5 values 0.037/0.034 match the Section 3.2 text, so the reconstruction is corroborated."62 },63 {64 "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: abstract headline (0.0855, 18.79%, Table 2 not in extract, mean 0.455) differs from Table 3 (binary outcome, 0.0962, 36.85%, mean 0.261).",65 "handling": "Different outcome definitions per Section 4.1; R5 cites the Table 3 result, which is checked directly. Recorded only."66 },67 {68 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: Tables 2 and 3 were re-set by the extract editor (values stated verbatim).",69 "handling": "Values taken as printed; Table 3 column 1 duplicates Table 2's ATE column, providing a cross-check (identical values)."70 }71 ],72 "n_input_rows": {73 "README.md": 17,74 "reference_list.json": 5,75 "sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134,76 "sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,77 "sources/arxiv-2603.03260v2.txt": 107,78 "sources/arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,79 "sources/arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 9180 },81 "n_analysed": 5,82 "random_seed": null,83 "baseline_naive_number_match": {84 "R1": {85 "title_matches": true,86 "year_matches": true,87 "all_cited_numbers_found": true,88 "numbers_not_found": []89 },90 "R2": {91 "title_matches": true,92 "year_matches": true,93 "all_cited_numbers_found": true,94 "numbers_not_found": []95 },96 "R3": {97 "title_matches": false,98 "year_matches": false,99 "all_cited_numbers_found": true,100 "numbers_not_found": []101 },102 "R4": {103 "title_matches": true,104 "year_matches": true,105 "all_cited_numbers_found": true,106 "numbers_not_found": []107 },108 "R5": {109 "title_matches": true,110 "year_matches": true,111 "all_cited_numbers_found": true,112 "numbers_not_found": []113 }114 },115 "n_evidence_strings_verified": 26116}