1{2 "task_id": "F5-conf-01",3 "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,4 "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,5 "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,6 "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,7 "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,8 "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,9 "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,10 "walras_law_residual": 0.0,11 "walras_law_max_abs_residual_offequilibrium_grid": 5.684341886080802e-14,12 "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,13 "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,14 "price_ratio_numerical": 0.8750000000000001,15 "abs_diff_closed_form_vs_numerical": 2.220446049250313e-16,16 "sensitivity_excess_demand_good1_vs_summary_sheet_aggregate": -2.0,17 "feasibility": "complete",18 "feasibility_reason": null,19 "data_issues": [20 {21 "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1 = 14 but the sum of individual endowments of good 1 in endowments.csv is 12 (A=8, B=4).",22 "handling": "Used the sum of individual endowments (12) as the aggregate endowment. In an exchange economy aggregate supply is by definition the sum of individual endowments, and endowments.csv is declared the primary data; the summary-sheet value is treated as a transcription error. Using it would make markets impossible to clear (excess demand for good 1 at the equilibrium price would be -2, not 0); this is reported as a sensitivity figure only."23 }24 ],25 "n_input_rows": {26 "endowments.csv": 2,27 "parameters.csv": 428 },29 "n_analysed": 2,30 "random_seed": null31}