1# Data audit2All SHA-256 match data/README.md and bundle.json.3| file | sha256 | lines (wc -l) / items | content |4|---|---|---|---|5| data/effects.json | 708c1ff0… | 5 top-level items | 5 effect specs, keys id/source/effect/reported_definition/target_definition; no duplicates, no missing |6| data/README.md | 7cf7cb38… | 16 lines | provenance table |7| sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt | ee2d444d… | 134 | DCR: Tables 6, 7, A19; log rates per 100k; no level/mean of outcome printed |8| sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt | 27c463c0… | 58 | RESEA Table 2 (means in %, effects in pp), Table 3 |9| sources/arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt | b1731a9b… | 66 | MW Table 2: elasticity -0.388, % MW changes 0.047 |10| sources/arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt | f8782937… | 91 | Benin Table 3 LPM; Mean Dep. Var. 0.261 |1112Anomalies (also in results.json data_issues):13- DCR: CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431 has SE (0.210) in Table 6 but (0.218) in Table A19.14- DCR: control regions 608 in tables, but A19 note says 640 never-treated regions.15- DCR: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35%; Table 7 5 km -0.354 implies -29.8% (Sec 6.1 says ~30%).16- DCR: printed % change rows for some A19 columns differ by 0.1 from 100(exp(b)-1) (rounding of b).17- DCR: no level (mean/baseline) of fatal hospitalisation rate printed -> E4 not harmonisable.18- MW: note says "about 4% minimum wage increase" whereas table row "% MW changes" prints 0.047 (4.7%). Target says use table value.19- RESEA: control mean 75.0% is the raw aggregate control mean, not block-adjusted; ATE 1.47 pp is block-adjusted. Abstract rounds to 1.5 pp.20- Benin: abstract/text headline 0.0855 (18.79%, mean 0.455) refers to Table 2, not in extract; Table 3 col (4) is -0.0962 with mean 0.261; "% Change" row -0.3685 consistent.21No filtering applied: all 5 items analysed (exclusions.csv records zero removals).22Availability: no input violates rules; E4 requires an unprinted quantity -> declared not harmonisable.23