1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"Exactly one reference, R3, is unverifiable; R1, R2, R4 and R5 pass all three checks.","results_keys":["unverifiable_references","n_verified","reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"R4 passes on the printed SE, which may be a transcription error in the source."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"R3 fails the title check, the year check (2024 vs 2026 submissions) and the finding check (0.5% in event year rising to 3.4-3.7% by years 4-5, not a jump at entry).","results_keys":["reference_checks.R3"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},4 {"id":"C3","text":"R1's cited ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210, -35.0%, significant at 5%) is printed in Table 6, 5 km column.","results_keys":["reference_checks.R1"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; significance at 5% holds under both."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"R2's cited wage, reemployment and UI-weeks effects, CI and N are stated in Table 2 and the abstract.","results_keys":["reference_checks.R2"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},6 {"id":"C5","text":"R4's year 2025 is consistent (v1 submission year) and its elasticities -0.388 (0.132) and -0.732 (0.091) are printed in Table 2.","results_keys":["reference_checks.R4","data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Printed SE 0.091 for the own-wage elasticity is implausible relative to its components (delta-method approx. 0.42)."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"R5's cited -0.0962 (0.0129) and 36.85% reduction are in Table 3 column (4), the stated preferred specification.","results_keys":["reference_checks.R5"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},8 {"id":"C7","text":"Source extracts contain internal inconsistencies and rendering defects that do not change any verdict.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},9 {"id":"C8","text":"A bibliographic-only baseline (title and year) flags the same set {R3}.","results_keys":["baseline_unverifiable_references_bibliographic_only","baseline_n_verified_bibliographic_only"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}10]11