1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"The Armendariz 5 km overall ATT of -0.431 log points corresponds to a -35.01% change in the drug-related hospitalisation rate (100*(exp(-0.431)-1)), matching the printed -35.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised.E1"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact transformation of the point estimate; no uncertainty propagated."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"The RESEA reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp equals a +1.96% relative change against the printed control mean of 75.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised.E2"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Denominator is the raw aggregate control mean, not a block-adjusted counterfactual."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"The minimum-wage employment elasticity of -0.388 applied to the printed 0.047 proportional MW increase implies a -1.82% employment change.","results_keys":["harmonised.E3"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Linear approximation; the table note says 'about 4%' whereas the table prints 0.047 (0.047 used)."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"The fatal drug-related hospitalisation effect (E4) cannot be expressed as an absolute change per 100,000 per year because the extract prints no level of that rate.","results_keys":["harmonised.E4","n_not_harmonisable"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Its implied relative change (-29.81%) is computable but is not the target definition."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"The Tossou LPM coefficient -0.0962 (Table 3, col. 4) equals -9.62 percentage points.","results_keys":["harmonised.E5"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Distinct from the paper's -36.85% relative change."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"The task is complete: 4 effects harmonised and 1 justified as not harmonisable.","results_keys":["n_harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","feasibility"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Several internal inconsistencies in the sources are documented in data_issues."}8]9