1# Data audit2| file | sha256 | rows x cols |3|---|---|---|4| data/endowments.csv | fc130a2f54c750a5834ec7314060d91f7984769c7c006ad04b98582a016ba74b | 2 x 3 (agent, good1, good2) |5| data/parameters.csv | 717807e75337fbf4aff8e4d74e0fc0b83b799f78fa689172be0d501cb3e43983 | 4 x 3 (parameter, value, description) |67- endowments: A=(8,2), B=(4,8); no missing, no duplicates, all strictly positive. Units: units of each good. No dates.8- parameters: alpha_A=0.4, alpha_B=0.6 (both in (0,1)); aggregate_endowment_good1=14, aggregate_endowment_good2=10.9- ANOMALY: recorded aggregate good1 = 14 != 8+4 = 12. Good 2: 10 = 2+8 consistent.10 Decision: endowments.csv is the primary data; aggregate = sum of individual endowments = 12. Recorded 14 ignored, reported in data_issues.11 (Using 14 would make market clearing impossible for these agents: z1 = -2 at any equilibrium of the actual agents.)12- No information-availability violations (both files allowed).13