1{2 "task_id": "F5-conf-01",3 "price_ratio_p1_over_p2": 0.8749999999999999,4 "x1_A": 4.114285714285715,5 "x2_A": 5.3999999999999995,6 "x1_B": 7.885714285714286,7 "x2_B": 4.6000000000000005,8 "excess_demand_good1": 0.0,9 "excess_demand_good2": 0.0,10 "walras_law_residual": 0.0,11 "aggregate_endowment_good1": 12.0,12 "aggregate_endowment_good2": 10.0,13 "price_ratio_numerical": 0.875,14 "abs_diff_closed_vs_numerical": 1.1102230246251565e-16,15 "excess_demand_good1_at_numerical_price": 0.0,16 "wealth_A": 9.0,17 "wealth_B": 11.5,18 "summary_sheet_aggregate_endowment_good1": 14.0,19 "sensitivity_excess_demand_good1_vs_summary_E1": -2.0,20 "feasibility": "complete",21 "feasibility_reason": null,22 "data_issues": [23 {24 "issue": "parameters.csv aggregate_endowment_good1=14 disagrees with the sum of individual endowments in endowments.csv (12).",25 "handling": "Used the sum of individual endowments (12) because endowments.csv is the primary data and market clearing must be consistent with the agents' budget constraints (using the summary value would make the good-1 clearing condition inconsistent with the budget constraints, so Walras' law would fail). Summary value not used in any computation except a reported sensitivity."26 }27 ],28 "n_input_rows": {29 "endowments.csv": 2,30 "parameters.csv": 431 },32 "n_analysed": 2,33 "random_seed": null34}