1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"A1 (5 km overall ATT -0.431, SE 0.210, significant at 5%, -35.0%) is supported by Table 6.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons","computation_details"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table A19 prints a different SE (0.218) for the same estimate; significance holds under both."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"A2 is not supported: the 1 km HIV ATT in Table 7 is +0.063, not negative.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},4 {"id":"C3","text":"A3 is not supported: a -0.283 log-point ATT corresponds to -24.7%, not 28.3%.","results_keys":["verdicts","reasons","computation_details"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},5 {"id":"C4","text":"A4 is not supported: the 95% CI for the 5 km hepatitis ATT is about [-0.896, 0.084] and includes zero.","results_keys":["verdicts","reasons","computation_details"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Robust to using 2.0 instead of 1.96."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"A5 is not assessable: the DCR extract reports no estimates by sex.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","computation_details"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Omitted parts of the paper might contain such estimates."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"A6 is supported by RESEA Table 2 (-1.99 weeks, CI [-2.24,-1.75], 11.5% of 17.3).","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons","computation_details"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},8 {"id":"C7","text":"Overall 2 supported, 3 not supported, 1 not assessable; a literal number-matching baseline would wrongly support A2 and A5.","results_keys":["n_supported","n_not_supported","n_not_assessable","baseline_verdicts_literal_number_match"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},9 {"id":"C8","text":"The sources contain internal inconsistencies (A19 vs Table 6 SE, abstract vs Table 7 percentages) that do not change any verdict.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}10]11