1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"A1 (5 km overall ATT -0.431, SE 0.210, significant at 5%, 35.0% reduction) is supported by Table 6.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Appendix Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; significance still holds (|t|=1.98>1.96, ** printed)."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"A2 is not supported: the 1 km HIV ATT is +0.063, not negative.","results_keys":["verdicts","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Estimate is very imprecise (SE 0.801), but the assertion's sign is still contradicted."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"A3 is not supported: -0.283 log points implies a 24.7% reduction, not 28.3%.","results_keys":["verdicts","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Relies on the 100*(exp(b)-1) convention, which the source itself uses."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"A4 is not supported: the 95% CI for hepatitis at 5 km is about [-0.90, 0.08] and includes zero.","results_keys":["verdicts","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Robust to using 1.96 or 2.0 as critical value."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"A5 (larger reduction for men than women) is not assessable because the extract reports no sex-specific estimates.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators"],"status":"supported","caveat":"The omitted parts of the full paper might contain such estimates."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"A6 (-1.99 weeks on UI, 95% CI [-2.24,-1.75], 11.5% of control mean 17.3) is supported by Table 2.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Text prints the CI as unsigned magnitudes; treated as equivalent."},8 {"id":"C7","text":"Overall: 2 supported, 3 not supported, 1 not assessable.","results_keys":["n_supported","n_not_supported","n_not_assessable"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}9]10