1{"type":"atis-latch","atis":"","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}2{"type":"queue-operation","operation":"enqueue","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.394Z","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","content":"Begin"}3{"type":"queue-operation","operation":"dequeue","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.397Z","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}4{"parentUuid":null,"isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":"Begin"},"uuid":"b9e92cd3-664e-44b4-b131-2d3f819f76b7","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.400Z","permissionMode":"default","promptSource":"sdk","turnOrigin":"sdk","turnPosition":{"promptIndex":0,"turnIndex":1},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}5{"type":"api-request-shape","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.410Z","version":"2.1.314","shape":{"system":[{"type":"text","text":"You are Claude Code, Anthropic's official CLI for Claude, running within the Claude Agent SDK."},{"type":"text","text":"CWD: /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088\nDate: 2026-10-30\n\nYou are a research assistant executing one bounded scientific task inside the current working directory, which is your workspace.\n\nEnvironment facts (identical for every task):\n- The task statement is the file `TASK.md` in the workspace. It is the complete and only authoritative description of what is required: the scientific question, the inputs under `data/`, the required output files and their exact keys, and the information-availability rules.\n- There is no network access. Use the Python interpreter `~/wp29/venv/bin/python` (numpy, pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib are installed). Standard shell tools are available. Do not try to install packages.\n- Write every deliverable under `./out/`. The required deliverables are listed in `TASK.md`; at minimum they always include `out/results.json`, `out/report.md`, and a replication entry point `out/analysis.py` that regenerates `out/results.json` from `data/` when run with `~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py` from the workspace root.\n- You are working alone and unattended; nobody will answer questions. Make reasonable, documented decisions.\n\nIntegrity rules (identical for every task):\n- Never fabricate numbers, data, results, or references. Every number in `out/results.json` and `out/report.md` must be produced by code you ran on the provided inputs.\n- Respect the information-availability rules in `TASK.md` exactly (for example, never use information that would not have been available at the stated decision time).\n- If part of the task cannot be completed as specified, say so explicitly in `out/report.md`, explain why, and still write every required file (use `null` for values you could not legitimately produce). An honest statement of a limitation is always preferred to a fabricated or guessed value.\n- Do not modify anything under `data/`.\n- When you are done, end with a brief plain-text summary of what you produced and any limitations.\n\nComplete the task described in `TASK.md` by following this research protocol. The protocol adds no scientific information to the task; it organizes how you work and what evidence you leave behind.\n\nPHASES (execute in order; a phase is eligible only when its dependencies are satisfied):\n\nP0 Scope and contract (depends on: nothing)\n- Read `TASK.md` completely. In `out/state/contract.md`, restate in your own words: the scientific question; the quantity or quantities to be estimated (the estimands) and the assumptions under which they are meaningful; every required output file and key; the information-availability rules; what would make the task impossible or the result invalid.\n- Write the initial phase ledger `out/state/phases.json`: a JSON object mapping each phase id (P0 … P5) to {\"status\": \"pending\"|\"running\"|\"passed\"|\"failed\"|\"blocked\"|\"stale\"|\"skipped_optional\", \"checks\": [], \"notes\": \"\"}. Keep it current as you work. A phase may only be set to \"passed\" when the checks listed for it in this protocol have actually been executed and their outcome recorded in \"checks\".\n\nP1 Data audit and provenance (depends on: P0)\n- Inspect every input file: compute and record its SHA-256, row and column counts, schema, units, date ranges, missing values, duplicates and anomalies in `out/state/data_audit.md`.\n- Keep an exclusion ledger in `out/exclusions.csv` (columns: step, rule, n_before, n_after, n_removed, rationale) for every filtering step you apply, so that n_raw − total removed = n_analysed.\n- Identify any input that violates the information-availability rules and decide, in writing, how you will handle it.\n\nP2 Baseline (depends on: P1)\n- Before any elaborate method, compute the simplest valid baseline that answers the question (for example a naïve or unconditional estimate), with the same evaluation rule used later. Record it in `out/results.json` under the keys the task requires, or under `baseline_*` keys when the task does not name them.\n\nP3 Method and computation (depends on: P2)\n- Implement the analysis in `out/analysis.py` so that it reads only `data/`, writes `out/results.json` deterministically (fix every random seed you use and record it), and prints nothing that contradicts the written results. Any figure or table must be generated by this script.\n\nP4 Verification (depends on: P3)\n- Re-run `out/analysis.py` from a clean state and confirm it regenerates `out/results.json` with identical values. Record the check in `out/state/phases.json` under P4.\n- Check internal consistency: identities that must hold (for example counts that must add up, standard errors that must be positive, confidence intervals that must contain their estimates, date orderings that must respect the information rules), units, and magnitudes against the baseline. Record every check and its outcome in `out/state/checks.md`. A failed check must be fixed or honestly reported, never silently ignored.\n\nP5 Reporting (depends on: P4)\n- Write `out/report.md` with the sections: Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues. Every quantitative statement must cite the key of `out/results.json` it comes from.\n- Write `out/claims.json`: a list of the central claims of your report, each as {\"id\": \"C1\", \"text\": \"...\", \"results_keys\": [\"...\"], \"status\": \"supported\"|\"unsupported\"|\"not_evaluated\", \"caveat\": \"...\"}. Do not state a claim in the report that is not in this ledger.\n- Set the final statuses in `out/state/phases.json`.\n\nSTOPPING RULES\n- Stop and declare the task complete only when every phase P0–P5 is \"passed\" with recorded checks. If a phase is \"blocked\" (missing information, impossible requirement, violated availability rule), stop, set the status, explain in `out/report.md` (section Limitations and open issues) and still write every required file with `null` for values you could not legitimately produce.\n- Do not spend effort on extensions that the task does not require.\n\nRECOVERY RULES\n- Append a short dated entry to `out/state/log.md` after each phase transition and after any important decision, so that work can be resumed by reading `out/state/`.\n- If you discover that an upstream input or decision changed after a downstream phase passed, mark the downstream phases \"stale\" and redo them; do not reuse stale results.\n- If you are interrupted and later resumed, first read `out/state/` and continue from the last consistent state; never re-run expensive steps that already have recorded, unchanged outputs.\n"}],"tools":[{"name":"Bash","description":"execute shell commands","input_schema":{"$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","type":"object","properties":{"command":{"description":"The command to execute","type":"string"},"timeout":{"description":"Optional timeout in milliseconds (max 600000 for a foreground command)","type":"number"},"description":{"description":"Clear, concise description of what this command does in active voice. Never use words like \"complex\" or \"risk\" in the description - just describe what it does.\n\nSay what the command does in plain words: do not echo the command's text, its flags, or file paths - the user reads this description, often without seeing the command.\n\nFor simple commands (git, npm, standard CLI tools), keep it brief (5-10 words):\n- ls → \"List files in current directory\"\n- git status → \"Show working tree status\"\n- npm install → \"Install package dependencies\"\n\nFor commands that are harder to parse at a glance (piped commands, obscure flags, etc.), add enough context to clarify what it does:\n- find . -name \"*.tmp\" -exec rm {} \\; → \"Find and delete all .tmp files recursively\"\n- git reset --hard origin/main → \"Discard all local changes and match remote main\"\n- curl -s url | jq '.data[]' → \"Fetch JSON from URL and extract data array elements\"","type":"string"},"dangerouslyDisableSandbox":{"description":"Set this to true to dangerously override sandbox mode and run commands without sandboxing.","type":"boolean"}},"required":["command"],"additionalProperties":false}},{"name":"Edit","description":"modify file contents in place","input_schema":{"$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","type":"object","properties":{"file_path":{"description":"The absolute path to the file to modify","type":"string"},"old_string":{"description":"The text to replace","type":"string"},"new_string":{"description":"The text to replace it with (must be different from old_string)","type":"string"},"replace_all":{"description":"Replace all occurrences of old_string (default false)","default":false,"type":"boolean"}},"required":["file_path","old_string","new_string"],"additionalProperties":false}},{"name":"Read","description":"read files, images, PDFs, notebooks","input_schema":{"$schema":"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema","type":"object","properties":{"file_path":{"description":"The absolute path to the file to read","type":"string"},"offset":{"description":"The line number to start reading from. Only provide if the file is too large to read at once","type":"integer","minimum":0,"maximum":9007199254740991},"limit":{"description":"The number of lines to read. Only provide if the file is too large to read at once.","type":"integer","exclusiveMinimum":0,"maximum":9007199254740991},"pages":{"description":"Page range for PDF files (e.g., \"1-5\", \"3\", \"10-20\"). Only applicable to PDF files. Maximum 20 pages per request.","type":"string"},"allow_large":{"description":"Set to true to read a text file, or a line range of one, that is over the usual size limits, up to what still fits in your context. Only use this when you genuinely need all of it or the user asked for the whole file; otherwise read it in parts with offset and limit, or search it.","type":"boolean"}},"required":["file_path"],"additionalProperties":false}}]}}6{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"d43ab0e0b8ec9db790a6459cb2f4bc4ffce02825ca05063162023be60912ced9","message":{"role":"system","content":[],"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}}}7{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"6421ce85-7ca9-4709-a83a-8600cb0de246","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.410Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"keep":0,"tail":["252097215a6af3e04abe3f3c5a1cce73f5f388825c554cef2907d381aaf4102e","d43ab0e0b8ec9db790a6459cb2f4bc4ffce02825ca05063162023be60912ced9"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",0,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"8cc7c46907c333445204b06d146513bd62c60dd97e79aa41af9d821711b4429d"}8{"parentUuid":"b9e92cd3-664e-44b4-b131-2d3f819f76b7","isSidechain":false,"attachment":{"type":"session_context","context":{}},"type":"attachment","uuid":"86aa764a-9dde-4fb8-8f48-2d089df2f747","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.404Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}9{"parentUuid":"86aa764a-9dde-4fb8-8f48-2d089df2f747","isSidechain":false,"attachment":{"type":"date","date":"2026-10-30"},"type":"attachment","uuid":"3e33e506-efa2-469b-9e71-618159c205fd","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.404Z","rendered":[{"content":"<system-reminder>\nToday's date is 2026-10-30.\n</system-reminder>"}],"renderedRole":"system","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}10{"parentUuid":"3e33e506-efa2-469b-9e71-618159c205fd","isSidechain":false,"attachment":{"type":"remote_session_change","url":null,"commit":"Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>","pr":"🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)","sendUserFileHint":false,"managedCommit":false,"managedPr":false},"type":"attachment","uuid":"a7424f3f-7a73-4b8a-8973-aac90a3ebcd7","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:04.404Z","rendered":[{"content":"<system-reminder>\nAttribution for git commits and pull requests you create from here on (this replaces Claude Code's own earlier attribution guidance, such as a previous copy of this reminder; the user's own instructions about these lines, such as a CLAUDE.md or memory rule, take precedence over this reminder, but do not add attribution lines this reminder leaves out):\n- End git commit messages with:\nCo-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>\n- End pull request descriptions with:\n🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)\n</system-reminder>"}],"renderedRole":"user","renderedBesideToolResult":true,"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}11{"type":"tools-used","tools":["Bash"],"sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}12{"parentUuid":"a7424f3f-7a73-4b8a-8973-aac90a3ebcd7","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXndaGCfXvHeL7MzBdj1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":4,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2209,"cache_read_input_tokens":1504,"output_tokens":122,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":20},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2209},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"thinkingDurationMs":459,"thinkingDisplay":"updates","apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXndZyaS8Hc7VjL2fc9Y","requestRef":"6421ce85-7ca9-4709-a83a-8600cb0de246","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"c4c0cd53-9484-4924-b08a-ca55d320f0fb","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:06.817Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}13{"parentUuid":"c4c0cd53-9484-4924-b08a-ca55d320f0fb","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXndaGCfXvHeL7MzBdj1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01S5tsJV5htKN1hDEhrqPbQ9","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat TASK.md; ls -laR data out 2>/dev/null | head -50","description":"Read task and list workspace"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":4,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2209,"cache_read_input_tokens":1504,"output_tokens":122,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":20},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2209},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXndZyaS8Hc7VjL2fc9Y","requestRef":"6421ce85-7ca9-4709-a83a-8600cb0de246","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"b18ab2aa-d7b0-46a2-8105-cf3d30588626","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:07.370Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}14{"parentUuid":"b18ab2aa-d7b0-46a2-8105-cf3d30588626","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01S5tsJV5htKN1hDEhrqPbQ9","type":"tool_result","content":"# F4-conf-02 — Is each quoted assertion supported by the source it cites?\n\n## Scientific question\nA literature review drafted from two open-access studies contains six assertions, each citing one of the two sources provided. For every assertion, decide from the cited extract alone whether it is **supported** (every element of the assertion — sign, magnitude, uncertainty statement, significance claim, population — is stated in, or follows arithmetically from, the source), **not_supported** (at least one element is contradicted by the source or does not follow from it), or **not_assessable** (the source does not report the quantity or comparison needed to judge the assertion, so it can be neither confirmed nor refuted from the extract). Each verdict must carry a locator (source id and the table, row/column or section that decides it) and a one-sentence reason. The estimands are the six verdicts.\n\n## Inputs\n- `data/assertions.json` — list of the six assertions: {\"id\", \"cites\" (source id), \"text\"}.\n- `data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt` — extract of Armendariz (2026), *Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland*, arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN], CC BY 4.0: abstract, Section 6 (Results: Table 6 overall ATT by buffer; Table 7 ATT by outcome category and buffer; Section 6.1 Mechanisms) and Appendix Table A19. Outcomes are log hospitalisation rates per 100,000 inhabitants (ATTs in log points; the \"% change\" rows and the text convert them to percentage changes); standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the MedStat region level; stars: *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.10.\n- `data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt` — extract of Li, Pearson-Merkowitz & Yokum (2026), *Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining RESEA Program on Employment Outcomes*, arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN], CC BY 4.0: abstract, Section 3 Results (Table 2 with group means, treatment–control differences and ATE estimates with p-values and 95% CIs; results text; Section 3.1) and Table 3. Tables 2 and 3 were re-set one row per outcome (values verbatim; see the extract header).\n- `data/README.md` — provenance, retrieval times, licences, SHA-256 of the extracts.\n\n## Information-availability rules\n- The extracts are the only admissible evidence. Do not use remembered content of the papers, other versions, or outside knowledge of the programmes.\n- A percentage change implied by a log-point coefficient b is 100·(exp(b) − 1); a 95% confidence interval from a printed standard error is the estimate ± 1.96·SE (2.0 is also acceptable). Use these conventions when an assertion requires a conversion the source does not print.\n- \"Supported\" requires every element of the assertion to hold; an assertion that is partly correct and partly contradicted is `not_supported`. Use `not_assessable` only when the extract contains no quantity or comparison bearing on the claim (e.g. a subgroup the source never reports), not when the claim is merely imprecise.\n- A locator has the form `<source id> | Table <n> | row \"<row>\" | column \"<col>\"` or `<source id> | Section <n or title>`; one locator per assertion.\n\n## Required outputs\n- `out/results.json` with the keys:\n\n| key | type | unit | meaning |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `verdicts` | object | — | {\"A1\": \"supported\" / \"not_supported\" / \"not_assessable\", …, \"A6\": …} |\n| `locators` | object | — | {\"A1\": \"<locator>\", …} — the table/section that decides the verdict (for `not_assessable`, the table/section where the relevant outcome is reported, or \"not reported in <source id>\") |\n| `reasons` | object | — | {\"A1\": \"<one sentence naming the decisive element>\", …} |\n| `n_supported`, `n_not_supported`, `n_not_assessable` | integer | — | counts over the six assertions |\n| `task_id` | string | — | \"F4-conf-02\" |\n| `feasibility` | string | — | \"complete\", \"partial\" or \"infeasible\" — refers to the task as a whole |\n| `feasibility_reason` | string or null | — | explanation if not complete |\n| `data_issues` | array of {\"issue\",\"handling\"} | — | problems detected in the inputs (rendering defects, internal inconsistencies of a source, etc.) and how they were handled; empty list if none |\n| `n_input_rows` | object | lines / items | {file name: number of lines} for every file under `data/` that you read (text files: number of newline-terminated lines as reported by `wc -l`; JSON files: number of top-level items) |\n| `n_analysed` | integer or null | — | number of reported items (values, assertions, effects or references) you actually assessed |\n| `random_seed` | integer or null | — | null (no randomness is involved) |\n\n- `out/report.md` with the sections: Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues. \"Uncertainty\" must discuss which verdicts depend on a convention (critical value, log-to-percent conversion) and whether the verdict would change under a reasonable alternative.\n- `out/analysis.py` — running `~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py` from the workspace root must regenerate `out/results.json` from `data/` only, deterministically (the script may encode the verdict logic explicitly; it must print the source lines it relies on).\n- `out/claims.json` — a list of the central claims of the report: [{\"id\": \"C1\", \"text\": \"...\", \"results_keys\": [\"...\"], \"status\": \"supported\"|\"unsupported\"|\"not_evaluated\", \"caveat\": \"...\"}].\n\n## Constraints\n- No network access. Python: `~/wp29/venv/bin/python` (numpy, pandas, scipy, statsmodels available; the standard library is sufficient for this task). Do not modify `data/`.\n- The source extracts under `data/sources/` are the **only** admissible evidence. Do not rely on memory of the papers or on other versions of them; if a quantity is not in the extract, it is not available.\n- Report numbers exactly as printed in the source (same sign, same number of decimals); do not round or rescale printed values unless the key definition asks for a transformation.\n- This task is designed to be completed in well under 20 minutes of work.\ndata:\ntotal 16\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 simon-pierreboucher staff 160 oct. 29 23:45 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 simon-pierreboucher staff 192 oct. 29 23:45 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 1365 oct. 29 23:45 assertions.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 2017 oct. 29 23:45 README.md\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 simon-pierreboucher staff 128 oct. 29 23:45 sources\n\ndata/sources:\ntotal 64\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 simon-pierreboucher staff 128 oct. 29 23:45 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 simon-pierreboucher staff 160 oct. 29 23:45 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 13405 oct. 29 23:45 arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 12401 oct. 29 23:45 arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"a4e63e5d-390a-44a5-a271-16e2ec4af9ec","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:07.454Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"# F4-conf-02 — Is each quoted assertion supported by the source it cites?\n\n## Scientific question\nA literature review drafted from two open-access studies contains six assertions, each citing one of the two sources provided. For every assertion, decide from the cited extract alone whether it is **supported** (every element of the assertion — sign, magnitude, uncertainty statement, significance claim, population — is stated in, or follows arithmetically from, the source), **not_supported** (at least one element is contradicted by the source or does not follow from it), or **not_assessable** (the source does not report the quantity or comparison needed to judge the assertion, so it can be neither confirmed nor refuted from the extract). Each verdict must carry a locator (source id and the table, row/column or section that decides it) and a one-sentence reason. The estimands are the six verdicts.\n\n## Inputs\n- `data/assertions.json` — list of the six assertions: {\"id\", \"cites\" (source id), \"text\"}.\n- `data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt` — extract of Armendariz (2026), *Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland*, arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN], CC BY 4.0: abstract, Section 6 (Results: Table 6 overall ATT by buffer; Table 7 ATT by outcome category and buffer; Section 6.1 Mechanisms) and Appendix Table A19. Outcomes are log hospitalisation rates per 100,000 inhabitants (ATTs in log points; the \"% change\" rows and the text convert them to percentage changes); standard errors in parentheses, clustered at the MedStat region level; stars: *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.10.\n- `data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt` — extract of Li, Pearson-Merkowitz & Yokum (2026), *Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining RESEA Program on Employment Outcomes*, arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN], CC BY 4.0: abstract, Section 3 Results (Table 2 with group means, treatment–control differences and ATE estimates with p-values and 95% CIs; results text; Section 3.1) and Table 3. Tables 2 and 3 were re-set one row per outcome (values verbatim; see the extract header).\n- `data/README.md` — provenance, retrieval times, licences, SHA-256 of the extracts.\n\n## Information-availability rules\n- The extracts are the only admissible evidence. Do not use remembered content of the papers, other versions, or outside knowledge of the programmes.\n- A percentage change implied by a log-point coefficient b is 100·(exp(b) − 1); a 95% confidence interval from a printed standard error is the estimate ± 1.96·SE (2.0 is also acceptable). Use these conventions when an assertion requires a conversion the source does not print.\n- \"Supported\" requires every element of the assertion to hold; an assertion that is partly correct and partly contradicted is `not_supported`. Use `not_assessable` only when the extract contains no quantity or comparison bearing on the claim (e.g. a subgroup the source never reports), not when the claim is merely imprecise.\n- A locator has the form `<source id> | Table <n> | row \"<row>\" | column \"<col>\"` or `<source id> | Section <n or title>`; one locator per assertion.\n\n## Required outputs\n- `out/results.json` with the keys:\n\n| key | type | unit | meaning |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `verdicts` | object | — | {\"A1\": \"supported\" / \"not_supported\" / \"not_assessable\", …, \"A6\": …} |\n| `locators` | object | — | {\"A1\": \"<locator>\", …} — the table/section that decides the verdict (for `not_assessable`, the table/section where the relevant outcome is reported, or \"not reported in <source id>\") |\n| `reasons` | object | — | {\"A1\": \"<one sentence naming the decisive element>\", …} |\n| `n_supported`, `n_not_supported`, `n_not_assessable` | integer | — | counts over the six assertions |\n| `task_id` | string | — | \"F4-conf-02\" |\n| `feasibility` | string | — | \"complete\", \"partial\" or \"infeasible\" — refers to the task as a whole |\n| `feasibility_reason` | string or null | — | explanation if not complete |\n| `data_issues` | array of {\"issue\",\"handling\"} | — | problems detected in the inputs (rendering defects, internal inconsistencies of a source, etc.) and how they were handled; empty list if none |\n| `n_input_rows` | object | lines / items | {file name: number of lines} for every file under `data/` that you read (text files: number of newline-terminated lines as reported by `wc -l`; JSON files: number of top-level items) |\n| `n_analysed` | integer or null | — | number of reported items (values, assertions, effects or references) you actually assessed |\n| `random_seed` | integer or null | — | null (no randomness is involved) |\n\n- `out/report.md` with the sections: Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues. \"Uncertainty\" must discuss which verdicts depend on a convention (critical value, log-to-percent conversion) and whether the verdict would change under a reasonable alternative.\n- `out/analysis.py` — running `~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py` from the workspace root must regenerate `out/results.json` from `data/` only, deterministically (the script may encode the verdict logic explicitly; it must print the source lines it relies on).\n- `out/claims.json` — a list of the central claims of the report: [{\"id\": \"C1\", \"text\": \"...\", \"results_keys\": [\"...\"], \"status\": \"supported\"|\"unsupported\"|\"not_evaluated\", \"caveat\": \"...\"}].\n\n## Constraints\n- No network access. Python: `~/wp29/venv/bin/python` (numpy, pandas, scipy, statsmodels available; the standard library is sufficient for this task). Do not modify `data/`.\n- The source extracts under `data/sources/` are the **only** admissible evidence. Do not rely on memory of the papers or on other versions of them; if a quantity is not in the extract, it is not available.\n- Report numbers exactly as printed in the source (same sign, same number of decimals); do not round or rescale printed values unless the key definition asks for a transformation.\n- This task is designed to be completed in well under 20 minutes of work.\ndata:\ntotal 16\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 simon-pierreboucher staff 160 oct. 29 23:45 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 simon-pierreboucher staff 192 oct. 29 23:45 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 1365 oct. 29 23:45 assertions.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 2017 oct. 29 23:45 README.md\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 simon-pierreboucher staff 128 oct. 29 23:45 sources\n\ndata/sources:\ntotal 64\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 simon-pierreboucher staff 128 oct. 29 23:45 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 simon-pierreboucher staff 160 oct. 29 23:45 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 13405 oct. 29 23:45 arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\n-rw-r--r-- 1 simon-pierreboucher staff 12401 oct. 29 23:45 arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"b18ab2aa-d7b0-46a2-8105-cf3d30588626","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}15{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"690dc3f0327e3a24d0650bb6d707fe3c8a40e5b17e28d30663224cba35288625","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"CAQSmgUKEAgTGAI4AUIIdGhpbmtpbmcSDHndR3XpNlvl927VzRoMSAUfPPCFFes/i7QYIjDsW79GlVEcOe03werSR51NriXiI3r3cZ1GcQFYFCwQvEJbXmoSfH5M0/AzPeMTnBQqtwT5WNdjulfbtAqkn+n6iXPduWIvNxm6Ch9fN4If/S8BRdW65NMYrZ79Hy3pDigF1QqOud+5GnvpHbpcmHO8bgpG40ENQBhgTlDTZ+jyo9GWbE7XmfrdZ5GxvfF1KrOkcC1cmhyWj479jusm+l8uViyQpGdOgnVGC5ldT4sAzsasUEy+z+94mGKW1vmGNs6xaGDEULToZU6qJ9j6fkUohYMSF+KQK8X1NizlBtpVgUeBNvzo5CC+6TPuPhN6og1lKUK29cgGCrCxvbEBjLd2VHm2eWQpPbfXxHJwY2nfRVlp09Pys8l6eZy73w4EnZbA5nwOwtzghfaYsY3m8PHKSDt5OCNCmeOZ5YcqgaGW/4uPKpDLok/EoBQTcT7ChXjhK9HkMMeSHkG9fmnDChNEymTG/UwcY92a6LkOxWejXkSe8NAQi2Dn0l+ijAFwNo7q6Ic5XQFaUAxFA0NZ8mtBNqGxi5s3DNyFm7doiJly31V1CSyZBNmhv4DUq52iWavH6VqAAfdqX8l94qA/RtEOqJK158v79Hp/DmMIF45Boi1WK/Iw4mKSj0ZyDUgIVUPs4Wyi5zvusjt7AbDgyg/1cSwpfyjDnCVBfHd7c2FRjMjXtvFUiCnmeV8XS+WXBLXPOAijd9G6wdcqNsZOpZl/CYYHUoj/HG4IavjxY2ufw+k5wPVa4ZieaIWmvrMf3IO6ChOI8RUqJSiO37xtyHs2dzteUe/cWzyFqZJXKgvTKzgXNmN40VBbQ9gYAQ=="},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01S5tsJV5htKN1hDEhrqPbQ9","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat TASK.md; ls -laR data out 2>/dev/null | head -50","description":"Read task and list workspace"}}]}}16{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"bbabfd60-b881-4512-8685-49e8df81fcfa","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:07.458Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"6421ce85-7ca9-4709-a83a-8600cb0de246","keep":2,"tail":["690dc3f0327e3a24d0650bb6d707fe3c8a40e5b17e28d30663224cba35288625","f331213a39dff77cea18ce2e48119da1310aba5b8299eedcc902e5b22ee04e00"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",3,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"88d9f927e2d99f5cff247722f5d6697e06a29841bddcf783152e46af409e1606"}17{"type":"last-prompt","lastPrompt":"Begin","leafUuid":"a4e63e5d-390a-44a5-a271-16e2ec4af9ec","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}18{"type":"atis-latch","atis":"","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}19{"parentUuid":"a4e63e5d-390a-44a5-a271-16e2ec4af9ec","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnditrNzZ88Tp47ghCQ","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01LQe4tGskau6V8gHSD2Kgm7","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat data/assertions.json data/README.md; cat -n data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","description":"Read assertions, README, first source"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2732,"cache_read_input_tokens":3713,"output_tokens":258,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2732},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXndicEkF6xQUuQrrucp","requestRef":"bbabfd60-b881-4512-8685-49e8df81fcfa","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"f1bf8d19-cdc1-49fc-964a-aa342573ce6e","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:09.656Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}20{"parentUuid":"f1bf8d19-cdc1-49fc-964a-aa342573ce6e","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01LQe4tGskau6V8gHSD2Kgm7","type":"tool_result","content":"[\n {\n \"id\": \"A1\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"Within 5 km of a drug consumption room, the overall ATT on the log drug-related hospitalisation rate is −0.431 (SE 0.210), statistically significant at the 5% level, which corresponds to a 35.0% reduction in the hospitalisation rate.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A2\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"At the 1 km buffer, the estimated ATT for HIV hospitalisations is negative (−0.063), i.e. HIV hospitalisations fall after a DCR opening in the immediate vicinity.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A3\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"The 3 km ATT of −0.283 implies a 28.3% reduction in drug-related hospitalisations within 3 km of a DCR.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A4\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"For viral hepatitis at the 5 km buffer, the 95% confidence interval of the ATT is approximately [−0.66, −0.16] and therefore excludes zero.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A5\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"The reduction in drug-related hospitalisations after a DCR opening is larger for men than for women.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A6\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\",\n \"text\": \"Selection into RESEA reduced the number of weeks on UI by 1.99 weeks (95% CI [−2.24, −1.75]), an 11.5% decrease relative to the control-group mean of 17.3 weeks.\"\n }\n]\n# Data provenance — F4-conf-02\n\nAll files under `data/sources/` are plain-text extracts of publicly accessible documents, prepared by the task designer on 2026-10-30 (UTC). Each extract begins with a provenance header (title, authors, bibliographic record, retrieval URL and UTC, SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML, license, list of included and omitted sections). Only the excerpts needed for the task are reproduced; everything else is omitted. Tables are rendered one row per line with ` | ` between cells; in regression tables, the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses as printed in the original.\n\n| file | document | retrieval UTC | license | SHA-256 of the extract |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| `sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt` | Armendariz, A. (2026). Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland. arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27732v1 (full text: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.27732v1) | 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z | CC BY 4.0 | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b |\n| `sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt` | Li, H. H., Pearson-Merkowitz, S., & Yokum, D. (2026). Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes. arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14621v1 (full text: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.14621v1) | 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z | CC BY 4.0 | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 |\n\nTask-specific input files (prepared by the task designer, not observed data):\n\n- `assertions.json` — the six assertions to be checked (id, cited source id, text), written by the task designer\n\nRights: arXiv e-prints are reproduced in part under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence shown on their arXiv abstract pages. No numbers were altered; where a table was re-set for legibility (RESEA Tables 2-3, London Table 3 header) the extract header says so.\n 1\tSOURCE EXTRACT — arxiv-2609.27732v1\n 2\tTitle: Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland\n 3\tAuthors: Ana Armendariz (University of St. Gallen)\n 4\tBibliographic record: arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN], submitted 23 Sep 2026 (version 1, the only version at retrieval). Abstract page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27732v1\n 5\tRetrieved: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.27732v1 on 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z (SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML: 22b06050f4ff6e665aedd80561fa4031b1717867ecfeca71d1d2902ee1b09f52)\n 6\tLicense: CC BY 4.0 (license shown on the arXiv abstract page; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reproduced in part with attribution.\n 7\tExtract contents: title, author, date and abstract; Section 6 'Results' in full (Figure notes, Table 6, Table 7, Section 6.1 'Mechanisms'); Appendix Table A19 with its note and the paragraph that discusses it.\n 8\tOmitted: Sections 1-5 and 7, the other appendix tables and figures, the references.\n 9\tRendering note: converted from the HTML rendering to plain text. Tables are rendered one row per line with \" | \" separating cells; in regression tables the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses, exactly as printed. Mathematical expressions appear as LaTeX source; non-breaking spaces were replaced by ordinary spaces. No numbers were altered.\n 10\t================================================================\n 11\t\n 12\t# Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland\n 13\t\n 14\tAna Armendariz*\n 15\t\n 16\tSeptember 23, 2026\n 17\t\n 18\tThis paper estimates the causal effect of drug consumption room (DCR) openings on drug-related hospitalizations in Switzerland. I exploit the staggered introduction of DCRs across Swiss cities between 1998 and 2022, using individual-level hospital records and a difference-in-differences estimator. DCR openings reduce drug-related hospitalization rates by roughly 35% within 5 km of a facility. The reduction is most pronounced for fatal outcomes, which fall by 35% while narcotics poisoning hospitalizations rise by a comparable amount, consistent with DCRs converting potentially fatal overdoses into non-fatal hospitalizations. Mental and behavioral disorder hospitalizations decline by 32% while estimates for Hepatitis and HIV are imprecise. The findings support the role of DCRs as an effective harm reduction strategy.\n 19\t\n 20\tKeywords: Drug Consumption Rooms, Harm Reduction, Hospitalizations, Drugs, Public Health, Causal Inference\n 21\t\n 22\t## 6 Results\n 23\t\n 24\tThis section reports the effect of DCR openings on the rate of drug-related hospitalizations per 100,000 inhabitants. I begin with the event-study estimates and then present the overall pooled ATT. I then disaggregate the overall outcome into its sub-outcome categories and report the same estimates for each.\n 25\t\n 26\tFigure 6: Event study estimates by buffer zone, \\pm 5-year window\n 27\t\n 28\tNote: The figure plots event-study coefficients from the doubly robust estimator of Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) for regions within 5 km of a DCR opening. The comparison group consists of never-treated regions (608 control regions). The outcome is the log drug-related hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants. The sample includes all staggered-treated MedStat regions within 5 km of a DCR that opened between 1998 and 2022 and all never-treated regions. The estimation uses a \\pm 5-year window relative to DCR opening, with t=-5 and t=+5 representing pooled endpoint bins that absorb all periods beyond the window. The reference period is a universal base period. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998 (always-treated) are excluded through out. 95% confidence intervals are based on standard errors clustered at the MedStat region level. Results for the 1 km and 3 km buffer specifications are reported in Appendix Figure A17.\n 29\t\n 30\tFigure 6 presents the event study estimates for the 5 km buffer specifications. I focus on the 5 km buffer specification, as it includes the largest number of treated regions and yields the most precise estimates. I summarize dynamic effects over a symmetric five year window around DCR openings. This window avoids relying on distant leads and lags that are informed by only a small subset of adopters. Pre-treatment coefficients are small and statistically insignificant, supporting the parallel trends assumption. The post-treatment coefficients are consistently negative, indicating a reduction in drug-related hospitalizations following DCR openings. The estimates of the overall summary of ATTs based on calendar time aggregation of Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) is around -35% reduction in hospitalizations due to drugs.\n 31\t\n 32\tTable 6: Overall Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)\n 33\t\n 34\t| 1 km | 3 km | 5 km\n 35\t\n 36\tATT | -0.399 | -0.283 | -0.431**\n 37\t\n 38\t| (0.412) | (0.279) | (0.210)\n 39\t\n 40\t% change | -32.9% | -24.7% | -35.0%\n 41\t\n 42\tTreated regions | 7 | 35 | 50\n 43\t\n 44\tControl regions | 608 | 608 | 608\n 45\t\n 46\tObservations | 16,175 | 16,875 | 17,250\n 47\t\n 48\tNote: The table reports the overall ATT estimated using the doubly robust Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) estimator with never-treated controls and a universal base period. The outcome is the log drug-related hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants. Columns differ in the geographic buffer used to define treated Medstat regions. The control group consists of 608 never-treated Medstat regions\n 49\tthroughout. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998\n 50\t(always-treated) are excluded. Standard errors clustered at the Medstat region level in\n 51\tparentheses. Significance: {}^{***}p<0.01 , {}^{**}p<0.05 ,\n 52\t{}^{*}p<0.10 .\n 53\t\n 54\tTable 6 reports the pooled ATT for the 1 km, 3 km and 5 km buffer specification, aggregating the dynamic treatment effects into a single estimate averaged across all post-treatment periods and cohorts. The 5 km specification, yields an ATT of -0.431\n 55\tcorresponding to a 35% reduction in the drug-related hospitalization rate. This estimate is statistically significant at the 5% level. The 3 km and 1 km estimates point in the same direction but are less precise, due to the smaller number of treated regions.\n 56\t\n 57\tTo further explore the mechanisms through which DCR openings affect drug-related hospitalizations, I disaggregate the main outcome into five diagnostic\n 58\tsub-categories: (i) mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use, (ii) viral hepatitis, (iii) HIV, (iv) poisoning by narcotics and psychodysleptics, and (v) fatal drug-related hospitalizations. Accidental poisoning is excluded due to the very small number of cases.\n 59\t\n 60\tFigure 7: Event study: Sub-outcome estimates,\n 61\twithin 5 km, \\pm 5-year window\n 62\t\n 63\tNote: The figure plots event-study coefficients from the doubly robust Callaway & Sant’Anna (2021) estimator for four diagnostic sub-categories of drug-related hospitalizations. Each panel uses a separate y -axis to accommodate differences in scale across outcomes. The sample includes all staggered-treated MedStat regions within 5 km of a\n 64\tDCR that opened between 1998 and 2022. The reference period is a universal base period. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998 (always-treated) are excluded. 95% confidence intervals are based on standard errors clustered at the MedStat region level.\n 65\t\n 66\tTable 7: Overall ATT by Outcome Category and Buffer Zone\n 67\t\n 68\tOutcome | 1 km | 3 km | 5 km\n 69\t\n 70\tMental/Behavioral | -0.354 | -0.202 | -0.381*\n 71\t\n 72\t| (0.382) | (0.244) | (0.220)\n 73\t\n 74\tHepatitis | -0.270 | -0.413 | -0.406\n 75\t\n 76\t| (0.486) | (0.270) | (0.250)\n 77\t\n 78\tHIV | 0.063 | -0.239 | -0.340\n 79\t\n 80\t| (0.801) | (0.337) | (0.294)\n 81\t\n 82\tNarcotics | 1.186*** | 0.549*** | 0.390**\n 83\t\n 84\t| (0.288) | (0.187) | (0.165)\n 85\t\n 86\tDrug-related (fatal) | -1.207*** | -0.290 | -0.354**\n 87\t\n 88\t| (0.137) | (0.215) | (0.178)\n 89\t\n 90\tTreated regions | 7 | 35 | 50\n 91\t\n 92\tControl regions | 608 (never-treated) | |\n 93\t\n 94\tNote: Each cell reports the overall ATT from\n 95\tthe doubly robust Callaway & Sant’Anna (2021) estimator with\n 96\tnever-treated controls and a universal base period. Outcomes are\n 97\tlog hospitalization rates per 100,000 inhabitants. Sub-outcomes:\n 98\tmental and behavioral disorders (F11–F19), viral hepatitis (B15–B19),\n 99\tHIV disease (B20–B24), narcotics/psychodysleptics (T40). The 1 km\n 100\testimates are identified from a single treated region per cohort and\n 101\tshould be interpreted with caution. Regions near DCRs opened before\n 102\t1998 excluded. Standard errors clustered at the Medstat region level.\n 103\tSignificance: {}^{***}p<0.01 , {}^{**}p<0.05 , {}^{*}p<0.10 .\n 104\t\n 105\tFigure 7 and Table 7 repeat the estimation for the five diagnostic categories. From Table 7, the ATT estimates for hospitalizations due to mental and behavioral disorders are consistently negative and marginally significant at the 5 km buffer specification. Moreover, the estimates of hepatitis are also negative and of comparable magnitude but insignificant. However, the event-study path in Figure 7 shows a gradual decline that builds from year 3 onward, consistent with a slow-acting reduction in needle sharing. HIV estimates are insignificant and close to zero. Narcotics poisoning hospitalizations rise after DCR opening and remain positive across all buffers. Lastly, fatal drug-related hospitalizations move in the opposite direction, falling after opening the DCR. The opposing patterns in narcotics and fatal hospitalizations suggest that DCRs convert events that would otherwise be fatal into survivable hospital contacts.\n 106\t\n 107\t### 6.1 Mechanisms\n 108\t\n 109\tThe sub-outcome results point to two channels through which DCRs reduce drug-related hospitalizations. The first is overdose supervision. DCRs provide a medically supervised environment where staff can control the dose consumed, perform resuscitation, and call emergency services when an overdose occurs. When supervision prevents a death that would otherwise happen outside a hospital, the consequence is a simultaneous decline in fatal drug-related hospitalizations and a rise in non-fatal poisoning contacts, as events that would have ended in death instead end in a hospital visit. The results are consistent with this prediction. Drug-related fatal hospitalizations fall near DCRs, by approximately 30% at 5 km, while narcotics and psychodysleptics hospitalizations rise by 47% at 5 km. The opposing signs and spatial concentration of these two effects are consistent with a\n 110\tsubstitution from out-of-hospital mortality to in-hospital survival. Since I cannot observe overdose events that do not result in a hospital contact, this interpretation is suggestive rather than identified, but it is consistent with the clinical evidence on DCR-based overdose reversals\n 111\t(Kerr et al., 2017; Hedrich, 2004).\n 112\t\n 113\tThe second channel is harm reduction for blood-borne diseases. DCRs distribute sterile injection equipment, which reduces needle sharing and the transmission of viral hepatitis and HIV. Unlike overdose prevention, these effects are expected to emerge slowly, since disease progression and hospitalization take years to follow from initial infection. The event-study path for hepatitis is consistent with this lag. The estimates are close to zero in the first two post-treatment years and become progressively more negative from year 3 onward, reaching approximately 40% below baseline by year 5. HIV estimates are near zero through out the analysis, with wide confidence intervals. A longer panel and additional out-patient data would be needed to determine whether these trends continue and to get more precise estimates.\n 114\t\n 115\tA third potential channel is referral to treatment and social services. DCRs routinely connect users to addiction treatment, primary care, and housing support, and a sustained reduction in hospitalizations could partly reflect better long-term management of drug dependence. The regional hospitalization panel used in this paper does not contain information on treatment entry or service use, so I cannot separate this channel from the two described above. It remains a plausible additional mechanism that future work with information on treatment take up data could examine.\n 116\t\n 117\tTable A19: Robustness: Overall ATT Across Estimators — 5 km buffer, \\pm 5-year window\n 118\t\n 119\t| CS-DR | Sun & Abraham | Synthetic DiD | Stacked DiD\n 120\t\n 121\tATT | -0.431** | -0.438** | -0.362* | -0.149***\n 122\t\n 123\t| (0.218) | (0.208) | (0.205) | (0.038)\n 124\t\n 125\t% change | -35.0% | -35.5% | -30.3% | -13.9%\n 126\t\n 127\tTreated regions | 50 | | |\n 128\t\n 129\tControl regions | 608 | | |\n 130\t\n 131\tObservations | 17,250 | | |\n 132\t\n 133\tNote: All specifications use the 5 km buffer,\n 134\tnever-treated comparison regions (640 regions), and a \\pm 5-year window","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"e03904d0-07f7-4933-9080-851180a0707d","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:09.704Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"[\n {\n \"id\": \"A1\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"Within 5 km of a drug consumption room, the overall ATT on the log drug-related hospitalisation rate is −0.431 (SE 0.210), statistically significant at the 5% level, which corresponds to a 35.0% reduction in the hospitalisation rate.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A2\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"At the 1 km buffer, the estimated ATT for HIV hospitalisations is negative (−0.063), i.e. HIV hospitalisations fall after a DCR opening in the immediate vicinity.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A3\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"The 3 km ATT of −0.283 implies a 28.3% reduction in drug-related hospitalisations within 3 km of a DCR.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A4\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"For viral hepatitis at the 5 km buffer, the 95% confidence interval of the ATT is approximately [−0.66, −0.16] and therefore excludes zero.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A5\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"The reduction in drug-related hospitalisations after a DCR opening is larger for men than for women.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A6\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\",\n \"text\": \"Selection into RESEA reduced the number of weeks on UI by 1.99 weeks (95% CI [−2.24, −1.75]), an 11.5% decrease relative to the control-group mean of 17.3 weeks.\"\n }\n]\n# Data provenance — F4-conf-02\n\nAll files under `data/sources/` are plain-text extracts of publicly accessible documents, prepared by the task designer on 2026-10-30 (UTC). Each extract begins with a provenance header (title, authors, bibliographic record, retrieval URL and UTC, SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML, license, list of included and omitted sections). Only the excerpts needed for the task are reproduced; everything else is omitted. Tables are rendered one row per line with ` | ` between cells; in regression tables, the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses as printed in the original.\n\n| file | document | retrieval UTC | license | SHA-256 of the extract |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| `sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt` | Armendariz, A. (2026). Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland. arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27732v1 (full text: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.27732v1) | 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z | CC BY 4.0 | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b |\n| `sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt` | Li, H. H., Pearson-Merkowitz, S., & Yokum, D. (2026). Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes. arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14621v1 (full text: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.14621v1) | 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z | CC BY 4.0 | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 |\n\nTask-specific input files (prepared by the task designer, not observed data):\n\n- `assertions.json` — the six assertions to be checked (id, cited source id, text), written by the task designer\n\nRights: arXiv e-prints are reproduced in part under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence shown on their arXiv abstract pages. No numbers were altered; where a table was re-set for legibility (RESEA Tables 2-3, London Table 3 header) the extract header says so.\n 1\tSOURCE EXTRACT — arxiv-2609.27732v1\n 2\tTitle: Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland\n 3\tAuthors: Ana Armendariz (University of St. Gallen)\n 4\tBibliographic record: arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN], submitted 23 Sep 2026 (version 1, the only version at retrieval). Abstract page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27732v1\n 5\tRetrieved: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.27732v1 on 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z (SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML: 22b06050f4ff6e665aedd80561fa4031b1717867ecfeca71d1d2902ee1b09f52)\n 6\tLicense: CC BY 4.0 (license shown on the arXiv abstract page; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reproduced in part with attribution.\n 7\tExtract contents: title, author, date and abstract; Section 6 'Results' in full (Figure notes, Table 6, Table 7, Section 6.1 'Mechanisms'); Appendix Table A19 with its note and the paragraph that discusses it.\n 8\tOmitted: Sections 1-5 and 7, the other appendix tables and figures, the references.\n 9\tRendering note: converted from the HTML rendering to plain text. Tables are rendered one row per line with \" | \" separating cells; in regression tables the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses, exactly as printed. Mathematical expressions appear as LaTeX source; non-breaking spaces were replaced by ordinary spaces. No numbers were altered.\n 10\t================================================================\n 11\t\n 12\t# Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland\n 13\t\n 14\tAna Armendariz*\n 15\t\n 16\tSeptember 23, 2026\n 17\t\n 18\tThis paper estimates the causal effect of drug consumption room (DCR) openings on drug-related hospitalizations in Switzerland. I exploit the staggered introduction of DCRs across Swiss cities between 1998 and 2022, using individual-level hospital records and a difference-in-differences estimator. DCR openings reduce drug-related hospitalization rates by roughly 35% within 5 km of a facility. The reduction is most pronounced for fatal outcomes, which fall by 35% while narcotics poisoning hospitalizations rise by a comparable amount, consistent with DCRs converting potentially fatal overdoses into non-fatal hospitalizations. Mental and behavioral disorder hospitalizations decline by 32% while estimates for Hepatitis and HIV are imprecise. The findings support the role of DCRs as an effective harm reduction strategy.\n 19\t\n 20\tKeywords: Drug Consumption Rooms, Harm Reduction, Hospitalizations, Drugs, Public Health, Causal Inference\n 21\t\n 22\t## 6 Results\n 23\t\n 24\tThis section reports the effect of DCR openings on the rate of drug-related hospitalizations per 100,000 inhabitants. I begin with the event-study estimates and then present the overall pooled ATT. I then disaggregate the overall outcome into its sub-outcome categories and report the same estimates for each.\n 25\t\n 26\tFigure 6: Event study estimates by buffer zone, \\pm 5-year window\n 27\t\n 28\tNote: The figure plots event-study coefficients from the doubly robust estimator of Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) for regions within 5 km of a DCR opening. The comparison group consists of never-treated regions (608 control regions). The outcome is the log drug-related hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants. The sample includes all staggered-treated MedStat regions within 5 km of a DCR that opened between 1998 and 2022 and all never-treated regions. The estimation uses a \\pm 5-year window relative to DCR opening, with t=-5 and t=+5 representing pooled endpoint bins that absorb all periods beyond the window. The reference period is a universal base period. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998 (always-treated) are excluded through out. 95% confidence intervals are based on standard errors clustered at the MedStat region level. Results for the 1 km and 3 km buffer specifications are reported in Appendix Figure A17.\n 29\t\n 30\tFigure 6 presents the event study estimates for the 5 km buffer specifications. I focus on the 5 km buffer specification, as it includes the largest number of treated regions and yields the most precise estimates. I summarize dynamic effects over a symmetric five year window around DCR openings. This window avoids relying on distant leads and lags that are informed by only a small subset of adopters. Pre-treatment coefficients are small and statistically insignificant, supporting the parallel trends assumption. The post-treatment coefficients are consistently negative, indicating a reduction in drug-related hospitalizations following DCR openings. The estimates of the overall summary of ATTs based on calendar time aggregation of Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) is around -35% reduction in hospitalizations due to drugs.\n 31\t\n 32\tTable 6: Overall Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)\n 33\t\n 34\t| 1 km | 3 km | 5 km\n 35\t\n 36\tATT | -0.399 | -0.283 | -0.431**\n 37\t\n 38\t| (0.412) | (0.279) | (0.210)\n 39\t\n 40\t% change | -32.9% | -24.7% | -35.0%\n 41\t\n 42\tTreated regions | 7 | 35 | 50\n 43\t\n 44\tControl regions | 608 | 608 | 608\n 45\t\n 46\tObservations | 16,175 | 16,875 | 17,250\n 47\t\n 48\tNote: The table reports the overall ATT estimated using the doubly robust Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) estimator with never-treated controls and a universal base period. The outcome is the log drug-related hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants. Columns differ in the geographic buffer used to define treated Medstat regions. The control group consists of 608 never-treated Medstat regions\n 49\tthroughout. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998\n 50\t(always-treated) are excluded. Standard errors clustered at the Medstat region level in\n 51\tparentheses. Significance: {}^{***}p<0.01 , {}^{**}p<0.05 ,\n 52\t{}^{*}p<0.10 .\n 53\t\n 54\tTable 6 reports the pooled ATT for the 1 km, 3 km and 5 km buffer specification, aggregating the dynamic treatment effects into a single estimate averaged across all post-treatment periods and cohorts. The 5 km specification, yields an ATT of -0.431\n 55\tcorresponding to a 35% reduction in the drug-related hospitalization rate. This estimate is statistically significant at the 5% level. The 3 km and 1 km estimates point in the same direction but are less precise, due to the smaller number of treated regions.\n 56\t\n 57\tTo further explore the mechanisms through which DCR openings affect drug-related hospitalizations, I disaggregate the main outcome into five diagnostic\n 58\tsub-categories: (i) mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use, (ii) viral hepatitis, (iii) HIV, (iv) poisoning by narcotics and psychodysleptics, and (v) fatal drug-related hospitalizations. Accidental poisoning is excluded due to the very small number of cases.\n 59\t\n 60\tFigure 7: Event study: Sub-outcome estimates,\n 61\twithin 5 km, \\pm 5-year window\n 62\t\n 63\tNote: The figure plots event-study coefficients from the doubly robust Callaway & Sant’Anna (2021) estimator for four diagnostic sub-categories of drug-related hospitalizations. Each panel uses a separate y -axis to accommodate differences in scale across outcomes. The sample includes all staggered-treated MedStat regions within 5 km of a\n 64\tDCR that opened between 1998 and 2022. The reference period is a universal base period. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998 (always-treated) are excluded. 95% confidence intervals are based on standard errors clustered at the MedStat region level.\n 65\t\n 66\tTable 7: Overall ATT by Outcome Category and Buffer Zone\n 67\t\n 68\tOutcome | 1 km | 3 km | 5 km\n 69\t\n 70\tMental/Behavioral | -0.354 | -0.202 | -0.381*\n 71\t\n 72\t| (0.382) | (0.244) | (0.220)\n 73\t\n 74\tHepatitis | -0.270 | -0.413 | -0.406\n 75\t\n 76\t| (0.486) | (0.270) | (0.250)\n 77\t\n 78\tHIV | 0.063 | -0.239 | -0.340\n 79\t\n 80\t| (0.801) | (0.337) | (0.294)\n 81\t\n 82\tNarcotics | 1.186*** | 0.549*** | 0.390**\n 83\t\n 84\t| (0.288) | (0.187) | (0.165)\n 85\t\n 86\tDrug-related (fatal) | -1.207*** | -0.290 | -0.354**\n 87\t\n 88\t| (0.137) | (0.215) | (0.178)\n 89\t\n 90\tTreated regions | 7 | 35 | 50\n 91\t\n 92\tControl regions | 608 (never-treated) | |\n 93\t\n 94\tNote: Each cell reports the overall ATT from\n 95\tthe doubly robust Callaway & Sant’Anna (2021) estimator with\n 96\tnever-treated controls and a universal base period. Outcomes are\n 97\tlog hospitalization rates per 100,000 inhabitants. Sub-outcomes:\n 98\tmental and behavioral disorders (F11–F19), viral hepatitis (B15–B19),\n 99\tHIV disease (B20–B24), narcotics/psychodysleptics (T40). The 1 km\n 100\testimates are identified from a single treated region per cohort and\n 101\tshould be interpreted with caution. Regions near DCRs opened before\n 102\t1998 excluded. Standard errors clustered at the Medstat region level.\n 103\tSignificance: {}^{***}p<0.01 , {}^{**}p<0.05 , {}^{*}p<0.10 .\n 104\t\n 105\tFigure 7 and Table 7 repeat the estimation for the five diagnostic categories. From Table 7, the ATT estimates for hospitalizations due to mental and behavioral disorders are consistently negative and marginally significant at the 5 km buffer specification. Moreover, the estimates of hepatitis are also negative and of comparable magnitude but insignificant. However, the event-study path in Figure 7 shows a gradual decline that builds from year 3 onward, consistent with a slow-acting reduction in needle sharing. HIV estimates are insignificant and close to zero. Narcotics poisoning hospitalizations rise after DCR opening and remain positive across all buffers. Lastly, fatal drug-related hospitalizations move in the opposite direction, falling after opening the DCR. The opposing patterns in narcotics and fatal hospitalizations suggest that DCRs convert events that would otherwise be fatal into survivable hospital contacts.\n 106\t\n 107\t### 6.1 Mechanisms\n 108\t\n 109\tThe sub-outcome results point to two channels through which DCRs reduce drug-related hospitalizations. The first is overdose supervision. DCRs provide a medically supervised environment where staff can control the dose consumed, perform resuscitation, and call emergency services when an overdose occurs. When supervision prevents a death that would otherwise happen outside a hospital, the consequence is a simultaneous decline in fatal drug-related hospitalizations and a rise in non-fatal poisoning contacts, as events that would have ended in death instead end in a hospital visit. The results are consistent with this prediction. Drug-related fatal hospitalizations fall near DCRs, by approximately 30% at 5 km, while narcotics and psychodysleptics hospitalizations rise by 47% at 5 km. The opposing signs and spatial concentration of these two effects are consistent with a\n 110\tsubstitution from out-of-hospital mortality to in-hospital survival. Since I cannot observe overdose events that do not result in a hospital contact, this interpretation is suggestive rather than identified, but it is consistent with the clinical evidence on DCR-based overdose reversals\n 111\t(Kerr et al., 2017; Hedrich, 2004).\n 112\t\n 113\tThe second channel is harm reduction for blood-borne diseases. DCRs distribute sterile injection equipment, which reduces needle sharing and the transmission of viral hepatitis and HIV. Unlike overdose prevention, these effects are expected to emerge slowly, since disease progression and hospitalization take years to follow from initial infection. The event-study path for hepatitis is consistent with this lag. The estimates are close to zero in the first two post-treatment years and become progressively more negative from year 3 onward, reaching approximately 40% below baseline by year 5. HIV estimates are near zero through out the analysis, with wide confidence intervals. A longer panel and additional out-patient data would be needed to determine whether these trends continue and to get more precise estimates.\n 114\t\n 115\tA third potential channel is referral to treatment and social services. DCRs routinely connect users to addiction treatment, primary care, and housing support, and a sustained reduction in hospitalizations could partly reflect better long-term management of drug dependence. The regional hospitalization panel used in this paper does not contain information on treatment entry or service use, so I cannot separate this channel from the two described above. It remains a plausible additional mechanism that future work with information on treatment take up data could examine.\n 116\t\n 117\tTable A19: Robustness: Overall ATT Across Estimators — 5 km buffer, \\pm 5-year window\n 118\t\n 119\t| CS-DR | Sun & Abraham | Synthetic DiD | Stacked DiD\n 120\t\n 121\tATT | -0.431** | -0.438** | -0.362* | -0.149***\n 122\t\n 123\t| (0.218) | (0.208) | (0.205) | (0.038)\n 124\t\n 125\t% change | -35.0% | -35.5% | -30.3% | -13.9%\n 126\t\n 127\tTreated regions | 50 | | |\n 128\t\n 129\tControl regions | 608 | | |\n 130\t\n 131\tObservations | 17,250 | | |\n 132\t\n 133\tNote: All specifications use the 5 km buffer,\n 134\tnever-treated comparison regions (640 regions), and a \\pm 5-year window","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f1bf8d19-cdc1-49fc-964a-aa342573ce6e","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}21{"parentUuid":"e03904d0-07f7-4933-9080-851180a0707d","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnditrNzZ88Tp47ghCQ","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Bu1av8rTSktE6ehrumg5v8","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat -n data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt; cd data && wc -l README.md sources/*.txt assertions.json && shasum -a 256 README.md assertions.json sources/*","description":"Read second source, counts, hashes"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2732,"cache_read_input_tokens":3713,"output_tokens":258,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2732},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXndicEkF6xQUuQrrucp","requestRef":"bbabfd60-b881-4512-8685-49e8df81fcfa","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"a028c857-a274-498b-8dcf-46c50ee38f01","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:10.594Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}22{"parentUuid":"a028c857-a274-498b-8dcf-46c50ee38f01","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Bu1av8rTSktE6ehrumg5v8","type":"tool_result","content":" 1\tSOURCE EXTRACT — arxiv-2606.14621v1\n 2\tTitle: Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes\n 3\tAuthors: Harrison H. Li; Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz; David Yokum\n 4\tBibliographic record: arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN], submitted 12 Jun 2026 (version 1, the only version at retrieval). Abstract page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14621v1\n 5\tRetrieved: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.14621v1 on 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z (SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML: f98fb1b39edd2107051cddf1da34aa8cf19e74e04d60bf9305a88cf966417da1)\n 6\tLicense: CC BY 4.0 (license shown on the arXiv abstract page; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reproduced in part with attribution.\n 7\tExtract contents: title, authors and abstract; Section 3 'Results' (Table 2 with caption, the results paragraphs, Section 3.1 'Cost-benefit analysis'); from Section 4.1, Table 3 with its caption and the paragraph that discusses it.\n 8\tOmitted: Sections 1-2, Table 1, Section 3.2 (heterogeneous effects), the rest of Section 4, the references and the appendix.\n 9\tRendering note: converted from the HTML rendering to plain text. Tables are rendered one row per line with \" | \" separating cells; in regression tables the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses, exactly as printed. Mathematical expressions appear as LaTeX source; non-breaking spaces were replaced by ordinary spaces. No numbers were altered.\n 10\tEditorial note: Tables 2 and 3 were re-set in a one-row-per-outcome layout because the HTML rendering split each outcome over three rows and detached the p-values from their columns; the p-values and confidence intervals are attached to the column they belong to in the original (first p-value = treatment-control difference, second = average treatment effect).\n 11\t================================================================\n 12\t\n 13\t# Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes\n 14\t\n 15\tHarrison H. Li (Harvey Mudd College), Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz (University of Maryland, College Park), David Yokum (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)\n 16\t\n 17\t###### Abstract\n 18\t\n 19\tProlonged unemployment carries serious economic, health, and wellbeing costs. With federal support, most U.S. states now operate a Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) program to help Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants return to work faster. We report results from a large (N = 23,549) preregistered randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating Rhode Island’s RESEA program from February 2022 to September 2023. We estimate that selection into the program increased annualized wages by $1,153, increased reemployment by 1.5 percentage points, and reduced UI duration by nearly two weeks. The vast majority of these wage and reemployment effects appeared within two quarters of claimants’ first pay dates and persisted through at least the following year, and we estimate that each dollar spent on the program saved the state $2.64. Using causal forests, a machine learning technique for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE), we also conduct an exploratory analysis to investigate if there are differential effects of selection into the RESEA program. We find that all participants experienced positive wage benefits from RESEA selection, with particularly large effects for older and lower-income workers. Finally, we improve upon prior RESEA evaluations by explicitly controlling for the week of treatment assignment — a methodological refinement absent from several existing RCTs of job-training programs that is important to eliminate confounding bias. We also discuss ways to harvest precision gains from baseline covariate adjustment without introducing large-sample bias.\n 20\t\n 21\t## 3 Results\n 22\t\n 23\t[Table 1 (pre-treatment characteristics) omitted from this extract.]\n 24\t\n 25\t[Table 2 — re-set by the extract editor from the HTML rendering, in which each outcome occupied three table rows; all values are verbatim. Columns: Outcome | Treatment | Control | Treatment-control difference | Average treatment effect estimate]\n 26\t\n 27\tOutcome | Treatment | Control | Treatment-control difference | Average treatment effect estimate\n 28\tWage | $33,073 (SD: 36,749) | $33,043 (SD: 36,231) | $29; p=0.95; 95% CI: [-903, 962] | $1,153; p=0.022; 95% CI: [166, 2,141]\n 29\tReemployment | 75.2% | 75.0% | 0.26 pp; p=0.64; 95% CI: [-0.84, 1.37] | 1.47 pp; p=0.013; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]\n 30\tWeeks on UI | 15.2 weeks (SD: 9.3) | 17.3 weeks (SD: 9.4) | -2.10 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.34, -1.86] | -1.99 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75]\n 31\tShort-term wage | $23,776 (SD: 31,948) | $23,897 (SD: 32,293) | -$121; p=0.77; 95% CI: [-941, 700] | $1,195; p=0.007; 95% CI: [326, 2,064]\n 32\tShort-term reemployment | 61.4% | 61.6% | -0.18 pp; p=0.77; 95% CI: [-1.43, 1.06] | 1.66 pp; p=0.012; 95% CI: [0.37, 2.96]\n 33\tShort-term weeks on UI | 14.2 weeks (SD: 8.4) | 15.9 weeks (SD: 8.3) | -1.70 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-1.92, -1.49] | -1.77 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-1.99, -1.55]\n 34\t\n 35\tTable 2: The average values of our long-term and short-term outcomes for the aggregate treatment and control groups in the study cohort, along with information about the differences in these averages between the treatment and control groups and our average treatment effect estimates. For the average outcomes, standard deviations are given in parentheses for the quantitative outcomes (wage and weeks on UI). For the treatment-control differences and the average treatment effect estimates, we provide two-sided p -values and 95% confidence intervals based on Welch’s two-sample t -test and the methodology described in the main text, respectively. The two rightmost columns illustrate how direct comparisons of outcome averages between the aggregate treatment and control groups can lead to significantly biased causal conclusions.\n 36\t\n 37\tOverall, we find that RESEA selection led to a statistically significant improvement in all three of the preregistered outcomes. RESEA selection led to a wage outcome that was $1,153 higher annually (95% CI: [$166, $2,141]; p=0.022 ), a 3.5% increase relative to the mean wage outcome of $33,043 in the control group (Table 2). There was also an estimated 1.47 percentage point increase in reemployment (95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]; p=0.013 ) and a 1.99 week reduction in the number of weeks on UI (95% CI: [1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]; p<0.001 ) due to RESEA selection. The latter is an 11.5% decrease compared to the mean control group weeks on UI outcome of 17.3 weeks. All three of these results remain statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing using Holm’s method to keep the familywise error rate below 5 percent.\n 38\t\n 39\tThe results for the short-term outcomes are substantively similar to those for the longer-term outcomes (Table 2). We estimate RESEA selection leads to a short-term wage outcome that is $1,195 higher (95% CI: [$326, $2,064]; p = 0.007) on an annualized basis and a 1.66 percentage point higher rate of short-term reemployment (95% CI: [0.37, 2.96]; p = 0.012). Given that the magnitudes of these causal estimates are very similar to those for the corresponding long-term outcomes, this suggests that the full impact of RESEA selection on wages and reemployment appears quickly by the second quarter after randomization, and persists for at least five quarters. We also find that those selected for RESEA spend 1.77 fewer weeks on UI in the benefit year of their claim (95% CI: [1.55 weeks, 1.99 weeks]; p ¡ 0.001). As this is a bit smaller than the effect size of 1.99 weeks estimated for the long term weeks on UI outcome, which includes an additional 26 weeks beyond the benefit year, we see some directional evidence that RESEA selection may also reduce the time spent on UI in the following year, suggesting that it may be helping claimants find employment that lasts longer, thereby reducing repetitive use of UI benefits.\n 40\t\n 41\tAs noted earlier, wages and reemployment are artificially zero-inflated due to missing out-of-state wage data. The Rhode Island job market is tightly integrated with those of the neighboring states of Massachusetts and Connecticut; the 2016-2020 5-Year American Community Survey found that nearly 16 percent of Rhode Island workers 16 years and older commuted out of state, mainly to Massachusetts. We note, however, that this missingness should not affect the directional validity of our causal analysis. This is because randomization ensures that this missingness is balanced between the treatment and control groups (within each block), unless RESEA selection itself differentially helps or hinders finding employment out of state or self-employment. To investigate this, we examined the presence of individuals who failed to exhaust their UI benefits in the benefit year of their claim while having $0 in reported RI wages for all of the five complete quarters after randomization. There were 3,325 claimants falling into this group, including 1,618 individuals (13.7%) in the aggregate control group and 1,707 individuals (14.6%) in the aggregate treatment group. After controlling for randomization week, this difference in proportions was not significant ( p = 0.55). The lack of statistical significance on this test with our large sample size along with the fact that the Rhode Island job database focuses overwhelmingly on jobs offered by Rhode Island employers suggests that RESEA selection does not differentially assist in finding out-of-state employment or self-employment.\n 42\t\n 43\t### 3.1 Cost-benefit analysis\n 44\t\n 45\tWe find that the decrease in time spent drawing UI benefits due to RESEA selection corresponds to a considerable cost savings to the state from paying out a smaller amount of UI benefits. We estimate that the average individual selected for RESEA during the study period drew $676 less (95% CI: [$563, $789], p<0.001 ) in UI benefits during the same benefit year of their claim than they would have if they were not selected for RESEA. This is a 9.9 percent reduction relative to the control group average of $6,839 in UI benefits drawn during the benefit year of the claim. Multiplying the estimate by the total number of individuals selected for RESEA in the study ( n=11,700 ) suggests that as a result of the program, the state paid out about $7.9 million fewer in UI benefits to claimants randomized during the study period over the same benefit year as their UI claims. This is much higher than the total expenditures of $2.99 million for the RESEA program over the study period, representing $2.64 in savings for the state budget for every $1 spent on the program.\n 46\t\n 47\t### 4.1 Methodological lessons (excerpt)\n 48\t\n 49\t[Table 3 — re-set by the extract editor from the HTML rendering; all values are verbatim. Columns: Outcome | Difference in means | Covariate adjusted | Fixed effects regression]\n 50\t\n 51\tOutcome | Difference in means | Covariate adjusted | Fixed effects regression\n 52\tWage | $1,153; p=0.022; 95% CI: [166, 2,141] | $1,137; p=0.014; 95% CI: [228, 2,047] | $1,100; p=0.027; 95% CI: [127, 2,073]\n 53\tReemployment | 1.47 pp; p=0.013; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.62] | 1.48 pp; p=0.012; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.63] | 1.49 pp; p=0.011; 95% CI: [0.34, 2.64]\n 54\tWeeks on UI | -1.99 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75] | -1.93 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.18, -1.68] | -1.97 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.22, -1.72]\n 55\t\n 56\tTable 3: A comparison of the ITT estimates, two-sided p -values, and 95% confidence intervals for our primary outcomes from three different methodologies: the preregistered analysis based on eq. (1), the covariate adjusted analysis based on eq. (2), and the fixed effects regression in eq. (3). The leftmost column based on the preregistered analysis duplicates the rightmost column in Table 2 for ease of comparison.\n 57\t\n 58\tIf we directly compared treatment group and control group outcome averages without accounting for the week of randomization, the results would suggest RESEA selection had no detectable average effect on the wage and reemployment outcomes (column 4, Table 2). However, such an analysis is potentially biased under the experimental design because it does not respect the blocked randomization, which makes the week of randomization a known confounder. For example, weeks with a larger number of UI applicants, which had a higher proportion of control group individuals, tended to have lower-earning applicants (Fig. 7), thereby inflating the average wage outcome in the control group relative to the treatment group. This is critical because out of the thirteen publically available studies of RESEA-related employment assistance programs rated by CLEAR as having high causal evidence, six used block randomization like we do, yet only two of these (Black, Smith, Berger, & Noel., 2002; Klerman et al., 2019) properly adjusted for the block. Three others among these six studies used regression or matching methods in an attempt to control for observed demographic variables but not the block (Poe-Yamagata et al., 2011; Michaelides et al., 2012; Manoli et al., 2018), while the remaining study (Michaelides & Mueser, 2018) fit a linear regression model with the block indicators as fixed effects, as did two other more recent evaluations in Nevada (Michaelides & Mian, 2021; Brigandi et al., 2024) . These fixed effects regressions amount to estimating the coefficient in the regression model\n 14 README.md\n 58 sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\n 134 sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt\n 32 assertions.json\n 238 total\n5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 README.md\n2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 assertions.json\n27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\nee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"0315315a-9587-465d-a00e-8cec360a0234","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:10.659Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":" 1\tSOURCE EXTRACT — arxiv-2606.14621v1\n 2\tTitle: Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes\n 3\tAuthors: Harrison H. Li; Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz; David Yokum\n 4\tBibliographic record: arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN], submitted 12 Jun 2026 (version 1, the only version at retrieval). Abstract page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14621v1\n 5\tRetrieved: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.14621v1 on 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z (SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML: f98fb1b39edd2107051cddf1da34aa8cf19e74e04d60bf9305a88cf966417da1)\n 6\tLicense: CC BY 4.0 (license shown on the arXiv abstract page; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reproduced in part with attribution.\n 7\tExtract contents: title, authors and abstract; Section 3 'Results' (Table 2 with caption, the results paragraphs, Section 3.1 'Cost-benefit analysis'); from Section 4.1, Table 3 with its caption and the paragraph that discusses it.\n 8\tOmitted: Sections 1-2, Table 1, Section 3.2 (heterogeneous effects), the rest of Section 4, the references and the appendix.\n 9\tRendering note: converted from the HTML rendering to plain text. Tables are rendered one row per line with \" | \" separating cells; in regression tables the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses, exactly as printed. Mathematical expressions appear as LaTeX source; non-breaking spaces were replaced by ordinary spaces. No numbers were altered.\n 10\tEditorial note: Tables 2 and 3 were re-set in a one-row-per-outcome layout because the HTML rendering split each outcome over three rows and detached the p-values from their columns; the p-values and confidence intervals are attached to the column they belong to in the original (first p-value = treatment-control difference, second = average treatment effect).\n 11\t================================================================\n 12\t\n 13\t# Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes\n 14\t\n 15\tHarrison H. Li (Harvey Mudd College), Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz (University of Maryland, College Park), David Yokum (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)\n 16\t\n 17\t###### Abstract\n 18\t\n 19\tProlonged unemployment carries serious economic, health, and wellbeing costs. With federal support, most U.S. states now operate a Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) program to help Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants return to work faster. We report results from a large (N = 23,549) preregistered randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating Rhode Island’s RESEA program from February 2022 to September 2023. We estimate that selection into the program increased annualized wages by $1,153, increased reemployment by 1.5 percentage points, and reduced UI duration by nearly two weeks. The vast majority of these wage and reemployment effects appeared within two quarters of claimants’ first pay dates and persisted through at least the following year, and we estimate that each dollar spent on the program saved the state $2.64. Using causal forests, a machine learning technique for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE), we also conduct an exploratory analysis to investigate if there are differential effects of selection into the RESEA program. We find that all participants experienced positive wage benefits from RESEA selection, with particularly large effects for older and lower-income workers. Finally, we improve upon prior RESEA evaluations by explicitly controlling for the week of treatment assignment — a methodological refinement absent from several existing RCTs of job-training programs that is important to eliminate confounding bias. We also discuss ways to harvest precision gains from baseline covariate adjustment without introducing large-sample bias.\n 20\t\n 21\t## 3 Results\n 22\t\n 23\t[Table 1 (pre-treatment characteristics) omitted from this extract.]\n 24\t\n 25\t[Table 2 — re-set by the extract editor from the HTML rendering, in which each outcome occupied three table rows; all values are verbatim. Columns: Outcome | Treatment | Control | Treatment-control difference | Average treatment effect estimate]\n 26\t\n 27\tOutcome | Treatment | Control | Treatment-control difference | Average treatment effect estimate\n 28\tWage | $33,073 (SD: 36,749) | $33,043 (SD: 36,231) | $29; p=0.95; 95% CI: [-903, 962] | $1,153; p=0.022; 95% CI: [166, 2,141]\n 29\tReemployment | 75.2% | 75.0% | 0.26 pp; p=0.64; 95% CI: [-0.84, 1.37] | 1.47 pp; p=0.013; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]\n 30\tWeeks on UI | 15.2 weeks (SD: 9.3) | 17.3 weeks (SD: 9.4) | -2.10 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.34, -1.86] | -1.99 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75]\n 31\tShort-term wage | $23,776 (SD: 31,948) | $23,897 (SD: 32,293) | -$121; p=0.77; 95% CI: [-941, 700] | $1,195; p=0.007; 95% CI: [326, 2,064]\n 32\tShort-term reemployment | 61.4% | 61.6% | -0.18 pp; p=0.77; 95% CI: [-1.43, 1.06] | 1.66 pp; p=0.012; 95% CI: [0.37, 2.96]\n 33\tShort-term weeks on UI | 14.2 weeks (SD: 8.4) | 15.9 weeks (SD: 8.3) | -1.70 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-1.92, -1.49] | -1.77 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-1.99, -1.55]\n 34\t\n 35\tTable 2: The average values of our long-term and short-term outcomes for the aggregate treatment and control groups in the study cohort, along with information about the differences in these averages between the treatment and control groups and our average treatment effect estimates. For the average outcomes, standard deviations are given in parentheses for the quantitative outcomes (wage and weeks on UI). For the treatment-control differences and the average treatment effect estimates, we provide two-sided p -values and 95% confidence intervals based on Welch’s two-sample t -test and the methodology described in the main text, respectively. The two rightmost columns illustrate how direct comparisons of outcome averages between the aggregate treatment and control groups can lead to significantly biased causal conclusions.\n 36\t\n 37\tOverall, we find that RESEA selection led to a statistically significant improvement in all three of the preregistered outcomes. RESEA selection led to a wage outcome that was $1,153 higher annually (95% CI: [$166, $2,141]; p=0.022 ), a 3.5% increase relative to the mean wage outcome of $33,043 in the control group (Table 2). There was also an estimated 1.47 percentage point increase in reemployment (95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]; p=0.013 ) and a 1.99 week reduction in the number of weeks on UI (95% CI: [1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]; p<0.001 ) due to RESEA selection. The latter is an 11.5% decrease compared to the mean control group weeks on UI outcome of 17.3 weeks. All three of these results remain statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing using Holm’s method to keep the familywise error rate below 5 percent.\n 38\t\n 39\tThe results for the short-term outcomes are substantively similar to those for the longer-term outcomes (Table 2). We estimate RESEA selection leads to a short-term wage outcome that is $1,195 higher (95% CI: [$326, $2,064]; p = 0.007) on an annualized basis and a 1.66 percentage point higher rate of short-term reemployment (95% CI: [0.37, 2.96]; p = 0.012). Given that the magnitudes of these causal estimates are very similar to those for the corresponding long-term outcomes, this suggests that the full impact of RESEA selection on wages and reemployment appears quickly by the second quarter after randomization, and persists for at least five quarters. We also find that those selected for RESEA spend 1.77 fewer weeks on UI in the benefit year of their claim (95% CI: [1.55 weeks, 1.99 weeks]; p ¡ 0.001). As this is a bit smaller than the effect size of 1.99 weeks estimated for the long term weeks on UI outcome, which includes an additional 26 weeks beyond the benefit year, we see some directional evidence that RESEA selection may also reduce the time spent on UI in the following year, suggesting that it may be helping claimants find employment that lasts longer, thereby reducing repetitive use of UI benefits.\n 40\t\n 41\tAs noted earlier, wages and reemployment are artificially zero-inflated due to missing out-of-state wage data. The Rhode Island job market is tightly integrated with those of the neighboring states of Massachusetts and Connecticut; the 2016-2020 5-Year American Community Survey found that nearly 16 percent of Rhode Island workers 16 years and older commuted out of state, mainly to Massachusetts. We note, however, that this missingness should not affect the directional validity of our causal analysis. This is because randomization ensures that this missingness is balanced between the treatment and control groups (within each block), unless RESEA selection itself differentially helps or hinders finding employment out of state or self-employment. To investigate this, we examined the presence of individuals who failed to exhaust their UI benefits in the benefit year of their claim while having $0 in reported RI wages for all of the five complete quarters after randomization. There were 3,325 claimants falling into this group, including 1,618 individuals (13.7%) in the aggregate control group and 1,707 individuals (14.6%) in the aggregate treatment group. After controlling for randomization week, this difference in proportions was not significant ( p = 0.55). The lack of statistical significance on this test with our large sample size along with the fact that the Rhode Island job database focuses overwhelmingly on jobs offered by Rhode Island employers suggests that RESEA selection does not differentially assist in finding out-of-state employment or self-employment.\n 42\t\n 43\t### 3.1 Cost-benefit analysis\n 44\t\n 45\tWe find that the decrease in time spent drawing UI benefits due to RESEA selection corresponds to a considerable cost savings to the state from paying out a smaller amount of UI benefits. We estimate that the average individual selected for RESEA during the study period drew $676 less (95% CI: [$563, $789], p<0.001 ) in UI benefits during the same benefit year of their claim than they would have if they were not selected for RESEA. This is a 9.9 percent reduction relative to the control group average of $6,839 in UI benefits drawn during the benefit year of the claim. Multiplying the estimate by the total number of individuals selected for RESEA in the study ( n=11,700 ) suggests that as a result of the program, the state paid out about $7.9 million fewer in UI benefits to claimants randomized during the study period over the same benefit year as their UI claims. This is much higher than the total expenditures of $2.99 million for the RESEA program over the study period, representing $2.64 in savings for the state budget for every $1 spent on the program.\n 46\t\n 47\t### 4.1 Methodological lessons (excerpt)\n 48\t\n 49\t[Table 3 — re-set by the extract editor from the HTML rendering; all values are verbatim. Columns: Outcome | Difference in means | Covariate adjusted | Fixed effects regression]\n 50\t\n 51\tOutcome | Difference in means | Covariate adjusted | Fixed effects regression\n 52\tWage | $1,153; p=0.022; 95% CI: [166, 2,141] | $1,137; p=0.014; 95% CI: [228, 2,047] | $1,100; p=0.027; 95% CI: [127, 2,073]\n 53\tReemployment | 1.47 pp; p=0.013; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.62] | 1.48 pp; p=0.012; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.63] | 1.49 pp; p=0.011; 95% CI: [0.34, 2.64]\n 54\tWeeks on UI | -1.99 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75] | -1.93 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.18, -1.68] | -1.97 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.22, -1.72]\n 55\t\n 56\tTable 3: A comparison of the ITT estimates, two-sided p -values, and 95% confidence intervals for our primary outcomes from three different methodologies: the preregistered analysis based on eq. (1), the covariate adjusted analysis based on eq. (2), and the fixed effects regression in eq. (3). The leftmost column based on the preregistered analysis duplicates the rightmost column in Table 2 for ease of comparison.\n 57\t\n 58\tIf we directly compared treatment group and control group outcome averages without accounting for the week of randomization, the results would suggest RESEA selection had no detectable average effect on the wage and reemployment outcomes (column 4, Table 2). However, such an analysis is potentially biased under the experimental design because it does not respect the blocked randomization, which makes the week of randomization a known confounder. For example, weeks with a larger number of UI applicants, which had a higher proportion of control group individuals, tended to have lower-earning applicants (Fig. 7), thereby inflating the average wage outcome in the control group relative to the treatment group. This is critical because out of the thirteen publically available studies of RESEA-related employment assistance programs rated by CLEAR as having high causal evidence, six used block randomization like we do, yet only two of these (Black, Smith, Berger, & Noel., 2002; Klerman et al., 2019) properly adjusted for the block. Three others among these six studies used regression or matching methods in an attempt to control for observed demographic variables but not the block (Poe-Yamagata et al., 2011; Michaelides et al., 2012; Manoli et al., 2018), while the remaining study (Michaelides & Mueser, 2018) fit a linear regression model with the block indicators as fixed effects, as did two other more recent evaluations in Nevada (Michaelides & Mian, 2021; Brigandi et al., 2024) . These fixed effects regressions amount to estimating the coefficient in the regression model\n 14 README.md\n 58 sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\n 134 sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt\n 32 assertions.json\n 238 total\n5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 README.md\n2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 assertions.json\n27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\nee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a028c857-a274-498b-8dcf-46c50ee38f01","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}23{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"9bcf862ab863326c7d68659ef12a3cb52dbdb771dec154523dda1770dc4cb7d6","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01LQe4tGskau6V8gHSD2Kgm7","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat data/assertions.json data/README.md; cat -n data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","description":"Read assertions, README, first source"}},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Bu1av8rTSktE6ehrumg5v8","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat -n data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt; cd data && wc -l README.md sources/*.txt assertions.json && shasum -a 256 README.md assertions.json sources/*","description":"Read second source, counts, hashes"}}]}}24{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"8f6075bd2ce49df838a2f17e892f68f318c4f1637c4a09c934e74b68094aa246","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01LQe4tGskau6V8gHSD2Kgm7","type":"tool_result","content":"[\n {\n \"id\": \"A1\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"Within 5 km of a drug consumption room, the overall ATT on the log drug-related hospitalisation rate is −0.431 (SE 0.210), statistically significant at the 5% level, which corresponds to a 35.0% reduction in the hospitalisation rate.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A2\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"At the 1 km buffer, the estimated ATT for HIV hospitalisations is negative (−0.063), i.e. HIV hospitalisations fall after a DCR opening in the immediate vicinity.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A3\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"The 3 km ATT of −0.283 implies a 28.3% reduction in drug-related hospitalisations within 3 km of a DCR.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A4\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"For viral hepatitis at the 5 km buffer, the 95% confidence interval of the ATT is approximately [−0.66, −0.16] and therefore excludes zero.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A5\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"text\": \"The reduction in drug-related hospitalisations after a DCR opening is larger for men than for women.\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"A6\",\n \"cites\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\",\n \"text\": \"Selection into RESEA reduced the number of weeks on UI by 1.99 weeks (95% CI [−2.24, −1.75]), an 11.5% decrease relative to the control-group mean of 17.3 weeks.\"\n }\n]\n# Data provenance — F4-conf-02\n\nAll files under `data/sources/` are plain-text extracts of publicly accessible documents, prepared by the task designer on 2026-10-30 (UTC). Each extract begins with a provenance header (title, authors, bibliographic record, retrieval URL and UTC, SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML, license, list of included and omitted sections). Only the excerpts needed for the task are reproduced; everything else is omitted. Tables are rendered one row per line with ` | ` between cells; in regression tables, the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses as printed in the original.\n\n| file | document | retrieval UTC | license | SHA-256 of the extract |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| `sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt` | Armendariz, A. (2026). Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland. arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27732v1 (full text: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.27732v1) | 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z | CC BY 4.0 | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b |\n| `sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt` | Li, H. H., Pearson-Merkowitz, S., & Yokum, D. (2026). Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes. arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14621v1 (full text: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.14621v1) | 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z | CC BY 4.0 | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 |\n\nTask-specific input files (prepared by the task designer, not observed data):\n\n- `assertions.json` — the six assertions to be checked (id, cited source id, text), written by the task designer\n\nRights: arXiv e-prints are reproduced in part under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence shown on their arXiv abstract pages. No numbers were altered; where a table was re-set for legibility (RESEA Tables 2-3, London Table 3 header) the extract header says so.\n 1\tSOURCE EXTRACT — arxiv-2609.27732v1\n 2\tTitle: Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland\n 3\tAuthors: Ana Armendariz (University of St. Gallen)\n 4\tBibliographic record: arXiv:2609.27732v1 [econ.GN], submitted 23 Sep 2026 (version 1, the only version at retrieval). Abstract page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27732v1\n 5\tRetrieved: https://arxiv.org/html/2609.27732v1 on 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z (SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML: 22b06050f4ff6e665aedd80561fa4031b1717867ecfeca71d1d2902ee1b09f52)\n 6\tLicense: CC BY 4.0 (license shown on the arXiv abstract page; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reproduced in part with attribution.\n 7\tExtract contents: title, author, date and abstract; Section 6 'Results' in full (Figure notes, Table 6, Table 7, Section 6.1 'Mechanisms'); Appendix Table A19 with its note and the paragraph that discusses it.\n 8\tOmitted: Sections 1-5 and 7, the other appendix tables and figures, the references.\n 9\tRendering note: converted from the HTML rendering to plain text. Tables are rendered one row per line with \" | \" separating cells; in regression tables the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses, exactly as printed. Mathematical expressions appear as LaTeX source; non-breaking spaces were replaced by ordinary spaces. No numbers were altered.\n 10\t================================================================\n 11\t\n 12\t# Do Drug Consumption Rooms Reduce Drug-Related Hospitalizations? Evidence from Switzerland\n 13\t\n 14\tAna Armendariz*\n 15\t\n 16\tSeptember 23, 2026\n 17\t\n 18\tThis paper estimates the causal effect of drug consumption room (DCR) openings on drug-related hospitalizations in Switzerland. I exploit the staggered introduction of DCRs across Swiss cities between 1998 and 2022, using individual-level hospital records and a difference-in-differences estimator. DCR openings reduce drug-related hospitalization rates by roughly 35% within 5 km of a facility. The reduction is most pronounced for fatal outcomes, which fall by 35% while narcotics poisoning hospitalizations rise by a comparable amount, consistent with DCRs converting potentially fatal overdoses into non-fatal hospitalizations. Mental and behavioral disorder hospitalizations decline by 32% while estimates for Hepatitis and HIV are imprecise. The findings support the role of DCRs as an effective harm reduction strategy.\n 19\t\n 20\tKeywords: Drug Consumption Rooms, Harm Reduction, Hospitalizations, Drugs, Public Health, Causal Inference\n 21\t\n 22\t## 6 Results\n 23\t\n 24\tThis section reports the effect of DCR openings on the rate of drug-related hospitalizations per 100,000 inhabitants. I begin with the event-study estimates and then present the overall pooled ATT. I then disaggregate the overall outcome into its sub-outcome categories and report the same estimates for each.\n 25\t\n 26\tFigure 6: Event study estimates by buffer zone, \\pm 5-year window\n 27\t\n 28\tNote: The figure plots event-study coefficients from the doubly robust estimator of Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) for regions within 5 km of a DCR opening. The comparison group consists of never-treated regions (608 control regions). The outcome is the log drug-related hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants. The sample includes all staggered-treated MedStat regions within 5 km of a DCR that opened between 1998 and 2022 and all never-treated regions. The estimation uses a \\pm 5-year window relative to DCR opening, with t=-5 and t=+5 representing pooled endpoint bins that absorb all periods beyond the window. The reference period is a universal base period. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998 (always-treated) are excluded through out. 95% confidence intervals are based on standard errors clustered at the MedStat region level. Results for the 1 km and 3 km buffer specifications are reported in Appendix Figure A17.\n 29\t\n 30\tFigure 6 presents the event study estimates for the 5 km buffer specifications. I focus on the 5 km buffer specification, as it includes the largest number of treated regions and yields the most precise estimates. I summarize dynamic effects over a symmetric five year window around DCR openings. This window avoids relying on distant leads and lags that are informed by only a small subset of adopters. Pre-treatment coefficients are small and statistically insignificant, supporting the parallel trends assumption. The post-treatment coefficients are consistently negative, indicating a reduction in drug-related hospitalizations following DCR openings. The estimates of the overall summary of ATTs based on calendar time aggregation of Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) is around -35% reduction in hospitalizations due to drugs.\n 31\t\n 32\tTable 6: Overall Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)\n 33\t\n 34\t| 1 km | 3 km | 5 km\n 35\t\n 36\tATT | -0.399 | -0.283 | -0.431**\n 37\t\n 38\t| (0.412) | (0.279) | (0.210)\n 39\t\n 40\t% change | -32.9% | -24.7% | -35.0%\n 41\t\n 42\tTreated regions | 7 | 35 | 50\n 43\t\n 44\tControl regions | 608 | 608 | 608\n 45\t\n 46\tObservations | 16,175 | 16,875 | 17,250\n 47\t\n 48\tNote: The table reports the overall ATT estimated using the doubly robust Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021) estimator with never-treated controls and a universal base period. The outcome is the log drug-related hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants. Columns differ in the geographic buffer used to define treated Medstat regions. The control group consists of 608 never-treated Medstat regions\n 49\tthroughout. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998\n 50\t(always-treated) are excluded. Standard errors clustered at the Medstat region level in\n 51\tparentheses. Significance: {}^{***}p<0.01 , {}^{**}p<0.05 ,\n 52\t{}^{*}p<0.10 .\n 53\t\n 54\tTable 6 reports the pooled ATT for the 1 km, 3 km and 5 km buffer specification, aggregating the dynamic treatment effects into a single estimate averaged across all post-treatment periods and cohorts. The 5 km specification, yields an ATT of -0.431\n 55\tcorresponding to a 35% reduction in the drug-related hospitalization rate. This estimate is statistically significant at the 5% level. The 3 km and 1 km estimates point in the same direction but are less precise, due to the smaller number of treated regions.\n 56\t\n 57\tTo further explore the mechanisms through which DCR openings affect drug-related hospitalizations, I disaggregate the main outcome into five diagnostic\n 58\tsub-categories: (i) mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use, (ii) viral hepatitis, (iii) HIV, (iv) poisoning by narcotics and psychodysleptics, and (v) fatal drug-related hospitalizations. Accidental poisoning is excluded due to the very small number of cases.\n 59\t\n 60\tFigure 7: Event study: Sub-outcome estimates,\n 61\twithin 5 km, \\pm 5-year window\n 62\t\n 63\tNote: The figure plots event-study coefficients from the doubly robust Callaway & Sant’Anna (2021) estimator for four diagnostic sub-categories of drug-related hospitalizations. Each panel uses a separate y -axis to accommodate differences in scale across outcomes. The sample includes all staggered-treated MedStat regions within 5 km of a\n 64\tDCR that opened between 1998 and 2022. The reference period is a universal base period. Regions near DCRs that opened before 1998 (always-treated) are excluded. 95% confidence intervals are based on standard errors clustered at the MedStat region level.\n 65\t\n 66\tTable 7: Overall ATT by Outcome Category and Buffer Zone\n 67\t\n 68\tOutcome | 1 km | 3 km | 5 km\n 69\t\n 70\tMental/Behavioral | -0.354 | -0.202 | -0.381*\n 71\t\n 72\t| (0.382) | (0.244) | (0.220)\n 73\t\n 74\tHepatitis | -0.270 | -0.413 | -0.406\n 75\t\n 76\t| (0.486) | (0.270) | (0.250)\n 77\t\n 78\tHIV | 0.063 | -0.239 | -0.340\n 79\t\n 80\t| (0.801) | (0.337) | (0.294)\n 81\t\n 82\tNarcotics | 1.186*** | 0.549*** | 0.390**\n 83\t\n 84\t| (0.288) | (0.187) | (0.165)\n 85\t\n 86\tDrug-related (fatal) | -1.207*** | -0.290 | -0.354**\n 87\t\n 88\t| (0.137) | (0.215) | (0.178)\n 89\t\n 90\tTreated regions | 7 | 35 | 50\n 91\t\n 92\tControl regions | 608 (never-treated) | |\n 93\t\n 94\tNote: Each cell reports the overall ATT from\n 95\tthe doubly robust Callaway & Sant’Anna (2021) estimator with\n 96\tnever-treated controls and a universal base period. Outcomes are\n 97\tlog hospitalization rates per 100,000 inhabitants. Sub-outcomes:\n 98\tmental and behavioral disorders (F11–F19), viral hepatitis (B15–B19),\n 99\tHIV disease (B20–B24), narcotics/psychodysleptics (T40). The 1 km\n 100\testimates are identified from a single treated region per cohort and\n 101\tshould be interpreted with caution. Regions near DCRs opened before\n 102\t1998 excluded. Standard errors clustered at the Medstat region level.\n 103\tSignificance: {}^{***}p<0.01 , {}^{**}p<0.05 , {}^{*}p<0.10 .\n 104\t\n 105\tFigure 7 and Table 7 repeat the estimation for the five diagnostic categories. From Table 7, the ATT estimates for hospitalizations due to mental and behavioral disorders are consistently negative and marginally significant at the 5 km buffer specification. Moreover, the estimates of hepatitis are also negative and of comparable magnitude but insignificant. However, the event-study path in Figure 7 shows a gradual decline that builds from year 3 onward, consistent with a slow-acting reduction in needle sharing. HIV estimates are insignificant and close to zero. Narcotics poisoning hospitalizations rise after DCR opening and remain positive across all buffers. Lastly, fatal drug-related hospitalizations move in the opposite direction, falling after opening the DCR. The opposing patterns in narcotics and fatal hospitalizations suggest that DCRs convert events that would otherwise be fatal into survivable hospital contacts.\n 106\t\n 107\t### 6.1 Mechanisms\n 108\t\n 109\tThe sub-outcome results point to two channels through which DCRs reduce drug-related hospitalizations. The first is overdose supervision. DCRs provide a medically supervised environment where staff can control the dose consumed, perform resuscitation, and call emergency services when an overdose occurs. When supervision prevents a death that would otherwise happen outside a hospital, the consequence is a simultaneous decline in fatal drug-related hospitalizations and a rise in non-fatal poisoning contacts, as events that would have ended in death instead end in a hospital visit. The results are consistent with this prediction. Drug-related fatal hospitalizations fall near DCRs, by approximately 30% at 5 km, while narcotics and psychodysleptics hospitalizations rise by 47% at 5 km. The opposing signs and spatial concentration of these two effects are consistent with a\n 110\tsubstitution from out-of-hospital mortality to in-hospital survival. Since I cannot observe overdose events that do not result in a hospital contact, this interpretation is suggestive rather than identified, but it is consistent with the clinical evidence on DCR-based overdose reversals\n 111\t(Kerr et al., 2017; Hedrich, 2004).\n 112\t\n 113\tThe second channel is harm reduction for blood-borne diseases. DCRs distribute sterile injection equipment, which reduces needle sharing and the transmission of viral hepatitis and HIV. Unlike overdose prevention, these effects are expected to emerge slowly, since disease progression and hospitalization take years to follow from initial infection. The event-study path for hepatitis is consistent with this lag. The estimates are close to zero in the first two post-treatment years and become progressively more negative from year 3 onward, reaching approximately 40% below baseline by year 5. HIV estimates are near zero through out the analysis, with wide confidence intervals. A longer panel and additional out-patient data would be needed to determine whether these trends continue and to get more precise estimates.\n 114\t\n 115\tA third potential channel is referral to treatment and social services. DCRs routinely connect users to addiction treatment, primary care, and housing support, and a sustained reduction in hospitalizations could partly reflect better long-term management of drug dependence. The regional hospitalization panel used in this paper does not contain information on treatment entry or service use, so I cannot separate this channel from the two described above. It remains a plausible additional mechanism that future work with information on treatment take up data could examine.\n 116\t\n 117\tTable A19: Robustness: Overall ATT Across Estimators — 5 km buffer, \\pm 5-year window\n 118\t\n 119\t| CS-DR | Sun & Abraham | Synthetic DiD | Stacked DiD\n 120\t\n 121\tATT | -0.431** | -0.438** | -0.362* | -0.149***\n 122\t\n 123\t| (0.218) | (0.208) | (0.205) | (0.038)\n 124\t\n 125\t% change | -35.0% | -35.5% | -30.3% | -13.9%\n 126\t\n 127\tTreated regions | 50 | | |\n 128\t\n 129\tControl regions | 608 | | |\n 130\t\n 131\tObservations | 17,250 | | |\n 132\t\n 133\tNote: All specifications use the 5 km buffer,\n 134\tnever-treated comparison regions (640 regions), and a \\pm 5-year window","is_error":false},{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Bu1av8rTSktE6ehrumg5v8","type":"tool_result","content":" 1\tSOURCE EXTRACT — arxiv-2606.14621v1\n 2\tTitle: Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes\n 3\tAuthors: Harrison H. Li; Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz; David Yokum\n 4\tBibliographic record: arXiv:2606.14621v1 [econ.GN], submitted 12 Jun 2026 (version 1, the only version at retrieval). Abstract page: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14621v1\n 5\tRetrieved: https://arxiv.org/html/2606.14621v1 on 2026-10-30T03:23:18Z (SHA-256 of the retrieved HTML: f98fb1b39edd2107051cddf1da34aa8cf19e74e04d60bf9305a88cf966417da1)\n 6\tLicense: CC BY 4.0 (license shown on the arXiv abstract page; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Reproduced in part with attribution.\n 7\tExtract contents: title, authors and abstract; Section 3 'Results' (Table 2 with caption, the results paragraphs, Section 3.1 'Cost-benefit analysis'); from Section 4.1, Table 3 with its caption and the paragraph that discusses it.\n 8\tOmitted: Sections 1-2, Table 1, Section 3.2 (heterogeneous effects), the rest of Section 4, the references and the appendix.\n 9\tRendering note: converted from the HTML rendering to plain text. Tables are rendered one row per line with \" | \" separating cells; in regression tables the line following a coefficient row holds the standard errors in parentheses, exactly as printed. Mathematical expressions appear as LaTeX source; non-breaking spaces were replaced by ordinary spaces. No numbers were altered.\n 10\tEditorial note: Tables 2 and 3 were re-set in a one-row-per-outcome layout because the HTML rendering split each outcome over three rows and detached the p-values from their columns; the p-values and confidence intervals are attached to the column they belong to in the original (first p-value = treatment-control difference, second = average treatment effect).\n 11\t================================================================\n 12\t\n 13\t# Evaluating the Impact of Rhode Island's Self-Sustaining Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program on Employment Outcomes\n 14\t\n 15\tHarrison H. Li (Harvey Mudd College), Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz (University of Maryland, College Park), David Yokum (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)\n 16\t\n 17\t###### Abstract\n 18\t\n 19\tProlonged unemployment carries serious economic, health, and wellbeing costs. With federal support, most U.S. states now operate a Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) program to help Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants return to work faster. We report results from a large (N = 23,549) preregistered randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating Rhode Island’s RESEA program from February 2022 to September 2023. We estimate that selection into the program increased annualized wages by $1,153, increased reemployment by 1.5 percentage points, and reduced UI duration by nearly two weeks. The vast majority of these wage and reemployment effects appeared within two quarters of claimants’ first pay dates and persisted through at least the following year, and we estimate that each dollar spent on the program saved the state $2.64. Using causal forests, a machine learning technique for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE), we also conduct an exploratory analysis to investigate if there are differential effects of selection into the RESEA program. We find that all participants experienced positive wage benefits from RESEA selection, with particularly large effects for older and lower-income workers. Finally, we improve upon prior RESEA evaluations by explicitly controlling for the week of treatment assignment — a methodological refinement absent from several existing RCTs of job-training programs that is important to eliminate confounding bias. We also discuss ways to harvest precision gains from baseline covariate adjustment without introducing large-sample bias.\n 20\t\n 21\t## 3 Results\n 22\t\n 23\t[Table 1 (pre-treatment characteristics) omitted from this extract.]\n 24\t\n 25\t[Table 2 — re-set by the extract editor from the HTML rendering, in which each outcome occupied three table rows; all values are verbatim. Columns: Outcome | Treatment | Control | Treatment-control difference | Average treatment effect estimate]\n 26\t\n 27\tOutcome | Treatment | Control | Treatment-control difference | Average treatment effect estimate\n 28\tWage | $33,073 (SD: 36,749) | $33,043 (SD: 36,231) | $29; p=0.95; 95% CI: [-903, 962] | $1,153; p=0.022; 95% CI: [166, 2,141]\n 29\tReemployment | 75.2% | 75.0% | 0.26 pp; p=0.64; 95% CI: [-0.84, 1.37] | 1.47 pp; p=0.013; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]\n 30\tWeeks on UI | 15.2 weeks (SD: 9.3) | 17.3 weeks (SD: 9.4) | -2.10 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.34, -1.86] | -1.99 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75]\n 31\tShort-term wage | $23,776 (SD: 31,948) | $23,897 (SD: 32,293) | -$121; p=0.77; 95% CI: [-941, 700] | $1,195; p=0.007; 95% CI: [326, 2,064]\n 32\tShort-term reemployment | 61.4% | 61.6% | -0.18 pp; p=0.77; 95% CI: [-1.43, 1.06] | 1.66 pp; p=0.012; 95% CI: [0.37, 2.96]\n 33\tShort-term weeks on UI | 14.2 weeks (SD: 8.4) | 15.9 weeks (SD: 8.3) | -1.70 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-1.92, -1.49] | -1.77 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-1.99, -1.55]\n 34\t\n 35\tTable 2: The average values of our long-term and short-term outcomes for the aggregate treatment and control groups in the study cohort, along with information about the differences in these averages between the treatment and control groups and our average treatment effect estimates. For the average outcomes, standard deviations are given in parentheses for the quantitative outcomes (wage and weeks on UI). For the treatment-control differences and the average treatment effect estimates, we provide two-sided p -values and 95% confidence intervals based on Welch’s two-sample t -test and the methodology described in the main text, respectively. The two rightmost columns illustrate how direct comparisons of outcome averages between the aggregate treatment and control groups can lead to significantly biased causal conclusions.\n 36\t\n 37\tOverall, we find that RESEA selection led to a statistically significant improvement in all three of the preregistered outcomes. RESEA selection led to a wage outcome that was $1,153 higher annually (95% CI: [$166, $2,141]; p=0.022 ), a 3.5% increase relative to the mean wage outcome of $33,043 in the control group (Table 2). There was also an estimated 1.47 percentage point increase in reemployment (95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]; p=0.013 ) and a 1.99 week reduction in the number of weeks on UI (95% CI: [1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]; p<0.001 ) due to RESEA selection. The latter is an 11.5% decrease compared to the mean control group weeks on UI outcome of 17.3 weeks. All three of these results remain statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing using Holm’s method to keep the familywise error rate below 5 percent.\n 38\t\n 39\tThe results for the short-term outcomes are substantively similar to those for the longer-term outcomes (Table 2). We estimate RESEA selection leads to a short-term wage outcome that is $1,195 higher (95% CI: [$326, $2,064]; p = 0.007) on an annualized basis and a 1.66 percentage point higher rate of short-term reemployment (95% CI: [0.37, 2.96]; p = 0.012). Given that the magnitudes of these causal estimates are very similar to those for the corresponding long-term outcomes, this suggests that the full impact of RESEA selection on wages and reemployment appears quickly by the second quarter after randomization, and persists for at least five quarters. We also find that those selected for RESEA spend 1.77 fewer weeks on UI in the benefit year of their claim (95% CI: [1.55 weeks, 1.99 weeks]; p ¡ 0.001). As this is a bit smaller than the effect size of 1.99 weeks estimated for the long term weeks on UI outcome, which includes an additional 26 weeks beyond the benefit year, we see some directional evidence that RESEA selection may also reduce the time spent on UI in the following year, suggesting that it may be helping claimants find employment that lasts longer, thereby reducing repetitive use of UI benefits.\n 40\t\n 41\tAs noted earlier, wages and reemployment are artificially zero-inflated due to missing out-of-state wage data. The Rhode Island job market is tightly integrated with those of the neighboring states of Massachusetts and Connecticut; the 2016-2020 5-Year American Community Survey found that nearly 16 percent of Rhode Island workers 16 years and older commuted out of state, mainly to Massachusetts. We note, however, that this missingness should not affect the directional validity of our causal analysis. This is because randomization ensures that this missingness is balanced between the treatment and control groups (within each block), unless RESEA selection itself differentially helps or hinders finding employment out of state or self-employment. To investigate this, we examined the presence of individuals who failed to exhaust their UI benefits in the benefit year of their claim while having $0 in reported RI wages for all of the five complete quarters after randomization. There were 3,325 claimants falling into this group, including 1,618 individuals (13.7%) in the aggregate control group and 1,707 individuals (14.6%) in the aggregate treatment group. After controlling for randomization week, this difference in proportions was not significant ( p = 0.55). The lack of statistical significance on this test with our large sample size along with the fact that the Rhode Island job database focuses overwhelmingly on jobs offered by Rhode Island employers suggests that RESEA selection does not differentially assist in finding out-of-state employment or self-employment.\n 42\t\n 43\t### 3.1 Cost-benefit analysis\n 44\t\n 45\tWe find that the decrease in time spent drawing UI benefits due to RESEA selection corresponds to a considerable cost savings to the state from paying out a smaller amount of UI benefits. We estimate that the average individual selected for RESEA during the study period drew $676 less (95% CI: [$563, $789], p<0.001 ) in UI benefits during the same benefit year of their claim than they would have if they were not selected for RESEA. This is a 9.9 percent reduction relative to the control group average of $6,839 in UI benefits drawn during the benefit year of the claim. Multiplying the estimate by the total number of individuals selected for RESEA in the study ( n=11,700 ) suggests that as a result of the program, the state paid out about $7.9 million fewer in UI benefits to claimants randomized during the study period over the same benefit year as their UI claims. This is much higher than the total expenditures of $2.99 million for the RESEA program over the study period, representing $2.64 in savings for the state budget for every $1 spent on the program.\n 46\t\n 47\t### 4.1 Methodological lessons (excerpt)\n 48\t\n 49\t[Table 3 — re-set by the extract editor from the HTML rendering; all values are verbatim. Columns: Outcome | Difference in means | Covariate adjusted | Fixed effects regression]\n 50\t\n 51\tOutcome | Difference in means | Covariate adjusted | Fixed effects regression\n 52\tWage | $1,153; p=0.022; 95% CI: [166, 2,141] | $1,137; p=0.014; 95% CI: [228, 2,047] | $1,100; p=0.027; 95% CI: [127, 2,073]\n 53\tReemployment | 1.47 pp; p=0.013; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.62] | 1.48 pp; p=0.012; 95% CI: [0.32, 2.63] | 1.49 pp; p=0.011; 95% CI: [0.34, 2.64]\n 54\tWeeks on UI | -1.99 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75] | -1.93 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.18, -1.68] | -1.97 wks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.22, -1.72]\n 55\t\n 56\tTable 3: A comparison of the ITT estimates, two-sided p -values, and 95% confidence intervals for our primary outcomes from three different methodologies: the preregistered analysis based on eq. (1), the covariate adjusted analysis based on eq. (2), and the fixed effects regression in eq. (3). The leftmost column based on the preregistered analysis duplicates the rightmost column in Table 2 for ease of comparison.\n 57\t\n 58\tIf we directly compared treatment group and control group outcome averages without accounting for the week of randomization, the results would suggest RESEA selection had no detectable average effect on the wage and reemployment outcomes (column 4, Table 2). However, such an analysis is potentially biased under the experimental design because it does not respect the blocked randomization, which makes the week of randomization a known confounder. For example, weeks with a larger number of UI applicants, which had a higher proportion of control group individuals, tended to have lower-earning applicants (Fig. 7), thereby inflating the average wage outcome in the control group relative to the treatment group. This is critical because out of the thirteen publically available studies of RESEA-related employment assistance programs rated by CLEAR as having high causal evidence, six used block randomization like we do, yet only two of these (Black, Smith, Berger, & Noel., 2002; Klerman et al., 2019) properly adjusted for the block. Three others among these six studies used regression or matching methods in an attempt to control for observed demographic variables but not the block (Poe-Yamagata et al., 2011; Michaelides et al., 2012; Manoli et al., 2018), while the remaining study (Michaelides & Mueser, 2018) fit a linear regression model with the block indicators as fixed effects, as did two other more recent evaluations in Nevada (Michaelides & Mian, 2021; Brigandi et al., 2024) . These fixed effects regressions amount to estimating the coefficient in the regression model\n 14 README.md\n 58 sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\n 134 sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt\n 32 assertions.json\n 238 total\n5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 README.md\n2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 assertions.json\n27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\nee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","is_error":false}]}}25{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"03dd8068-774a-44f4-bac1-2b36dbad962e","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:10.662Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"bbabfd60-b881-4512-8685-49e8df81fcfa","keep":4,"tail":["9bcf862ab863326c7d68659ef12a3cb52dbdb771dec154523dda1770dc4cb7d6","8f6075bd2ce49df838a2f17e892f68f318c4f1637c4a09c934e74b68094aa246"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",5,"content",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"6c37f9998ed5de3f797a85731003979540973d5cb4c5a38185836ce012264413"}26{"type":"last-prompt","lastPrompt":"Begin","leafUuid":"0315315a-9587-465d-a00e-8cec360a0234","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}27{"type":"atis-latch","atis":"","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}28{"parentUuid":"0315315a-9587-465d-a00e-8cec360a0234","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXndxcbvy5UvMgqqiYge","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":12316,"cache_read_input_tokens":6445,"output_tokens":1632,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":995},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":12316},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"thinkingDurationMs":9296,"thinkingDisplay":"updates","apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXndxKjupKLpoaoMVkSp","requestRef":"03dd8068-774a-44f4-bac1-2b36dbad962e","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"e3ac3ef1-9339-4359-a701-9e9a189c870b","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:21.790Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}29{"parentUuid":"e3ac3ef1-9339-4359-a701-9e9a189c870b","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXndxcbvy5UvMgqqiYge","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01CXY5c77EjKvTuk9yQ7DVC9","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"mkdir -p out/state && cd out/state && cat > contract.md <<'EOF'\n# Contract — F4-conf-02\n**Question.** For each of six literature-review assertions (data/assertions.json), decide from the cited source extract alone whether it is supported / not_supported / not_assessable.\n**Estimands.** Six categorical verdicts, each with one locator and one-sentence reason. Meaningful under the task's rules: \"supported\" requires every element (sign, magnitude, uncertainty, significance, population) to hold; partial contradiction => not_supported; not_assessable only when the extract has no bearing quantity.\n**Conventions.** % change = 100(exp(b)-1); 95% CI = b ± 1.96·SE (2.0 acceptable).\n**Outputs.** out/results.json keys: verdicts, locators, reasons, n_supported, n_not_supported, n_not_assessable, task_id (\"F4-conf-02\"), feasibility, feasibility_reason, data_issues [{issue,handling}], n_input_rows {file: lines/items}, n_analysed, random_seed (null). Also out/report.md (Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues), out/analysis.py, out/claims.json, out/exclusions.csv, out/state/*.\n**Information rules.** Only the two extracts are admissible; no memory of papers or outside knowledge.\n**Invalidity.** Using outside info; a source missing; assertion citing a source not provided.\nEOF\ncat > log.md <<'EOF'\n# Log\n- 2026-10-30 P0: read TASK.md, wrote contract. \nEOF\necho ok","description":"Write contract and log"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":12316,"cache_read_input_tokens":6445,"output_tokens":1632,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":995},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":12316},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXndxKjupKLpoaoMVkSp","requestRef":"03dd8068-774a-44f4-bac1-2b36dbad962e","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"e9b726ba-435d-468a-84f7-99ad5dc11dce","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:26.909Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}30{"parentUuid":"e9b726ba-435d-468a-84f7-99ad5dc11dce","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01CXY5c77EjKvTuk9yQ7DVC9","type":"tool_result","content":"ok","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"fac50460-ad62-4747-bfb4-b44f53e39655","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:26.924Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"ok","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"e9b726ba-435d-468a-84f7-99ad5dc11dce","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}31{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"1d6fb1c1c069d1a31856e28f3b8e4b3e13320c44ae98e735037152ea6cfd596b","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"CAQS4RUKEAgTGAI4AUIIdGhpbmtpbmcSDJLAS1CM9pPmRsJ9/xoM9qi8kUJv+FyX1e1rIjCadsH9LMEZVTzx7l/IT9PPw94JaxqBZP2MlT3KjQlp+S1QVh8J7fegIygdTyf1xLMq/hQLKX/Vw4QoazWUnKdm+3n+KgZuFPfmDYKKJiOsAwFZ2gDK4KecUBnJZARpyEkjP2/0kXt3Znw0c8N6c6fLkCem8+EuXWHP19QvggUtUaSQ/vT0BMh5fUpa3ThoWllpPGM1nbmiDJYLI4lZMfks9WQW5gCXs0M+Jfv7g5KnvtTukFHlHjkV8prSHxVJWDWJwEyR7hQB+6M7+6PiZXVRmFuqBDWdCibUmx7PrGrQo3dy2w4lLZGBuAQk+L3695g+5CoaH8JdCJtOBAOmUGeI1EazfE3KW6juvNEf4jKDGv2XBLwyA2p8b6MdeXfRYkY7rWweHHv/uTdDfQ+Ib4C70p2gRPHWpcG5Iv9k1BjS7yRhPVQvHhLkuH6yrbRXqYgs6LA+g4VDosbUGH+VUC7IB8wh/8JRsqyrGPBIz3jWm0Jbjz31LA+N1b65+mKB8RfVwuBU5SdRmTlBJCXdmIG2pPyJmtUg4yTMJrWwqaA3TpZ0tWaBncKx5+DwTBkurSol+Q5S5ijRS6+5FO8zIUvpuSBvMiU9peQf0iPsWYYYl6uEyPAsjc5fYJdCeeak/Jj0MYFA4NNEuqQnp2KkFU7sAP1yvhTcwhxgORrwGzm8HYJi3443vWt1lWeq3EaWUcyRWWnsUyAeEAQ+W0H+u7uXqE5q2BphE4NBd5i0j+H+A4g9CuGI4ZasMRv5DXcFiXspLuPONERZPFHHGRb6ekUhmZfVEwe4hmmr5QLWUkDiRC/LsHr1MwxbDDOs45G0u83YmWjHS5Al4nQUTuBuDn9/VU9l3e3Wp5SEhhYjys4UXXLu+YHCbG5z/mnnrNMRCS0Y37QINB3A/BlKf/Zlit21lmVDrzZKDCAuVxJC44RwgOXV2jZp7faLcTl3GD+Z4075S+6kCAvUDzjdRkYerQbbLPWgJb+8Mfm+L3HrJYz//HLm1Ihchw7HwFQj+Li/5SJ4kU5ASMyCX/JVaZDpd4sXAaPSKGNxhre/TcrV2VsIt5+N3xZqVVaFgAJ3RWsA+4VXzu+S78a03UD3xjUsVNbD7Fnne73lQng0PmvP6oflY9qk94OCU/1MTuwTprERZfwxg47Ow38scT7ldpDsnpkr4eoHaZCD+gbM5ZrVbZRVf0X/es6+Z8DLCY5abR4PQVybNJrIK8qq7vdKhN/RngmaE1zOs9DHNSmcTrVioz38a2gWid5ZiBZqCRsC5w9HzHIshyZmr00C1gCxV9+k94WNJ1FVwJdV9ZFRyb3x4RgQpFvTbvTXVxZWhmKBBiYKh6Cmata809mXK0AJfl2SI0jUD50ZjLaDa9tQobBtYwQeGxvUJ/LvApZy4/U8EQENUnO2ys4gxa+Y6eBA7yxSzsqfmpDX+g8t/xfOWZkcShZ2kPB9q8g3GUV3Ca/REq1vgQr0/tfSsC2RYwehrChFYPwV3b1M4CuvJJTkYUgKWjHD3EfFbnEEZIc9V6WLKCGmzfXS3o2pG23kNdm82IoKDpdmJ/wyaeS/zlFxbf0P+PxcP7aTOZ92Kyswnb/dD1QVsAzY3HWALTuDyjyw5qKyGim2jPHm7EJxk3wmGfnKAIbIUPAOA2VeEH+URtnWN+QDbjdmr5wPSYTOhT35PS1mbrZ40f7mf6XGiEWO+I9mMHG1auPa6qEfb5fQpfs/ptiguq4JFrjktBES0KVJpa5fM8MQX/wCsKozfn6d17+G3wdSvRK39KbHOrG+wZgCrsvcIcJr18EOMX6uNz28ihOJ5e0mVgeS2xe9YkZ0r981C56EpPc7jOs9BvbicDAbtUoptbJ9wbwTANkvciWTSeQ4HoeIwBvYjSEQUFpEPmTLCNz+pBzQO53POdvKq2hhrkUOz70fBT6eJX4sP6aE5RgbBmax7iXytE7KrH8W1XEKZWQBZnrq/NoYRBQ7hdwdmYVgAx7AwFXH+yScjm/YAUjuRBHsuI9G+BJBZezLCGw7In8AvBQfsANxGPMs4KaveliOViXwCp/nrso+TLB62mq//9hWO001pdVSDWcfjQPHX5qHXXQYOlcPfj3CwQYL2RmEmcdRfOyhJ0BNM77hGFjBle+LxRmV6/a+rMhDevEQz40tMhA7ZnBU6M+8TUoqzMc1dyZlYM1d58tqj2wJsVvtHm86Vdi3nP3GlncoZrCXMg/NMk3fgCeoOJFL2NHvD3x4HWNA1SbdlTCl7TOqF5bbJYhra9fLT9j9hfOxvOxcxsDigoyHHvHH5u2oDIE4a5vDuio+xPz225W/IDGTFULnFEBNuGxyIB2H+8gHooGWeVfASkcWJNeTr2SyVCYVsyc7pkmDe0YJdfBrdY3/eHF04PWoSDjgOWmPAkK16WgD7eMpIBclEcPeutLPhFLsaqKVtUo1KCciCzD1nU8tjE0KFExk4oBS5zodYEVsBrTT44HrfEr8jIggAiXPamMkQsacfiFLKHe6tfC5MTNZuQJDtH6llY0HQYH/eIdtgtpnyD/0wfZDMtLV8CIhXV4g0IWEwtXDzLowjFmTCTeXeu3+CmRmcx9yHBHlynmhFnRaYw6Baev6Wia4ma15q6CWUnhf5mcbx4ZHkvGIkmuOb/BvcGRJ3sbX/98b9+EjebYpJF8p76vGhvKAn1ZElC1DOvw6VUL4uPvQYgSnCJUi+IhM53Z/L5Bh1jrmA9ZtJy9CNlU+yMKrqpWn8j/b9XlXEhc4Pu4ocNH4AfB/tvuQ7WXZz0LjXmO820kde78QbvlKrAFuYoabxYfjgrgNTKJRXCoyD0F1PF2EgHkOHiykpWmr4QgGSuXf63WVpD9cC6SlpH9K0cYkntzH/nISdqMvwcJE2XohqBfm5/4z/du1F6WLXrTb6OhjOS3ptrY7ETlPJ3tqQ+9cupwwGOAp9p3EUxbT0iRZHc6yt6A9LA9mzDd77sCgEoZTx4T08Eu5wjIkMhgPlaivckjWFXzybC47NzHk50lhx/jI5DWaq2BFmfjOTuLI1zk+rb6ShP4XELOkQSZLjhd38qrFiL5cUkDV7IHhlGoxIVPsZ32Dz2B7QlDUfutAlgtEUlNtmP4RwE95yw0Xm1+loVZCJBJu4e+EFg88L6eeYrcnIbGLKSLYqu0qpCvfFw1TZIctZxtlkbjKFfEPbq/6LGVvWYYbiyrmFyp7Y9ThlMawLuaJ6Xp0NtG30wMDw1s0dpwk9SrVvvla2w6UcIywdzaXEXTpDNIL/v5HZzGdInovni2YJzT20FdcwMn3ssLAbZURAhsclhuJbEariTzm6NwSDNmRq15Gblcc35Gh7VV2dk1dIrT4njwmrKMKZ7/WZ2dKriUvSxO0xqXTxdfBgUA8unF3iawfGL8zaBlDt5p4Yh1iT1oIYj/7nlR7SFNHvuguw+xdOfR+snJ0SsVjZifkkdydMne44NM7cO+fYmtf8OmqvW3OU/DOHOU6aeE1gnqDDPHkeAjhmn158RRH2X6LkmnWka4nGeo1He3OdLcAxercdJhyDppRdbNJbJgeVWyFvEttE6kBVXmALiLYwypFcUJqhYt5akaPl6YdTAse1ak4DNco3hlgqkBiOxeobaSZDTF1exRfrIdcw4eeTzW0AF27+MzF227WYvuhGAE="},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01CXY5c77EjKvTuk9yQ7DVC9","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"mkdir -p out/state && cd out/state && cat > contract.md <<'EOF'\n# Contract — F4-conf-02\n**Question.** For each of six literature-review assertions (data/assertions.json), decide from the cited source extract alone whether it is supported / not_supported / not_assessable.\n**Estimands.** Six categorical verdicts, each with one locator and one-sentence reason. Meaningful under the task's rules: \"supported\" requires every element (sign, magnitude, uncertainty, significance, population) to hold; partial contradiction => not_supported; not_assessable only when the extract has no bearing quantity.\n**Conventions.** % change = 100(exp(b)-1); 95% CI = b ± 1.96·SE (2.0 acceptable).\n**Outputs.** out/results.json keys: verdicts, locators, reasons, n_supported, n_not_supported, n_not_assessable, task_id (\"F4-conf-02\"), feasibility, feasibility_reason, data_issues [{issue,handling}], n_input_rows {file: lines/items}, n_analysed, random_seed (null). Also out/report.md (Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues), out/analysis.py, out/claims.json, out/exclusions.csv, out/state/*.\n**Information rules.** Only the two extracts are admissible; no memory of papers or outside knowledge.\n**Invalidity.** Using outside info; a source missing; assertion citing a source not provided.\nEOF\ncat > log.md <<'EOF'\n# Log\n- 2026-10-30 P0: read TASK.md, wrote contract. \nEOF\necho ok","description":"Write contract and log"}}]}}32{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"c99438c0-ca77-4203-8f60-8eff6c79fab6","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:26.927Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"03dd8068-774a-44f4-bac1-2b36dbad962e","keep":6,"tail":["1d6fb1c1c069d1a31856e28f3b8e4b3e13320c44ae98e735037152ea6cfd596b","7dbf10bef8948ed024b2fe2277a303f55fd8a05b00a038aa6fdeea994075e60f"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",7,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"fe3f3b25fd65a79603a6433dc56a5e47ff2ba8093720d58f006f4337175506cb"}33{"parentUuid":"fac50460-ad62-4747-bfb4-b44f53e39655","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnfA9fsyv5AWkifQcmb","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now the analysis script."}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1639,"cache_read_input_tokens":18761,"output_tokens":5086,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1639},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnf9rKWrd5jyTWxgW8u","requestRef":"c99438c0-ca77-4203-8f60-8eff6c79fab6","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"d48028f4-28c7-46f2-b76b-d63603c9b4f8","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:26:28.385Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}34{"parentUuid":"d48028f4-28c7-46f2-b76b-d63603c9b4f8","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnfA9fsyv5AWkifQcmb","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01SQQroR3EA4dBe99KzEKRdN","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat > out/analysis.py <<'EOF'\n\"\"\"F4-conf-02: verdicts on six assertions against cited source extracts.\nReads data/ only; writes out/results.json deterministically. No randomness.\"\"\"\nimport json, math, os, re\n\nROOT = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))\nD = os.path.join(ROOT, \"data\")\nDCR, RES = \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\", \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\"\n\ndef lines(path):\n with open(path, encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n return f.read().split(\"\\n\")\n\ndef wc_l(path):\n with open(path, \"rb\") as f:\n return f.read().count(b\"\\n\")\n\nassertions = json.load(open(os.path.join(D, \"assertions.json\"), encoding=\"utf-8\"))\nsrc = {s: lines(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", s + \".txt\")) for s in (DCR, RES)}\n\ndef find(s, pattern, start=0):\n \"\"\"Return (lineno, text) of first line at/after `start` matching regex.\"\"\"\n for i, l in enumerate(src[s][start:], start):\n if re.search(pattern, l):\n print(f\" [{s} L{i+1}] {l.strip()}\")\n return i, l\n raise ValueError(f\"pattern {pattern!r} not found in {s}\")\n\ndef cells(l):\n return [c.strip() for c in l.split(\"|\")]\n\ndef num(c):\n return float(re.sub(r\"[^\\d\\.\\-]\", \"\", c.replace(\"−\", \"-\")))\n\ndef stars(c):\n return c.count(\"*\")\n\npct = lambda b: 100 * (math.exp(b) - 1)\ncols = {\"1 km\": 1, \"3 km\": 2, \"5 km\": 3}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 6 ----------\nprint(\"Table 6 (DCR):\")\nt6, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 6:\")\ni, att = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", t6); att = cells(att)\n_, se = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); se = cells(se)\n_, pc = find(DCR, r\"^% change \\|\", i); pc = cells(pc)\nt6v = {k: dict(b=num(att[c]), st=stars(att[c]), se=num(se[c]), pct=num(pc[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 7 ----------\nprint(\"Table 7 (DCR):\")\nt7, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 7:\")\nt7v = {}\nfor row in (\"Hepatitis\", \"HIV\"):\n i, l = find(DCR, rf\"^{row} \\|\", t7); l = cells(l)\n _, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); s = cells(s)\n t7v[row] = {k: dict(b=num(l[c]), st=stars(l[c]), se=num(s[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR A19 (for consistency check only) ----------\nprint(\"Table A19 (DCR, consistency check):\")\na19, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table A19:\")\ni, l = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", a19)\n_, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i)\na19_se_csdr = num(cells(s)[1])\n_, a19note = find(DCR, r\"never-treated comparison regions \\(\\d+ regions\\)\", a19)\na19_controls = int(re.search(r\"\\((\\d+) regions\\)\", a19note).group(1))\n\n# ---------- Sex/gender search (A5) ----------\nprint(\"Search for sex/gender breakdown in DCR extract:\")\nsex_hits = [k + 1 for k, l in enumerate(src[DCR]) if re.search(r\"\\b(men|women|male|female|sex|gender)\\b\", l, re.I)]\nprint(f\" lines mentioning men/women/male/female/sex/gender: {sex_hits}\")\n\n# ---------- RESEA Table 2 ----------\nprint(\"Table 2 (RESEA):\")\n_, w = find(RES, r\"^Weeks on UI \\|\")\nw = cells(w)\nctrl_mean = num(w[2].split(\"weeks\")[0])\nate = w[4]\nate_b = float(re.search(r\"(-?\\d+\\.\\d+) weeks\", ate).group(1))\nate_ci = [float(x) for x in re.search(r\"CI: \\[(-?[\\d\\.]+), (-?[\\d\\.]+)\\]\", ate).groups()]\n_, txt = find(RES, r\"11\\.5% decrease\")\n\n# ---------- Verdict logic ----------\nV, L, R, calc = {}, {}, {}, {}\na = {x[\"id\"]: x for x in assertions}\nassert a[\"A1\"][\"cites\"] == a[\"A5\"][\"cites\"] == DCR and a[\"A6\"][\"cites\"] == RES\n\n# A1: 5 km overall ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210), significant at 5%, 35.0% reduction\nx = t6v[\"5 km\"]\nok1 = (x[\"b\"] == -0.431 and x[\"se\"] == 0.210 and x[\"st\"] >= 2 and x[\"pct\"] == -35.0\n and round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 1) == -35.0)\ncalc[\"A1\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2),\n z=round(x[\"b\"] / x[\"se\"], 3))\nV[\"A1\"] = \"supported\" if ok1 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A1\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"ATT\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A1\"] = (\"Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and % change -35.0% at 5 km, and the text states significance at the 5% level, \"\n \"matching every element of the assertion.\" if ok1 else \"Table 6 5 km values do not match the assertion.\")\n\n# A2: HIV 1 km ATT negative (-0.063)\nx = t7v[\"HIV\"][\"1 km\"]\ncalc[\"A2\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"])\nV[\"A2\"] = \"not_supported\" if x[\"b\"] > 0 else \"supported\"\nL[\"A2\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"HIV\" | column \"1 km\"'\nR[\"A2\"] = (f\"Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +{x['b']:.3f} (SE {x['se']:.3f}), positive and insignificant, so the claimed negative \"\n \"sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.\")\n\n# A3: 3 km ATT -0.283 implies 28.3% reduction\nx = t6v[\"3 km\"]\ncalc[\"A3\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2))\nok3 = abs(pct(x[\"b\"]) - (-28.3)) < 0.05\nV[\"A3\"] = \"supported\" if ok3 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A3\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"% change\" | column \"3 km\"'\nR[\"A3\"] = (f\"The ATT of {x['b']:.3f} log points corresponds to a {x['pct']:.1f}% change (printed in Table 6; \"\n f\"100(exp({x['b']:.3f})-1) = {pct(x['b']):.2f}%), not a 28.3% reduction, which wrongly reads log points as percent.\")\n\n# A4: hepatitis 5 km 95% CI approx [-0.66, -0.16], excludes zero\nx = t7v[\"Hepatitis\"][\"5 km\"]\nci196 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci200 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci100 = [round(x[\"b\"] - x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + x[\"se\"], 3)]\ncalc[\"A4\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], ci95_1p96=ci196, ci95_2p00=ci200, ci_pm_1se=ci100)\nexcl = ci196[1] < 0 or ci196[0] > 0\nV[\"A4\"] = \"supported\" if excl else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A4\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"Hepatitis\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A4\"] = (f\"With ATT {x['b']:.3f} and SE {x['se']:.3f} the 95% CI is [{ci196[0]:.3f}, {ci196[1]:.3f}] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero \"\n \"(the estimate carries no star); the asserted interval is only ±1 SE.\")\n\n# A5: larger reduction for men than women\ncalc[\"A5\"] = dict(sex_lines=sex_hits)\nV[\"A5\"] = \"not_assessable\" if not sex_hits else \"REVIEW\"\nL[\"A5\"] = f\"not reported in {DCR}\"\nR[\"A5\"] = (\"The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and never \"\n \"by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.\")\n\n# A6: ATE -1.99 weeks, CI [-2.24,-1.75], 11.5% of control mean 17.3\nrel = 100 * abs(ate_b) / ctrl_mean\ncalc[\"A6\"] = dict(ate=ate_b, ci=ate_ci, control_mean=ctrl_mean, rel_pct=round(rel, 2))\nok6 = ate_b == -1.99 and ate_ci == [-2.24, -1.75] and ctrl_mean == 17.3 and round(rel, 1) == 11.5\nV[\"A6\"] = \"supported\" if ok6 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A6\"] = f'{RES} | Table 2 | row \"Weeks on UI\" | column \"Average treatment effect estimate\"'\nR[\"A6\"] = (f\"Table 2 prints the ATE as -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with a control mean of 17.3 weeks, and \"\n f\"1.99/17.3 = {rel:.2f}% matches the 11.5% decrease stated in the results text.\")\n\n# ---------- Data issues ----------\nissues = []\nif a19_se_csdr != t6v[\"5 km\"][\"se\"]:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: the same CS-DR 5 km ATT (-0.431**) has SE {t6v['5 km']['se']:.3f} in Table 6 but \"\n f\"{a19_se_csdr:.3f} in Table A19 (internal inconsistency).\",\n handling=\"A1 cites Table 6, whose SE (0.210) matches the assertion; verdict uses Table 6. With SE 0.218, \"\n f\"z = {-0.431/a19_se_csdr:.3f}, still significant at 5% under 1.96 (borderline under 2.0); A1 verdict unchanged since the printed ** applies to both.\"))\nif a19_controls != 608:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: Table A19 note says {a19_controls} never-treated comparison regions while Tables 6/A19 rows and the Figure 6 note say 608.\",\n handling=\"Not decisive for any assertion; recorded only.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: narrative percentages for sub-outcomes are inconsistent: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35% while Section 6.1 says ~30% at 5 km \"\n f\"(100(exp(-0.354)-1) = {pct(-0.354):.1f}%); narcotics +47% at 5 km (implied {pct(0.390):.1f}%); text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero' although the 5 km HIV ATT is -0.340.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely on the printed table coefficients, not the narrative; none of these is decisive for A1-A6.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{RES}: results text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]) for a 'reduction', while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75]; also a rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' for p < 0.001.\",\n handling=\"Treated as equivalent sign conventions; A6 judged against the signed Table 2 values.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=\"Both extracts are partial (sections omitted), and RESEA Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely only on the extract content as instructed; values in re-set tables are taken as verbatim per the editorial note.\"))\n\nids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\nres = dict(\n task_id=\"F4-conf-02\",\n verdicts={k: V[k] for k in ids},\n locators={k: L[k] for k in ids},\n reasons={k: R[k] for k in ids},\n n_supported=sum(V[k] == \"supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_supported=sum(V[k] == \"not_supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_assessable=sum(V[k] == \"not_assessable\" for k in ids),\n feasibility=\"complete\",\n feasibility_reason=None,\n data_issues=issues,\n n_input_rows={\"assertions.json\": len(assertions), \"README.md\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"README.md\")),\n f\"{DCR}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", DCR + \".txt\")),\n f\"{RES}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", RES + \".txt\"))},\n n_analysed=len(ids),\n random_seed=None,\n supporting_calculations=calc,\n)\nos.makedirs(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\"), exist_ok=True)\nwith open(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\", \"results.json\"), \"w\", encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n json.dump(res, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)\nprint(\"\\nVerdicts:\", json.dumps(res[\"verdicts\"]))\nprint(\"Counts: supported\", res[\"n_supported\"], \"| not_supported\", res[\"n_not_supported\"], \"| not_assessable\", res[\"n_not_assessable\"])\nEOF\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py && cat out/results.json | head -80","description":"Write and run analysis script"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1639,"cache_read_input_tokens":18761,"output_tokens":5086,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1639},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXnf9rKWrd5jyTWxgW8u","requestRef":"c99438c0-ca77-4203-8f60-8eff6c79fab6","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"a2f2ac3f-70a1-40c4-884f-1aa4d0ec1da5","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:07.297Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}35{"parentUuid":"a2f2ac3f-70a1-40c4-884f-1aa4d0ec1da5","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","content":"Exit code 2\n(eval):1: no such file or directory: out/analysis.py\n/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.14/3.14.4/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.14/Resources/Python.app/Contents/MacOS/Python: can't open file '/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state/out/analysis.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory","is_error":true,"tool_use_id":"toolu_01SQQroR3EA4dBe99KzEKRdN"}]},"uuid":"48fdd7bd-6925-49fc-9c5d-5490a7db34f9","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:07.342Z","toolUseResult":"Error: Exit code 2\n(eval):1: no such file or directory: out/analysis.py\n/opt/homebrew/Cellar/python@3.14/3.14.4/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.14/Resources/Python.app/Contents/MacOS/Python: can't open file '/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state/out/analysis.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory","sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a2f2ac3f-70a1-40c4-884f-1aa4d0ec1da5","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}36{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"d53436f813bd79c6036eb87aa6a8efc5b569c6db2fda6e28c94c840aeca3a19d","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now the analysis script."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01SQQroR3EA4dBe99KzEKRdN","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat > out/analysis.py <<'EOF'\n\"\"\"F4-conf-02: verdicts on six assertions against cited source extracts.\nReads data/ only; writes out/results.json deterministically. No randomness.\"\"\"\nimport json, math, os, re\n\nROOT = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))\nD = os.path.join(ROOT, \"data\")\nDCR, RES = \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\", \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\"\n\ndef lines(path):\n with open(path, encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n return f.read().split(\"\\n\")\n\ndef wc_l(path):\n with open(path, \"rb\") as f:\n return f.read().count(b\"\\n\")\n\nassertions = json.load(open(os.path.join(D, \"assertions.json\"), encoding=\"utf-8\"))\nsrc = {s: lines(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", s + \".txt\")) for s in (DCR, RES)}\n\ndef find(s, pattern, start=0):\n \"\"\"Return (lineno, text) of first line at/after `start` matching regex.\"\"\"\n for i, l in enumerate(src[s][start:], start):\n if re.search(pattern, l):\n print(f\" [{s} L{i+1}] {l.strip()}\")\n return i, l\n raise ValueError(f\"pattern {pattern!r} not found in {s}\")\n\ndef cells(l):\n return [c.strip() for c in l.split(\"|\")]\n\ndef num(c):\n return float(re.sub(r\"[^\\d\\.\\-]\", \"\", c.replace(\"−\", \"-\")))\n\ndef stars(c):\n return c.count(\"*\")\n\npct = lambda b: 100 * (math.exp(b) - 1)\ncols = {\"1 km\": 1, \"3 km\": 2, \"5 km\": 3}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 6 ----------\nprint(\"Table 6 (DCR):\")\nt6, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 6:\")\ni, att = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", t6); att = cells(att)\n_, se = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); se = cells(se)\n_, pc = find(DCR, r\"^% change \\|\", i); pc = cells(pc)\nt6v = {k: dict(b=num(att[c]), st=stars(att[c]), se=num(se[c]), pct=num(pc[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 7 ----------\nprint(\"Table 7 (DCR):\")\nt7, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 7:\")\nt7v = {}\nfor row in (\"Hepatitis\", \"HIV\"):\n i, l = find(DCR, rf\"^{row} \\|\", t7); l = cells(l)\n _, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); s = cells(s)\n t7v[row] = {k: dict(b=num(l[c]), st=stars(l[c]), se=num(s[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR A19 (for consistency check only) ----------\nprint(\"Table A19 (DCR, consistency check):\")\na19, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table A19:\")\ni, l = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", a19)\n_, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i)\na19_se_csdr = num(cells(s)[1])\n_, a19note = find(DCR, r\"never-treated comparison regions \\(\\d+ regions\\)\", a19)\na19_controls = int(re.search(r\"\\((\\d+) regions\\)\", a19note).group(1))\n\n# ---------- Sex/gender search (A5) ----------\nprint(\"Search for sex/gender breakdown in DCR extract:\")\nsex_hits = [k + 1 for k, l in enumerate(src[DCR]) if re.search(r\"\\b(men|women|male|female|sex|gender)\\b\", l, re.I)]\nprint(f\" lines mentioning men/women/male/female/sex/gender: {sex_hits}\")\n\n# ---------- RESEA Table 2 ----------\nprint(\"Table 2 (RESEA):\")\n_, w = find(RES, r\"^Weeks on UI \\|\")\nw = cells(w)\nctrl_mean = num(w[2].split(\"weeks\")[0])\nate = w[4]\nate_b = float(re.search(r\"(-?\\d+\\.\\d+) weeks\", ate).group(1))\nate_ci = [float(x) for x in re.search(r\"CI: \\[(-?[\\d\\.]+), (-?[\\d\\.]+)\\]\", ate).groups()]\n_, txt = find(RES, r\"11\\.5% decrease\")\n\n# ---------- Verdict logic ----------\nV, L, R, calc = {}, {}, {}, {}\na = {x[\"id\"]: x for x in assertions}\nassert a[\"A1\"][\"cites\"] == a[\"A5\"][\"cites\"] == DCR and a[\"A6\"][\"cites\"] == RES\n\n# A1: 5 km overall ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210), significant at 5%, 35.0% reduction\nx = t6v[\"5 km\"]\nok1 = (x[\"b\"] == -0.431 and x[\"se\"] == 0.210 and x[\"st\"] >= 2 and x[\"pct\"] == -35.0\n and round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 1) == -35.0)\ncalc[\"A1\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2),\n z=round(x[\"b\"] / x[\"se\"], 3))\nV[\"A1\"] = \"supported\" if ok1 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A1\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"ATT\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A1\"] = (\"Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and % change -35.0% at 5 km, and the text states significance at the 5% level, \"\n \"matching every element of the assertion.\" if ok1 else \"Table 6 5 km values do not match the assertion.\")\n\n# A2: HIV 1 km ATT negative (-0.063)\nx = t7v[\"HIV\"][\"1 km\"]\ncalc[\"A2\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"])\nV[\"A2\"] = \"not_supported\" if x[\"b\"] > 0 else \"supported\"\nL[\"A2\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"HIV\" | column \"1 km\"'\nR[\"A2\"] = (f\"Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +{x['b']:.3f} (SE {x['se']:.3f}), positive and insignificant, so the claimed negative \"\n \"sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.\")\n\n# A3: 3 km ATT -0.283 implies 28.3% reduction\nx = t6v[\"3 km\"]\ncalc[\"A3\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2))\nok3 = abs(pct(x[\"b\"]) - (-28.3)) < 0.05\nV[\"A3\"] = \"supported\" if ok3 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A3\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"% change\" | column \"3 km\"'\nR[\"A3\"] = (f\"The ATT of {x['b']:.3f} log points corresponds to a {x['pct']:.1f}% change (printed in Table 6; \"\n f\"100(exp({x['b']:.3f})-1) = {pct(x['b']):.2f}%), not a 28.3% reduction, which wrongly reads log points as percent.\")\n\n# A4: hepatitis 5 km 95% CI approx [-0.66, -0.16], excludes zero\nx = t7v[\"Hepatitis\"][\"5 km\"]\nci196 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci200 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci100 = [round(x[\"b\"] - x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + x[\"se\"], 3)]\ncalc[\"A4\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], ci95_1p96=ci196, ci95_2p00=ci200, ci_pm_1se=ci100)\nexcl = ci196[1] < 0 or ci196[0] > 0\nV[\"A4\"] = \"supported\" if excl else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A4\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"Hepatitis\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A4\"] = (f\"With ATT {x['b']:.3f} and SE {x['se']:.3f} the 95% CI is [{ci196[0]:.3f}, {ci196[1]:.3f}] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero \"\n \"(the estimate carries no star); the asserted interval is only ±1 SE.\")\n\n# A5: larger reduction for men than women\ncalc[\"A5\"] = dict(sex_lines=sex_hits)\nV[\"A5\"] = \"not_assessable\" if not sex_hits else \"REVIEW\"\nL[\"A5\"] = f\"not reported in {DCR}\"\nR[\"A5\"] = (\"The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and never \"\n \"by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.\")\n\n# A6: ATE -1.99 weeks, CI [-2.24,-1.75], 11.5% of control mean 17.3\nrel = 100 * abs(ate_b) / ctrl_mean\ncalc[\"A6\"] = dict(ate=ate_b, ci=ate_ci, control_mean=ctrl_mean, rel_pct=round(rel, 2))\nok6 = ate_b == -1.99 and ate_ci == [-2.24, -1.75] and ctrl_mean == 17.3 and round(rel, 1) == 11.5\nV[\"A6\"] = \"supported\" if ok6 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A6\"] = f'{RES} | Table 2 | row \"Weeks on UI\" | column \"Average treatment effect estimate\"'\nR[\"A6\"] = (f\"Table 2 prints the ATE as -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with a control mean of 17.3 weeks, and \"\n f\"1.99/17.3 = {rel:.2f}% matches the 11.5% decrease stated in the results text.\")\n\n# ---------- Data issues ----------\nissues = []\nif a19_se_csdr != t6v[\"5 km\"][\"se\"]:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: the same CS-DR 5 km ATT (-0.431**) has SE {t6v['5 km']['se']:.3f} in Table 6 but \"\n f\"{a19_se_csdr:.3f} in Table A19 (internal inconsistency).\",\n handling=\"A1 cites Table 6, whose SE (0.210) matches the assertion; verdict uses Table 6. With SE 0.218, \"\n f\"z = {-0.431/a19_se_csdr:.3f}, still significant at 5% under 1.96 (borderline under 2.0); A1 verdict unchanged since the printed ** applies to both.\"))\nif a19_controls != 608:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: Table A19 note says {a19_controls} never-treated comparison regions while Tables 6/A19 rows and the Figure 6 note say 608.\",\n handling=\"Not decisive for any assertion; recorded only.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: narrative percentages for sub-outcomes are inconsistent: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35% while Section 6.1 says ~30% at 5 km \"\n f\"(100(exp(-0.354)-1) = {pct(-0.354):.1f}%); narcotics +47% at 5 km (implied {pct(0.390):.1f}%); text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero' although the 5 km HIV ATT is -0.340.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely on the printed table coefficients, not the narrative; none of these is decisive for A1-A6.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{RES}: results text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]) for a 'reduction', while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75]; also a rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' for p < 0.001.\",\n handling=\"Treated as equivalent sign conventions; A6 judged against the signed Table 2 values.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=\"Both extracts are partial (sections omitted), and RESEA Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely only on the extract content as instructed; values in re-set tables are taken as verbatim per the editorial note.\"))\n\nids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\nres = dict(\n task_id=\"F4-conf-02\",\n verdicts={k: V[k] for k in ids},\n locators={k: L[k] for k in ids},\n reasons={k: R[k] for k in ids},\n n_supported=sum(V[k] == \"supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_supported=sum(V[k] == \"not_supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_assessable=sum(V[k] == \"not_assessable\" for k in ids),\n feasibility=\"complete\",\n feasibility_reason=None,\n data_issues=issues,\n n_input_rows={\"assertions.json\": len(assertions), \"README.md\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"README.md\")),\n f\"{DCR}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", DCR + \".txt\")),\n f\"{RES}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", RES + \".txt\"))},\n n_analysed=len(ids),\n random_seed=None,\n supporting_calculations=calc,\n)\nos.makedirs(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\"), exist_ok=True)\nwith open(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\", \"results.json\"), \"w\", encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n json.dump(res, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)\nprint(\"\\nVerdicts:\", json.dumps(res[\"verdicts\"]))\nprint(\"Counts: supported\", res[\"n_supported\"], \"| not_supported\", res[\"n_not_supported\"], \"| not_assessable\", res[\"n_not_assessable\"])\nEOF\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py && cat out/results.json | head -80","description":"Write and run analysis script"}}]}}37{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"9e4e0766-835c-4761-96bf-423249edf9b8","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:07.345Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"c99438c0-ca77-4203-8f60-8eff6c79fab6","keep":8,"tail":["d53436f813bd79c6036eb87aa6a8efc5b569c6db2fda6e28c94c840aeca3a19d","831578021d56e0da114b411a6c1ca1498bc80cde07f0e6461d4e385b35122d57"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",9,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"448189f5d27955b4487a38a881c5704a01c6b1c595f6ad34a336b9072050549d"}38{"type":"last-prompt","lastPrompt":"Begin","leafUuid":"48fdd7bd-6925-49fc-9c5d-5490a7db34f9","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}39{"type":"atis-latch","atis":"","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}40{"parentUuid":"48fdd7bd-6925-49fc-9c5d-5490a7db34f9","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXni8waX9MomZNCmoSjf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":5247,"cache_read_input_tokens":20400,"output_tokens":229,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":105},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":5247},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"thinkingDurationMs":935,"thinkingDisplay":"updates","apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXni8gChEpmDHVG1A8dr","requestRef":"9e4e0766-835c-4761-96bf-423249edf9b8","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"01dba839-69b7-4fa3-baeb-414176e3ceb2","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:09.921Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}41{"parentUuid":"01dba839-69b7-4fa3-baeb-414176e3ceb2","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXni8waX9MomZNCmoSjf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01PboVuCc71ZDPo542mMd1td","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088 && ls -R data/out && cat data/out/state/*","description":"Check accidentally created dir under data"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":5247,"cache_read_input_tokens":20400,"output_tokens":229,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":105},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":5247},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXni8gChEpmDHVG1A8dr","requestRef":"9e4e0766-835c-4761-96bf-423249edf9b8","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"5df7b744-244d-40f1-a7c8-afcc297d3b4e","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:10.584Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088/data/out/state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}42{"parentUuid":"5df7b744-244d-40f1-a7c8-afcc297d3b4e","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01PboVuCc71ZDPo542mMd1td","type":"tool_result","content":"state\n\ndata/out/state:\ncontract.md\nlog.md\n# Contract — F4-conf-02\n**Question.** For each of six literature-review assertions (data/assertions.json), decide from the cited source extract alone whether it is supported / not_supported / not_assessable.\n**Estimands.** Six categorical verdicts, each with one locator and one-sentence reason. Meaningful under the task's rules: \"supported\" requires every element (sign, magnitude, uncertainty, significance, population) to hold; partial contradiction => not_supported; not_assessable only when the extract has no bearing quantity.\n**Conventions.** % change = 100(exp(b)-1); 95% CI = b ± 1.96·SE (2.0 acceptable).\n**Outputs.** out/results.json keys: verdicts, locators, reasons, n_supported, n_not_supported, n_not_assessable, task_id (\"F4-conf-02\"), feasibility, feasibility_reason, data_issues [{issue,handling}], n_input_rows {file: lines/items}, n_analysed, random_seed (null). Also out/report.md (Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues), out/analysis.py, out/claims.json, out/exclusions.csv, out/state/*.\n**Information rules.** Only the two extracts are admissible; no memory of papers or outside knowledge.\n**Invalidity.** Using outside info; a source missing; assertion citing a source not provided.\n# Log\n- 2026-10-30 P0: read TASK.md, wrote contract.","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"1f2bb398-f578-4d28-bf05-d78c983b89b0","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:10.617Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"state\n\ndata/out/state:\ncontract.md\nlog.md\n# Contract — F4-conf-02\n**Question.** For each of six literature-review assertions (data/assertions.json), decide from the cited source extract alone whether it is supported / not_supported / not_assessable.\n**Estimands.** Six categorical verdicts, each with one locator and one-sentence reason. Meaningful under the task's rules: \"supported\" requires every element (sign, magnitude, uncertainty, significance, population) to hold; partial contradiction => not_supported; not_assessable only when the extract has no bearing quantity.\n**Conventions.** % change = 100(exp(b)-1); 95% CI = b ± 1.96·SE (2.0 acceptable).\n**Outputs.** out/results.json keys: verdicts, locators, reasons, n_supported, n_not_supported, n_not_assessable, task_id (\"F4-conf-02\"), feasibility, feasibility_reason, data_issues [{issue,handling}], n_input_rows {file: lines/items}, n_analysed, random_seed (null). Also out/report.md (Question; Data and exclusions; Method; Results; Uncertainty; Limitations and open issues), out/analysis.py, out/claims.json, out/exclusions.csv, out/state/*.\n**Information rules.** Only the two extracts are admissible; no memory of papers or outside knowledge.\n**Invalidity.** Using outside info; a source missing; assertion citing a source not provided.\n# Log\n- 2026-10-30 P0: read TASK.md, wrote contract.","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"5df7b744-244d-40f1-a7c8-afcc297d3b4e","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}43{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"bff25bf183fd703e6fcc9d1056247108d6291336e1412ceb17de734c2416b551","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01PboVuCc71ZDPo542mMd1td","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088 && ls -R data/out && cat data/out/state/*","description":"Check accidentally created dir under data"}}]}}44{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"390a2585-473c-4421-a7ff-f1ddec73877b","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:10.620Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"9e4e0766-835c-4761-96bf-423249edf9b8","keep":10,"tail":["bff25bf183fd703e6fcc9d1056247108d6291336e1412ceb17de734c2416b551","96c6cc1dd63ed4f1b9a465801fdbdcf44b23f9489be5b5f3660ca2e356bc54dd"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",11,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"39f35434f120083cea301efebf2415893ac6920e4f46f6418f3b72f674bec524"}45{"parentUuid":"1f2bb398-f578-4d28-bf05-d78c983b89b0","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXniNxCAn76CgRP4D2TM","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"I accidentally created files under `data/` (the shell's working directory carried over). Moving them to `out/` and restoring `data/` to its original state, then re-running."}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":757,"cache_read_input_tokens":25647,"output_tokens":301,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":757},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXniNebG7BishVTXeNuS","requestRef":"390a2585-473c-4421-a7ff-f1ddec73877b","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"89f3a133-93bd-4cd2-a593-3f23d32bfd63","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:12.613Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}46{"parentUuid":"89f3a133-93bd-4cd2-a593-3f23d32bfd63","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXniNxCAn76CgRP4D2TM","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01PtwTAtiKQaBcAQy86eLF4M","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"mkdir -p out && mv data/out/state out/state && rmdir data/out && echo \"- 2026-10-30 Incident: contract/log were first written to data/out/state by a cwd mistake; moved to out/state and removed data/out. Original data files untouched (hashes re-checked in P1).\" >> out/state/log.md && ls data && shasum -a 256 data/README.md data/assertions.json data/sources/*","description":"Move misplaced files out of data, verify hashes"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":757,"cache_read_input_tokens":25647,"output_tokens":301,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":757},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXniNebG7BishVTXeNuS","requestRef":"390a2585-473c-4421-a7ff-f1ddec73877b","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"bfac5e2b-bc88-4eac-8594-171233304ea1","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:14.738Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}47{"parentUuid":"bfac5e2b-bc88-4eac-8594-171233304ea1","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01PtwTAtiKQaBcAQy86eLF4M","type":"tool_result","content":"assertions.json\nREADME.md\nsources\n5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 data/README.md\n2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 data/assertions.json\n27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\nee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"169011aa-338c-4142-a789-164ef08649c3","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:14.818Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"assertions.json\nREADME.md\nsources\n5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 data/README.md\n2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 data/assertions.json\n27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\nee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"bfac5e2b-bc88-4eac-8594-171233304ea1","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}48{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"1b3c0c97ff248129fb1e7f0aede40d6d79aabf4f61389478be01a6af08479124","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"I accidentally created files under `data/` (the shell's working directory carried over). Moving them to `out/` and restoring `data/` to its original state, then re-running."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01PtwTAtiKQaBcAQy86eLF4M","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"mkdir -p out && mv data/out/state out/state && rmdir data/out && echo \"- 2026-10-30 Incident: contract/log were first written to data/out/state by a cwd mistake; moved to out/state and removed data/out. Original data files untouched (hashes re-checked in P1).\" >> out/state/log.md && ls data && shasum -a 256 data/README.md data/assertions.json data/sources/*","description":"Move misplaced files out of data, verify hashes"}}]}}49{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"230fb3fe-b7be-4ec9-a408-1d9102595f17","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:14.820Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"390a2585-473c-4421-a7ff-f1ddec73877b","keep":12,"tail":["1b3c0c97ff248129fb1e7f0aede40d6d79aabf4f61389478be01a6af08479124","33719ce994add5d3eed41684a26f3bea1ccec66f8c2bfc6b2f4a85bc28a923e3"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",13,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"c186a6bd931f492d233b56deea45896efddbac12a537ba1deafef216595d5edb"}50{"parentUuid":"169011aa-338c-4142-a789-164ef08649c3","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXniguSn2dWvCTTUaUy1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":520,"cache_read_input_tokens":26404,"output_tokens":5203,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":45},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":520},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"thinkingDurationMs":309,"thinkingDisplay":"updates","apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnigcqDYcGrznsVSRA9","requestRef":"230fb3fe-b7be-4ec9-a408-1d9102595f17","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"11cc757f-34fb-4278-ba94-dbd4232f902f","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:16.669Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}51{"parentUuid":"11cc757f-34fb-4278-ba94-dbd4232f902f","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXniguSn2dWvCTTUaUy1","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01HjgvUv7JFcheqP53w5FhQb","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat > out/analysis.py <<'EOF'\n\"\"\"F4-conf-02: verdicts on six assertions against cited source extracts.\nReads data/ only; writes out/results.json deterministically. No randomness.\"\"\"\nimport json, math, os, re\n\nROOT = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))\nD = os.path.join(ROOT, \"data\")\nDCR, RES = \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\", \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\"\n\ndef lines(path):\n with open(path, encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n return f.read().split(\"\\n\")\n\ndef wc_l(path):\n with open(path, \"rb\") as f:\n return f.read().count(b\"\\n\")\n\nassertions = json.load(open(os.path.join(D, \"assertions.json\"), encoding=\"utf-8\"))\nsrc = {s: lines(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", s + \".txt\")) for s in (DCR, RES)}\n\ndef find(s, pattern, start=0):\n \"\"\"Return (index, text) of first line at/after `start` matching regex; print it.\"\"\"\n for i, l in enumerate(src[s][start:], start):\n if re.search(pattern, l):\n print(f\" [{s} L{i+1}] {l.strip()}\")\n return i, l\n raise ValueError(f\"pattern {pattern!r} not found in {s}\")\n\ndef cells(l):\n return [c.strip() for c in l.split(\"|\")]\n\ndef num(c):\n return float(re.sub(r\"[^\\d\\.\\-]\", \"\", c.replace(\"−\", \"-\")))\n\ndef stars(c):\n return c.count(\"*\")\n\npct = lambda b: 100 * (math.exp(b) - 1)\ncols = {\"1 km\": 1, \"3 km\": 2, \"5 km\": 3}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 6 ----------\nprint(\"Table 6 (DCR):\")\nt6, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 6:\")\ni, att = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", t6); att = cells(att)\n_, se = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); se = cells(se)\n_, pc = find(DCR, r\"^% change \\|\", i); pc = cells(pc)\nfind(DCR, r\"statistically significant at the 5% level\", i)\nt6v = {k: dict(b=num(att[c]), st=stars(att[c]), se=num(se[c]), pct=num(pc[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 7 ----------\nprint(\"Table 7 (DCR):\")\nt7, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 7:\")\nt7v = {}\nfor row in (\"Hepatitis\", \"HIV\"):\n i, l = find(DCR, rf\"^{row} \\|\", t7); l = cells(l)\n _, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); s = cells(s)\n t7v[row] = {k: dict(b=num(l[c]), st=stars(l[c]), se=num(s[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR A19 (consistency check only) ----------\nprint(\"Table A19 (DCR, consistency check):\")\na19, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table A19:\")\ni, l = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", a19)\n_, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i)\na19_se_csdr = num(cells(s)[1])\n_, a19note = find(DCR, r\"never-treated comparison regions \\(\\d+ regions\\)\", a19)\na19_controls = int(re.search(r\"\\((\\d+) regions\\)\", a19note).group(1))\n\n# ---------- Sex/gender search (A5) ----------\nprint(\"Search for sex/gender breakdown in DCR extract:\")\nsex_hits = [k + 1 for k, l in enumerate(src[DCR]) if re.search(r\"\\b(men|women|male|female|males|females|sex|gender)\\b\", l, re.I)]\nprint(f\" lines mentioning men/women/male/female/sex/gender: {sex_hits}\")\n\n# ---------- RESEA Table 2 ----------\nprint(\"Table 2 (RESEA):\")\n_, w = find(RES, r\"^Weeks on UI \\|\")\nw = cells(w)\nctrl_mean = num(w[2].split(\"weeks\")[0])\nate = w[4]\nate_b = float(re.search(r\"(-?\\d+\\.\\d+) weeks\", ate).group(1))\nate_ci = [float(x) for x in re.search(r\"CI: \\[(-?[\\d\\.]+), (-?[\\d\\.]+)\\]\", ate).groups()]\nfind(RES, r\"11\\.5% decrease\")\n\n# ---------- Verdict logic ----------\nV, L, R, calc = {}, {}, {}, {}\na = {x[\"id\"]: x for x in assertions}\nassert all(a[k][\"cites\"] == DCR for k in (\"A1\", \"A2\", \"A3\", \"A4\", \"A5\")) and a[\"A6\"][\"cites\"] == RES\n\n# A1: 5 km overall ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210), significant at 5%, 35.0% reduction\nx = t6v[\"5 km\"]\nok1 = (x[\"b\"] == -0.431 and x[\"se\"] == 0.210 and x[\"st\"] >= 2 and x[\"pct\"] == -35.0\n and round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 1) == -35.0)\ncalc[\"A1\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2),\n z=round(x[\"b\"] / x[\"se\"], 3))\nV[\"A1\"] = \"supported\" if ok1 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A1\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"ATT\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A1\"] = (\"Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and % change -35.0% at 5 km, and the text states significance at the 5% level, \"\n \"matching every element of the assertion.\" if ok1 else \"Table 6 5 km values do not match the assertion.\")\n\n# A2: HIV 1 km ATT negative (-0.063)\nx = t7v[\"HIV\"][\"1 km\"]\ncalc[\"A2\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"])\nV[\"A2\"] = \"not_supported\" if x[\"b\"] > 0 else \"supported\"\nL[\"A2\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"HIV\" | column \"1 km\"'\nR[\"A2\"] = (f\"Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +{x['b']:.3f} (SE {x['se']:.3f}), positive and insignificant, so the claimed negative \"\n \"sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.\")\n\n# A3: 3 km ATT -0.283 implies 28.3% reduction\nx = t6v[\"3 km\"]\ncalc[\"A3\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2))\nok3 = abs(pct(x[\"b\"]) - (-28.3)) < 0.05\nV[\"A3\"] = \"supported\" if ok3 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A3\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"% change\" | column \"3 km\"'\nR[\"A3\"] = (f\"The ATT of {x['b']:.3f} log points corresponds to a {x['pct']:.1f}% change (printed in Table 6; \"\n f\"100(exp({x['b']:.3f})-1) = {pct(x['b']):.2f}%), not a 28.3% reduction, which wrongly reads log points as percent.\")\n\n# A4: hepatitis 5 km 95% CI approx [-0.66, -0.16], excludes zero\nx = t7v[\"Hepatitis\"][\"5 km\"]\nci196 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci200 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci100 = [round(x[\"b\"] - x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + x[\"se\"], 3)]\ncalc[\"A4\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], ci95_1p96=ci196, ci95_2p00=ci200, ci_pm_1se=ci100)\nexcl = ci196[1] < 0 or ci196[0] > 0\nV[\"A4\"] = \"supported\" if excl else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A4\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"Hepatitis\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A4\"] = (f\"With ATT {x['b']:.3f} and SE {x['se']:.3f} the 95% CI is [{ci196[0]:.3f}, {ci196[1]:.3f}] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero \"\n \"(the estimate carries no star); the asserted interval is only ±1 SE.\")\n\n# A5: larger reduction for men than women\ncalc[\"A5\"] = dict(sex_lines=sex_hits)\nV[\"A5\"] = \"not_assessable\" if not sex_hits else \"REVIEW\"\nL[\"A5\"] = f\"not reported in {DCR}\"\nR[\"A5\"] = (\"The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and never \"\n \"by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.\")\n\n# A6: ATE -1.99 weeks, CI [-2.24,-1.75], 11.5% of control mean 17.3\nrel = 100 * abs(ate_b) / ctrl_mean\ncalc[\"A6\"] = dict(ate=ate_b, ci=ate_ci, control_mean=ctrl_mean, rel_pct=round(rel, 2))\nok6 = ate_b == -1.99 and ate_ci == [-2.24, -1.75] and ctrl_mean == 17.3 and round(rel, 1) == 11.5\nV[\"A6\"] = \"supported\" if ok6 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A6\"] = f'{RES} | Table 2 | row \"Weeks on UI\" | column \"Average treatment effect estimate\"'\nR[\"A6\"] = (f\"Table 2 prints the ATE as -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with a control mean of 17.3 weeks, and \"\n f\"1.99/17.3 = {rel:.2f}% matches the 11.5% decrease stated in the results text.\")\n\n# ---------- Data issues ----------\nissues = []\nif a19_se_csdr != t6v[\"5 km\"][\"se\"]:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: the same CS-DR 5 km ATT (-0.431**) has SE {t6v['5 km']['se']:.3f} in Table 6 but \"\n f\"{a19_se_csdr:.3f} in Table A19 (internal inconsistency).\",\n handling=\"A1 cites Table 6, whose SE (0.210) matches the assertion; verdict uses Table 6. With SE 0.218, \"\n f\"|z| = {0.431/a19_se_csdr:.3f}: still significant at 5% under 1.96, borderline under 2.0; A1 verdict unchanged because the printed ** appears in both tables.\"))\nif a19_controls != 608:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: Table A19 note says {a19_controls} never-treated comparison regions while the Table 6/A19 rows and the Figure 6 note say 608.\",\n handling=\"Not decisive for any assertion; recorded only.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: narrative percentages for sub-outcomes are inconsistent: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35% while Section 6.1 says ~30% at 5 km \"\n f\"(100(exp(-0.354)-1) = {pct(-0.354):.1f}%); Section 6.1 says narcotics +47% at 5 km (implied {pct(0.390):.1f}%); text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero' although the 5 km HIV ATT is -0.340.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely on the printed table coefficients, not the narrative; none of these is decisive for A1-A6.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{RES}: results text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]) for a 'reduction', while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75]; also a rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' for p < 0.001.\",\n handling=\"Treated as equivalent sign conventions; A6 judged against the signed Table 2 values.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=\"Both extracts are partial (sections omitted), and RESEA Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely only on the extract content as instructed; values in re-set tables are taken as verbatim per the editorial note.\"))\n\nids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\nres = dict(\n task_id=\"F4-conf-02\",\n verdicts={k: V[k] for k in ids},\n locators={k: L[k] for k in ids},\n reasons={k: R[k] for k in ids},\n n_supported=sum(V[k] == \"supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_supported=sum(V[k] == \"not_supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_assessable=sum(V[k] == \"not_assessable\" for k in ids),\n feasibility=\"complete\",\n feasibility_reason=None,\n data_issues=issues,\n n_input_rows={\"assertions.json\": len(assertions), \"README.md\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"README.md\")),\n f\"{DCR}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", DCR + \".txt\")),\n f\"{RES}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", RES + \".txt\"))},\n n_analysed=len(ids),\n random_seed=None,\n supporting_calculations=calc,\n)\nos.makedirs(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\"), exist_ok=True)\nwith open(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\", \"results.json\"), \"w\", encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n json.dump(res, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)\nprint(\"\\nVerdicts:\", json.dumps(res[\"verdicts\"]))\nprint(\"Counts: supported\", res[\"n_supported\"], \"| not_supported\", res[\"n_not_supported\"], \"| not_assessable\", res[\"n_not_assessable\"])\nEOF\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py && cat out/results.json","description":"Write and run analysis script from workspace root"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":520,"cache_read_input_tokens":26404,"output_tokens":5203,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":45},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":520},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXnigcqDYcGrznsVSRA9","requestRef":"230fb3fe-b7be-4ec9-a408-1d9102595f17","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"744a5c9a-608b-431d-ab07-1cd60a8cc03e","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:49.272Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}52{"parentUuid":"744a5c9a-608b-431d-ab07-1cd60a8cc03e","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01HjgvUv7JFcheqP53w5FhQb","type":"tool_result","content":"Table 6 (DCR):\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L32] Table 6: Overall Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L36] ATT | -0.399 | -0.283 | -0.431**\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L38] | (0.412) | (0.279) | (0.210)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L40] % change | -32.9% | -24.7% | -35.0%\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L55] corresponding to a 35% reduction in the drug-related hospitalization rate. This estimate is statistically significant at the 5% level. The 3 km and 1 km estimates point in the same direction but are less precise, due to the smaller number of treated regions.\nTable 7 (DCR):\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L66] Table 7: Overall ATT by Outcome Category and Buffer Zone\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L74] Hepatitis | -0.270 | -0.413 | -0.406\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L76] | (0.486) | (0.270) | (0.250)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L78] HIV | 0.063 | -0.239 | -0.340\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L80] | (0.801) | (0.337) | (0.294)\nTable A19 (DCR, consistency check):\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L117] Table A19: Robustness: Overall ATT Across Estimators — 5 km buffer, \\pm 5-year window\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L121] ATT | -0.431** | -0.438** | -0.362* | -0.149***\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L123] | (0.218) | (0.208) | (0.205) | (0.038)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L134] never-treated comparison regions (640 regions), and a \\pm 5-year window\nSearch for sex/gender breakdown in DCR extract:\n lines mentioning men/women/male/female/sex/gender: []\nTable 2 (RESEA):\n [arxiv-2606.14621v1 L30] Weeks on UI | 15.2 weeks (SD: 9.3) | 17.3 weeks (SD: 9.4) | -2.10 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.34, -1.86] | -1.99 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75]\n [arxiv-2606.14621v1 L37] Overall, we find that RESEA selection led to a statistically significant improvement in all three of the preregistered outcomes. RESEA selection led to a wage outcome that was $1,153 higher annually (95% CI: [$166, $2,141]; p=0.022 ), a 3.5% increase relative to the mean wage outcome of $33,043 in the control group (Table 2). There was also an estimated 1.47 percentage point increase in reemployment (95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]; p=0.013 ) and a 1.99 week reduction in the number of weeks on UI (95% CI: [1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]; p<0.001 ) due to RESEA selection. The latter is an 11.5% decrease compared to the mean control group weeks on UI outcome of 17.3 weeks. All three of these results remain statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing using Holm’s method to keep the familywise error rate below 5 percent.\n\nVerdicts: {\"A1\": \"supported\", \"A2\": \"not_supported\", \"A3\": \"not_supported\", \"A4\": \"not_supported\", \"A5\": \"not_assessable\", \"A6\": \"supported\"}\nCounts: supported 2 | not_supported 3 | not_assessable 1\n{\n \"task_id\": \"F4-conf-02\",\n \"verdicts\": {\n \"A1\": \"supported\",\n \"A2\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A3\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A4\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A5\": \"not_assessable\",\n \"A6\": \"supported\"\n },\n \"locators\": {\n \"A1\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \\\"ATT\\\" | column \\\"5 km\\\"\",\n \"A2\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \\\"HIV\\\" | column \\\"1 km\\\"\",\n \"A3\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \\\"% change\\\" | column \\\"3 km\\\"\",\n \"A4\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \\\"Hepatitis\\\" | column \\\"5 km\\\"\",\n \"A5\": \"not reported in arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"A6\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row \\\"Weeks on UI\\\" | column \\\"Average treatment effect estimate\\\"\"\n },\n \"reasons\": {\n \"A1\": \"Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and % change -35.0% at 5 km, and the text states significance at the 5% level, matching every element of the assertion.\",\n \"A2\": \"Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +0.063 (SE 0.801), positive and insignificant, so the claimed negative sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.\",\n \"A3\": \"The ATT of -0.283 log points corresponds to a -24.7% change (printed in Table 6; 100(exp(-0.283)-1) = -24.65%), not a 28.3% reduction, which wrongly reads log points as percent.\",\n \"A4\": \"With ATT -0.406 and SE 0.250 the 95% CI is [-0.896, 0.084] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero (the estimate carries no star); the asserted interval is only ±1 SE.\",\n \"A5\": \"The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and never by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.\",\n \"A6\": \"Table 2 prints the ATE as -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with a control mean of 17.3 weeks, and 1.99/17.3 = 11.50% matches the 11.5% decrease stated in the results text.\"\n },\n \"n_supported\": 2,\n \"n_not_supported\": 3,\n \"n_not_assessable\": 1,\n \"feasibility\": \"complete\",\n \"feasibility_reason\": null,\n \"data_issues\": [\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1: the same CS-DR 5 km ATT (-0.431**) has SE 0.210 in Table 6 but 0.218 in Table A19 (internal inconsistency).\",\n \"handling\": \"A1 cites Table 6, whose SE (0.210) matches the assertion; verdict uses Table 6. With SE 0.218, |z| = 1.977: still significant at 5% under 1.96, borderline under 2.0; A1 verdict unchanged because the printed ** appears in both tables.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions while the Table 6/A19 rows and the Figure 6 note say 608.\",\n \"handling\": \"Not decisive for any assertion; recorded only.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1: narrative percentages for sub-outcomes are inconsistent: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35% while Section 6.1 says ~30% at 5 km (100(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%); Section 6.1 says narcotics +47% at 5 km (implied 47.7%); text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero' although the 5 km HIV ATT is -0.340.\",\n \"handling\": \"Verdicts rely on the printed table coefficients, not the narrative; none of these is decisive for A1-A6.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1: results text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]) for a 'reduction', while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75]; also a rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' for p < 0.001.\",\n \"handling\": \"Treated as equivalent sign conventions; A6 judged against the signed Table 2 values.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"Both extracts are partial (sections omitted), and RESEA Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor.\",\n \"handling\": \"Verdicts rely only on the extract content as instructed; values in re-set tables are taken as verbatim per the editorial note.\"\n }\n ],\n \"n_input_rows\": {\n \"assertions.json\": 6,\n \"README.md\": 14,\n \"arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt\": 134,\n \"arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\": 58\n },\n \"n_analysed\": 6,\n \"random_seed\": null,\n \"supporting_calculations\": {\n \"A1\": {\n \"b\": -0.431,\n \"se\": 0.21,\n \"stars\": 2,\n \"pct_printed\": -35.0,\n \"pct_implied\": -35.01,\n \"z\": -2.052\n },\n \"A2\": {\n \"b\": 0.063,\n \"se\": 0.801,\n \"stars\": 0\n },\n \"A3\": {\n \"b\": -0.283,\n \"pct_printed\": -24.7,\n \"pct_implied\": -24.65\n },\n \"A4\": {\n \"b\": -0.406,\n \"se\": 0.25,\n \"stars\": 0,\n \"ci95_1p96\": [\n -0.896,\n 0.084\n ],\n \"ci95_2p00\": [\n -0.906,\n 0.094\n ],\n \"ci_pm_1se\": [\n -0.656,\n -0.156\n ]\n },\n \"A5\": {\n \"sex_lines\": []\n },\n \"A6\": {\n \"ate\": -1.99,\n \"ci\": [\n -2.24,\n -1.75\n ],\n \"control_mean\": 17.3,\n \"rel_pct\": 11.5\n }\n }\n}","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"6310845f-4750-4a10-b925-afca52c36b7d","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:49.346Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"Table 6 (DCR):\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L32] Table 6: Overall Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L36] ATT | -0.399 | -0.283 | -0.431**\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L38] | (0.412) | (0.279) | (0.210)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L40] % change | -32.9% | -24.7% | -35.0%\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L55] corresponding to a 35% reduction in the drug-related hospitalization rate. This estimate is statistically significant at the 5% level. The 3 km and 1 km estimates point in the same direction but are less precise, due to the smaller number of treated regions.\nTable 7 (DCR):\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L66] Table 7: Overall ATT by Outcome Category and Buffer Zone\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L74] Hepatitis | -0.270 | -0.413 | -0.406\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L76] | (0.486) | (0.270) | (0.250)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L78] HIV | 0.063 | -0.239 | -0.340\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L80] | (0.801) | (0.337) | (0.294)\nTable A19 (DCR, consistency check):\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L117] Table A19: Robustness: Overall ATT Across Estimators — 5 km buffer, \\pm 5-year window\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L121] ATT | -0.431** | -0.438** | -0.362* | -0.149***\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L123] | (0.218) | (0.208) | (0.205) | (0.038)\n [arxiv-2609.27732v1 L134] never-treated comparison regions (640 regions), and a \\pm 5-year window\nSearch for sex/gender breakdown in DCR extract:\n lines mentioning men/women/male/female/sex/gender: []\nTable 2 (RESEA):\n [arxiv-2606.14621v1 L30] Weeks on UI | 15.2 weeks (SD: 9.3) | 17.3 weeks (SD: 9.4) | -2.10 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.34, -1.86] | -1.99 weeks; p<0.001; 95% CI: [-2.24, -1.75]\n [arxiv-2606.14621v1 L37] Overall, we find that RESEA selection led to a statistically significant improvement in all three of the preregistered outcomes. RESEA selection led to a wage outcome that was $1,153 higher annually (95% CI: [$166, $2,141]; p=0.022 ), a 3.5% increase relative to the mean wage outcome of $33,043 in the control group (Table 2). There was also an estimated 1.47 percentage point increase in reemployment (95% CI: [0.32, 2.62]; p=0.013 ) and a 1.99 week reduction in the number of weeks on UI (95% CI: [1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]; p<0.001 ) due to RESEA selection. The latter is an 11.5% decrease compared to the mean control group weeks on UI outcome of 17.3 weeks. All three of these results remain statistically significant after correcting for multiple testing using Holm’s method to keep the familywise error rate below 5 percent.\n\nVerdicts: {\"A1\": \"supported\", \"A2\": \"not_supported\", \"A3\": \"not_supported\", \"A4\": \"not_supported\", \"A5\": \"not_assessable\", \"A6\": \"supported\"}\nCounts: supported 2 | not_supported 3 | not_assessable 1\n{\n \"task_id\": \"F4-conf-02\",\n \"verdicts\": {\n \"A1\": \"supported\",\n \"A2\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A3\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A4\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A5\": \"not_assessable\",\n \"A6\": \"supported\"\n },\n \"locators\": {\n \"A1\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \\\"ATT\\\" | column \\\"5 km\\\"\",\n \"A2\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \\\"HIV\\\" | column \\\"1 km\\\"\",\n \"A3\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \\\"% change\\\" | column \\\"3 km\\\"\",\n \"A4\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \\\"Hepatitis\\\" | column \\\"5 km\\\"\",\n \"A5\": \"not reported in arxiv-2609.27732v1\",\n \"A6\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row \\\"Weeks on UI\\\" | column \\\"Average treatment effect estimate\\\"\"\n },\n \"reasons\": {\n \"A1\": \"Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and % change -35.0% at 5 km, and the text states significance at the 5% level, matching every element of the assertion.\",\n \"A2\": \"Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +0.063 (SE 0.801), positive and insignificant, so the claimed negative sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.\",\n \"A3\": \"The ATT of -0.283 log points corresponds to a -24.7% change (printed in Table 6; 100(exp(-0.283)-1) = -24.65%), not a 28.3% reduction, which wrongly reads log points as percent.\",\n \"A4\": \"With ATT -0.406 and SE 0.250 the 95% CI is [-0.896, 0.084] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero (the estimate carries no star); the asserted interval is only ±1 SE.\",\n \"A5\": \"The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and never by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.\",\n \"A6\": \"Table 2 prints the ATE as -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with a control mean of 17.3 weeks, and 1.99/17.3 = 11.50% matches the 11.5% decrease stated in the results text.\"\n },\n \"n_supported\": 2,\n \"n_not_supported\": 3,\n \"n_not_assessable\": 1,\n \"feasibility\": \"complete\",\n \"feasibility_reason\": null,\n \"data_issues\": [\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1: the same CS-DR 5 km ATT (-0.431**) has SE 0.210 in Table 6 but 0.218 in Table A19 (internal inconsistency).\",\n \"handling\": \"A1 cites Table 6, whose SE (0.210) matches the assertion; verdict uses Table 6. With SE 0.218, |z| = 1.977: still significant at 5% under 1.96, borderline under 2.0; A1 verdict unchanged because the printed ** appears in both tables.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions while the Table 6/A19 rows and the Figure 6 note say 608.\",\n \"handling\": \"Not decisive for any assertion; recorded only.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2609.27732v1: narrative percentages for sub-outcomes are inconsistent: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35% while Section 6.1 says ~30% at 5 km (100(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%); Section 6.1 says narcotics +47% at 5 km (implied 47.7%); text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero' although the 5 km HIV ATT is -0.340.\",\n \"handling\": \"Verdicts rely on the printed table coefficients, not the narrative; none of these is decisive for A1-A6.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"arxiv-2606.14621v1: results text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]) for a 'reduction', while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75]; also a rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' for p < 0.001.\",\n \"handling\": \"Treated as equivalent sign conventions; A6 judged against the signed Table 2 values.\"\n },\n {\n \"issue\": \"Both extracts are partial (sections omitted), and RESEA Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor.\",\n \"handling\": \"Verdicts rely only on the extract content as instructed; values in re-set tables are taken as verbatim per the editorial note.\"\n }\n ],\n \"n_input_rows\": {\n \"assertions.json\": 6,\n \"README.md\": 14,\n \"arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt\": 134,\n \"arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt\": 58\n },\n \"n_analysed\": 6,\n \"random_seed\": null,\n \"supporting_calculations\": {\n \"A1\": {\n \"b\": -0.431,\n \"se\": 0.21,\n \"stars\": 2,\n \"pct_printed\": -35.0,\n \"pct_implied\": -35.01,\n \"z\": -2.052\n },\n \"A2\": {\n \"b\": 0.063,\n \"se\": 0.801,\n \"stars\": 0\n },\n \"A3\": {\n \"b\": -0.283,\n \"pct_printed\": -24.7,\n \"pct_implied\": -24.65\n },\n \"A4\": {\n \"b\": -0.406,\n \"se\": 0.25,\n \"stars\": 0,\n \"ci95_1p96\": [\n -0.896,\n 0.084\n ],\n \"ci95_2p00\": [\n -0.906,\n 0.094\n ],\n \"ci_pm_1se\": [\n -0.656,\n -0.156\n ]\n },\n \"A5\": {\n \"sex_lines\": []\n },\n \"A6\": {\n \"ate\": -1.99,\n \"ci\": [\n -2.24,\n -1.75\n ],\n \"control_mean\": 17.3,\n \"rel_pct\": 11.5\n }\n }\n}","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"744a5c9a-608b-431d-ab07-1cd60a8cc03e","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}53{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"6153f9b36f82c12deeddc068ca479d829488e24fe7e53ea80ad9997f6661d299","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01HjgvUv7JFcheqP53w5FhQb","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cat > out/analysis.py <<'EOF'\n\"\"\"F4-conf-02: verdicts on six assertions against cited source extracts.\nReads data/ only; writes out/results.json deterministically. No randomness.\"\"\"\nimport json, math, os, re\n\nROOT = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))\nD = os.path.join(ROOT, \"data\")\nDCR, RES = \"arxiv-2609.27732v1\", \"arxiv-2606.14621v1\"\n\ndef lines(path):\n with open(path, encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n return f.read().split(\"\\n\")\n\ndef wc_l(path):\n with open(path, \"rb\") as f:\n return f.read().count(b\"\\n\")\n\nassertions = json.load(open(os.path.join(D, \"assertions.json\"), encoding=\"utf-8\"))\nsrc = {s: lines(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", s + \".txt\")) for s in (DCR, RES)}\n\ndef find(s, pattern, start=0):\n \"\"\"Return (index, text) of first line at/after `start` matching regex; print it.\"\"\"\n for i, l in enumerate(src[s][start:], start):\n if re.search(pattern, l):\n print(f\" [{s} L{i+1}] {l.strip()}\")\n return i, l\n raise ValueError(f\"pattern {pattern!r} not found in {s}\")\n\ndef cells(l):\n return [c.strip() for c in l.split(\"|\")]\n\ndef num(c):\n return float(re.sub(r\"[^\\d\\.\\-]\", \"\", c.replace(\"−\", \"-\")))\n\ndef stars(c):\n return c.count(\"*\")\n\npct = lambda b: 100 * (math.exp(b) - 1)\ncols = {\"1 km\": 1, \"3 km\": 2, \"5 km\": 3}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 6 ----------\nprint(\"Table 6 (DCR):\")\nt6, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 6:\")\ni, att = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", t6); att = cells(att)\n_, se = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); se = cells(se)\n_, pc = find(DCR, r\"^% change \\|\", i); pc = cells(pc)\nfind(DCR, r\"statistically significant at the 5% level\", i)\nt6v = {k: dict(b=num(att[c]), st=stars(att[c]), se=num(se[c]), pct=num(pc[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR Table 7 ----------\nprint(\"Table 7 (DCR):\")\nt7, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table 7:\")\nt7v = {}\nfor row in (\"Hepatitis\", \"HIV\"):\n i, l = find(DCR, rf\"^{row} \\|\", t7); l = cells(l)\n _, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i); s = cells(s)\n t7v[row] = {k: dict(b=num(l[c]), st=stars(l[c]), se=num(s[c])) for k, c in cols.items()}\n\n# ---------- DCR A19 (consistency check only) ----------\nprint(\"Table A19 (DCR, consistency check):\")\na19, _ = find(DCR, r\"^Table A19:\")\ni, l = find(DCR, r\"^ATT \\|\", a19)\n_, s = find(DCR, r\"^\\| \\(\", i)\na19_se_csdr = num(cells(s)[1])\n_, a19note = find(DCR, r\"never-treated comparison regions \\(\\d+ regions\\)\", a19)\na19_controls = int(re.search(r\"\\((\\d+) regions\\)\", a19note).group(1))\n\n# ---------- Sex/gender search (A5) ----------\nprint(\"Search for sex/gender breakdown in DCR extract:\")\nsex_hits = [k + 1 for k, l in enumerate(src[DCR]) if re.search(r\"\\b(men|women|male|female|males|females|sex|gender)\\b\", l, re.I)]\nprint(f\" lines mentioning men/women/male/female/sex/gender: {sex_hits}\")\n\n# ---------- RESEA Table 2 ----------\nprint(\"Table 2 (RESEA):\")\n_, w = find(RES, r\"^Weeks on UI \\|\")\nw = cells(w)\nctrl_mean = num(w[2].split(\"weeks\")[0])\nate = w[4]\nate_b = float(re.search(r\"(-?\\d+\\.\\d+) weeks\", ate).group(1))\nate_ci = [float(x) for x in re.search(r\"CI: \\[(-?[\\d\\.]+), (-?[\\d\\.]+)\\]\", ate).groups()]\nfind(RES, r\"11\\.5% decrease\")\n\n# ---------- Verdict logic ----------\nV, L, R, calc = {}, {}, {}, {}\na = {x[\"id\"]: x for x in assertions}\nassert all(a[k][\"cites\"] == DCR for k in (\"A1\", \"A2\", \"A3\", \"A4\", \"A5\")) and a[\"A6\"][\"cites\"] == RES\n\n# A1: 5 km overall ATT -0.431 (SE 0.210), significant at 5%, 35.0% reduction\nx = t6v[\"5 km\"]\nok1 = (x[\"b\"] == -0.431 and x[\"se\"] == 0.210 and x[\"st\"] >= 2 and x[\"pct\"] == -35.0\n and round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 1) == -35.0)\ncalc[\"A1\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2),\n z=round(x[\"b\"] / x[\"se\"], 3))\nV[\"A1\"] = \"supported\" if ok1 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A1\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"ATT\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A1\"] = (\"Table 6 prints ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210) and % change -35.0% at 5 km, and the text states significance at the 5% level, \"\n \"matching every element of the assertion.\" if ok1 else \"Table 6 5 km values do not match the assertion.\")\n\n# A2: HIV 1 km ATT negative (-0.063)\nx = t7v[\"HIV\"][\"1 km\"]\ncalc[\"A2\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"])\nV[\"A2\"] = \"not_supported\" if x[\"b\"] > 0 else \"supported\"\nL[\"A2\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"HIV\" | column \"1 km\"'\nR[\"A2\"] = (f\"Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as +{x['b']:.3f} (SE {x['se']:.3f}), positive and insignificant, so the claimed negative \"\n \"sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.\")\n\n# A3: 3 km ATT -0.283 implies 28.3% reduction\nx = t6v[\"3 km\"]\ncalc[\"A3\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], pct_printed=x[\"pct\"], pct_implied=round(pct(x[\"b\"]), 2))\nok3 = abs(pct(x[\"b\"]) - (-28.3)) < 0.05\nV[\"A3\"] = \"supported\" if ok3 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A3\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 6 | row \"% change\" | column \"3 km\"'\nR[\"A3\"] = (f\"The ATT of {x['b']:.3f} log points corresponds to a {x['pct']:.1f}% change (printed in Table 6; \"\n f\"100(exp({x['b']:.3f})-1) = {pct(x['b']):.2f}%), not a 28.3% reduction, which wrongly reads log points as percent.\")\n\n# A4: hepatitis 5 km 95% CI approx [-0.66, -0.16], excludes zero\nx = t7v[\"Hepatitis\"][\"5 km\"]\nci196 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 1.96 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci200 = [round(x[\"b\"] - 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + 2.0 * x[\"se\"], 3)]\nci100 = [round(x[\"b\"] - x[\"se\"], 3), round(x[\"b\"] + x[\"se\"], 3)]\ncalc[\"A4\"] = dict(b=x[\"b\"], se=x[\"se\"], stars=x[\"st\"], ci95_1p96=ci196, ci95_2p00=ci200, ci_pm_1se=ci100)\nexcl = ci196[1] < 0 or ci196[0] > 0\nV[\"A4\"] = \"supported\" if excl else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A4\"] = f'{DCR} | Table 7 | row \"Hepatitis\" | column \"5 km\"'\nR[\"A4\"] = (f\"With ATT {x['b']:.3f} and SE {x['se']:.3f} the 95% CI is [{ci196[0]:.3f}, {ci196[1]:.3f}] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero \"\n \"(the estimate carries no star); the asserted interval is only ±1 SE.\")\n\n# A5: larger reduction for men than women\ncalc[\"A5\"] = dict(sex_lines=sex_hits)\nV[\"A5\"] = \"not_assessable\" if not sex_hits else \"REVIEW\"\nL[\"A5\"] = f\"not reported in {DCR}\"\nR[\"A5\"] = (\"The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and never \"\n \"by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.\")\n\n# A6: ATE -1.99 weeks, CI [-2.24,-1.75], 11.5% of control mean 17.3\nrel = 100 * abs(ate_b) / ctrl_mean\ncalc[\"A6\"] = dict(ate=ate_b, ci=ate_ci, control_mean=ctrl_mean, rel_pct=round(rel, 2))\nok6 = ate_b == -1.99 and ate_ci == [-2.24, -1.75] and ctrl_mean == 17.3 and round(rel, 1) == 11.5\nV[\"A6\"] = \"supported\" if ok6 else \"not_supported\"\nL[\"A6\"] = f'{RES} | Table 2 | row \"Weeks on UI\" | column \"Average treatment effect estimate\"'\nR[\"A6\"] = (f\"Table 2 prints the ATE as -1.99 weeks (95% CI [-2.24, -1.75]) with a control mean of 17.3 weeks, and \"\n f\"1.99/17.3 = {rel:.2f}% matches the 11.5% decrease stated in the results text.\")\n\n# ---------- Data issues ----------\nissues = []\nif a19_se_csdr != t6v[\"5 km\"][\"se\"]:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: the same CS-DR 5 km ATT (-0.431**) has SE {t6v['5 km']['se']:.3f} in Table 6 but \"\n f\"{a19_se_csdr:.3f} in Table A19 (internal inconsistency).\",\n handling=\"A1 cites Table 6, whose SE (0.210) matches the assertion; verdict uses Table 6. With SE 0.218, \"\n f\"|z| = {0.431/a19_se_csdr:.3f}: still significant at 5% under 1.96, borderline under 2.0; A1 verdict unchanged because the printed ** appears in both tables.\"))\nif a19_controls != 608:\n issues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: Table A19 note says {a19_controls} never-treated comparison regions while the Table 6/A19 rows and the Figure 6 note say 608.\",\n handling=\"Not decisive for any assertion; recorded only.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{DCR}: narrative percentages for sub-outcomes are inconsistent: abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35% while Section 6.1 says ~30% at 5 km \"\n f\"(100(exp(-0.354)-1) = {pct(-0.354):.1f}%); Section 6.1 says narcotics +47% at 5 km (implied {pct(0.390):.1f}%); text calls HIV estimates 'close to zero' although the 5 km HIV ATT is -0.340.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely on the printed table coefficients, not the narrative; none of these is decisive for A1-A6.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=f\"{RES}: results text reports the weeks-on-UI CIs as positive magnitudes ([1.75 weeks, 2.24 weeks]) for a 'reduction', while Table 2 prints signed [-2.24, -1.75]; also a rendering defect 'p ¡ 0.001' for p < 0.001.\",\n handling=\"Treated as equivalent sign conventions; A6 judged against the signed Table 2 values.\"))\nissues.append(dict(issue=\"Both extracts are partial (sections omitted), and RESEA Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor.\",\n handling=\"Verdicts rely only on the extract content as instructed; values in re-set tables are taken as verbatim per the editorial note.\"))\n\nids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\nres = dict(\n task_id=\"F4-conf-02\",\n verdicts={k: V[k] for k in ids},\n locators={k: L[k] for k in ids},\n reasons={k: R[k] for k in ids},\n n_supported=sum(V[k] == \"supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_supported=sum(V[k] == \"not_supported\" for k in ids),\n n_not_assessable=sum(V[k] == \"not_assessable\" for k in ids),\n feasibility=\"complete\",\n feasibility_reason=None,\n data_issues=issues,\n n_input_rows={\"assertions.json\": len(assertions), \"README.md\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"README.md\")),\n f\"{DCR}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", DCR + \".txt\")),\n f\"{RES}.txt\": wc_l(os.path.join(D, \"sources\", RES + \".txt\"))},\n n_analysed=len(ids),\n random_seed=None,\n supporting_calculations=calc,\n)\nos.makedirs(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\"), exist_ok=True)\nwith open(os.path.join(ROOT, \"out\", \"results.json\"), \"w\", encoding=\"utf-8\") as f:\n json.dump(res, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)\nprint(\"\\nVerdicts:\", json.dumps(res[\"verdicts\"]))\nprint(\"Counts: supported\", res[\"n_supported\"], \"| not_supported\", res[\"n_not_supported\"], \"| not_assessable\", res[\"n_not_assessable\"])\nEOF\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py && cat out/results.json","description":"Write and run analysis script from workspace root"}}]}}54{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"15bf0c8a-6e8f-4eea-8f0a-1b83724786a7","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:49.350Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"230fb3fe-b7be-4ec9-a408-1d9102595f17","keep":14,"tail":["6153f9b36f82c12deeddc068ca479d829488e24fe7e53ea80ad9997f6661d299","9a75edcb5b9fb5d056c881f41860dfe6362ee64fed98cb6e60b03fe1f266c518"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",15,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"b5b929b47866c1b5fddc10ddf1d6ff2b7afd648139c3cbd4d5ff2e49201587b0"}55{"type":"last-prompt","lastPrompt":"Begin","leafUuid":"6310845f-4750-4a10-b925-afca52c36b7d","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}56{"type":"atis-latch","atis":"","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}57{"parentUuid":"6310845f-4750-4a10-b925-afca52c36b7d","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnmET3nKVRSWbfPgoyM","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"CAQS8AgKEAgTGAI4AUIIdGhpbmtpbmcSDA52nN7cIxh4vwloPhoMOBwYngJyqVv9yddQIjA4zrPLofNSwYFNd1QoESZx5fHIOAdhk7wU9Xr/8Wt5bBztUp2whuQQr++AdL22BgAqjQgexidhfkw16y96PyXjxEcMzJYm4xHY0dnX2XUJBbS9FNtRLc94D2UW8/vnJlYgZa4FzU27MSmcF4ZFZcnC0JAN12+qkJkkzX1sailrLPIu+5SeMfpOCxeZ41hRc2nIANWAiaK1UfmzrYA3qAoFuCjANmHO7WJAgzTKKMtd7Uoj8a1qcRTd2MpO9widd00w4zEeW3m7MXMtFbqVXTAYlNp/s2CJPCC6ZdtEuuIUrdBju8eY4QXXf6jwacG0AolDaoFhe2bo99yMeoLDoZqoYZjq7JBYAksQcugsAu0cu+8IH+4nPQMFKczOYUyfIQRfAOyA8ZDVgiHND7w51kM+mbEhFpsd8com5ChLJqKN2Kdn26GO/LUzVxTOsfV4GbkVodNAls6zh5LCuLN8gZbBvagX/vuIpVC8H/F8Yx1bn37BsmXHqTHJ6iCrNKJxYW1ivD8lZQ9h2oE8E2mtTLJiDdRfZIfpC93b0yI6IC6U5DTlYUgu//Y7xZejwNfyqWpwWC5xO0OkmQJloA03N3z0sfgAd138CLJTXD4iokCNshROETdyLHQIN5EwgP+0IwehgOOz26nHFBd5fxrt0+z/f0EJJtoz4ACxvo4kC1e0XfLWH7wDTSCiqYxH8hVAA0k3/Z+XKPdQjjs3mJAPm3vRf1R2or0lJ3aMNhyjEBfcSdAaE+LNWKdbShD2Nkvor7xNfrmXaKo64hr12XoH69G0NbWMNePgm7UgceyXLZXxZq+rkNPeL7oURCeu/gYRQkH9ta22iTtwcOkANT/QIkcgqEua3vuf03bAA+VMaU6nYtHwbnNXAwN5jkm7rH7E9mqqtiPaQ+duh2RxQNZqXLigbPI6rQx1juzK0H1rcXPSqL+kp204Whac0wCqtUYyLlxg3GLDT1Yrj+dyUfglrLUvx8i6178COtMpnPH3my7jwRqigyCfPlK4lG5mDKLOJ4ow6DBityEfhepbH4c2lz1Y7Uk56BVzMi+IeVQjSFqpAht1oP+MJCCrVnGGS2Si98RkH0kZ7rqf4uyKzcpBdfk/AgwHbs7NJksBaVPeKlrAnPQIC4uxg7WjzPmAG+jqzonOjtR/1yg8JYY68r1fh5PyKOEMwb73o89XP0pkBp6EOUilTNBizG9LDTAn5SH/CwfssUJbECYxRrLgJ/CFQbY/nrywHq1Wr7Ap/xYZORQ3TYIUcqYOsBvmpbwsprrHwX8Qk2K0dzswaB6qeUm3o24PXvfeR09j71fdhtthsZw+6bMrI/EXW1GT2QSlutk5snCJkUPdQINAj95Z6Pw3jcOdqrX12ckrsw60+tT/P6iNKskvEGDOvYgmCtvRBdIr3wu7WwjdJM/BOwMSSKAtO3pMrOji94eOz9XdMsYYtcsdohgB"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":8682,"cache_read_input_tokens":26924,"output_tokens":721,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":127},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":8682},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"thinkingDurationMs":1322,"thinkingDisplay":"updates","apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnmEEuHyoSzSFFT4zE4","requestRef":"15bf0c8a-6e8f-4eea-8f0a-1b83724786a7","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"4e6c9244-47b0-4d49-9f71-cdf44003f168","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:52.559Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}58{"parentUuid":"4e6c9244-47b0-4d49-9f71-cdf44003f168","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnmET3nKVRSWbfPgoyM","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01QsAmiiuLYsNNivWeYWBm56","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"~/wp29/venv/bin/python - <<'EOF'\np='out/analysis.py'\ns=open(p).read()\ns=s.replace(\"\"\"ids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\nres = dict(\"\"\",\"\"\"ids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\n\n# ---------- Naive baseline (P2): verbatim number matching ----------\n# 'supported' if every number in the assertion (sign dropped) occurs verbatim in the cited extract, else 'not_supported'.\nbaseline = {}\nfor x in assertions:\n nums = re.findall(r\"\\\\d+\\\\.\\\\d+|\\\\d+\", x[\"text\"].replace(\"−\", \"-\"))\n nums = [n for n in nums if n not in (\"1\", \"3\", \"5\", \"95\")] # buffer sizes / CI level are labels\n body = \"\\\\n\".join(src[x[\"cites\"]])\n baseline[x[\"id\"]] = \"supported\" if all(n in body for n in nums) else \"not_supported\"\nprint(\"Naive verbatim-number baseline:\", json.dumps(baseline))\n\nres = dict(\"\"\")\ns=s.replace(\" supporting_calculations=calc,\\n\",\" supporting_calculations=calc,\\n baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match=baseline,\\n baseline_agreement_with_verdicts=sum(baseline[k] == V[k] for k in ids),\\n\")\nopen(p,'w').write(s)\nEOF\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py | tail -3; cp out/results.json /tmp/r1.json","description":"Add naive baseline and rerun"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":8682,"cache_read_input_tokens":26924,"output_tokens":721,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":127},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":8682},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXnmEEuHyoSzSFFT4zE4","requestRef":"15bf0c8a-6e8f-4eea-8f0a-1b83724786a7","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"30342145-02a7-4c21-9f43-bdd35d5efc5c","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:56.784Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}59{"parentUuid":"30342145-02a7-4c21-9f43-bdd35d5efc5c","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01QsAmiiuLYsNNivWeYWBm56","type":"tool_result","content":"Verdicts: {\"A1\": \"supported\", \"A2\": \"not_supported\", \"A3\": \"not_supported\", \"A4\": \"not_supported\", \"A5\": \"not_assessable\", \"A6\": \"supported\"}\nCounts: supported 2 | not_supported 3 | not_assessable 1","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"2c93264b-c629-40ae-8c6f-06ff335dcf0b","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:56.883Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"Verdicts: {\"A1\": \"supported\", \"A2\": \"not_supported\", \"A3\": \"not_supported\", \"A4\": \"not_supported\", \"A5\": \"not_assessable\", \"A6\": \"supported\"}\nCounts: supported 2 | not_supported 3 | not_assessable 1","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"30342145-02a7-4c21-9f43-bdd35d5efc5c","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}60{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"35d8d277573de91bd76741170434028222a6aa3e0e2da12bb4b2913b89c24eb9","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"CAQS8AgKEAgTGAI4AUIIdGhpbmtpbmcSDA52nN7cIxh4vwloPhoMOBwYngJyqVv9yddQIjA4zrPLofNSwYFNd1QoESZx5fHIOAdhk7wU9Xr/8Wt5bBztUp2whuQQr++AdL22BgAqjQgexidhfkw16y96PyXjxEcMzJYm4xHY0dnX2XUJBbS9FNtRLc94D2UW8/vnJlYgZa4FzU27MSmcF4ZFZcnC0JAN12+qkJkkzX1sailrLPIu+5SeMfpOCxeZ41hRc2nIANWAiaK1UfmzrYA3qAoFuCjANmHO7WJAgzTKKMtd7Uoj8a1qcRTd2MpO9widd00w4zEeW3m7MXMtFbqVXTAYlNp/s2CJPCC6ZdtEuuIUrdBju8eY4QXXf6jwacG0AolDaoFhe2bo99yMeoLDoZqoYZjq7JBYAksQcugsAu0cu+8IH+4nPQMFKczOYUyfIQRfAOyA8ZDVgiHND7w51kM+mbEhFpsd8com5ChLJqKN2Kdn26GO/LUzVxTOsfV4GbkVodNAls6zh5LCuLN8gZbBvagX/vuIpVC8H/F8Yx1bn37BsmXHqTHJ6iCrNKJxYW1ivD8lZQ9h2oE8E2mtTLJiDdRfZIfpC93b0yI6IC6U5DTlYUgu//Y7xZejwNfyqWpwWC5xO0OkmQJloA03N3z0sfgAd138CLJTXD4iokCNshROETdyLHQIN5EwgP+0IwehgOOz26nHFBd5fxrt0+z/f0EJJtoz4ACxvo4kC1e0XfLWH7wDTSCiqYxH8hVAA0k3/Z+XKPdQjjs3mJAPm3vRf1R2or0lJ3aMNhyjEBfcSdAaE+LNWKdbShD2Nkvor7xNfrmXaKo64hr12XoH69G0NbWMNePgm7UgceyXLZXxZq+rkNPeL7oURCeu/gYRQkH9ta22iTtwcOkANT/QIkcgqEua3vuf03bAA+VMaU6nYtHwbnNXAwN5jkm7rH7E9mqqtiPaQ+duh2RxQNZqXLigbPI6rQx1juzK0H1rcXPSqL+kp204Whac0wCqtUYyLlxg3GLDT1Yrj+dyUfglrLUvx8i6178COtMpnPH3my7jwRqigyCfPlK4lG5mDKLOJ4ow6DBityEfhepbH4c2lz1Y7Uk56BVzMi+IeVQjSFqpAht1oP+MJCCrVnGGS2Si98RkH0kZ7rqf4uyKzcpBdfk/AgwHbs7NJksBaVPeKlrAnPQIC4uxg7WjzPmAG+jqzonOjtR/1yg8JYY68r1fh5PyKOEMwb73o89XP0pkBp6EOUilTNBizG9LDTAn5SH/CwfssUJbECYxRrLgJ/CFQbY/nrywHq1Wr7Ap/xYZORQ3TYIUcqYOsBvmpbwsprrHwX8Qk2K0dzswaB6qeUm3o24PXvfeR09j71fdhtthsZw+6bMrI/EXW1GT2QSlutk5snCJkUPdQINAj95Z6Pw3jcOdqrX12ckrsw60+tT/P6iNKskvEGDOvYgmCtvRBdIr3wu7WwjdJM/BOwMSSKAtO3pMrOji94eOz9XdMsYYtcsdohgB"},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01QsAmiiuLYsNNivWeYWBm56","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"~/wp29/venv/bin/python - <<'EOF'\np='out/analysis.py'\ns=open(p).read()\ns=s.replace(\"\"\"ids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\nres = dict(\"\"\",\"\"\"ids = [x[\"id\"] for x in assertions]\n\n# ---------- Naive baseline (P2): verbatim number matching ----------\n# 'supported' if every number in the assertion (sign dropped) occurs verbatim in the cited extract, else 'not_supported'.\nbaseline = {}\nfor x in assertions:\n nums = re.findall(r\"\\\\d+\\\\.\\\\d+|\\\\d+\", x[\"text\"].replace(\"−\", \"-\"))\n nums = [n for n in nums if n not in (\"1\", \"3\", \"5\", \"95\")] # buffer sizes / CI level are labels\n body = \"\\\\n\".join(src[x[\"cites\"]])\n baseline[x[\"id\"]] = \"supported\" if all(n in body for n in nums) else \"not_supported\"\nprint(\"Naive verbatim-number baseline:\", json.dumps(baseline))\n\nres = dict(\"\"\")\ns=s.replace(\" supporting_calculations=calc,\\n\",\" supporting_calculations=calc,\\n baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match=baseline,\\n baseline_agreement_with_verdicts=sum(baseline[k] == V[k] for k in ids),\\n\")\nopen(p,'w').write(s)\nEOF\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py | tail -3; cp out/results.json /tmp/r1.json","description":"Add naive baseline and rerun"}}]}}61{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"c2e82b37-9474-4400-86ea-16586087351c","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:56.885Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"15bf0c8a-6e8f-4eea-8f0a-1b83724786a7","keep":16,"tail":["35d8d277573de91bd76741170434028222a6aa3e0e2da12bb4b2913b89c24eb9","1a39646a3c9b0f7bb96ffdb1e14a60cb3703dbf938ddcb39dc0b87fb724babcd"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",17,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"6bf0754c61f8aea7bc29036f25d33027015aaaca44db86ba186258481ec190e1"}62{"parentUuid":"2c93264b-c629-40ae-8c6f-06ff335dcf0b","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnmnkkn8LLaCx86dfyB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01RPx1CjHg5JbSg5uahxSjo3","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py | grep -i baseline; grep -A9 baseline_verdicts out/results.json","description":"Show baseline output"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":817,"cache_read_input_tokens":35606,"output_tokens":120,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":817},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnmnU8eqjo5EUxz6QgF","requestRef":"c2e82b37-9474-4400-86ea-16586087351c","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"a5d27cd6-5891-438a-94d0-7a0b821183b7","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:59.213Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}63{"parentUuid":"a5d27cd6-5891-438a-94d0-7a0b821183b7","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01RPx1CjHg5JbSg5uahxSjo3","type":"tool_result","content":"Naive verbatim-number baseline: {\"A1\": \"supported\", \"A2\": \"supported\", \"A3\": \"not_supported\", \"A4\": \"not_supported\", \"A5\": \"supported\", \"A6\": \"supported\"}\n \"baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match\": {\n \"A1\": \"supported\",\n \"A2\": \"supported\",\n \"A3\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A4\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A5\": \"supported\",\n \"A6\": \"supported\"\n },\n \"baseline_agreement_with_verdicts\": 4\n}","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"14235725-ef8c-4c60-b2d7-96377bf985bf","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:59.286Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"Naive verbatim-number baseline: {\"A1\": \"supported\", \"A2\": \"supported\", \"A3\": \"not_supported\", \"A4\": \"not_supported\", \"A5\": \"supported\", \"A6\": \"supported\"}\n \"baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match\": {\n \"A1\": \"supported\",\n \"A2\": \"supported\",\n \"A3\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A4\": \"not_supported\",\n \"A5\": \"supported\",\n \"A6\": \"supported\"\n },\n \"baseline_agreement_with_verdicts\": 4\n}","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"a5d27cd6-5891-438a-94d0-7a0b821183b7","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}64{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"a13aa8d2907488ab3452192f501dcef5d918eb5dd0bd77b18495e000d5591f2f","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01RPx1CjHg5JbSg5uahxSjo3","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py | grep -i baseline; grep -A9 baseline_verdicts out/results.json","description":"Show baseline output"}}]}}65{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"9a1ddbb1-f603-45cc-8cd3-cbd055249503","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:27:59.289Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"c2e82b37-9474-4400-86ea-16586087351c","keep":18,"tail":["a13aa8d2907488ab3452192f501dcef5d918eb5dd0bd77b18495e000d5591f2f","551e456a3834aa69c0465b6f071eb64cd18b0abbfa9103f14e22a90cfdac0afb"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",19,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"1f70df6511c7f30d3ea9b20b217679622fd0921192086a33bbb8e376fca4b3b1"}66{"parentUuid":"14235725-ef8c-4c60-b2d7-96377bf985bf","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnmy1PsWSTa4PSMxH6R","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":303,"cache_read_input_tokens":36423,"output_tokens":724,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":57},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":303},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"thinkingDurationMs":851,"thinkingDisplay":"updates","apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnmxjmWSU9V8gE5sFq7","requestRef":"9a1ddbb1-f603-45cc-8cd3-cbd055249503","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"0614bf50-447a-4ed9-aebf-067eb6d8e7d5","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:01.738Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}67{"parentUuid":"0614bf50-447a-4ed9-aebf-067eb6d8e7d5","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnmy1PsWSTa4PSMxH6R","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Baseline shows the expected failure modes (sign ignored for A2, missing subgroup for A5). Now the clean re-run check and consistency checks."}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":303,"cache_read_input_tokens":36423,"output_tokens":724,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":57},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":303},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXnmxjmWSU9V8gE5sFq7","requestRef":"9a1ddbb1-f603-45cc-8cd3-cbd055249503","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"fc304752-8e58-4465-a9f9-ce336c08dce8","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:01.739Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}68{"parentUuid":"fc304752-8e58-4465-a9f9-ce336c08dce8","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnmy1PsWSTa4PSMxH6R","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_012FaSGGTpLQueNxbq9eLxwY","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cp out/results.json /tmp/r1.json && rm out/results.json && ~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py >/dev/null && cmp /tmp/r1.json out/results.json && echo IDENTICAL\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python - <<'EOF'\nimport json,math\nr=json.load(open('out/results.json'))\nv=r['verdicts']\nprint(\"counts sum 6:\", r['n_supported']+r['n_not_supported']+r['n_not_assessable']==6==r['n_analysed'])\nprint(\"keys A1-A6 in all:\", all(set(r[k])=={f\"A{i}\" for i in range(1,7)} for k in ('verdicts','locators','reasons')))\nprint(\"valid labels:\", set(v.values())<= {\"supported\",\"not_supported\",\"not_assessable\"})\nc=r['supporting_calculations']\nprint(\"A4 CI contains est:\", c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][0]<c['A4']['b']<c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][1], \"contains 0:\", c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][0]<0<c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][1])\nprint(\"A1 |z|>1.96 and >2.0:\", abs(c['A1']['z'])>1.96, abs(c['A1']['z'])>2.0)\nprint(\"A3 printed vs implied:\", c['A3'])\nprint(\"A6 CI contains est:\", c['A6']['ci'][0]<c['A6']['ate']<c['A6']['ci'][1])\nEOF\ngit -C data status 2>/dev/null; ls -a data","description":"Reproducibility and consistency checks"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":303,"cache_read_input_tokens":36423,"output_tokens":724,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":57},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":303},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":2,"requestId":"req_011CgXnmxjmWSU9V8gE5sFq7","requestRef":"9a1ddbb1-f603-45cc-8cd3-cbd055249503","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"2de162fd-b866-441b-ba6d-b28b275e3be9","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:06.284Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}69{"parentUuid":"2de162fd-b866-441b-ba6d-b28b275e3be9","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_012FaSGGTpLQueNxbq9eLxwY","type":"tool_result","content":"IDENTICAL\ncounts sum 6: True\nkeys A1-A6 in all: True\nvalid labels: True\nA4 CI contains est: True contains 0: True\nA1 |z|>1.96 and >2.0: True True\nA3 printed vs implied: {'b': -0.283, 'pct_printed': -24.7, 'pct_implied': -24.65}\nA6 CI contains est: True\n.\n..\nassertions.json\nREADME.md\nsources","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"007cbe25-3a8d-4217-b5c0-528c960ed862","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:06.387Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"IDENTICAL\ncounts sum 6: True\nkeys A1-A6 in all: True\nvalid labels: True\nA4 CI contains est: True contains 0: True\nA1 |z|>1.96 and >2.0: True True\nA3 printed vs implied: {'b': -0.283, 'pct_printed': -24.7, 'pct_implied': -24.65}\nA6 CI contains est: True\n.\n..\nassertions.json\nREADME.md\nsources","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"2de162fd-b866-441b-ba6d-b28b275e3be9","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}70{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"14535a9a642a685defa94157735066d09fa1aea14ad6c730d964d9a7ce820538","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"thinking","thinking":"","signature":"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"},{"type":"text","text":"Baseline shows the expected failure modes (sign ignored for A2, missing subgroup for A5). Now the clean re-run check and consistency checks."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_012FaSGGTpLQueNxbq9eLxwY","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cp out/results.json /tmp/r1.json && rm out/results.json && ~/wp29/venv/bin/python out/analysis.py >/dev/null && cmp /tmp/r1.json out/results.json && echo IDENTICAL\n~/wp29/venv/bin/python - <<'EOF'\nimport json,math\nr=json.load(open('out/results.json'))\nv=r['verdicts']\nprint(\"counts sum 6:\", r['n_supported']+r['n_not_supported']+r['n_not_assessable']==6==r['n_analysed'])\nprint(\"keys A1-A6 in all:\", all(set(r[k])=={f\"A{i}\" for i in range(1,7)} for k in ('verdicts','locators','reasons')))\nprint(\"valid labels:\", set(v.values())<= {\"supported\",\"not_supported\",\"not_assessable\"})\nc=r['supporting_calculations']\nprint(\"A4 CI contains est:\", c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][0]<c['A4']['b']<c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][1], \"contains 0:\", c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][0]<0<c['A4']['ci95_1p96'][1])\nprint(\"A1 |z|>1.96 and >2.0:\", abs(c['A1']['z'])>1.96, abs(c['A1']['z'])>2.0)\nprint(\"A3 printed vs implied:\", c['A3'])\nprint(\"A6 CI contains est:\", c['A6']['ci'][0]<c['A6']['ate']<c['A6']['ci'][1])\nEOF\ngit -C data status 2>/dev/null; ls -a data","description":"Reproducibility and consistency checks"}}]}}71{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"4f5f39e9-efc5-4cbf-84a9-d4c35a1843e1","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:06.389Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"9a1ddbb1-f603-45cc-8cd3-cbd055249503","keep":20,"tail":["14535a9a642a685defa94157735066d09fa1aea14ad6c730d964d9a7ce820538","30e7921220099126eff6d268b7b51eed47202a9cabd56403239cee28e8a4c93b"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",21,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"db7acdfeabcd4f52a5dfd9b1b6eeb407b1dd38b980b0e2f27aec792c5681511f"}72{"parentUuid":"007cbe25-3a8d-4217-b5c0-528c960ed862","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnnVRV7XQ5MkHeUmP8J","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now the state files, report, and claims."}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":876,"cache_read_input_tokens":36726,"output_tokens":2729,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":876},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnnV6ehafEiTV1mfVXH","requestRef":"4f5f39e9-efc5-4cbf-84a9-d4c35a1843e1","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"3f55c652-bb2b-4cc1-a586-1c93e7cd64ad","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:08.155Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}73{"parentUuid":"3f55c652-bb2b-4cc1-a586-1c93e7cd64ad","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnnVRV7XQ5MkHeUmP8J","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_017MgXK1HsDA93HYPxLc1nyP","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088\ncat > out/state/data_audit.md <<'EOF'\n# Data audit (P1)\n| file | SHA-256 | lines (wc -l) / items | notes |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| data/assertions.json | 2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 | 32 lines; 6 top-level items | ids A1–A6, unique; A1–A5 cite arxiv-2609.27732v1, A6 cites arxiv-2606.14621v1; no missing fields |\n| data/README.md | 5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 | 14 | provenance; lists extract SHA-256s |\n| data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b (matches README) | 134 | DCR paper: abstract, Sec. 6, Tables 6, 7, A19. Units: log points of hospitalisation rate per 100,000; SEs clustered by MedStat region |\n| data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 (matches README) | 58 | RESEA RCT: Table 2, Sec. 3 text, 3.1, Table 3. Units: $, pp, weeks |\n\nSchema: tables are one row per line, ` | ` separated; SE rows follow coefficient rows (DCR). No duplicates among assertions.\n\nAnomalies (also in results.json `data_issues`):\n- DCR: CS-DR 5 km ATT SE 0.210 (Table 6) vs 0.218 (Table A19).\n- DCR: A19 note says 640 control regions vs 608 elsewhere.\n- DCR: narrative % (fatal 35% in abstract vs ~30% in 6.1; HIV \"close to zero\" vs -0.340 at 5 km).\n- RESEA: text gives CI as positive magnitudes; \"p ¡ 0.001\" rendering defect.\n- Both extracts are partial; RESEA tables re-set by editor.\n\nInformation availability: no input violates the rules; only the two extracts are used as evidence. assertions.json is the object of evaluation, not evidence.\nNo rows excluded (see out/exclusions.csv).\nEOF\ncat > out/exclusions.csv <<'EOF'\nstep,rule,n_before,n_after,n_removed,rationale\n1,none: all assertions assessed,6,6,0,Every assertion cites one of the two provided sources; nothing to exclude\nEOF\ncat > out/state/checks.md <<'EOF'\n# Checks (P4)\n| # | check | outcome |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | Clean re-run (delete results.json, rerun analysis.py) reproduces byte-identical results.json | PASS (cmp identical) |\n| 2 | n_supported+n_not_supported+n_not_assessable = 6 = n_analysed | PASS |\n| 3 | verdicts/locators/reasons each have exactly keys A1–A6; labels in allowed set | PASS |\n| 4 | Source SHA-256 match README | PASS |\n| 5 | A1: printed % (-35.0) equals 100(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.01 rounded; |z| = 2.052 > 1.96 and > 2.0; ** printed | PASS |\n| 6 | A3: printed -24.7% equals implied -24.65%; asserted 28.3% ≠ | PASS (assertion contradicted) |\n| 7 | A4: 95% CI [-0.896, 0.084] contains estimate and zero; same under 2.0 ([-0.906, 0.094]); asserted interval equals ±1 SE [-0.656,-0.156] | PASS (assertion contradicted) |\n| 8 | A5: regex search for men/women/male/female/sex/gender in DCR extract returns no lines | PASS (not_assessable) |\n| 9 | A6: CI contains estimate; 1.99/17.3 = 11.50% | PASS |\n| 10 | data/ unchanged after accidental write (data/out removed; hashes re-verified; listing shows only original files) | PASS |\n| 11 | Baseline vs final: 4/6 agree; disagreements (A2 sign, A5 missing subgroup) are explained by baseline ignoring sign and population | PASS (expected) |\n| 12 | Internal inconsistency A19 SE 0.218 vs Table 6 0.210 | Reported in data_issues; |z| with 0.218 = 1.977 (>1.96, <2.0); not decisive for A1 since A1 cites Table 6 and ** printed in both |\nEOF\ncat > out/claims.json <<'EOF'\n[\n {\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"A1 is supported: Table 6 prints the 5 km ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210), -35.0%, significant at 5%.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; significance still holds at 1.96 and the ** is printed in both tables.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C2\",\"text\":\"A2 is not supported: the 1 km HIV ATT is +0.063, not negative.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"\"},\n {\"id\":\"C3\",\"text\":\"A3 is not supported: -0.283 log points corresponds to -24.7%, not -28.3%.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Relies on the exp conversion, which the table itself prints.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C4\",\"text\":\"A4 is not supported: the 95% CI of the 5 km hepatitis ATT is about [-0.90, 0.08] and includes zero; the asserted interval equals ±1 SE.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Same verdict under critical value 1.96 or 2.0.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C5\",\"text\":\"A5 is not assessable: the DCR extract never reports effects by sex.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Judged on the extract only; omitted sections of the paper are not admissible.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C6\",\"text\":\"A6 is supported: Table 2 ATE -1.99 weeks, 95% CI [-2.24, -1.75], control mean 17.3, 11.5% decrease.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Text reports the CI as positive magnitudes; treated as a sign convention.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C7\",\"text\":\"Overall 2 supported, 3 not supported, 1 not assessable.\",\"results_keys\":[\"n_supported\",\"n_not_supported\",\"n_not_assessable\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"\"},\n {\"id\":\"C8\",\"text\":\"A naive verbatim-number-match baseline agrees with the final verdicts on 4 of 6 assertions, failing on sign (A2) and absent subgroup (A5).\",\"results_keys\":[\"baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match\",\"baseline_agreement_with_verdicts\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Baseline is illustrative only.\"}\n]\nEOF\necho done","description":"Write audit, exclusions, checks, claims"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":876,"cache_read_input_tokens":36726,"output_tokens":2729,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":876},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":1,"requestId":"req_011CgXnnV6ehafEiTV1mfVXH","requestRef":"4f5f39e9-efc5-4cbf-84a9-d4c35a1843e1","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"d22381b4-264b-4e3f-8f30-6da51fd91fe6","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:31.378Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}74{"parentUuid":"d22381b4-264b-4e3f-8f30-6da51fd91fe6","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_017MgXK1HsDA93HYPxLc1nyP","type":"tool_result","content":"done","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"d98ad7b8-a374-46a1-851f-2fe4d0a56af5","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:31.429Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"done","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"d22381b4-264b-4e3f-8f30-6da51fd91fe6","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}75{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"cff3f395a21e070e2b20881ac1cdcd07d2aaffee6c2fbbe9fe4123562b690118","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now the state files, report, and claims."},{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_017MgXK1HsDA93HYPxLc1nyP","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088\ncat > out/state/data_audit.md <<'EOF'\n# Data audit (P1)\n| file | SHA-256 | lines (wc -l) / items | notes |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| data/assertions.json | 2965ab3acc6f326653169b83a5345698b51fac88a556de65faf89210aea0cad4 | 32 lines; 6 top-level items | ids A1–A6, unique; A1–A5 cite arxiv-2609.27732v1, A6 cites arxiv-2606.14621v1; no missing fields |\n| data/README.md | 5348bd49912099735108dbbe19ae09fa72bd600cb3d12b878658e6b9806198a7 | 14 | provenance; lists extract SHA-256s |\n| data/sources/arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt | ee2d444d2f78f2af2ca2cf69b59a61fcd7ac5e10ea29e8ddcd67917bf07d6a8b (matches README) | 134 | DCR paper: abstract, Sec. 6, Tables 6, 7, A19. Units: log points of hospitalisation rate per 100,000; SEs clustered by MedStat region |\n| data/sources/arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt | 27c463c0a144d9d5a3916dc641f15b6029f6c68b5e574ad9074e7df1aeb0a238 (matches README) | 58 | RESEA RCT: Table 2, Sec. 3 text, 3.1, Table 3. Units: $, pp, weeks |\n\nSchema: tables are one row per line, ` | ` separated; SE rows follow coefficient rows (DCR). No duplicates among assertions.\n\nAnomalies (also in results.json `data_issues`):\n- DCR: CS-DR 5 km ATT SE 0.210 (Table 6) vs 0.218 (Table A19).\n- DCR: A19 note says 640 control regions vs 608 elsewhere.\n- DCR: narrative % (fatal 35% in abstract vs ~30% in 6.1; HIV \"close to zero\" vs -0.340 at 5 km).\n- RESEA: text gives CI as positive magnitudes; \"p ¡ 0.001\" rendering defect.\n- Both extracts are partial; RESEA tables re-set by editor.\n\nInformation availability: no input violates the rules; only the two extracts are used as evidence. assertions.json is the object of evaluation, not evidence.\nNo rows excluded (see out/exclusions.csv).\nEOF\ncat > out/exclusions.csv <<'EOF'\nstep,rule,n_before,n_after,n_removed,rationale\n1,none: all assertions assessed,6,6,0,Every assertion cites one of the two provided sources; nothing to exclude\nEOF\ncat > out/state/checks.md <<'EOF'\n# Checks (P4)\n| # | check | outcome |\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | Clean re-run (delete results.json, rerun analysis.py) reproduces byte-identical results.json | PASS (cmp identical) |\n| 2 | n_supported+n_not_supported+n_not_assessable = 6 = n_analysed | PASS |\n| 3 | verdicts/locators/reasons each have exactly keys A1–A6; labels in allowed set | PASS |\n| 4 | Source SHA-256 match README | PASS |\n| 5 | A1: printed % (-35.0) equals 100(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.01 rounded; |z| = 2.052 > 1.96 and > 2.0; ** printed | PASS |\n| 6 | A3: printed -24.7% equals implied -24.65%; asserted 28.3% ≠ | PASS (assertion contradicted) |\n| 7 | A4: 95% CI [-0.896, 0.084] contains estimate and zero; same under 2.0 ([-0.906, 0.094]); asserted interval equals ±1 SE [-0.656,-0.156] | PASS (assertion contradicted) |\n| 8 | A5: regex search for men/women/male/female/sex/gender in DCR extract returns no lines | PASS (not_assessable) |\n| 9 | A6: CI contains estimate; 1.99/17.3 = 11.50% | PASS |\n| 10 | data/ unchanged after accidental write (data/out removed; hashes re-verified; listing shows only original files) | PASS |\n| 11 | Baseline vs final: 4/6 agree; disagreements (A2 sign, A5 missing subgroup) are explained by baseline ignoring sign and population | PASS (expected) |\n| 12 | Internal inconsistency A19 SE 0.218 vs Table 6 0.210 | Reported in data_issues; |z| with 0.218 = 1.977 (>1.96, <2.0); not decisive for A1 since A1 cites Table 6 and ** printed in both |\nEOF\ncat > out/claims.json <<'EOF'\n[\n {\"id\":\"C1\",\"text\":\"A1 is supported: Table 6 prints the 5 km ATT -0.431** (SE 0.210), -35.0%, significant at 5%.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; significance still holds at 1.96 and the ** is printed in both tables.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C2\",\"text\":\"A2 is not supported: the 1 km HIV ATT is +0.063, not negative.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"\"},\n {\"id\":\"C3\",\"text\":\"A3 is not supported: -0.283 log points corresponds to -24.7%, not -28.3%.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Relies on the exp conversion, which the table itself prints.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C4\",\"text\":\"A4 is not supported: the 95% CI of the 5 km hepatitis ATT is about [-0.90, 0.08] and includes zero; the asserted interval equals ±1 SE.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Same verdict under critical value 1.96 or 2.0.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C5\",\"text\":\"A5 is not assessable: the DCR extract never reports effects by sex.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Judged on the extract only; omitted sections of the paper are not admissible.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C6\",\"text\":\"A6 is supported: Table 2 ATE -1.99 weeks, 95% CI [-2.24, -1.75], control mean 17.3, 11.5% decrease.\",\"results_keys\":[\"verdicts\",\"locators\",\"reasons\",\"supporting_calculations\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Text reports the CI as positive magnitudes; treated as a sign convention.\"},\n {\"id\":\"C7\",\"text\":\"Overall 2 supported, 3 not supported, 1 not assessable.\",\"results_keys\":[\"n_supported\",\"n_not_supported\",\"n_not_assessable\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"\"},\n {\"id\":\"C8\",\"text\":\"A naive verbatim-number-match baseline agrees with the final verdicts on 4 of 6 assertions, failing on sign (A2) and absent subgroup (A5).\",\"results_keys\":[\"baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match\",\"baseline_agreement_with_verdicts\"],\"status\":\"supported\",\"caveat\":\"Baseline is illustrative only.\"}\n]\nEOF\necho done","description":"Write audit, exclusions, checks, claims"}}]}}76{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"53808fec-e652-4df3-a32c-fff5d8defa32","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:31.433Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"4f5f39e9-efc5-4cbf-84a9-d4c35a1843e1","keep":22,"tail":["cff3f395a21e070e2b20881ac1cdcd07d2aaffee6c2fbbe9fe4123562b690118","e0755949d4b46f8f6e5bc0a3e9410f6ef7fd7ebbbb9950e12d368cb05f669415"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",23,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"7fcc204e3faa3fd6dd3861e0aa7a4dc0a01ba9f3b5f1c171f3292280ff21c378"}77{"type":"last-prompt","lastPrompt":"Begin","leafUuid":"d98ad7b8-a374-46a1-851f-2fe4d0a56af5","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}78{"type":"atis-latch","atis":"","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}79{"parentUuid":"d98ad7b8-a374-46a1-851f-2fe4d0a56af5","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnpLTnUH3EF9yf4Qz2m","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_019ncY7CAyczqaXe5Sp8nxeQ","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088\ncat > out/report.md <<'EOF'\n# F4-conf-02 — Are the six review assertions supported by their cited sources?\n\n## Question\nFor each of six assertions (A1–A5 cite Armendariz 2026, arXiv:2609.27732v1, on drug consumption rooms (DCRs); A6 cites Li, Pearson-Merkowitz & Yokum 2026, arXiv:2606.14621v1, on the RESEA programme), I decide from the cited extract alone whether it is supported, not_supported or not_assessable. Each verdict comes with a locator and a one-sentence reason (`verdicts`, `locators`, `reasons`).\n\n## Data and exclusions\nInputs: `data/assertions.json` (6 items), `data/README.md` (14 lines), the DCR extract (134 lines) and the RESEA extract (58 lines) (`n_input_rows`). The SHA-256 hashes of both extracts match the README (`out/state/data_audit.md`). No assertion was excluded (`out/exclusions.csv`), so all 6 were assessed (`n_analysed`). I found and recorded these issues in the inputs (`data_issues`):\n- The DCR paper gives two different SEs for the same CS-DR 5 km ATT: 0.210 in Table 6 and 0.218 in Table A19.\n- The Table A19 note says there are 640 control regions; everywhere else the count is 608.\n- The DCR text's percentages for sub-outcomes don't agree with each other. The abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35%, while Section 6.1 says about 30%. The text also calls the HIV estimates \"close to zero\" although the 5 km HIV ATT is −0.340.\n- In the RESEA text, the confidence intervals are written as positive magnitudes, and \"p ¡ 0.001\" is a rendering defect.\n\nNone of these issues decides a verdict.\n\nProcess note: through a working-directory mistake, two of my own state files (contract.md, log.md) were briefly written to `data/out/state/`. I moved them to `out/state/` and removed the directory. The original data files were never touched, and their hashes were re-checked (`out/state/checks.md`, check 10).\n\n## Method\n`out/analysis.py` parses the relevant table rows from the extracts and prints them. It then applies explicit rules: the sign, magnitude, SE and stars must match; percentages are converted as 100·(exp(b)−1); 95% CIs are b ± 1.96·SE; for the subgroup claim it runs a regex search for sex terms. The script writes `results.json` and uses no randomness (`random_seed` = null). As a baseline, I first ran a naive check that only asks whether every number in an assertion appears verbatim in the cited extract (`baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match`). It agrees with the final verdicts on 4 of 6 assertions (`baseline_agreement_with_verdicts`). It gets A2 wrong because it ignores sign, and A5 wrong because it ignores population.\n\n## Results\n| id | verdict (`verdicts`) | locator (`locators`) | decisive element (`reasons`, `supporting_calculations`) |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| A1 | supported | DCR, Table 6, row \"ATT\", column \"5 km\" | −0.431** (0.210), % change −35.0%; the text states 5% significance |\n| A2 | not_supported | DCR, Table 7, row \"HIV\", column \"1 km\" | the printed ATT is +0.063 (SE 0.801), i.e. positive, not negative |\n| A3 | not_supported | DCR, Table 6, row \"% change\", column \"3 km\" | −0.283 log points = −24.7% (implied −24.65%), not −28.3% |\n| A4 | not_supported | DCR, Table 7, row \"Hepatitis\", column \"5 km\" | −0.406 ± 1.96·0.250 = [−0.896, 0.084], which includes 0; the asserted [−0.66, −0.16] is ±1 SE |\n| A5 | not_assessable | not reported in arxiv-2609.27732v1 | the extract never breaks results down by sex (the regex finds no hits) |\n| A6 | supported | RESEA, Table 2, row \"Weeks on UI\", column \"Average treatment effect estimate\" | −1.99 weeks, CI [−2.24, −1.75], control mean 17.3; 1.99/17.3 = 11.50% |\n\nCounts: 2 supported (`n_supported`), 3 not supported (`n_not_supported`), 1 not assessable (`n_not_assessable`). Feasibility: complete (`feasibility`).\n\n## Uncertainty\n- **Critical value.** A4 depends on how the CI is built. With 1.96 the interval is [−0.896, 0.084]; with 2.0 it is [−0.906, 0.094] (`supporting_calculations.A4`). Both include zero, and the estimate has no star in Table 7, so the verdict is the same either way. The asserted interval matches only a ±1 SE (≈68%) band. A1's 5% significance claim rests on the printed ** and the text. With Table 6's SE the |z| is 2.052 (`supporting_calculations.A1.z`), above both 1.96 and 2.0. With Table A19's SE of 0.218 the |z| is 1.977. That is still above 1.96 but just below 2.0, which is noted in `data_issues`. A1 cites Table 6, and the ** is printed in both tables, so the verdict stays supported.\n- **Log-to-percent conversion.** For A1 and A3 the conversion is printed in Table 6 and matches 100(exp(b)−1). A3's 28.3% only comes out if log points are read as percent changes, which is not a reasonable alternative convention when the source prints −24.7%. For A6 the ratio 1.99/17.3 is computed directly and is also stated in the source.\n- A2 and A5 do not depend on any convention.\n\n## Limitations and open issues\n- The verdicts are based only on the extracts, as the task requires. A5 might be assessable from omitted parts of the paper, but those are not admissible here.\n- The internal inconsistencies in the DCR source (two SEs for one estimate; 608 vs 640 control regions; narrative percentages) are reported, not resolved.\n- The verdicts are rule-based judgements encoded in `out/analysis.py`. They are not statistical estimates, so no sampling uncertainty applies to them.\nEOF\ncat > out/state/phases.json <<'EOF'\n{\n \"P0\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"TASK.md read in full\",\"contract.md written\"],\"notes\":\"contract initially misplaced under data/out/state due to cwd error; moved\"},\n \"P1\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"SHA-256 of all 4 inputs computed; extracts match README\",\"line/item counts recorded\",\"anomalies listed\",\"exclusions.csv: 6->6\"],\"notes\":\"no availability violations\"},\n \"P2\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"naive verbatim-number baseline computed in analysis.py (baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match)\"],\"notes\":\"4/6 agreement with final\"},\n \"P3\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"analysis.py reads only data/, prints source lines, writes results.json\",\"no randomness; random_seed null\"],\"notes\":\"\"},\n \"P4\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"clean re-run byte-identical (cmp)\",\"counts sum to 6\",\"CI contain estimates\",\"A4 robust to 1.96/2.0\",\"data/ unchanged\"],\"notes\":\"see checks.md\"},\n \"P5\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"report.md with all 6 sections and results_keys citations\",\"claims.json C1-C8 written\"],\"notes\":\"\"}\n}\nEOF\ncat >> out/state/log.md <<'EOF'\n- 2026-10-30 P1 passed: audit, hashes match README, no exclusions.\n- 2026-10-30 P2 passed: naive verbatim-number baseline added to analysis.py.\n- 2026-10-30 P3 passed: analysis.py implemented; verdicts S,NS,NS,NS,NA,S.\n- 2026-10-30 P4 passed: clean re-run identical; checks.md written.\n- 2026-10-30 P5 passed: report.md, claims.json written. Task complete.\nEOF\nls -R out; ls data","description":"Write report, phases, log; list outputs"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2735,"cache_read_input_tokens":37602,"output_tokens":2928,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2735},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnpLBBLcgiQZaGZNwHP","requestRef":"53808fec-e652-4df3-a32c-fff5d8defa32","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"6971335f-1081-4ec8-ab49-a8c2cf43f719","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:56.314Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}80{"parentUuid":"6971335f-1081-4ec8-ab49-a8c2cf43f719","isSidechain":false,"promptId":"8e1efe65-46bd-4279-8161-7a9fec3e94ff","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_019ncY7CAyczqaXe5Sp8nxeQ","type":"tool_result","content":"analysis.py\nclaims.json\nexclusions.csv\nreport.md\nresults.json\nstate\n\nout/state:\nchecks.md\ncontract.md\ndata_audit.md\nlog.md\nphases.json\nassertions.json\nREADME.md\nsources","is_error":false}]},"uuid":"94a03fb0-a0c8-4d68-991b-b442cff6491a","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:56.367Z","toolUseResult":{"stdout":"analysis.py\nclaims.json\nexclusions.csv\nreport.md\nresults.json\nstate\n\nout/state:\nchecks.md\ncontract.md\ndata_audit.md\nlog.md\nphases.json\nassertions.json\nREADME.md\nsources","stderr":"","interrupted":false,"isImage":false,"noOutputExpected":false},"sandboxed":false,"sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6971335f-1081-4ec8-ab49-a8c2cf43f719","permissionDecision":{"decision":"accept","source":"config","reasonType":"rule","ruleSource":"cliArg"},"userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}81{"type":"api-request-blob","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","hash":"eb6d8d129c8cc4a9a6a1a30c0ca45fe1d2766b66e330174b232c2e7cbd56281e","message":{"role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_019ncY7CAyczqaXe5Sp8nxeQ","name":"Bash","input":{"command":"cd /Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088\ncat > out/report.md <<'EOF'\n# F4-conf-02 — Are the six review assertions supported by their cited sources?\n\n## Question\nFor each of six assertions (A1–A5 cite Armendariz 2026, arXiv:2609.27732v1, on drug consumption rooms (DCRs); A6 cites Li, Pearson-Merkowitz & Yokum 2026, arXiv:2606.14621v1, on the RESEA programme), I decide from the cited extract alone whether it is supported, not_supported or not_assessable. Each verdict comes with a locator and a one-sentence reason (`verdicts`, `locators`, `reasons`).\n\n## Data and exclusions\nInputs: `data/assertions.json` (6 items), `data/README.md` (14 lines), the DCR extract (134 lines) and the RESEA extract (58 lines) (`n_input_rows`). The SHA-256 hashes of both extracts match the README (`out/state/data_audit.md`). No assertion was excluded (`out/exclusions.csv`), so all 6 were assessed (`n_analysed`). I found and recorded these issues in the inputs (`data_issues`):\n- The DCR paper gives two different SEs for the same CS-DR 5 km ATT: 0.210 in Table 6 and 0.218 in Table A19.\n- The Table A19 note says there are 640 control regions; everywhere else the count is 608.\n- The DCR text's percentages for sub-outcomes don't agree with each other. The abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35%, while Section 6.1 says about 30%. The text also calls the HIV estimates \"close to zero\" although the 5 km HIV ATT is −0.340.\n- In the RESEA text, the confidence intervals are written as positive magnitudes, and \"p ¡ 0.001\" is a rendering defect.\n\nNone of these issues decides a verdict.\n\nProcess note: through a working-directory mistake, two of my own state files (contract.md, log.md) were briefly written to `data/out/state/`. I moved them to `out/state/` and removed the directory. The original data files were never touched, and their hashes were re-checked (`out/state/checks.md`, check 10).\n\n## Method\n`out/analysis.py` parses the relevant table rows from the extracts and prints them. It then applies explicit rules: the sign, magnitude, SE and stars must match; percentages are converted as 100·(exp(b)−1); 95% CIs are b ± 1.96·SE; for the subgroup claim it runs a regex search for sex terms. The script writes `results.json` and uses no randomness (`random_seed` = null). As a baseline, I first ran a naive check that only asks whether every number in an assertion appears verbatim in the cited extract (`baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match`). It agrees with the final verdicts on 4 of 6 assertions (`baseline_agreement_with_verdicts`). It gets A2 wrong because it ignores sign, and A5 wrong because it ignores population.\n\n## Results\n| id | verdict (`verdicts`) | locator (`locators`) | decisive element (`reasons`, `supporting_calculations`) |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| A1 | supported | DCR, Table 6, row \"ATT\", column \"5 km\" | −0.431** (0.210), % change −35.0%; the text states 5% significance |\n| A2 | not_supported | DCR, Table 7, row \"HIV\", column \"1 km\" | the printed ATT is +0.063 (SE 0.801), i.e. positive, not negative |\n| A3 | not_supported | DCR, Table 6, row \"% change\", column \"3 km\" | −0.283 log points = −24.7% (implied −24.65%), not −28.3% |\n| A4 | not_supported | DCR, Table 7, row \"Hepatitis\", column \"5 km\" | −0.406 ± 1.96·0.250 = [−0.896, 0.084], which includes 0; the asserted [−0.66, −0.16] is ±1 SE |\n| A5 | not_assessable | not reported in arxiv-2609.27732v1 | the extract never breaks results down by sex (the regex finds no hits) |\n| A6 | supported | RESEA, Table 2, row \"Weeks on UI\", column \"Average treatment effect estimate\" | −1.99 weeks, CI [−2.24, −1.75], control mean 17.3; 1.99/17.3 = 11.50% |\n\nCounts: 2 supported (`n_supported`), 3 not supported (`n_not_supported`), 1 not assessable (`n_not_assessable`). Feasibility: complete (`feasibility`).\n\n## Uncertainty\n- **Critical value.** A4 depends on how the CI is built. With 1.96 the interval is [−0.896, 0.084]; with 2.0 it is [−0.906, 0.094] (`supporting_calculations.A4`). Both include zero, and the estimate has no star in Table 7, so the verdict is the same either way. The asserted interval matches only a ±1 SE (≈68%) band. A1's 5% significance claim rests on the printed ** and the text. With Table 6's SE the |z| is 2.052 (`supporting_calculations.A1.z`), above both 1.96 and 2.0. With Table A19's SE of 0.218 the |z| is 1.977. That is still above 1.96 but just below 2.0, which is noted in `data_issues`. A1 cites Table 6, and the ** is printed in both tables, so the verdict stays supported.\n- **Log-to-percent conversion.** For A1 and A3 the conversion is printed in Table 6 and matches 100(exp(b)−1). A3's 28.3% only comes out if log points are read as percent changes, which is not a reasonable alternative convention when the source prints −24.7%. For A6 the ratio 1.99/17.3 is computed directly and is also stated in the source.\n- A2 and A5 do not depend on any convention.\n\n## Limitations and open issues\n- The verdicts are based only on the extracts, as the task requires. A5 might be assessable from omitted parts of the paper, but those are not admissible here.\n- The internal inconsistencies in the DCR source (two SEs for one estimate; 608 vs 640 control regions; narrative percentages) are reported, not resolved.\n- The verdicts are rule-based judgements encoded in `out/analysis.py`. They are not statistical estimates, so no sampling uncertainty applies to them.\nEOF\ncat > out/state/phases.json <<'EOF'\n{\n \"P0\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"TASK.md read in full\",\"contract.md written\"],\"notes\":\"contract initially misplaced under data/out/state due to cwd error; moved\"},\n \"P1\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"SHA-256 of all 4 inputs computed; extracts match README\",\"line/item counts recorded\",\"anomalies listed\",\"exclusions.csv: 6->6\"],\"notes\":\"no availability violations\"},\n \"P2\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"naive verbatim-number baseline computed in analysis.py (baseline_verdicts_verbatim_number_match)\"],\"notes\":\"4/6 agreement with final\"},\n \"P3\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"analysis.py reads only data/, prints source lines, writes results.json\",\"no randomness; random_seed null\"],\"notes\":\"\"},\n \"P4\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"clean re-run byte-identical (cmp)\",\"counts sum to 6\",\"CI contain estimates\",\"A4 robust to 1.96/2.0\",\"data/ unchanged\"],\"notes\":\"see checks.md\"},\n \"P5\": {\"status\":\"passed\",\"checks\":[\"report.md with all 6 sections and results_keys citations\",\"claims.json C1-C8 written\"],\"notes\":\"\"}\n}\nEOF\ncat >> out/state/log.md <<'EOF'\n- 2026-10-30 P1 passed: audit, hashes match README, no exclusions.\n- 2026-10-30 P2 passed: naive verbatim-number baseline added to analysis.py.\n- 2026-10-30 P3 passed: analysis.py implemented; verdicts S,NS,NS,NS,NA,S.\n- 2026-10-30 P4 passed: clean re-run identical; checks.md written.\n- 2026-10-30 P5 passed: report.md, claims.json written. Task complete.\nEOF\nls -R out; ls data","description":"Write report, phases, log; list outputs"}}]}}82{"type":"api-request","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","id":"9a049224-8a6f-43e7-863c-6d0777e51fe1","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:28:56.371Z","version":"2.1.314","querySource":"sdk","shapeHash":"6a4d10d25a57debefcb68b5507404675ec702dd2cff78b90af8f25e24580879e","params":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","betas":["claude-code-20250219","interleaved-thinking-2025-05-14","context-management-2025-06-27","prompt-caching-scope-2026-01-05","per-turn-control-2026-07-01","thinking-token-count-2026-05-13","mid-conversation-system-clear-at-2026-08-21","effort-2025-11-24","thinking-binding-controls-2026-08-01","thinking-display-updates-2026-08-18","cache-diagnosis-2026-04-07"],"max_tokens":128000,"thinking":{"type":"adaptive","display":"updates"},"context_management":{"edits":[{"type":"clear_thinking_20251015","keep":"all"}]},"output_config":{"effort":"medium"}},"base":"53808fec-e652-4df3-a32c-fff5d8defa32","keep":24,"tail":["eb6d8d129c8cc4a9a6a1a30c0ca45fe1d2766b66e330174b232c2e7cbd56281e","5830d17e0802fb283d32ee9de44ec1872fd44cdd9eafe5152527b77b1088dbf9"],"cacheControl":[{"path":["system",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["system",1],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}},{"path":["messages",25,"content",0],"value":{"type":"ephemeral"}}],"requestDigest":"87845d1f6077488d4f4d9d98d3b84ad904e9314fcc945950b3e87f487778312e"}83{"parentUuid":"94a03fb0-a0c8-4d68-991b-b442cff6491a","isSidechain":false,"message":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","id":"msg_011CgXnrB4YZSD2ejRhJDb5P","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"I've checked all six assertions against their cited extracts: 2 are supported, 3 are not supported and 1 can't be assessed. A clean re-run of `out/analysis.py` reproduces `out/results.json` byte for byte.\n\n| id | verdict | what decides it |\n|---|---|---|\n| A1 | supported | Table 6, 5 km: the effect is −0.431 with standard error 0.210, marked significant at 5%, which the table gives as a −35.0% change. Everything in the assertion matches. |\n| A2 | not supported | Table 7 gives the 1 km HIV estimate as **+0.063**, so it is positive, not negative. |\n| A3 | not supported | An effect of −0.283 log points is a −24.7% change (printed in the table), not −28.3%. The assertion reads log points as percent. |\n| A4 | not supported | The 95% interval for hepatitis at 5 km is [−0.896, 0.084], which includes zero. The asserted [−0.66, −0.16] is only ±1 standard error. |\n| A5 | not assessable | The extract never reports results separately for men and women. |\n| A6 | supported | Table 2 gives −1.99 weeks, 95% interval [−2.24, −1.75], against a control mean of 17.3 weeks; 1.99/17.3 = 11.5%. |\n\n**Sensitivity to conventions:** A4 comes out the same whether the interval uses 1.96 or 2.0 standard errors. The −35.0% and −24.7% figures in A1 and A3 are printed in the source, and they agree with the task's log-to-percent formula.\n\n**Problems in the sources** (recorded in `data_issues`; none changes a verdict):\n- **Two standard errors for one estimate.** The drug consumption room paper gives 0.210 for the main 5 km effect in Table 6 but 0.218 in Table A19. With 0.218 the estimate is still significant at 5% using 1.96, but just misses using 2.0. A1 cites Table 6 and both tables mark it significant, so A1 stays supported.\n- **Control-region count:** the Table A19 note says 640 control regions; everywhere else the figure is 608.\n- **Narrative percentages disagree:** the abstract says fatal hospitalisations fall by 35%, while Section 6.1 says about 30%.\n- **RESEA paper:** the text writes the weeks-on-benefits interval as positive numbers (the table's are signed), and a \"p < 0.001\" is garbled as \"p ¡ 0.001\".\n\n**Limitations:** A5 might be answerable from parts of the paper that aren't in the extract, but the task only allows the extracts.\n\n**My mistake with `data/`:** early on I accidentally wrote two of my own notes files into `data/out/state/`. I moved them to `out/state/` and deleted that folder. The original data files were never changed, and their checksums still match the README. This is noted in the report and the log.\n\nFiles are in `out/`:\n- `results.json`\n- `report.md`\n- `analysis.py`\n- `claims.json`\n- `exclusions.csv`\n- `state/` (contract, data audit, checks, phase ledger, log)"}],"container":null,"stop_reason":"end_turn","stop_sequence":null,"stop_details":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":2,"cache_creation_input_tokens":3005,"cache_read_input_tokens":40337,"output_tokens":1049,"output_tokens_details":{"thinking_tokens":0},"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":3005},"inference_geo":"global","iterations":[],"speed":"standard","fallback_credit":null},"input_transformations":[],"diagnostics":null,"context_management":null},"apiBlockIndex":0,"requestId":"req_011CgXnrAofbzAyp2GyTCBLx","requestRef":"9a049224-8a6f-43e7-863c-6d0777e51fe1","requestedModel":"claude-opus-5-5","type":"assistant","uuid":"7fb62eb5-1968-4a67-95c4-edebbb2ebdb2","timestamp":"2026-10-30T04:29:07.619Z","effort":"medium","perTurnEffort":"medium","userType":"external","entrypoint":"sdk-cli","cwd":"/Users/simon-pierreboucher/wp29/runs/RC0088","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","version":"2.1.314","gitBranch":"HEAD"}84{"type":"last-prompt","lastPrompt":"Begin","leafUuid":"7fb62eb5-1968-4a67-95c4-edebbb2ebdb2","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae"}85{"type":"cost-state","sessionId":"e5dc877d-c215-4466-b2ee-fc2287f289ae","totalCostUSD":0.6946404,"totalAPIDuration":182718,"totalAPIDurationWithoutRetries":182713,"totalToolDuration":546,"totalLinesAdded":0,"totalLinesRemoved":0,"totalDuration":183345,"startTime":1793334364301,"modelUsage":{"claude-opus-5-5":{"inputTokens":28,"outputTokens":21102,"thinkingTokens":1349,"cacheReadInputTokens":316492,"cacheCreationInputTokens":41838,"cacheCreationEphemeral5mInputTokens":41838,"cacheCreationEphemeral1hInputTokens":0,"webSearchRequests":0,"costUSD":0.6946404}},"hasUnknownModelCost":false}86