1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"A1 (5 km overall ATT −0.431, SE 0.210, significant at 5%, −35.0%) is supported by Table 6.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons","derived"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table A19 prints SE 0.218 for the same estimate; still significant at 5% with 1.96."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"A2 is not supported: the 1 km HIV ATT in Table 7 is +0.063, not negative.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},4 {"id":"C3","text":"A3 is not supported: −0.283 log points corresponds to −24.7%, not 28.3%.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons","derived"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},5 {"id":"C4","text":"A4 is not supported: the 95% CI for 5 km hepatitis, [−0.896, 0.084], includes zero; the asserted interval is ±1 SE.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons","derived"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Robust to 1.96 vs 2.0 critical value."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"A5 (larger reduction for men than women) is not assessable because the DCR extract reports no results by sex.","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Judged from the extract only."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"A6 is supported by RESEA Table 2 (ATE −1.99 weeks, CI [−2.24, −1.75], 11.5% of the 17.3-week control mean).","results_keys":["verdicts","locators","reasons","derived"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},8 {"id":"C7","text":"Overall 2 supported, 3 not_supported, 1 not_assessable; the DCR source has internal inconsistencies that do not affect any verdict.","results_keys":["n_supported","n_not_supported","n_not_assessable","data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}9]10