1{2 "task_id": "F4-conf-02",3 "verdicts": {4 "A1": "supported",5 "A2": "not_supported",6 "A3": "not_supported",7 "A4": "not_supported",8 "A5": "not_assessable",9 "A6": "supported"10 },11 "locators": {12 "A1": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \"ATT\" | column \"5 km\"",13 "A2": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \"HIV\" | column \"1 km\"",14 "A3": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row \"% change\" | column \"3 km\"",15 "A4": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row \"Hepatitis\" | column \"5 km\"",16 "A5": "not reported in arxiv-2609.27732v1",17 "A6": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row \"Weeks on UI\" | column \"Average treatment effect estimate\""18 },19 "reasons": {20 "A1": "Table 6 prints the 5 km ATT as -0.431** with SE (0.210) (** = p<0.05) and a % change of -35.0% (100(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.01%), matching every element of the assertion.",21 "A2": "Table 7 prints the 1 km HIV ATT as 0.063 (positive, SE (0.801)), not -0.063, so the sign and the claimed fall in HIV hospitalisations are contradicted.",22 "A3": "The 3 km ATT -0.283 log points converts to 100(exp(-0.283)-1) = -24.6% and Table 6 prints -24.7%, not -28.3% (the assertion equates log points with percent; the estimate is also insignificant, SE (0.279)).",23 "A4": "With ATT -0.406 and SE (0.250) the 95% CI is [-0.896, 0.084] (±1.96·SE), which includes zero (and the estimate carries no star); [-0.66, -0.16] is only ±1 SE.",24 "A5": "The extract reports ATTs only by buffer (Table 6), outcome category (Table 7) and estimator (Table A19) and contains no estimate by sex, so the men-versus-women comparison can be neither confirmed nor refuted.",25 "A6": "Table 2 gives the ATE as -1.99 weeks with 95% CI [-2.24, -1.75] and a control mean of 17.3 weeks; 1.99/17.3 = 11.50%, matching the 11.5% stated in the Section 3 text."26 },27 "n_supported": 2,28 "n_not_supported": 3,29 "n_not_assessable": 1,30 "feasibility": "complete",31 "feasibility_reason": null,32 "data_issues": [33 {34 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 prints the CS-DR 5 km SE as (0.218) whereas Table 6 prints (0.210) for the same ATT -0.431.",35 "handling": "A1 is judged against Table 6 (the table whose values the assertion quotes); 5% significance holds under either SE with the 1.96 critical value (t=2.05 or 1.98)."36 },37 {38 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 note states 640 never-treated comparison regions, while its body and Tables 6-7 state 608.",39 "handling": "Recorded only; no assertion depends on the control-region count."40 },41 {42 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract says fatal outcomes fall by 35%, but Table 7 5 km fatal ATT -0.354 implies -29.8% and Section 6.1 says approximately 30%.",43 "handling": "Recorded only; no assertion concerns fatal outcomes. Tables treated as authoritative over prose."44 },45 {46 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: text describes HIV estimates as close to zero, while Table 7 shows -0.340 (0.294) at 5 km and -0.239 (0.337) at 3 km.",47 "handling": "A2 is decided from the Table 7 1 km cell (0.063), not from the prose."48 },49 {50 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: results text renders 'p ¡ 0.001' (character-encoding defect for 'p < 0.001').",51 "handling": "Interpreted as p < 0.001; does not affect A6, which relies on Table 2."52 },53 {54 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: text reports the weeks-on-UI CI in magnitude form [1.75, 2.24] while Table 2 reports [-2.24, -1.75].",55 "handling": "Treated as the same interval under a sign convention; A6 uses Table 2."56 }57 ],58 "n_input_rows": {59 "assertions.json": 6,60 "README.md": 14,61 "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134,62 "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 5863 },64 "n_analysed": 6,65 "random_seed": null,66 "baseline_literal_number_match": {67 "A1": true,68 "A2": true,69 "A3": false,70 "A4": false,71 "A5": true,72 "A6": true73 },74 "conversions": {75 "A1_pct_change_5km": -35.0141,76 "A1_t_stat_table6": 2.0524,77 "A1_t_stat_tableA19": 1.9771,78 "A3_pct_change_3km": -24.648,79 "A4_ci95_196": [80 -0.896,81 0.08482 ],83 "A4_ci95_200": [84 -0.906,85 0.09486 ],87 "A6_relative_reduction_pct": 11.502988 }89}