SPB Git

spb/wp29_uqo

Public
2.5 KB · 28 lines json
1{2  "verdict": "accept",3  "issues": [4    {5      "id": "R1",6      "severity": "minor",7      "location": "out/analysis.py (data_issues construction)",8      "issue": "The data_issues text always says the missing UNRATE months lie outside the window, whether or not they do. It is correct for this data: the only blank is 2025-10, and the window-completeness assert would stop the script if a month inside the window were missing. The wording is just not derived from the data.",9      "suggested_fix": "Build the 'outside the window' statement from a check of each missing month's quarter against 1959Q4-2019Q4."10    },11    {12      "id": "R2",13      "severity": "minor",14      "location": "out/report.md (Uncertainty) / claims.json C4",15      "issue": "The sensitivity table counts L=0 (heteroskedasticity-robust only, not HAC) toward the HAC-bandwidth range. The robustness claim is limited to the 7 lags that were evaluated, and inference uses a normal critical value with no small-sample correction. Fixed-b inference was not computed. All of this is disclosed, and with |t| of about 7 it cannot change the conclusion.",16      "suggested_fix": "Optionally state the range for L>=1 only (0.032-0.037), and add a fixed-b or Student-t critical value as a cross-check."17    },18    {19      "id": "R3",20      "severity": "minor",21      "location": "out/report.md (Limitations)",22      "issue": "'No other limitations' is somewhat strong. The bandwidth comes from a rule of thumb even though lag-1 residual autocorrelation is 0.39. The specification is contemporaneous only, and the data are current vintage. Most of these points are already listed.",23      "suggested_fix": "Remove the 'No other limitations' sentence, or soften it."24    }25  ],26  "summary": "In a scratch copy, analysis.py regenerated results.json byte-identically. An independent numpy/pandas re-implementation matches: n=240, beta=-0.25577, alpha=0.18439, Newey-West SE with Bartlett kernel and L=4 of 0.035835, mean growth 0.7535. Checksums match the README. The only blank value is UNRATE 2025-10, which is outside the window. The code uses only data/ and the 1959Q4 levels, so no information rules are broken. All required keys are present and consistent: the CI equals beta ± 1.96·se_hac, okun_negative_5pct is consistent with t=-7.14, and the naive baseline SE and CI are reported. The bandwidth is justified, with sensitivity results. Claims follow from the numbers and carry suitable caveats. Only minor wording and robustness points remain."27}28
Files · main
Menu

Theme