1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"The DCR overall ATT of -0.431 log points (Table 6, 5 km) corresponds to a -35.0141% change in the hospitalisation rate, consistent with the printed -35.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact log-to-ratio identity; refers to the geometric-mean rate; no SE propagated."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"The RESEA reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp equals a 1.96% increase relative to the 75.0% control-group mean.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Control mean is unadjusted and rounded; ATE is block-adjusted."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"The employment elasticity of -0.388 applied to the printed 0.047 minimum-wage change implies a -1.8236% employment change.","results_keys":["harmonised","data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Table prints 0.047 while note says about 4%; with 0.04 the result would be -1.55%."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"E4 (absolute change in fatal hospitalisations per 100,000) cannot be harmonised because the baseline level of the fatal rate is not printed; only the relative change of -29.8125% is computable.","results_keys":["harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","baseline_printed"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Missing quantity named in harmonised.E4.missing_quantity."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"The Tossou LPM coefficient -0.0962 (Table 3, col. 4) equals -9.62 percentage points.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact unit rescaling."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"Four of five items are harmonised and one is declared not harmonisable, so the task is complete.","results_keys":["n_harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","feasibility","n_analysed"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},8 {"id":"C7","text":"Six internal inconsistencies or rendering issues were detected in the source extracts and handled as documented.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"None alters the harmonised values except the E3 MW-change ambiguity, discussed."}9]10