1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"The 5 km overall DCR ATT of -0.431 log points corresponds to a -35.01% relative change in drug-related hospitalisations, matching the printed -35.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Exact under the log-point convention; no SE propagated."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"The RESEA reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp is a 1.96% relative increase over the control-group mean of 75.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Control mean is a raw (not block-adjusted) aggregate; printed inputs are rounded."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"The MW employment elasticity of -0.388 applied to the printed 0.047 minimum-wage change implies a -1.82% change in employment.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Linear approximation; 0.047 interpreted as a proportion (note says 'about 4%')."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"E4 (fatal drug-related hospitalisations, absolute change per 100,000) cannot be harmonised because the extract prints no baseline level of the fatal hospitalisation rate.","results_keys":["harmonised","n_not_harmonisable"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Relative change (-29.81%) is computable and stated in the transformation string."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"The Tossou LPM coefficient of -0.0962 corresponds to -9.62 percentage points.","results_keys":["harmonised"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Pure rescaling."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"Four of five items were harmonised; the task is complete because the remaining item has a justified statement of impossibility.","results_keys":["n_harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","feasibility","n_analysed"],"status":"supported","caveat":""},8 {"id":"C7","text":"The sources contain internal inconsistencies (e.g. DCR abstract fatal -35% vs Table 7 -29.8%; SE 0.210 vs 0.218), none of which affects the point estimates used.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}9]10