1{2 "task_id": "F4-conf-03",3 "harmonised": {4 "E1": {5 "value": -35.01410892252505,6 "unit": "percent (relative change vs counterfactual rate)",7 "transformation": "100*(exp(b)-1) with b=-0.431 -> 100*(exp(-0.431)-1) = -35.0141% (printed check: -35.0%)",8 "harmonisable": true,9 "missing_quantity": null,10 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6 | row 'ATT' (line 36) | column '5 km' = -0.431**; cross-check row '% change' (line 40) | column '5 km' = -35.0%"11 },12 "E2": {13 "value": 1.96,14 "unit": "percent (relative change vs control-group mean)",15 "transformation": "100*Delta/p with Delta=1.47 pp, p=75.0% -> 100*1.47/75.0 = 1.9600%",16 "harmonisable": true,17 "missing_quantity": null,18 "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2 | row 'Reemployment' (line 29) | column 'Average treatment effect estimate' = 1.47 pp; column 'Control' = 75.0%"19 },20 "E3": {21 "value": -1.8236,22 "unit": "percent (relative change in employment)",23 "transformation": "100*eta*g with eta=-0.388, g=0.047 (proportional MW change) -> 100*(-0.388)*(0.047) = -1.8236%",24 "harmonisable": true,25 "missing_quantity": null,26 "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Table 2 | row 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' (line 50) | column 'Estimate (SE)' = -0.388; row '% MW changes' (line 60) | column 'Estimate (SE)' = 0.047"27 },28 "E4": {29 "value": null,30 "unit": "hospitalisations per 100,000 inhabitants per year",31 "transformation": "Absolute change = R0*(exp(b)-1) with b=-0.354 -> R0*(-0.2981); R0 (counterfactual/baseline fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 in treated 5 km regions) is not printed in the extract, so the value cannot be computed",32 "harmonisable": false,33 "missing_quantity": "baseline (counterfactual, e.g. pre-opening or control-group mean) level of the fatal drug-related hospitalisation rate per 100,000 inhabitants per year for the treated 5 km regions",34 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 7 | row 'Drug-related (fatal)' (line 86) | column '5 km' = -0.354**"35 },36 "E5": {37 "value": -9.62,38 "unit": "percentage points",39 "transformation": "100*beta with beta=-0.0962 (0-1 scale) -> 100*(-0.0962) = -9.62 pp",40 "harmonisable": true,41 "missing_quantity": null,42 "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3 | row 'Treatment' (line 49) | column '(4)' = -0.0962"43 }44 },45 "n_harmonised": 4,46 "n_not_harmonisable": 1,47 "feasibility": "complete",48 "feasibility_reason": null,49 "data_issues": [50 {51 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract says fatal outcomes 'fall by 35%', whereas Section 6.1 says 'approximately 30% at 5 km'; Table 7 5 km fatal ATT -0.354 implies 100*(exp(-0.354)-1) = -29.8%, consistent with ~30% not 35%.",52 "handling": "E4 is based on the Table 7 coefficient only; the abstract figure is not used. Noted as an internal inconsistency of the source."53 },54 {55 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431 has SE (0.210) in Table 6 but (0.218) in Table A19; Table 6 note says 608 control regions while the Table A19 note says 640 never-treated comparison regions (Table A19 body says 608).",56 "handling": "Point estimate identical in both tables, so E1 is unaffected; no SE is propagated. Recorded only."57 },58 {59 "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: Table 2 prints '% MW changes' = 0.047 (4.7%) while the table note describes the 2023 change as 'about 4% minimum wage increase'.",60 "handling": "E3 uses the printed table value g=0.047, as the target definition asks for the size printed in the same table; with 0.04 the implied change would be -1.5520% (reported for transparency only)."61 },62 {63 "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: the abstract and Section 4.1 describe -0.0855 as 'a 18.79 percentage change' (a relative change computed against a mean of 0.455), and Section 4.1 attributes it to 'table 2', which is not in the extract; Table 3 relative change (-0.3685) is computed against the overall dependent-variable mean (0.261), not a counterfactual level.",64 "handling": "E5 only requires rescaling the Table 3 column (4) LPM coefficient to percentage points (exact); the relative-change figures are not used."65 },66 {67 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: the abstract rounds the reemployment ATE to 1.5 pp; Table 2 prints 1.47 pp. The ATE is block-adjusted while the 75.0% control mean is the raw (unadjusted) aggregate control-group mean.",68 "handling": "E2 uses the Table 2 values (1.47 pp, 75.0%) exactly as the target definition (percent of the control-group mean) specifies; noted as a caveat."69 }70 ],71 "n_input_rows": {72 "effects.json": 5,73 "README.md": 16,74 "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,75 "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 91,76 "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,77 "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 13478 },79 "n_analysed": 5,80 "random_seed": null81}