1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"The 5 km overall DCR ATT of -0.431 log points corresponds to a -35.01% change in drug-related hospitalisations, matching the printed -35.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised.E1"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Point estimate only; exact log-to-percent conversion."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"The RESEA reemployment ATE of 1.47 pp equals a 1.96% relative increase over the control mean of 75.0%.","results_keys":["harmonised.E2"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Denominator is the raw control-group mean, not a block-adjusted counterfactual."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"The employment elasticity of -0.388 applied to the printed 4.7% minimum-wage increase implies a -1.82% change in employment.","results_keys":["harmonised.E3"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Linear approximation; the table note says 'about 4%', which would give -1.55%."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"The fatal drug-related hospitalisation ATT (-0.354) cannot be expressed as an absolute change per 100,000 because the extract prints no baseline rate.","results_keys":["harmonised.E4","n_not_harmonisable"],"status":"supported","caveat":"The implied relative change (-29.81%) is reported in the transformation text only."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"The preferred LPM coefficient of -0.0962 equals -9.62 percentage points in the probability of infant death or stillbirth.","results_keys":["harmonised.E5"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Pure unit rescaling."},7 {"id":"C6","text":"The Armendariz abstract's '35%' fall in fatal hospitalisations is inconsistent with the Table 7 coefficient, which implies about -29.8%.","results_keys":["data_issues"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Flagged as a source inconsistency; it does not change any harmonised value."},8 {"id":"C7","text":"Four of five items were harmonised, one was not harmonisable, and the task is complete.","results_keys":["n_harmonised","n_not_harmonisable","feasibility"],"status":"supported","caveat":"'Complete' means every item has a value or a justified impossibility statement."}9]10