1[2 {"id":"C1","text":"Exactly one reference, R3, is unverifiable; four references pass all three checks.","results_keys":["unverifiable_references","n_verified"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Depends on treating cited values printed verbatim (R1 SE 0.210, R4 SE 0.091) as supported despite internal source inconsistencies."},3 {"id":"C2","text":"R3 fails the title, year and finding checks: different title, year 2024 vs 2026 submissions, and the source shows a gradual rise (0.005 at event year to 0.037/0.034 at tau=4/5) rather than an immediate 3.4-3.7% jump.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Judged against the extract only."},4 {"id":"C3","text":"R1, R2, R4 and R5 have matching titles and years and their attributed findings are stated in the cited tables.","results_keys":["reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"R4 year 2025 accepted as the v1 year although the extract is v3 (2026), per the task's year rule."},5 {"id":"C4","text":"The R1 source reports two different SEs (0.210 Table 6, 0.218 Table A19) for the same 5 km specification; this does not change the 5% significance conclusion.","results_keys":["data_issues","reference_checks"],"status":"supported","caveat":"Recorded as a data issue, not a verification failure."},6 {"id":"C5","text":"A title/year-only baseline flags the same set (R3) as the full check.","results_keys":["baseline_unverifiable_title_year_only","baseline_n_verified_title_year_only"],"status":"supported","caveat":""}7]8