1{2 "task_id": "F4-conf-04",3 "reference_checks": {4 "R1": {5 "title_matches": true,6 "year_matches": true,7 "finding_supported": true,8 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6, row ATT / % change, column 5 km (abstract; Section 6 text for 5% significance and staggered DiD on hospital records)",9 "note": "Table 6 (5 km) prints ATT -0.431** with SE (0.210) and -35.0%, the text states 5% significance and the abstract describes a staggered DiD on individual hospital records, so every element is supported."10 },11 "R2": {12 "title_matches": true,13 "year_matches": true,14 "finding_supported": true,15 "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2, column 'Average treatment effect estimate', rows Wage / Reemployment / Weeks on UI (N and design from abstract)",16 "note": "Table 2 ATE column gives $1,153 (95% CI [166, 2,141]), 1.47 pp and -1.99 weeks, and the abstract gives a preregistered RCT with N = 23,549."17 },18 "R3": {19 "title_matches": false,20 "year_matches": false,21 "finding_supported": false,22 "locator": "arxiv-2603.03260v2 | Section 3.2 'Headline dynamic pattern' and Table 3, row 'Clean-onset threshold-2', columns tau=4 / tau=5",23 "note": "The extract reports a gradual rise from 0.005 log points at tau=0 to 0.037/0.034 at tau=4/5 ('prices do not jump immediately'), contradicting a 3.4-3.7% jump in the entry year; the entry's title and year (2024) also do not match the record."24 },25 "R4": {26 "title_matches": true,27 "year_matches": true,28 "finding_supported": true,29 "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Appendix A.1, Table 2, rows 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' and 'Emp. elasticity w.r.t affected wage'",30 "note": "Table 2 prints -0.388 (0.132) and -0.732 (0.091) for Japan's spot labour market (abstract), matching the citation; the 2025 year equals the v1 submission year."31 },32 "R5": {33 "title_matches": true,34 "year_matches": true,35 "finding_supported": true,36 "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3, row Treatment / % Change, column (4) (Section 4.1 identifies column 4 as preferred)",37 "note": "Table 3 column (4), the stated preferred specification, prints -0.0962 (0.0129) and % change -0.3685 (36.85% of the 0.261 mean), matching the citation."38 }39 },40 "unverifiable_references": [41 "R3"42 ],43 "n_verified": 4,44 "feasibility": "complete",45 "feasibility_reason": null,46 "data_issues": [47 {48 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 prints SE (0.218) for the CS-DR 5 km ATT -0.431, whereas Table 6 prints (0.210) for the same estimate.",49 "handling": "Table 6 (the main results table, which the citation's SE 0.210 matches) is used as the deciding locator; inconsistency reported, finding judged supported since 0.210 is printed in the extract and significance at 5% holds under either SE."50 },51 {52 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Table A19 note states 640 never-treated comparison regions, while Table 6, Table A19 body and figure notes state 608.",53 "handling": "Not relevant to the cited finding; reported only."54 },55 {56 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: Section 6.1 gives -30% (fatal) and +47% (narcotics) at 5 km, while the abstract says fatal outcomes fall 35% and narcotics rise by a comparable amount.",57 "handling": "Not part of the cited finding; reported only."58 },59 {60 "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: Table 2 prints the same SE (0.091) for 'Affected employment' and for the own-wage elasticity, although the latter is a ratio (-0.268/0.366 = -0.732) whose SE would generally differ.",61 "handling": "Cannot be resolved from the extract; the cited SE equals the printed value, so the finding is judged supported, with the caveat noted."62 },63 {64 "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: abstract/Section 4.1 headline (0.0855, 18.79%, mean 0.455, from a Table 2 not reproduced) differs from Table 3 column (4) (-0.0962, 36.85%, mean 0.261); footnote markers are rendered as '^9^9 9'.",65 "handling": "Treated as different outcome definitions/tables, not an internal contradiction; Table 3 decides the citation, which explicitly refers to the preferred specification and 36.85%."66 },67 {68 "issue": "arxiv-2603.03260v2: Table 3 header row is garbled in the HTML rendering.",69 "handling": "Column order taken from the extract editor's note (Specification | Treated-role LSOAs | Stacked p | Sun p | tau=4 | tau=5); consistent with the Section 3.2 text (0.037, 0.034)."70 }71 ],72 "n_input_rows": {73 "README.md": 17,74 "reference_list.json": 5,75 "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134,76 "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,77 "arxiv-2603.03260v2.txt": 107,78 "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,79 "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 9180 },81 "n_analysed": 5,82 "random_seed": null,83 "baseline_unverifiable_title_year_only": [84 "R3"85 ]86}