1{2 "task_id": "F4-conf-04",3 "reference_checks": {4 "R1": {5 "title_matches": true,6 "year_matches": true,7 "finding_supported": true,8 "locator": "arxiv-2609.27732v1 | Table 6, row ATT / % change, column 5 km (with Section 6 text)",9 "note": "Table 6 (5 km column) prints ATT -0.431** with SE (0.210) and -35.0%, and the text states 5% significance for a staggered DiD on hospital records; Table A19 prints a different SE (0.218) for the same CS-DR estimate, which does not change the conclusion."10 },11 "R2": {12 "title_matches": true,13 "year_matches": true,14 "finding_supported": true,15 "locator": "arxiv-2606.14621v1 | Table 2, rows Wage / Reemployment / Weeks on UI, column Average treatment effect estimate (with abstract for N and design)",16 "note": "Table 2 ATE column prints $1,153 (95% CI [166, 2,141]), 1.47 pp and -1.99 weeks, and the abstract describes a preregistered RCT with N = 23,549."17 },18 "R3": {19 "title_matches": false,20 "year_matches": false,21 "finding_supported": false,22 "locator": "arxiv-2603.03260v2 | Section 3.2 'Headline dynamic pattern' (stacked tau=0 coefficient 0.005) and Table 3, row Clean-onset threshold-2, columns tau=4 (0.037) / tau=5 (0.034)",23 "note": "The extract reports a gradual rise from about 0.5% (0.005) in the event year to 3.4-3.7% only by years four and five, explicitly stating that prices do not jump immediately, so the 'jump in the entry year with no further appreciation' attribution contradicts the source. Bibliographic mismatch: entry title/year 'Restaurants, Cafés and Neighbourhood Change: Commercial Entry and House Prices in Greater London' (2024) vs extract 'Does Entry of Food-and-Drink Establishments Raise Local House Prices? Event-Study Evidence from London' (submitted 2026)."24 },25 "R4": {26 "title_matches": true,27 "year_matches": true,28 "finding_supported": true,29 "locator": "arxiv-2505.04555v3 | Appendix A.1, Table 2, rows 'Employment elasticity w.r.t MW' and 'Emp. elasticity w.r.t affected wage'",30 "note": "Table 2 prints -0.388 (0.132) and -0.732 (0.091) for Japan's spot labour market (abstract), and the text calls -0.732 the own-wage employment elasticity."31 },32 "R5": {33 "title_matches": true,34 "year_matches": true,35 "finding_supported": true,36 "locator": "arxiv-2510.03658v1 | Table 3, row Treatment / % Change, column (4) (preferred specification per Section 4.1)",37 "note": "Table 3 column (4), identified as preferred in Section 4.1, prints -0.0962 (0.0129) and % change -0.3685 (= -0.0962/0.261), i.e. a 36.85% reduction in the probability of infant death or stillbirth."38 }39 },40 "unverifiable_references": [41 "R3"42 ],43 "n_verified": 4,44 "feasibility": "complete",45 "feasibility_reason": null,46 "data_issues": [47 {48 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: the same 5 km CS-DR ATT (-0.431**) has SE (0.210) in Table 6 but (0.218) in Table A19; control regions are 608 in Tables 6-7 but '640 regions' in the Table A19 note.",49 "handling": "R1's cited SE (0.210) matches Table 6, the main results table; 5% significance holds under either SE (|t| = 2.05 or 1.98), so the finding check is not affected; the inconsistency is reported."50 },51 {52 "issue": "arxiv-2609.27732v1: abstract says fatal outcomes 'fall by 35%', whereas Section 6.1 says approximately 30% and Table 7 prints -0.354 (exp(-0.354)-1 = -29.8%).",53 "handling": "Not part of any cited finding; recorded only."54 },55 {56 "issue": "arxiv-2505.04555v3: Table 2 prints the same SE (0.091) for 'Affected employment' and for the own-wage elasticity (a ratio of two estimates), which may be a duplication in the source.",57 "handling": "R4 cites the values as printed, so it is treated as supported; the possible duplication is flagged as a caveat."58 },59 {60 "issue": "arxiv-2510.03658v1: footnote text is interleaved with body text (footnotes 9-12 rendered inline); the text cites Table 2 (0.0855, mean 0.455), which is not in the extract.",61 "handling": "The R5 check relies only on Table 3 and the Section 4.1 sentence about column (4); the inline footnotes were read as footnotes."62 },63 {64 "issue": "arxiv-2606.14621v1: Tables 2-3 were re-set by the extract editor; 'p ¡ 0.001' rendering defect in Section 3 text.",65 "handling": "Values used verbatim from the re-set Table 2; the defect does not affect any checked value."66 },67 {68 "issue": "arxiv-2603.03260v2: Table 3 header row garbled in the HTML rendering (editor's note gives column order).",69 "handling": "Column order taken from the editor's note; tau=4/tau=5 values agree with the Section 3.2 text."70 }71 ],72 "n_input_rows": {73 "reference_list.json": 5,74 "README.md": 17,75 "arxiv-2609.27732v1.txt": 134,76 "arxiv-2606.14621v1.txt": 58,77 "arxiv-2603.03260v2.txt": 107,78 "arxiv-2505.04555v3.txt": 66,79 "arxiv-2510.03658v1.txt": 9180 },81 "n_analysed": 5,82 "random_seed": null83}